Ocean Freight Forwarding Analysis
Ocean Freight Forwarding Analysis
INTRODUCTION
II REVIEW OF LITERATURE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEXURE
LIST OF TABLES
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
LOGISTICS
Logistics is the process of planning and executing the efficient transportation and
storage of goods from the point of origin to the point of consumption. The goal of logistics is
to meet customer requirements in a timely, cost-effective manner. Logistics is used more
broadly to refer to the process of coordinating and moving resources – people, materials,
inventory, and equipment – from one location to storage at the desired destination. The term
logistics originated in the military, referring to the movement of equipment and supplies to
troops in the field.
Logistics refers to the overall process of managing how resources are acquired,
stored, and transported to their final destination. Logistics management involves identifying
prospective distributors and suppliers and determining their effectiveness and accessibility.
Logistics managers are referred to as logisticians. "Logistics" was initially a military-based
term used in reference to how military personnel obtained, stored, and moved equipment and
supplies The term is now used widely in the business sector, particularly by companies in
the manufacturing sectors, to refer to how resources are handled and moved along the supply
chain.
Logistics Management
1
Supply Chain Management is a series of interconnected activities related to the
transformation and transition of raw materials into finished goods until they reach the
consumer. Supply chain management takes care of the entire process of buying, supplying,
manufacturing, and selling, while logistics bridges the gap between among different
segments. Highly Supply Chain Management aims to gain a substantial competitive
advantage through efficiency. Logistics also involves other activities like warehousing,
protective packing, order fulfilment, stock control, maintenance of equilibrium between
demand and supply, and stock management.
DEFINITIONS
According to Coyle et al. (2015), logistics management refers to the systematic planning,
implementation, and coordination of activities related to the procurement, production,
inventory management, transportation, and distribution of goods and services, aiming to
optimize the flow of resources and minimize costs.
2
According to Mentzer et al. (2016), organizational performance is the measure of how
effectively and efficiently an organization achieves its goals and objectives, including
factors such as productivity, profitability, quality, innovation, and customer satisfaction,
relative to its competitors and industry benchmarks.
According to Chopra and Meindl (2018), logistics encompasses the set of activities
involved in the movement and storage of materials and finished products, as well as the
management of information flows, inventory levels, and transportation networks, with
the goal of ensuring timely delivery and meeting customer demand.
The increasing complexity involved in the movement of goods from the point of
origin to the point of consumption has made logistics management critical with regards to
keeping up with changing customer needs, growing competition and evolving market
dynamics. Logistics is key to utilizing, planning, implementing and controlling the flow and
storage of goods and services to meet customer requirements. Efficient logistics management
provides clear visibility of transportation activities involved in ensuring smooth supply chain
operations. By analyzing the transportation data, companies can implement better route
optimization to avoid potential disruptions and also save on operational and fuel costs.
3
enables the implementation of reliable strategies that help provide services to meet customer
demand and boost sales volume.
1) Order processing
The Logistics activities start from the order processing which might be the work of
the commercial department in an organization. The commercial department is the one who
ensures that the payment terms and the delivery terms have been met and then processes the
order from within the company. Basically, the commercial team accepts the order from the
customer and places the order to the warehouse. If the customer has given the payment, a
commercial team makes the entry into the system and tells the warehouse that the customer
has given an order of 10 units so the warehouse needs to deliver 10 units.
2) Materials handling
3) Warehousing
4
4) Inventory control
If a firm has 100 units of a product in stock, but the demand is only of 10 units, then
the company has uselessly invested in 90 units. This is money which can be used as
a working capital and it is money on which banks are applying interest.
5) Transportation
Now we come to one of the major logistics activities which is one of the most
resources heavy and revenue heavy segment of logistics. There is a single reason that
transportation is costly – Fuel. Be it petrol, Diesel or gas, fuel is costly, and it is mostly
consumed in transportation activities. This is why companies spend lakhs to control the
transportation expenses because it is one of the highest variable expense to any company.
Transportation involves the physical delivery of goods from the company to the distributor or
dealer and from the dealer to the end customer. Generally, companies are involved only till
the point delivery happens to the distributor or the dealer. The distributor is then responsible
for the delivery to the end customer.
6) Packaging
There are two types of packaging – One which the customer sees on the shelf of
supermarkets or hypermarkets where the package appears attractive and makes the customer
buy the packages. The other is transport packaging where the products are packed in bulk so
as to avoid any breakage or spillage and yet allow them to transfer huge volumes of the
product safely from one place to another. Packaging the product is a responsibility of the
logistics team because otherwise the product will reach damaged to the end customer and this
is a huge cost to the company. This is why, especially in export markets, a huge amount is
spent in the packaging of the product. The packaging may cost only 1-2% of the value of the
product, but if it is not right during transportation, it will result in 100% cost due to the
damage and loss of the product.
The logistics management process starts with the accumulation of raw material and
goes on to the final stage where goods are delivered to the destination. There are many types
5
of logistics associated with different supply chain processes. The main types of logistics
management are as follows:
1. Supply Management
This movement generally involves moving stored materials or products for further
manufacturing or distribution. This kind of logistics involves a lot of loading, unloading,
tracking, and keeping stock of materials. This type of management controls the movement of
supplies from a central warehouse to various other locations, involving intense material
movement where timely delivery is an important factor.
3. Product Management
6
5. Returns Management
Inventory Planning
Inventory planning ensures that proper stock quantities are maintained to meet
customer demand while minimising the costs related to storage. Inventory planning helps
provide accurate order fulfilment, a well-organized warehouse, increased productivity, and
savings in terms of time and money.
Inbound Logistics
Outbound Logistics
7
Fleet Management
Fleet management involves the managing of vehicles to eliminate or mitigate the risks
associated with transporting goods. It also helps improve efficiency, productivity and reduce
overall transportation and labour costs. Fleet management helps to calculate the profitability
and scalability of logistics services and further optimizes logistics planning.
Warehousing
Delivery Fulfilment
Demand Planning
Demand Planning is the process of analyzing, evaluating, and forecasting the demand
for goods to ensure availability of products and goods that customers want to buy. It gives a
business the ability to predict future sales and to have sufficient inventory levels to meet
customer needs, without having a surplus stock. Demand planning also predicts future
revenue generation opportunities and helps gain insights into market trends. It helps to plan
resources to meet demand and supply gaps as and when required.
8
1. Improving customer experience
Logistics works optimally when there are ample transparency and visibility in
operations. An efficient logistics management plan can analyze historical data and provide
route optimization to increase efficiency and reduce fuel costs. Logistics management can
optimize the utilization of assets, improve business efficiency and reduce operational costs.
3. Boosting profitability
Intermodal operations involve the use of two or more modes, or carriers, to transport
goods from supplier to consumer. Special standardized containers are used for intermodal
operations, which eliminates the risks of directly handling goods. Better intermodal
operations help to lower costs, are environment friendly, and are more reliable and safer.
9
meet quality standards, reduce failures, defects, and deviations to ensure that delivery
productivity is not affected.
Goods need to be delivered efficiently and seamlessly while adhering to road safety
rules and set time deliverables. Smart route planning allows the easy selection of the best
routes, help avoid traffic jams, make it easy to monitor the status of drivers and vehicles,
reduce empty miles and ensure that the goods reach customers intact and on time. Smart route
planning ensures a good fulfilment rate and customer satisfaction.
Logistics Management helps to connect all resources and integrate with various
departments to give a more visible and transparent view of operations. Real-time access to
information throughout the entire delivery process can streamline the transportation process
and ensure better control to mitigate delivery disruptions.
The location of inventory plays an important role to fulfil delivery timelines. With
customers expecting faster delivery service day by day, the distance between the customer
and product needs to shrink. Logistics management needs to find inventory locations, which
can speed up the delivery timelines and keep operational costs at a minimum.
10
among others can reduce costly errors, improve customer service, and drive high-levels of
operational excellence. Automation ensures speed, accuracy, quality, and efficiency when it
comes to the execution of operations.
Advanced routing practices help to plan delivery routes that highly efficient and
productive. By considering a plethora of external factors like weather, one-ways, tonnage,
empty miles, risk factors and more modern route planning platforms can significantly reduce
transportation costs and delays.
Driven by the need to be instantly gratified, modern customers need to know where
their orders are, when it was shipped, when exactly will it de delivered and who will be
delivering it. Brands need to provide customers with self-service type delivery models that
allow them to select, and change if necessary, the delivery date, time and location. Hence, it’s
critical to make logistics operations, especially the last-mile, customer-centric.
Transportation is one of the biggest reason for growing carbon emissions across the
globe. consume resources on a large scale and are largely responsible for the world’s carbon
emissions. By introducing modern technologies, like route optimization, automation,
Machine Learning, digital documentations among others, businesses can drastically shrink
their carbon footprint.
Third-party logistics companies are used when a business wants to outsource all or
some of its distribution and fulfilment functions. Embracing digital platform that empowers
logistics stakeholders to drive data-backed decision making goes a long way when it comes to
seamless management of third-party logistics providers. Effective logistics management that
ensures interoperability between in-house IT architecture with 3PL systems further enhances
3PL management by improving fleet visibility, real-time tracking, better delivery experiences
and enhanced compliance adherence.
11
8. Building robust risk management strategies
Companies can enhance the robustness of their supply chains and protect them against
crises through strategic planning driven by digital logistics tools. Rigid processes and lack of
transparency lead to a lack of logistics agility and resiliency. Embracing digital tools that can
mitigate thefts, pilferage and damage is vital for ensuring customer loyalty and better
margins.
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
Ocean freight forwarding has the mission of getting the right goods or services to the
right place, at the right time, and in the desired condition at the lowest cost and highest return
on investment but with real satisfaction of customers. Logistics has become a part of a
company’s strategic planning, management and controlling. Every company must develop
their strategy and logistics competitiveness factors from their own point of view. The
company must analyse the effectiveness of logistics management often. They must reframe
the strategy to much effective in the competitive world. It must ensure to increases the
12
employees performance, marketing performance, financial performance and profitability of
the concern. The company has to reframe the logistic strategies when there is negative
feedback. Hence the study is undertaken to analyse on effective logistics management on
organsiational performance with special reference to Broekman Logistics India Private
Limited,Chennai
Primary objective
Secondary objectives
To assess the logistics management in the organisation and its impact on profitability
The scope of the study is confined with Broekman Logistics India Private Limited,
Chennai. The main aim of the study is to analyses the Ocean freight forwarding with special
reference to Broekman Logistics India Private Limited, Chennai. This study is to analyse the
logistics management on employees performance, marketing performance, financial
performance and profitability of the organization. The sample of this study is 100. Efficient
and effective logistics management is viewed and regarded as competitive tool used as a
means of increasing performance. This study empirically looked at the relationship between
logistics management and performance of the oraganization. The concern can come to know
whether there is improvement in customer response. The study will be helpful to understand
whether the concern can minimize its employees handling cost by its effective logistics
management.
13
1.5 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The study restricts itself within Broekman Logistics India Private Limited, Chennai
only.
The study assumes that the information was given by the respondents without any
bios.
The study is done based on the opinions of the sample taken at random, the size of
which is 100.
The researcher found it difficult to collect the questionnaire, since some of the
respondents did not give proper response.
Global Logistics Industry includes all activities of the supply chain such as
transportation, customer service, inventory management, flow of information and order
processing. Other activities of the supply chain are warehousing, material handling,
purchasing, packaging, information dissemination and maintenance among others. The
Logistics market in terms of revenue was valued at US$ 8185.46 billion in 2015 and is
expected to reach US$15522.02 billion by 2023, growing at a CAGR of 7.5% from 2015 to
[Link] market in terms of volume was valued at 54.69 billion tons in 2015 and is expected
to reach 92.10 billion tons by 2024 growing at a CAGR of 6% from 2016 to 2024.1
1Transparency Market Research "Logistics Market - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share,
Growth, Trends and Forecast, 2016 – 2024’
The Global Logistics Industry in 2017 is equally subject to global geo political
machinations but that apart countless disruptions threaten to tip the balance of global trade as
we knew it. These could be stated as follows: -
14
Digitisation and demand driven logistics are pushing supply chains closer to demand.
Thus there are countless locations with compelling value propositions. Whether it is
pureplay distribution facility, manufacturing center of excellence, transhipment port, regional
E Commerce hub or new market to sell in/ source from, retailers and manufacturers have no
shortage of options. On top of that if we consider global volatility and hypersensitivity to
supply chain exceptions then what emerges is that supply chain modelling, simulation and
optimisation are fast becoming core competencies.
The Indian logistics sector is valued at USD$ 150 billion, contributing 14.4 % of
country’s GDP. With the easing of FDI norms, proposed implementation of GST, increasing
globalization, growth of ecommerce, positive changes in the regulatory policies, and
government initiatives such as “Sagarmala”, “Make in India”, the sector is expected to touch
$200 billion by 2020. In the World Bank’s Logistics performance ranking 2016, India’s ranks
has improved from 54 in 2014 to 35 in 2016, jumping 19 places.
Out of this USD 150 billion logistics cost, almost 99% is accounted for by the
unorganized sector (such as owners of less than 5 trucks, affiliated to a broker or a transport
company, small warehouse operators, customs brokers, freight forwarders, etc.), and slightly
more than 1%, i.e. approximately USD 1.5 billion, is contributed by the organized sector.
However, the industry is growing at a fast pace and if India can bring down its logistics cost
from 14% to 9% of the GDP (level in the US), savings to the tune of USD 50 billion will be
realized at the current GDP level, making Indian goods more competitive in the global
market. Moreover, growth in the logistics sector would imply improved service delivery and
customer satisfaction leading to growth of export of Indian goods and potential for creation of
job opportunities.
15
supported by several factors, including the fast-developing Ecommerce industry, impending
technical advancements, and an expanding retail sales market.
In 2021, India’s intercity logistics expenditure was USD 209 billion, accounting for
approximately 87 percent of overall logistics expenditure. The on-demand/spot market
accounted for 63% of total spending, while the contract market accounted for 37%. Metro
cities accounted for as much as 40 percent, or USD 84-billion of the total inter-city logistics
spend of USD 209 billion.
India’s freight business has a massive spot market, with USD 120-130 billion in
annual trade value expanding at a rate of 9-10 percentage. Agriculture accounts for 25% of
the entire spot market. Due to their modest production quantities and drop sizes, MSMEs
operate on the spot market, accounting for 25% of total truck bookings. The remaining 50%
is driven by large manufacturing enterprises that reserve FTL trucks on a spot basis.
With the ever increasing demand for logistics, it is important to stand up to the global
call for sustainability. The government, in association with TERI (The Energy and Resources
Institute), introduced the Sustainable Urban Freight Coalition (SUFC) to facilitate sustainable
urban freight solutions. It aims at helping the nation achieve the vision of decarbonized
transport and logistics sector by 2030. It also states that India is the world’s third-largest
emitter of GHG emissions emitting about 2625.968 Mt CO2e in 2019 which are responsible
for Climate Change. Out of which, the logistics sector is responsible for 13.5% of energy-
related CO2 emissions. Thus, switching fossil with renewables and alternate energy fuels is
an unavoidable need of the present and future. TCI, through its multimodal capabilities
continues to make efforts to reduce overall carbon footprint in the ongoing as well as years to
come. We enabled to save 21,994 Tonnes of CO2 equivalent in terms of GHG emissions in
the year 2020-21.
There have also been certain challenges that the industry is facing – high international
freight rates, shortage of containers, high prices of ships, driver shortages, fuel price increase
and inflation in general. Operating costs will continue to increase and international freight
rates may stabilize only around June 2022. In the year ahead, the way forward is to capitalize
on new opportunities including multimodal, leveraging future technology to reduce margins
and previous technology investments to incubate big data, IoT, and omnichannel solutions.
16
Thus, the above shift continues to make the industry much moreresilient in adapting to any
challenge that comes forth.
Logistics companies are responsible for planning, controlling, storing, and executing
the movement of goods from the producer to the consumer. In commercial terms, it is an
efficient method that enables the cost-effective movement of goods and their storage from
producer to customer. The logistics and supply chain companies in India will simplify and
eliminate all transportation issues for your industry. Following are the top 11 logistics
companies in India.
1. Stockarea
Stockarea is a leading logistics company in India, offering end businesses with on-
demand logistics solutions. They offer end-to-end logistics services, including customs
clearance, freight forwarding, warehousing, and transportation. They have competence in
various industries like FMCG(fast-moving consumer goods), automobiles, pharmaceuticals,
electronics, textiles and chemicals, and they are functional in all major cities in India.
Aegis Logistics Ltd was established in 1956. The company offers logistics and supply
chain management services to the oil, gas, and chemical industries. It distributes liquefied
petroleum gas and provides supply chain services to the oil, gas, and chemical industries.
Additionally, the company makes and distributes oleochemicals and kerosene oil, as well as
providing chemical storage. Storage facilities are located in Mumbai, Haldia, Pipavav, Kochi,
Kandla, and Mangalore.
Allcargo Logistics Ltd was established in 1993 and is based in Mumbai. It is one of
India’s biggest logistics companies. It provides services in a variety of modes of
transportation. This market leader in logistics is a subsidiary of the Avvashya Group. It
provides various multi-modal transportation services, including less than container load, non-
vessel operating common carrier, and full container load. It also offers container freight
17
terminals throughout India, third-party logistics, inland container depots, ship ownership,
warehousing, and chartering. The company employs over 300 people in over 160 countries.
Container Corporation of India was established in 1988 and is based in New Delhi.
The company is involved in container transportation (rail and road) and container handling.
Additionally, the company operates logistics infrastructure such as dry ports, container
freight stations, and private freight terminals. Its international services include train, road, air
cargo, reefer, and round trip block booking. Domestic services include train transportation,
door-to-door delivery/pickups, and terminal handling charges.
18
Additionally, it provides People Transport Solutions, a line of business that provides
enterprises with tailored services for employee transportation from home to work and return.
It is one of India’s top logistics companies.
TCI Express Ltd was established in 1996. TCI is a market leader in integrated supply
chain and logistics solutions and a pioneer in the Indian market for cargo transportation. TCI
provides integrated multi-modal logistics solutions, including transportation,
storage, warehousing, and transportation support services. The company engages in express
delivery and provides consumers with a single-window door-to-door service. Its
containerised fleet of vehicles offers express solutions with over 3,000 pickup points and
nearly 13,000 delivery locations. The company operates in about 200 countries. It provides
business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-to-business (B2B) distribution models with value-
added options such as cash on delivery (COD), pick and pack, late-night, and early morning
deliveries.
VRL Logistics Ltd was founded in 1976 and is based in Hubballi, Karnataka. The
company is involved in the transportation of commodities and passengers. The company
provides logistical services that include domestic freight transportation. It operates in the
following segments: freight transportation, bus operations, power sales, and air chartering
service. It provides less-than-truckload (LTL) services for general and priority parcels and
serves various industries, including fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), textiles, clothes,
furniture, metal and metal products, and automotive parts.
Since 1989, Gati has altered India’s logistic business through a series of ground-
breaking, revolutionary efforts that prepared the way for an organised logistic industry. Gati
now delivers complete Express Distribution and customised Supply Chain Solutions to
customers across multiple business verticals with annual revenue of INR 1700 Crores. Gati’s
advantage of continuous connectivity across air, road, and rail has resulted in an unrivalled
array of customer options. Gati owns and runs a fleet of approximately 5000 vehicles on the
road in India, and over 7000 business partners dubbed as Gati Associates.
19
11. TVS Supply Chain Solutions Ltd
TVS Supply Chain Solutions Limited is a subsidiary of the TVS Group, one of India’s
most prestigious enterprises with combined revenue of about US $8.5 billion. With a century
of experience, TVS Supply Chain Solutions Limited (TVS SCS) began as a business unit of
TV SundaramIyengar& Sons Ltd and was later spun off as TVS Logistics Services Limited
(TVS LSL) in December 2004. It is a global provider of world-class, end-to-end supply chain
services across various industries and an expert in transforming logistics supply chains
through increased efficiency, visibility of performance, and cost savings.
Company Overview
Established in India in 2006, Broekman Logistics India Pvt Ltd plays a pivotal role in
the global supply chain. Leveraging India's strategic geographical location, the company
connects diverse markets and facilitates international trade. Originally founded as a shipping
agent in the Port of Rotterdam in 1960, Broekman Logistics has significantly evolved, now
providing comprehensive end-to-end supply chain solutions. With offices in the Benelux,
Central Europe, and India, the company offers a global reach.
Historical Background
20
Services (VAS), aimed at simplifying and strengthening clients' supply chains on a global
scale.
Vision
Mission
Our mission is to deliver exceptional end-to-end supply chain solutions through our
expertise in handling, processing, and transporting complex, heavy, and dangerous goods. We
are committed to continuously reinventing ourselves to meet the evolving needs of our
clients, upholding the core values and dedication of the Geuther family, and fostering long-
term partnerships that drive success in specialized markets.
Broekman Logistics India Pvt Ltd operates from 18 strategically located offices
across India, delivering on promises to customers in regions such as South East Asia,
Oceania, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. The company specializes in providing tailored
end-to-end supply chain solutions for the machinery, chemicals, and industrial sectors. The
comprehensive services include:
Freight Services: Air freight, ocean freight, coastal transportation, Full Container
Load (FCL), Less than Container Load (LCL), and multimodal transportation.
21
Value Added Logistics (VAL) and Value Added Services (VAS): Designed to
enhance and streamline supply chain processes.
Customs Clearance: Ensuring smooth and compliant import and export processes.
Annual Turnover
Broekman Logistics boasts an annual turnover of approximately 250 million EUR and
employs around 1,000 people. As a comprehensive logistics service provider, the company
ranks among the top 20 logistics players in the Netherlands and is one of the few independent
providers with a strong focus on core industries. With substantial assets in terminals and
warehousing, Broekman Logistics effectively meets clients' needs in contract and port
logistics.
22
has expertise in handling pharmaceutical products. From India, the company extends its
third-party logistics expertise to partners in various sectors, including industrial equipment,
offshore energy and project cargo, chemicals, greenhouse and horticulture, retail, general
cargo commodities, and agricultural and construction machinery.
23
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
INTRODUCTION
The review of literature in research serves as the cornerstone upon which new
investigations are built. It offers a comprehensive examination and synthesis of existing
scholarly works relevant to the research topic. By delving into previously conducted studies,
researchers can identify gaps in knowledge, contradictory findings, and areas warranting
further exploration. This process not only enhances the understanding of the subject matter
but also aids in shaping the direction and focus of the current study. Through a meticulous
review of literature, researchers can position their work within the broader academic
discourse, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in their respective fields.
Izzah N (2016), Though resource based view (RBV) has been applied extensively in
supply chain studies to examine how firms utilize logistics resources to attain superior
performance, relatively little attention has been directed to exploring the effects of
operational routines on logistics and supply chain competencies. This study focus on logistics
service providers’ (LSPs) strategy and operations. Logistics service providers should adapt
their systems and procedures to customers’ specific requirements, to ensure high relationship
performance. Satisfied customers especially from e-business partners should promote the
providers’ adaptations, because these adaptations enhance the probability of contract renewal
and reduce the risk of providers’ unexpected termination of the contract, because of the
growth in online shopping has presented challenges for physical distribution service quality
provided by retailers and sellers including both multi-channel and pure players, and logistics
service providers. This paper aims to combine the perspectives of logistics-service providers
and e-business in the development of value-added logistics services. The purpose was to
create a theory-based and initially tested framework that could help both service providers
and e-business activities identify new opportunities for developing performance.
Xiaoyun Bing (2016),During the last two decades, EU legislation has put increasing
pressure on member countries to achieve specified recycling targets for municipal household
24
waste. These targets can be obtained in various ways choosing collection methods, separation
methods, decentral or central logistic systems, etc. This paper compares municipal solid
waste (MSW) management practices in various EU countries to identify the characteristics
and key issues from a waste management and reverse logistics point of view. Further, we
investigate literature on modelling municipal solid waste logistics in general. Comparing
issues addressed in literature with the identified issues in practice result in a research agenda
for modelling municipal solid waste logistics in Europe. We conclude that waste recycling is
a multi-disciplinary problem that needs to be considered at different decision levels
simultaneously. A holistic view and taking into account the characteristics of different waste
types are necessary when modelling a reverse supply chain for MSW recycling.
Gattorna, J., Day, A. and Hargreaves, J. (2017), Key components of the logistics
mix are described in an effort to create an understanding of the total logistics concept.
Chapters include an introduction to logistics; the strategic role of logistics, customer service
levels, channel relationships, facilities location, transport, inventory management, materials
handling, interface with production, purchasing and materials management, estimating
demand, order processing, systems performance, leadership and team building, business
resource management.
Allen, J., Browne, M., Hunter, A., Boyd, J. and Palmer, H. (2017), Discusses part
of a project conducted by the authors into the logistics planning and management and costs of
supplying biomass fuels to biomass‐fired power stations in the UK. Defines biomass fuels
and the reasons for the growth in interest in their use for electricity generation. The activities
and parties involved in the biomass fuel supply chain are discussed together with the
management of the chain in order to achieve smooth and consistent flow of biomass fuel to
power stations. Explains the approach used to modelling the delivered costs of biomass fuels
for four types of biomass fuel included in the project: forest fuel, short rotation coppice, straw
and miscanthus. Comments are given on the environmental impacts of the fuel supply chains.
The results indicate that straw supply systems are capable of producing the lowest delivered
25
costs of the four fuels studied. Short rotation coppice and miscanthus, two new energy crops,
are likely to have the highest delivered costs at present. This is due to the cost of growing
these fuels and the financial incentives required by farmers to persuade them to grow these
crops. Logistics costs (i.e. transport, storage and handling) are shown to represent a
significant proportion of total delivered cost in biomass supply. Careful supply chain
planning and logistics management will be of central importance to the success of the
biomass industry.
Allen, J., Browne, M., Hunter, A., Boyd, J. and Palmer, H. (2017). Logistics
management and costs of biomass fuel supply. International Journal of Physical
Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 463-477.
Goh, M. and Pinaikul, P. (2017), Many firms are starting to focus on the effective
and efficient supply chain management in Asia. This empirical paper reports on the state of
existing logistics management practices in Thailand. The main results reveal that firms prefer
agile suppliers. Also, most of the logistics costs incurred are on transportation and
warehousing. Firms that have instituted logistics departments are making an effort in
upgrading their logistical systems and are more pervasive in using technology to manage
logistics as compared to firms without formalised logistics departments. The factors
hindering logistics development include inefficient logistics information systems, acute
transportation bottlenecks, and the lack of logistics management expertise. Finally, future
logistics managers need to be competent in modern technology and possess logistics specific
skills.
Sum, C., Teo, C. and Ng, K. (2018),In today’s highly competitive environment,
many companies are going global to acquire market share and take advantage of higher
production and sourcing efficiencies. A key determinant of business performance is the role
of the logistics function in ensuring the smooth flow of materials, products and information
throughout the company’s supply chains. To compete effectively, companies must recognize
the strategic importance of the logistics function. The strategic management of logistics and
supply chain practices of companies in Singapore is examined. A framework is proposed to
classify companies according to the extent that logistics is used as a competitive weapon. The
26
practices and characteristics of the various strategic groups are then examined and analyzed.
The best practices of companies with strategic logistics are also identified. The use of
information technology (IT) and the factors that will shape the logistics industry in the future
are also explored. Being one of the first major studies on the Singapore logistics industry,
generates new insights and information for logistics managers and businessmen interested in
the Singapore logistics landscape.
Stefansson, G. (2018), this paper aims to derive and verify a collaborative framework
that specifies the role of different parties in contemporary logistics setups. To prepare this
paper, a study of the logistics literature has been conducted together with several case studies.
The empirical evidence has been collected in Europe as well as in the USA. Different aspects
of collaboration between organizations in logistics setups have been studied where the
27
services and the activities have been analyzed to understand the characteristics of the role of
third‐party service providers. The results from the work cluster the different third‐party
service providers in three different groups: carriers, logistics service providers (LSPs) and
logistics service intermediaries (LSIs). All of these parties have different roles and provide
various services in outsourced logistics setups. A collaborative logistics management (CLM)
model has been derived that embraces the role of the different parties, the information and
material flows between them, the interface attributes and the information systems
architecture. In this paper, a focus is mainly on the part of the model that reveals the role of
the third‐party service providers. The practical implications of the work has its foundation in
that activities, performed by two parties, can be adapted to each other so that their combined
efficiency is improved. The CLM model can be applied when designing and negotiating
third‐party services for specific logistics assignments.
Kenneth W. Green (2019) The purpose of this work is to theorise and assess a
logistics performance model that uses logistics performance as the central build, supply chain
management scheme as an precursor, and organisational performance—both financial and
marketing performance—as a result. Structural equation modelling is applied to examine data
from a nationwide sample of 142 stand and operations managers. The results demonstrate a
28
positive relationship between supply chain management strategy and logistics performance,
as well as a positive relationship between logistics performance and supply chain
management strategy and marketing performance, which in turn has a positive relationship
with financial performance. The efficiency of logistics and supply chain management did not
directly influence financial performance, it was found. Research This study's exclusive focus
is on how logistics performance affects organisational performance in a supply chain
environment. Real-world applications Manufacturers assist their organization's supply chain
plan by working to enhance the logistics operations, which leads to enhanced performance for
the entire supply chain and, eventually, their developed businesses. Organizational managers
are being urged to pay close attention to supply chain activities like logistics in order to
increase the competence potential of the supply chains in which their companies play a key
role.
Yuan Yuan (2019), Path selection is one of the fundamental problems in emergency
logistics management. Two mathematical models for path selection in emergency logistics
management are presented considering more actual factors in time of disaster. First a single-
objective path selection model is presented taking into account that the travel speed on each
arc will be affected by disaster extension. The objective of the model is to minimize total
travel time along a path. The travel speed on each arc is modeled as a continuous decrease
function with respect to time. A modified Dijkstra algorithm is designed to solve the model.
Based on the first model, we further consider the chaos, panic and congestions in time of
disaster. A multi-objective path selection model is presented to minimize the total travel time
along a path and to minimize the path complexity. The complexity of the path is modeled as
the total number of arcs included in the path. An ant colony optimization algorithm is
proposed to solve the model. Simulation results show the effectiveness and feasibility of the
models and algorithms presented in this paper.
Yuan Yuan (2019). Path selection model and algorithm for emergency logistics
management”, Elsevier, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 56, Issue 3,
Pages 1081-1094.
29
Fugate, B. S., Mentzer, J. T., and Stank, T. P. (2020),By experimentally examining
the effects of logistics performance on organisational performance, this study explores the
character of logistics performance and the position that logistics acting inside the firm. The
three variables of logistics competence, efficacy, and distinctiveness are used to compute
logistics performance as a second-order determining construct. The findings show a positive
correlation between logistical performance and organisational performance. However, the
idea of assessing logistics performance as a second-order determining construct is supported
by both theory and research, showing that competence, good organization, and distinction are
not always trade-offs but rather work in concert. Furthermore, managerial respondents'
perceptions of organisational performance were strongly linked with secondary financial data
for participating businesses acquired from Compustat, providing empirical support for the
connection between logistical performance and organisational performance.
Fugate, B. S., Mentzer, J. T., and Stank, T. P. (2020). Logistics Performance: Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Differentiation”, Journal of Business Logistics, 31 (1), pp: 43–62.
Pavel Ceniga (2020), The paper deals with ecological future development trends and
highlights the interest of the business professionals and partners on sustainability in logistics
management, assuming that economic needs, customer requirements and regulatory measures
will also drive towards sustainability. Sustainable development of logistics in the coming
years will most likely formed by seven key developments. Required forecasts contained in
this article are based on the assumption that the current trend towards sustainability will
continue and logistics service providers will seek to incorporate principles of sustainability
into their business models and transactions.
30
The efficiency of logistics and supply chain management did not directly influence financial
performance, it was found. To compete at the supply chain level, manufacturers must have a
supply chain management strategy. As part of this approach, supply chain partners must
integrate and coordinate important external procedures including buying, selling, and
shipping. The consequence of logistics performance on organisational concert within a supply
chain setting is the exclusive subject of this study. Manufacturers assist their organization's
supply chain tactic by working to enhance the logistics operations, which leads to enhanced
performance for the entire supply chain and, eventually, their developed businesses.
31
theoretical relationship between the study variables. Logistics management was discussed in
terms of warehousing, inventory management, transportation and logistics information
system while operational performance was seen through the lenses of cost reduction and lead
time. From literature it is evidential that logistics management has significant relationship
with operational performance. Based on this, the study concluded that logistics management
has significant impact on operational performance of oil and gas supply chain. The study
encouraged organizations to seek in-depth knowledge of logistics management in the quest
for improved performance in operations. Knowledge of the pivot role of distribution oil and
gas firms to deliver cost effective and timely production.
32
RESEARCH GAP
33
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN
Research design is the overall plan or structure that guides the entire research process,
providing a systematic framework for the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. The
research design adopted for the studies is descriptive research design.
SOURCES OF DATA
Data sources can include data that are already collected and data that will be collected
during the study. Data Sources can be used to describe different data collection methods
and/or tools. Two types of data are used.
PRIMARY DATA
Primary data are original observations collected the researcher or by his agents
for the first time for any investigation and used by them in the statistical analysis.
This primary source includes definition of terms and units used. It is essential that the
investigator understand the meaning of units in which data are record. The primary
source also includes a copy of the schedule used in data collection together with the
procedure used in data selecting the sample and the size of the sample`
The primary data was collected from 100 employees of the company Broekman
Logistics India Private Limited, Chennai by questionnaire through survey method.
34
Questionnaire Construction
SECONDARY DATA:
Secondary data means data that are already available that is, they refer to the data
which have already been collected and analyzed by someone else. When the research
utilized secondary data, then they have to look into various sources form where they
can obtain them. Methods of collecting secondary data are books. e.g. journals,
newspaper, magazines, internet, report and publications of various associations
connected with industries.
POPULATION
Here it covers the entire employees of Broekman Logistics India Private Limited,
[Link] population of the study is 300.
SAMPLE DESIGN
Convenience sampling design was used for the [Link] the samples are selected
based on the availability. This method is used when the availability of sample is rare and also
costly. So based on the convenience samples are selected.
Sampling Element:
35
Sampling Unit:
Sample Size
The sample size is the measure of the number of individual samples used in an
experiment. Total number of sample taken for the study is 100.
1. Percentage analysis
3. Correlation analysis
4. Anova analysis
5. Regression analysis
Percentage Analysis
This method is used to compare two or more series of data, to describe the
relationship or the distribution of two or more series of data. Percentage analysis test is done
to find out the percentage of the response of the response of the respondent. In this tool
various percentage are identified in the analysis and they are presented by the way of Bar
Diagrams in order to have better understanding of the analysis.
Number of respondents
Percentage of respondents = ______________________ X 100
Total respondents
Chi-square Analysis
Chi-square was done to find out one way analysis between socio demographic
variable and various dimensions of the programme.
(O – E)2
= ______
E
36
O – Observed value
E – Expected value
Correlation Analysis
Correlation is a statistical technique that can show whether and how strongly pairs of
variables are related. For example, height and weight are related; taller people tend to be
heavier than shorter people. The relationship isn't perfect. There are several different
correlation techniques.
If ‘r’ is equal to 1, then there is perfect positive correlation between two values;
If ‘r’ is equal to -1, then there is perfect negative correlation between two values;
If ‘r’ is equal to zero, then there is no correlation between the two values.
Anova Analysis
The analysis of variance is a method which separates the variation ascribable to one
set of causes from the variation ascribable to other set. The total variation is split up into the
following two components:
37
Regression Analysis
Simple linear regression is a model that assesses the relationship between a dependent
variable and one independent variable. The simple linear model is expressed using the
following equation:
Y = a + bX + ϵ
Where:
Y – dependent variable
X – independent (explanatory) variable
a – intercept
b – slope
ϵ – residual (error)
38
CHAPTER IV
Female 0 0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 100% of the respondents are male and 0% of the
respondents are female.
39
CHART NO: 4.1
40
TABLE NO: 4.2
20 - 25 years 33 33.0
26 - 30 years 20 20.0
31 – 35 year 32 32.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 10% of the respondents belong to the age group of
below 20 years, 33% of the respondents belong to the age group of 20-25 years, 20% of the
respondents belong to the age group of 26-30 years, 32% of the respondents belong to the
age group of 31-35 years and 5% of the respondents belong to the age group of above 35
years.
Thus the majority of the respondents belong to the age group of 20 - 25 years.
41
CHART NO: 4.2
42
TABLE NO: 4.3
HSC 14 14.0
UG 32 32.0
PG 25 25.0
Diploma 20 20.0
Others 9 9.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 14% of the respondents have HSC, 32% of the
respondents have completed UG, 25% of the respondents have completed PG, 20% of the
respondents have completed diploma and 9% of the respondents have completed others.
43
CHART NO: 4.3
44
TABLE NO: 4.4
Rs.10001-15000 29 29.0
Rs.15001-20000 21 21.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 23% of the respondents annual income is below
Rs.10, 000, 29% of the respondents annual income is Rs.10,001-15,000, 21% of the
respondents annual income is Rs.15,001-20,000, 19% of the respondents annual income is
Rs.20,001-25,000 and 8% of the respondents annual income is above Rs.25,000.
46
EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS
11 – 15 years 13 13.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts the 29% of respondents have below 5 years experience,
24% of the respondents have 5-10 years experience, 13% of the respondents have 11-15
years experience, 18% of the respondents have 15-20 years experience and 16% of the
respondents have above 20 years experience.
47
EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS
48
EFFICIENCY OF EMPLOYEES
Agree 9 9.0
Disagree 8 8.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 36% of respondents said that strongly agree, 9% of the
respondents said that agree,36% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 8% of
the respondents said that disagree and 11% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards efficiency of employees.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that strongly agree towards efficiency of
employees.
EFFICIENCY OF EMPLOYEES
49
TABLE NO: 4.7
50
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 37 37.0
Disagree 14 14.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 16% of respondents said that strongly agree, 37% of the
respondents said that agree,24% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 14%
of the respondents said that disagree and 9% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards providing fast and quality services in the organization.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that agree towards providing fast and
quality services in the organization.
51
TABLE NO: 4.8
52
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 9 9.0
Disagree 25 25.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 22% of respondents said that strongly agree, 9% of the
respondents said that agree,36% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 25%
of the respondents said that disagree and 8% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards increasing the delivery productivity.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree towards
increasing the delivery productivity.
53
TABLE NO: 4.9
54
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 21 21.0
Disagree 20 20.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 15% of respondents said that strongly agree, 21% of the
respondents said that agree,28% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 20%
of the respondents said that disagree and 16% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards leads to flow of information.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree towards
leads to flow of information.
55
TABLE NO: 4.10
56
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 24 24.0
Disagree 17 17.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 36% of respondents said that strongly agree, 24% of the
respondents said that agree,13% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 17%
of the respondents said that disagree and 10% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards minimizing the employees handling costs.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that strongly agree towards minimizing the
employees handling costs.
57
TABLE NO: 4.11
58
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Satisfied 41 41.0
Dissatisfied 8 8.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 29% of respondents are highly satisfied, 41% of the
respondents are satisfied,13% of the respondents are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 8% of
the respondents are dissatisfied and 9% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied towards
increased customer and supplier satisfaction.
Thus the majority of the respondents are satisfied towards increased customer and
supplier satisfaction.
59
TABLE NO:4.12
60
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Satisfied 9 9.0
Dissatisfied 16 16.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 19% of respondents are highly satisfied, 9% of the
respondents are satisfied,45% of the respondents are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 16% of
the respondents are dissatisfied and 11% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied towards
improved customer experience.
Thus the majority of the respondents are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied improved
customer experience.
61
TABLE NO: 4.13
Satisfied 21 21.0
Dissatisfied 7 7.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 49% of respondents are highly satisfied, 21% of the
respondents are satisfied,13% of the respondents are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 7% of the
respondents are dissatisfied and 10% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied towards ensures
intelligent route planning.
Thus the majority of the respondents are highly satisfied towards ensures intelligent
route planning.
63
TABLE NO: 4.14
64
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Satisfied 12 12.0
Dissatisfied 24 24.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 47% of respondents are highly satisfied, 12% of the
respondents are satisfied,12% of the respondents are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 24% of
the respondents are dissatisfied and 5% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied towards
logistics management improves customer responses in the company.
Thus the majority of the respondents are highly satisfied towards logistics
management improves customer responses in the company.
65
TABLE NO: 4.15
66
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Satisfied 11 11.0
Dissatisfied 20 20.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 31% of respondents are highly satisfied, 11% of the
respondents are satisfied,17% of the respondents are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 20% of
the respondents are dissatisfied and 21% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied towards
ensures sales growth.
Thus the majority of the respondents are highly satisfied towards ensures sales
growth.
67
TABLE NO: 4.16
68
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 11 11.0
Disagree 14 14.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 49% of respondents said that strongly agree, 11% of the
respondents said that agree,17% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 14% of
the respondents said that disagree and 9% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards lower the cost in every aspects.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that strongly agree towards lower the cost
in every aspects.
69
TABLE NO: 4.17
70
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 14 14.0
Disagree 16 16.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 25% of respondents said that strongly agree, 14% of the
respondents said that agree,33% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 16%
of the respondents said that disagree and 12% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards increases the market share.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree towards
increases the market share.
71
TABLE NO: 4.18
72
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 20 20.0
Disagree 14 14.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 33% of respondents said that strongly agree, 20% of the
respondents said that agree,26% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 14%
of the respondents said that disagree and 7% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards increases return on investment.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that strongly agree towards increases
return on investment.
73
TABLE NO: 4.19
74
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 44 44.0
Disagree 14 14.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 7% of respondents said that strongly agree, 44% of the
respondents said that agree,23% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 14% of
the respondents said that disagree and 12% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards reduces inventory holding costs.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that agree towards reduces inventory
holding costs.
75
TABLE NO: 4.20
76
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 10 10.0
Disagree 16 16.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 49% of respondents said that strongly agree, 10% of the
respondents said that agree,13% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 16%
of the respondents said that disagree and 12% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards reduces warehouse maintenance expenses.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that strongly agree towards reduces
warehouse maintenance expenses.
77
TABLE NO: 4.21
78
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 16 16.0
Disagree 14 14.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 24% of respondents said that strongly agree, 16% of
the respondents said that agree,27% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree,
14% of the respondents said that disagree and 19% of the respondents said that strongly
disagree towards higher the production rates.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree towards
higher the production rates.
79
TABLE NO: 4.22
80
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 35 35.0
Disagree 9 9.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 12% of respondents said that strongly agree, 35% of the
respondents said that agree,26% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 9% of
the respondents said that disagree and 18% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards better inventory control.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that agree towards better inventory control.
81
TABLE NO: 4.23
82
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 28 28.0
Disagree 8 8.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 39% of respondents said that strongly agree, 28% of the
respondents said that agree,13% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 8% of
the respondents said that disagree and 12% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards smarter use of warehouse space.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that strongly agree towards smarter use of
warehouse space.
83
TABLE NO: 4.24
84
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 11 11.0
Disagree 17 17.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 22% of respondents said that strongly agree, 11% of the
respondents said that agree,24% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 17%
of the respondents said that disagree and 26% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards optimizing operational cost of the organization.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that strongly disagree towards optimizing
operational cost of the organization.
85
TABLE NO: 4.25
86
Agree Level No. of Respondents Percentage
Agree 39 39.0
Disagree 19 19.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above table depicts that 25% of respondents said that strongly agree, 39% of the
respondents said that agree,8% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree, 19% of
the respondents said that disagree and 9% of the respondents said that strongly disagree
towards boosting the profitability.
Thus the majority of the respondents said that agree towards boosting the
profitability.
87
CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS
88
RELATION BETWEEN EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS AND
MINIMIZING THE EMPLOYEES HANDLING COSTS
Below 5 years 0 5 9 10 5 29
5-10 years 16 0 0 5 3 24
EXPERIENCE
OF THE 11 – 15 years 13 0 0 0 0 13
RESPONDENTS
15- 20 years 5 13 0 0 0 18
Above 20 years 2 6 4 2 2 16
Total 36 24 13 17 10 100
89
Chi-Square Tests
a. 19 cells (76.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.30.
INTERPRETATION:
As per the above table, it is inferred that the P value is .000; it is not significant to 5%
(0.05) significant level. The minimum expected count is 1.30. Thus alternative hypothesis is
accepted and it is finding that there is significant difference between the experience of the
respondents and minimizing the employees handling costs.
CORRELATION ANALYSIS
90
RELATION BETWEEN EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE
RESPONDENTS AND INCREASES THE MARKET SHARE
Correlations
EDUCATIONAL INCREASES
QUALIFICATION THE
OF THE MARKET
RESPONDENTS SHARE
INTERPRETATION:
The above table indicates that out of 100 respondents, co-efficient of correlation
between educational qualification of the respondents and increase the market share is 0.127.
It is below 1. So there is positive relationship between these two factors.
91
NULL HYPOTHESIS (HO): There is no significant relationship between age of the
respondents and logistics management in impact on profitability.
ANOVA
AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Total 123.790 99
Interpretation
The table clearly shows that age groupand logistics management in impact on
profitability has a figure on 0.616 values and significance around .863 level than the sum of
squares within group between groups values have 13.133 and 110.657 respectively. Hence,
the significant value is greater than 0.050 for which the significant percentage is above 95%,
hence accepting alternative hypothesis. Thus, rejecting null hypothesis i.e., There is
significant relationship between age of the respondents and logistics management in impact
on profitability.
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
92
Variables Entered/Removedb
Impact on financial
1 . Enter
performancea
a. All requested variables entered.
Model Summary
ANOVAb
93
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) .386 .341 1.130 .260
INCOME PER
4.157 .110 .952 37.900 .000
ANNUM
a. Dependent Variable: R1
Analysis:
Interpretation:
The F statistic value is 0.022 with p value (p = 0.000) were less than alpha value
(0.05). This means the independent variables gender of the respondents simultaneously
affected the dependent variables impact of financial performance. The coefficient of
determination (R Square) of regression model is -0.010, indicating that 1.00% of variance in
independent variables is influenced on impact of financial performance. The beta coefficients
for the independent variable were positive and the p values of the t-test for independent
variable were greater than the alpha value (0.05). This shows that there is significant positive
influence of gender of the respondents and impact of financial performance.
94
CHAPTER V
5.1 FINDINGS
Percentage Analysis
36% of the respondents said that strongly agree towards efficiency of employees.
37% of the respondents said that agree towards providing fast and quality services in
the organization.
36% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree towards increasing the
delivery productivity.
28% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree towards leads to flow of
information.
36% of the respondents said that strongly agree towards minimizing the employees
handling costs.
41% of the respondents are satisfied towards increased customer and supplier
satisfaction.
45% of the respondents are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied improved customer
experience.
49% of the respondents are highly satisfied towards ensures intelligent route planning.
47% of the respondents are highly satisfied towards improves customer responses.
31% of the respondents are highly satisfied towards ensures sales growth.
95
49% of the respondents said that strongly agree towards lower the cost in every
aspects.
33% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree towards increases the
market share.
33% of the respondents said that strongly agree towards increases return on
investment.
44% of the respondents said that agree towards reduces inventory holding costs.
49% of the respondents said that strongly agree towards reduces warehouse
maintenance expenses.
27% of the respondents said that neither agree nor disagree towards higher the
production rates.
35% of the respondents said that agree towards better inventory control.
39% of the respondents said that strongly agree towards smarter use of warehouse
space.
26% of the respondents said that strongly disagree towards optimizing operational
cost of the organization.
39% of the respondents said that agree towards boosting the profitability.
Chi-square Analysis
Correlation Analysis
96
Anova Analysis
Regression Analysis
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
97
transformation of goods and efficiency amongst workers and contribute significantly
to sustainable development for the present and future generation.
5.3 CONCLUSION
The study aimed to establish the Ocean freight forwarding on the performance of
Broekman Logistics India Private Limited, Chennai. Additionally, the study sought to
investigate the moderating influence of logistics information flow on the relationship between
logistics management magnitudes and firm performance. This study provided evidence that
inventory management, and information flow management are insignificantly and doesn’t
influence the performance of Broekman Logistics India Private Limited. This implies that an
increase in performance of manufacturing firm is likely through embracing transport
management practices within logistics management. It revealed that proper storage
management and control reduces storage costs. The results indicate that accurate,
relevant and timely information from inside and outside the company enables
appropriate and timely decision making. The study concludes that logistics management has
the potential of positively influencing performance on firms in terms of cost reduction, timely
delivery, reduced lead time, demand realization, increased market share, quality products and
customer service satisfaction. Consequently, this study provides organization’s managers
with insights of how firms can develop a competitive edge through the implementation of
logistics management. To conclude, monitoring and evaluation of all the logistics and
transportation practices is crucial to excellent operational performance at Broekman Logistics
India Private Limited, Chennai.
98
BIBLIOGRAPHY
REFERENCE BOOKS
1. Bowersox, D., Closs, D., and Cooper, B.M. (2007). Supply Chain Logistics Management.
New York: McGraw Hill
2. Bowersox, D., Closs, D., and Cooper, B.M. (2007). Supply Chain Logistics Management.
New York: McGraw Hill.
3. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, C. M. (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management. New
York: Elsevier Science Inc.
4. Murphy, P., & Wood, D. (2008). Contemporary Logistics. Pearson Education.
5. Stevenson, W. J. (2009). Operations Management (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
Irwin
REFERENCE JOURNALS
1. Francis Mbah Takwi, Atem Atabongfua Mavis, The Effects of Logistic Management on
Enterprise Performance: A Case of Gas Depot Atem in Yaounde Cameroon, American
Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems. Volume 5, Issue 3,
September 2020 , pp. 41-48. doi: 10.11648/[Link].20200503.12
2. Fugate, B. S., Mentzer, J. T., and Stank, T. P. (2010). Logistics Performance: Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Differentiation. Journal of Business Logistics, 31 (1), 43–62.
3. Lynch, D. F., Keller, S. B., and Ozment, J. (2010). The Effects of Logistics Capabilities
and Strategy on Firm Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 21 (2), 47–68.
4. Mentzer, J. T., andKonrad, B. P. (2017). An Efficiency/Effectiveness Approach to
Logistics Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 12 (1),
5. Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., and Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring
Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable: Towards Methodological Best
Practice.
REFERENCE WEBSITES
1. [Link]
2. [Link]
3. [Link]
4. [Link]
5. [Link]
99
ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Name:
2. Gender
a) Male b) Female
3. Designation
4. Educational qualification
5. Monthly salary
6. Experience
How do you agree that there is effective logistics management on employees’ performance in
the organisation?
Neither
agree
Strongly Strongly
Agree nor Disagree
agree disagree
disagre
e
[Link] of employees
100
[Link] the delivery productivity
Neither
satisfied
Highly Highly
Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
satisfied dissatisfied
dissatisfie
d
[Link] customer and
supplier satisfaction
[Link] customer
experience
[Link] customer
responses
How do you agree that the effective logistics management impacts on financial performance?
Neither
agree
Strongly Strongly
Agree nor Disagree
agree disagree
disagre
e
[Link] the cost in every aspects
101
[Link] inventory holding costs
How do you rate the logistics management in the organisation impact on profitability?
Neither
agree
Strongly Strongly
Agree nor Disagree
agree disagree
disagre
e
[Link] the production rates
27. Suggestions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
102