0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views5 pages

RCOP Notes

Rcop notes

Uploaded by

Raza Ullah
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views5 pages

RCOP Notes

Rcop notes

Uploaded by

Raza Ullah
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Research Council of Pakistan Level | notes =A CT dete Rea ener bile ce) LETTER TO THE EDITOR New discoveries* Suggestions/Additions* » Critique* » 200-300 words(max=500) 3 authors ° 5 references CRITIQUE FORMAT* Paragraph One: Quick overview, appreciation (NO BASHING) ° Paragraph Two: Flaws, effect on outcome Paragraph Three: Suggestions CASE REPORT » Rare presentations* » Rare side effects* ° Unique cases* * 1000-1500 words © 10 references 4 authors ° The style of writing and the points raised have significant amount of weightage FORMAT OF CASE REPORT* 1- Introduction: » Normal presentation/Side effects ° Statistics 2- Case: * Presentation of case «Initial investigations and management e Outcome/follow-up » Discharge history/ Stability of patient 3- Discussion: Explain the importance of your finding © Why the finding is unique ° Effects on community Future implications » COHERENCE IS KEY! ORIGINAL ARTICLE 1- How to choose a topic: » Convenient » Sample population should be easy to find No repetition © Importance of playing around with topics © No funding required Clear objective ° Impactful 2- Introduction*”: 1 st paragraph: Background(Worldwide, Continent wise, Nation wise) 2nd paragraph: What is known. What is unknown. RATIONALE (Justify the gap/importance of implications) 3 rd paragraph: Primary objective. Secondary objective. 3-Methodology**: Study location Study time period Study type ° Sample population ° Sample size ([Link]) «Inclusion criteria, Exclusion criteria » How bias has been reduced » Type of sampling (Random, Systematic, Cluster, Convenience)(how sample population approached) » Co-operation rate ° Details of questionnaire « Definition of important variables 3-Discussion*: © Paragraph one: Principal finding. Comparison and Contrast. Potential explanation/Future Implications Paragraph two: Secondary finding(Finding of secondary objective) Paragraph three: Minor findings » Paragraph four: Future Recommendations » Paragraph five: Limitations 4- Results*/: e Summarise what the data shows Point out simple relationships and big-picture trends Avoid repeating numbers of the tables and figures 5- Tables and Figures: » Should be specific and brief » Use superscript symbols to identify footnotes » Use footnotes to explain statistically significant differences Use 3 lined tables Everything should be aligned ¢ Units should be given and unnecessary columns should be omitted **Explained in detail with published examples from PubMed **Accompanied with a thorough session on data coding, data entry and basic analysis Discussion of this sub-topic was followed by a 20 minute interactive quiz, Answers to the quiz along with various tricks were subsequently provided

You might also like