0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views15 pages

Factors Influencing City Development

Urban Economics Lecture 3

Uploaded by

freetest55anon
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views15 pages

Factors Influencing City Development

Urban Economics Lecture 3

Uploaded by

freetest55anon
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Where Do Cities Develop?

How
Many Cities?
Profit Maximizing Firm
• Market oriented firm
• For each location, chooses cost minimizing
combination of K & L to produce Q
• Calculates profit in each location for life of
facility
• Choose location that
Factors Affecting Location Choice of
Businesses
• Transportation Costs
– Transfer oriented firm
• Resource oriented firm
• Market oriented firm
• Production Costs
– Energy,labor, local public goods, taxes
– Localization and Urbanization economies
• Inertia
Transfer Oriented Firm
• Model
– Single output
– Single transferable input
– Fixed factor proportion
– Fixed prices
• Production Costs are equal across locations
• Firm chooses location to minimize transportation costs:
witix+w0t0(xm-x)]Q where wi is the weight of the input, ti is
the transport rate for input, x is distance from input source,
xm is location of market, w0 is the weight of the output, t0
is the transport rate for output.
Findings
• In single output/single input model, firm will tend to locate
at one of the endpoints. This tendency is reinforced if there
are terminal costs of line haul economies.
• In single input/output model, if monetary weight of input
exceeds monetary weight of output, firm will locate at the
source of input (resource oriented firm).
• In single input/output model, if monetary weight of output
exceeds monetary weight of input, firm will locate at the
market (market oriented firm).
• With multiple markets and ubiquitous inputs, firm locates
at median location.
Principle of Median Location
• Single product but dispersed consumers
• Consumers uniformly distributed along line
• Ubiquitous inputs
• Cost of delivery included in price of product
• Choose location that minimizes delivery
costs - midpoint
• More generally, median location is where
1/2 sales on one side and 1/2 on other
Production Costs
• Local input costs
• Labor costs
• Taxes, regulations and public services
• Localization and urbanization economies
• Government Incentives --tax abatement;
industrial bonds; loan guarantees; site
development
Market Structure and Location
Decisions
• Monopoly, median location principle,
market area
• Monopolistic competition
– Trade-0ff between production costs and travel
costs because of economies of scale in
production
– Also, firm’s location decision affected by
presence of rival firms. Textbook doesn’t
discuss this.
Algebraic Model of Market Area
• Number of CD’s purchased each month per person
=d
• Population density - e
• Land area of region -A
• Output of typical store - q
• Per capita demand is independent of price
• Q =d*e*A (Total demand in region)
• N=Q/q (Total number of stores)
• M=A/N (Market Area of store)
q
M=
d×e
Determinants of Market Area
• Demand Density -- A larger density implies a smaller
market area. Demand density is a product of per capita
demand and population density. Income also affects
demand density.
• Economies of Scale --With fixed demand, significant
economies of scale imply a larger market area. When law
of demand holds, this tendency is offset by increase in
demand density.
• Transportation Costs - With fixed demand, a decrease in
transportation costs tends to increase market area. When
law of demand holds, this tendency is offset by increase in
demand density.
Simple Central Place Model

• Initial Uniform population density


• No shopping externalities
• Ubiquitous inputs
• Uniform demand
• Three goods. The three goods have
different per capita demands and scale
economies
Implications of Central Place
Theory
• Hierarchical system of cities
• Differences in scale economies give rise to
diversity in the size of cities
• Regions will have a small number of large
cities and a larger number of smaller cities
• Consumers travel to bigger cities to shop;
not vice versa.
Changes in Assumptions
• No disruption of urban hierarchy
– Scale economies
– Shopping externalities:may reduce number of
cities
– Variation in demand
• Possible disruption of urban hierarchy
– Resource oriented firms
Questions for Discussion
• What would explain the emergence of
mega-cities (a single large city , no smaller
cities)?
• How would central place theory explain the
emergence of edge cities (growth in number
and size of small cities surrounding a large
city)?

You might also like