Feasibility Study Guidelines Overview
Feasibility Study Guidelines Overview
TITLE
- If the title is more than one line continue to the next line after
the other
Business Logo
Author’s Name
APPROVAL SHEET
(Text: font size 12; leave 1 double-space every after each line)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
(Text: font size 12; leave 1 double-space every after each line)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(Font size of 12; bold letters for the word “EXECUTIVE SUMMARY”)
a) Name of the Firm: (State the name of the firm and describe/explain
why you have chosen the name)
b) Location: (the exact address and location and the reason why you
have chosen the location.
c) Brief Description of the Project: Write about the project, why you
have chosen it. Mention the benefits of the project to you and your
would-be customers)
d) Project Highlights: What are the highlights of the project? What are
the new things the project is offering to the proponent, would-be
customers, and the society as well)?
e) Project Summary:
Market Acceptability
Technical Impact
Management Availability
Financial Profitability
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF APPENDICES
Key points:
This section must be specifying the scope and limitation of each aspect
(Marketing, Technical, Management, and Financial)
This segment of the feasibility study will tell the reader who will be
benefited on the results of the study.
(Leave 1 double line space from the last line to begin)
CHAPTER 2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This section contains how data was treated, the statistical tool used
and the scoring procedure.
I. MARKETING ASPECT
(These are the components of marketing aspect but not limited to the
following)
[Link] Vision/Mission
(These are the components of technical aspect but not limited to the
following)
V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT
(These are the components of financial aspect but not limited to the
following)
CHAPTER 4:
4.1 Summary
4.2 Findings
4.3 Recommendations
REFERENCES
6.2 Receipts
6.3 Documentations
6.6Curriculum Vitae
Format:
Font Size : 12
Spacing : 1 ½ inch
Margin
Top: 1 inch
Bottom: 1 inch
Right: 1 inch
Chapter Title: Caps lock
Abstract/Appendices: Single
References: APA—Form
Adviser
Research Office
Representative
Editor
TOTAL
paper.
The proposed fees will be subdivided for group of undergraduate
students doing a common feasibility study. The fees will be used to pay
the honoraria of advisers, panel members, research office
representative, and editor.
RUBRIC FOR RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT
Introduction Clearly identifies and Limited discussion of Minimal discussion of Little or no discussion of
discusses research research focus/purpose research focus/purpose research focus/purpose
(Introductory focus/purpose of of research of research of research
paragraph(s), research Research focus is less Research focus is not Research focus not
literature review, Research focus is clearly well-grounded in well-grounded in grounded in previous
hypotheses, or grounded in previous previous previous research/theoretically
research/theoretically research/theoretically research/theoretically relevant literature
proposition)
relevant literature relevant literature relevant literature Significance of the
(10) Significance of the Significance of the Significance of the research is not identified
research is clearly research is not as clearly research is not clearly (how it adds to previous
identified (how it adds to identified (how it adds to identified (how it adds to research)
previous research) previous research) previous research) Hypotheses/propositions
Hypotheses/propositions Hypotheses/propositions Hypotheses/propositions are poorly articulated or
are clearly articulated are described but not as are not well articulated are absent altogether
well articulated
(10-8) (0-2)
(6-7)
(3-5)
Research Provides accurate, Description of how the Description of how the Description of how the
Methods thorough description of data was collected, data was collected, data was collected,
how the data was what/how many data what/how many data what/how many data
collected, what/how sources were analyzed, sources were analyzed, sources were analyzed,
(10) many data sources were plan of analysis or plan of analysis or plan of analysis or
analyzed, plan of measurement measurement measurement
analysis or measurement instrument, research instrument, research instrument, research
instrument, research context is adequate but context is somewhat context is very
context limited. confusing/ not clearly confusing/not
Reflection on social Reflection on social articulated. articulated sufficiently.
situatedness/reflexivity situatedness/reflexivity Reflection on social Reflection on social
and how it may and how it may situatedness/reflexivity situatedness/reflexivity
influence data collection influence data collection and how it may and how it may
and interpretation is and interpretation is influence data collection influence data collection
thorough and insightful. adequate but limited. and interpretation is and interpretation is
limited and lacks insight. severely limited, lacks
insight, or is absent
altogether
(3-5) (0-2)
(6-7)
(10-8)
Results and Results are clearly Results are explained Results are not very Results are not clearly
Discussion explained in a but not as clearly, level clearly explained, level explained, level of detail
comprehensive level of of detail is not as of detail is insufficient, is severely insufficient,
Marketing detail and are well- sufficient, and there are and there are more and there are serious
Management organized some organizational organizational issues organizational issues
Technical Tables/figures clearly issues Tables/figures are not Tables/figures are not
Environment and concisely convey the Tables/figures are not as clear/concise in clear/concise in
Socio- data clear/concise in conveying the data. conveying the data
economic Statistical Analyses (if conveying the data. Statistical analyses (if Statistical analyses (if
Financial used) are appropriate Statistical analyses (if used) are inappropriate used) are inappropriate
(50) tests and are accurately used) are appropriate tests and/or are not tests and/or not
interpreted. tests but are not accurately interpreted. accurately interpreted.
accurately interpreted
(37-25)
(50 - 38) (24-12) (11-0)
(15 – 12)
Documentation Cites all data obtained Cites most data obtained Cites some data Does not cite sources.
of sources, from other sources. APA from other sources. APA obtained from other Sources are
Quality of citation style is citation style is used in sources. Citation style is disproportionately non-
accurately used in both both text and either inconsistent or scholarly and do not
sources
text and bibliography. bibliography incorrect. clearly relate to the
Sources are all scholarly Sources are primarily Sources are not primarily research focus.
and clearly relate to the scholarly and relate to scholarly and relate to
(5) research focus the research focus. the research focus
somewhat tangentially.
(5 – 4) (3)
(2)
(1 – 0)
Spelling & No spelling & grammar Minimal spelling & Noticeable spelling and Excessive spelling and/or
Grammar mistakes grammar mistakes grammar mistakes grammar mistakes
(5)
(5 – 4) (3) (2) (1 – 0)
Manuscript Title page has proper Title page approximates Title page deviates a bit Title page completely
Format APA formatting APA formatting more from APA deviates from APA
Used correct headings & Used correct headings & formatting formatting
subheadings consistently subheadings almost Headings & subheadings Headings and
consistently less consistent. subheadings completely
(5) deviate from suggested
formatting or are absent
altogether
(1 – 0)
(3) (2)
(5 – 4)
Eligibility
A. General Eligibility
1. Open to all ATI students, who are eligible to take the course.
B. Research Eligibility
a. Financial Management
• Entrepreneurship
• Financial Innovations
• Organizational Management
2. The researches shall be in accordance with their field of study or area of specialization
3. The output of the proposed researches shall have impact to any of the following:
d. Industries; and
e. Community improvement.