Language Views in Speech & Theater Arts
Language Views in Speech & Theater Arts
As language theories move from structuralist to cognitivist to functionalist perspectives, they reflect a shift from viewing language as structured, observable data systems (structuralist), to innate cognitive systems governing understanding (cognitivist), to dynamic tools for conveying meaning in contexts (functionalist). These transformations encompass broader understandings of language as intricately tied to human cognitive functions and social interactions, highlighting its multifaceted role in communication .
Structuralists view language as a system of speech sounds that serves as a means of communication, described in terms of observable data and systematic structures . Cognitivists, on the other hand, consider language as an innate knowledge system, inherent in humans and governed by universal principles, which are made manifest in linguistic forms . Functionalists believe language is a dynamic system used for conveying functional meanings and emphasizes the meaning and function rather than grammatical characteristics .
The cognitivist view implies that language acquisition is a natural and rapid process facilitated by the brain's innate language acquisition device (LAD). It suggests that all normal children acquire language universally and effortlessly due to shared abstract principles across all languages .
Teaching from an innate perspective focuses on facilitating natural language discovery through exposure and use, aligning with the idea that language principles are already embedded in students' cognitive structures. In contrast, a structural approach would involve explicit instruction of language systems such as phonemes and grammatical rules. Educational programs would need to strike a balance, integrating activities that nurture cognitive language instincts alongside structured linguistic concepts to optimize learning outcomes .
Interactionalists view language as essential for performing social transactions and establishing interpersonal relationships. This perspective emphasizes the role of language as a tool for creating and maintaining social order through conversations and patterns of interaction, rather than focusing solely on grammatical or functional aspects .
Functionalists prioritize the expression of functional meaning, such as emotions or persuasion, through language, rather than focusing on grammatical characteristics. Language teaching from this perspective emphasizes categories of meaning and function, unlike more traditional linguistic approaches based on structural elements .
The arbitrariness of language suggests there is no inherent connection between words and their meanings or the objects they denote, which accounts for the variation observed across languages. However, it also implies a universally accepted convention among speakers of the same language community, leading to similarities in how meaning is encoded and understood within each language system .
Structuralists believe that speech is the primary medium of language, while writing is seen as a secondary representation. They argue that language consists primarily of vocal sounds produced by speech apparatus, and writing merely serves as the graphic representation of these sounds .
Transformationalists view language as an innate, creative system that allows for the generation and understanding of novel sentences, diverging from the structuralists who focus on fixed patterns and predictabilities in language structures. This creativity aspect facilitates the Chomskyan notion of infinite sentence generation through transformational rules .
Structuralists describe language as a system of systems structured with systematic order to form meaningful units. By adhering to regularities and patterns, language enables meaningful communication. Sounds are organized into words and sentences following rules, which facilitate effective encoding and exchange of meaning .