International Trade and Business Law Guide
Uploaded by
nguyenhoangmai.vogeInternational Trade and Business Law Guide
Uploaded by
nguyenhoangmai.vogeCommon questions
Powered by AIIf buyers fail to notify sellers of non-conformity within the reasonable time set in Article 39, they lose the right to claim compensation for non-conformance . This time limit is generally 'as soon as possible,' but cannot exceed two years from the handover date unless a contractual guarantee period applies, affecting the buyer's ability to enforce rights .
Time is crucial in CISG-governed sales contracts, emphasized through required delivery on specific dates as per Articles 33 and 35. Delays can lead to contract breach claims if they significantly impair a buyer's expected outcome, termed 'fundamental breach' . Timely delivery influences contractual validity, where failure allows buyers remedies such as cancellation or damages claims for non-conformity .
The CISG addresses the formation and performance of contracts by setting international standards that override domestic laws in member countries when stipulated in a contract. For instance, under CISG, a contract does not require writing as per Article 11, contrasting with Vietnam's commercial law, which mandates contracts for import/export to be in writing . Furthermore, the CISG allows for oral contracts and accepts the dispatch time for contract acceptance as binding (Mailbox rule), which may differ from domestic laws that require more stringent proof of contract acceptance timing .
The CISG provides several remedies if a seller commits a fundamental breach. These include the right to cancel the contract, seek a remedy or extension, request a price reduction, claim damages, and demand specific performance from the seller . A breach is fundamental if it significantly deprives the buyer of their expected contractual benefits, as outlined in Article 25 .
The CISG mandates that buyers examine goods within the shortest practical period after receipt or at the destination if shipped . Article 38 allows deferred examination if redirection occurs without a reasonable opportunity, while Article 39 requires buyers to notify sellers of non-conformity within a reasonable timeframe to retain compensation rights . Failure to notify results in losing the right to claim breaches, as stated in Articles 38 and 39 .
The 'Mailbox rule' in CISG influences contract formation by marking the time of acceptance as the time of sending, not receipt . This differs from many domestic laws that require acceptance receipt for enforceability, providing clarity and preventing delays in international trade agreements . It enhances reliability by allowing quicker binding agreements, reducing risk of withdrawal upon dispatch, crucial for international contracting.
The designation of 'sustained damages' influences breach outcomes by determining compensation eligibility. If the buyer can document such damages, the seller may be liable; otherwise, the lack of evidence negates compensation requirements . This can be contentious because proving damages might be difficult without explicit evidence, leading to disputes over liability and obligations .
Under the CISG, the seller's obligations include delivering goods and necessary documents like bills of lading and certificates of quality, on the right date and time as specified in Article 33. They must also ensure goods conform to the contract requirements, meaning they fit their intended purpose, match samples, and are properly packaged, according to Article 35 . If goods do not conform, under Article 37, the seller can offer replacement or redelivery. A lack of conformity is deemed serious if it deprives the buyer of their expected benefits, allowing for contract termination .
In the CISG, a 'fundamental breach' is defined in Article 25 as a breach that substantially deprives a party of what they were entitled to expect under the contract unless unforeseen by the breaching party . The breach must result in significant detriment and be foreseeable by a reasonable person in the same situation . This definition requires considering the nature of the breach and its impact on the contractual relationship.
Non-fundamental breaches under CISG, which do not substantially deprive affected parties, allow contracts to continue with available remedies like extensions and price reductions . The affected party can also seek specific performance or compensation for losses, as detailed under Remedies for Breach of Contract . These options provide a means of addressing lesser breaches without warranting contract termination.