Tax Revenue Factors in Jigjiga City
Tax Revenue Factors in Jigjiga City
Tax Collection
Table 3: Tax payers attitude regarding tax
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation
Tax office has enough capacity 312 1.9380 .86440
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation
File handling 312 2.414 .92195
The tax office uses quality system & technology 312 2.0124 .42222
The tax office has less man power and technology to control taxpayer transactions and does not
audit taxpayers annually. This results in the tax office not collecting the intended amount of tax.
Many respondents disagreed with the statement that the tax office has not capacity to handle
taxpayers' files properly, as well as the use of quality systems and technology (Hackney, Akitoby,
& Harrison, 2020).
The tax office's capacity is also affected by the types of services rendered, such as the type of
service offered and the location of the tax office. The majority of respondents disagreed with the
idea that the tax office is not comfortable for taxpayers, which could lead to less tax revenue
collection (Abdu & Adem, 2023).
In conclusion, the data suggests that while the tax office in Jigjiga city has cooperative staff, it
struggles with technological and staffing limitations, affecting its overall ability to serve taxpayers
effectively and collect the necessary revenue. Addressing these issues could lead to better taxpayer
compliance and increased revenue, enhancing the city’s financial health and public service
capability. This strategic focus aligns with the insights provided by the cited authors (Tilahun,
2016; Hackney, Akitoby, & Harrison, 2020; Abdu & Adem, 2023), suggesting that service quality
and office environment significantly influence taxpayer satisfaction and compliance.
Tax Compliance
Table 5: Status of tax compliance
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation
Declaring tax is obligation 312 3.9421 .95368
Tax declaration form is enough to fill all information 312 1.5620 .78780
The tax declaration form easy to compute tax 312 1.7686 .94899
The county has right tax rules and assessment 312 2.0702 1.04214
According to Table 1, both the Cronbach Alpha and Omega test for the overall indicators is well
beyond the minimum requirement. The Alpha and Omega values are (alpha=0.907 & 0.898) which
shows the measures used to measure the organizational resources are highly reliable on both
criteria. The results indicate the researcher employed the appropriate indicators to measure one of
our constructs. In addition, we used to test the value of individual indicators to measure the level
of reliability of each indicator used to measure the construct. The result is presented in the Figure
2
According to Figure 2, the reliability of individual indicators is well above the minimum
requirement of 0.7 (Nunnally, 1969). We can conclude that from both Table7 and Figure 2, the
instruments used in this research are highly reliable both overall and as individual indicators. With
this, we can say the results give a green light to conduct further analysis such as principal
component analysis.
Next, we analyzed the reliability of the items used to measure tax organizational capability (office
capacity, quality of expertise, technology, and tax assessment together).
Figure 2: Relaibility analysis for managerial statistics
Figure3 shows that the reliability test was used to measure the indicators of managerial
competence. According to Table3, the Cronbach Alpha result of the managerial competence is
(0.921) and the Omega value for the same measures is (0.923) in both cases the result is well above
the minimum requirement of (0.7). Table4 also shows the reliability value of each indicator where
the value of all the indicators used to measure managerial competence is above the minimum
requirement. Similar to organizational resources, managerial competence is measured by highly
reliable factors.
Figure 3: Reliability test for operational Statistics
According to above Figure, the reliability result, and the indicators used to measure organizational
performance are highly reliable. The Cronbach alpha value for the overall score is (0.917) and the
omega value is (0.910). The individual indicators are beyond the minimum requirement according
to (Nunnally, 1969).
After the reliability test, we conducted factor analysis, the principal component analysis to measure
the dimensionality of our variables. The principal component analysis primarily intends to reduce
the number of factors (which in this case the items) to a few dimensions based on the underlying
attributes of the latent variable. Before adding variables together or creating composite latent
factors, factor analysis is important to show the underlying similarities between each indicator to
form the latent independent and dependent variables. Because the items used in the research to
measure both the dependent and independent variables are standardized, therefore we use the PCA
(principal component analysis) based on the VARIMAX orthogonal rotation matrix. The Varimax
rotation is suggested by scholars since we used a standardized questionnaire from established
research. We employed strict criteria to establish the result based on the established criteria.
According to our theoretical and empirical review, tax revenue collection is a construct that
consists of awareness, compliance, office capacity, law and assessment about tax collection. This
conceptualization sets this research apart from the previous researches. Most of the previous
studies assumes or measure tax revenue collection as binary variable in which researchers ask
respondents whether they pay tax or not. Moreover, studies also take annual tax revenue as
continuous variable and measure the impact of others dimensions mentioned in this research as
independent variables.
However, we argue that tax revenue is a concept than a variable. This is because; it is a
conceptualization in which each element constitutes the higher order concept of tax collection.
Asking a yes or no question cannot reflect whether individuals or firms are paying the fair amount
of tax or according to their capacity. Similarly, whether a person is ranked according to the amount
of money paid didn’t realize whether the office is collecting higher income or not. Because tax
collection depends on the ERCA guidelines and more generally the government’s objective,
therefore it cannot be directly measured as it goes up or down against the will and objectives of
these stakeholders. Moreover, the amount of tax levied on individuals depends on the nature of
economy and government policy (Gnangnon, 2022). Therefore, we believe, tax collection is an
unobservable variable.
When there is high awareness among tax payers, office are better equipped, high rate of
compliance, the nature of tax law is good, and fair tax assessment exist, then the tax revenue
collection tend to increase. Government can increase its tax revenue by levying high tax rate, or
ignoring tax relief or tightly monitoring the behavior of tax administrators. But, this may be done
by infringing the individual’s rights. Moreover, governments may give tax holidays to implement
a certain economic policy such as encouraging imports or exports or to guide investors to a given
sector. Therefore, rather than solely relying on the amount or the extent to which each individual
or firm pay, conceptualizing tax revenue collection as a composite construct have numerous
advantages.
Figure 4: Chi -squared Test
Figure 5 shows the Chi-Square test with degrees of freedom and the P-value. According to the
result, the Chi-Square value is statistically significant at P-value (<0.01) which shows the model
is adequate to discriminate the number of factors where the factors measure distinct attributes of
the respondents. The two factors cannot be added together as they measure separate dimensions
with different attributes.
According to Figure6, two factors are extracted from our analysis and the cumulative variance
extracted to explain the two factors is 82.9%. Furthermore, the contribution of each factor to the
total variance is equal which makes the two dimensions independent of each other. The result
indicates the two factors explain sufficiently the variance in the independent variables and the
result suggests we can create two composite latent variables to measure tax revenue collection
problems.
The above result is also confirmed by the Scree plot presented below. Scree plot is a useful method
to show graphically the number of factors retained which are above the Eigenvalue greater than
one. The cut-off point is Eigenvalue 1 (Shorts et al., 2015).
Figure 6: The scree plot
The scree plot as shown in Figure 7 suggests we have two factors from the total of 15 indicators
used to measure our independent variables. As the result suggest, the Eigenvalue (1) is used as the
yardstick to divide the number of factors. As the figure indicates, there are two factors above the
Eigen Value (1).
Furthermore, we tested the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test. If the KMO result for each indicator is greater
than the minimum requirement of 0.5, we can conclude that the sampling adequacy is maintained.
Testing the sampling adequacy further confirms the suitability of the data for factor analysis and
if the KMO is above 0.7, it gives the researcher more confidence to conduct factor analysis. As
shown in Figure 14, all of the items have a greater than 0.8 value which indicates the instruments
used are highly valid.
Figure 7: KMO test
Regarding the dimensionality of the indicators, Figure 8 presents which items belong to which
latent variable (factor).
As figure9 shows, two components with factors loading above 0.6 are extracted. Based on the
standardized instruments, we named the two factors (organizational capability and legal and tax
assessment capability). Organizational capability include managerial competence, systems such as
tax collection technologies, office efficiency, complain handling, timely, and tax assessment
expertise in customer and revenue office in Jigjiga branch. Legal and tax assessment compliance
is concerned with the effectiveness of legal enforceability, fair assessment of tax, avoiding
negative perception of tax and others. Based on these factor analysis results, the following
inferential analysis was made to rank in order of importance (i.e. to answer the second research
question).
Pearson
1 .896** .639** .782** .623**
Correlation
Awareness
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
Pearson
.896** 1 .660** .861** .736**
Correlation
Office capacity
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
Pearson
.639** .660** 1 .756** .632**
Correlation
Tax assessment
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
Pearson
.782** .861** .756** 1 .794**
Correlation
Tax law
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
According to Table 8, these factors are highly correlated. Therefore according to our PCA and
correlation analysis, according to their order of importance
From the interview made with the tax officers, one of the biggest challenges faced by the authority
is solving the pervasive problem of corruption. Undesired communication of tax auditors with
taxpayers was the major challenge that the tax administration is facing. For one thing, there is
constant interaction between taxpayers and tax officials since taxpayers have to file returns
physically. This interaction encouraged the two parties to negotiate tax liability. They also are
facing problems in identifying corrupted tax officers since corruption networks develop and go
undetected. Furthermore, some of the tax officers are suspected to be accountants for some of the
taxpayers. Moreover, the lack of close and unreserved follow up by law income accomplisher and
controlling process in connection with different tax related activities are the main problems. When
the taxpayer presents income that is understated, the taxpayers will be penalized. However, the tax
officers are facing challenges due to the absence of any stated parameter to say a certain
understated amount as substantial or not. Therefore, this created a loophole for some undesired
bargaining and behavior between taxpayer and tax officer. Besides, there is no clear collaboration
of information through computerized system, because mostly assessments are done manually, so
lacks accuracy, efficiency and effectiveness. Furthermore, lack of competency, degree of
satisfaction of employees and unwillingness to delegate responsibility in the city administration.
Due to this audit functions are delayed. The quality of audits made by the officers of the tax office
is affected by lack of sufficient comprehensive audits. Furthermore, tax audits in most cases have
been conducted manually. Manual verification of taxpayer information is not only susceptible to
mistakes by revenue officers, but also slows down the auditing process. Besides, they are
aggressively suspicious about the reliability of the statements prepared by taxpayers, which has
influenced the tax attitude of the taxpayers that is a key factor in tax compliance. In addition to
this, tax officers lack uniform and satisfactory responses for the taxpayers’ questions. Taxpayers
do not timely keep adequate record for the purpose of assessment. There is inconsistency in record
keeping by taxpayers. Most of taxpayers do not timely submit books of record for assessment
purpose; taxpayers are not paying their debt as soon as they received assessment notification.
Sometime taxpayers rise irrelevant and taking points then they appeal top review committee
through core process owner for the purpose of getting additional time, and execution of reduction.
Taxpayers have limited ability regarding tax knowledge and competent accountants to keep
accounts. It is also observed that there exist lacks of sufficiently educated taxpayers with poorly
trained employees. Taxpayers perform deliberate submission of nil returns. Tax payers do have
problems regarding the acceptance of the statement that they believed was maintained properly. It
is also observed that taxpayers prepare of financial statement showing low profit for the sake of
paying reduced corporate profit tax and even there is also no willingness to submit complete
financial documents for audit. Preparation and maintenance of accounting records by unqualified
individual and without license is also one factor that affects the income tax administration.
Taxpayers continuously complain on the bureaucratic civil service procedures existing in the tax
office, when they went there for getting support or complain about different situations at their
hand. The major causes for the aforementioned challenges or problems on profit tax administration
are:
Absence of willingness and poor understanding about tax proclamations, rules and
regulations by taxpayers
Lack of paying attention to follow up the frequent government policies
Confusion due to frequent change of policies
Delayed tax assessment process by the authority
Lack of sustainable educative promotion by the government
Lack of sufficient, incompetent and motivated tax officers
The bureaucracy of offices
Lack of close follow up by law income accomplisher and controlling process
Unwillingness to give clear information by taxpayers
Lack of willingness to provide information by third party
Lack of awareness of the applicable tax proclamations and laws by taxpayers and few tax
officers
Complexity in understanding tax laws and proclamation
Regarding about VAT assessment and collection problems, Due to lack of manpower, Jigjiga city
Administration tax officers are not able to follow up whether all taxpayers declared and paid tax
for each tax period since they have registered. In addition, they are not able to make sure that
whether all taxpayers that must be registered were really registered. Due to this there exist
taxpayers, who collect tax from customers but not identified properly. Furthermore, the study
found out from the interviews that some of the tax officers have no clear vision of their duty and
responsibilities. Moreover, the tax collectors did not have adequate skills. The tax office is unable
to follow up whether printing presses prepare invoices based on the given permission letters.
Besides, it is unable to follow up the use of illegal invoice by the taxpayers. From the interview
made with tax officers, the decision-making process within the core process show that it is not
participatory. This may force the subordinates not to take part in the core process activities and
lack of willingness to implement decision. It also creates conflict within the core process, which
hinders the effectiveness of the core process. The organization also gives less attention on
employee training and personal development. There exist lack of identification of documents and
shortage of strict assessment system. This failure has an impact on collection.
The major causes for the aforementioned assessment and collection problems are summarized as
follows:
Regarding about Rental income tax assessment and collection problems, One major problem
observed from the tax office was lack of stiff search and control of registered and unregistered
rental income taxpayers due to insufficient number of employees to perform this duty. The major
causes for the rental income tax assessment and collection problems are as follows: