0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views4 pages

Peer Pressure Impact on Grade 10 Students

Uploaded by

jevsprinting
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views4 pages

Peer Pressure Impact on Grade 10 Students

Uploaded by

jevsprinting
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter IV

Presentation Analysis, and Interpretation of Data

This chapter presents the interpretation of the data and discusses the results of the

study. The results were presented in the following parts:(1) Descriptive Data Analysis and (2)

Inferential Data Analysis.

Part One, Descriptive Data Analysis, presents the descriptive analysis of the socio

demographic profile of the respondents.

Part Two, Inferential Data Analysis, presents the significant differences and the

level of influence of negative peer pressure and positive peer pressure to the Grade 10 Student's

of Marciano M. Patricio National High School as a whole and in terms of age, sex, family

income, and section.

Data needed for this quantitative-descriptive research were gathered using the

researcher-made questionnaire.

In analyzing the data, the following statistical tools were employed: Slovin’s

Formula which means n = N / (1 + Ne2) Where: n = Number of samples, N = Total population

and e = Error tolerance (level).


Table 2. Demographic profile of the respondents
Profile Frequency Percent

Age

14 - 15 years old 20 13.2

16 – 17 years old 131 86.8

Sex

Male 61 40.1

Female 90 59.6

Grade 10 Sections

10A 26 17.2

10B 29 19.2

10C 29 19.2

10D 25 16.6

10E 16 10.6

10F 17 11.3

10 G 9 6.0

Family Monthly Income

10,000 above 90 53.9

5,001 - 10, 000 49 29.3

5, 000 - below 13 7

Total 151 100

Table 1 shows the distribution of respondents in terms of age. showing that the frequency of

students aging from 14-15 is twenty (20) having a percentage of thirteen point two (13.2)

percent, and a frequency of one hundred and thirty-one (131) students aging16-17. having a
percentage of eighty-6 point three (86.8). It implies that the majority of the respondent’s age was

16 – 17 years old. In the distribution of respondents in terms of sex, showing that the frequency

of male respondents is sixty-one (61). which is forty-four (40.4) percent, and a frequency of

ninety (90) female respondents, having a percentage of fifty-nine point 6 (59.6) of the total

respondents. Another data signifies the shows the distribution of Respondents in terms of

section, showing that twenty-six (26) of the respondents is coming from the Grade 10-A, twenty-

nine (29) coming from the 10-B Section. twenty-nine (29) coming from the 10-C, twenty-five (5)

coming from the 10-D, sixteen (16) coming from the 10-E, seventeen (17) coming from the 10-F,

nine (9) coming from the 10-G. A total of one hundred fifty-one (151) sample size. Lastly, when

it comes family income it shows that sixty-one (61) of the total respondents is having a 5.000

below family income, seventy five (75) respondents having a 5,000-10,000 family income, and

sisxty one (14) respondents having a 10.000 up monthly family income.

Table 6 shows that the level of peer pressure in the academic performance of grade 10

students of Marciano M. Patricio National High School section preferences is having a

mean of (3.66) in terms of peer influences a mean of (3.70) in terms of parent's influences

and a mean of (4.07) in terms of financial status and were all included in the scale of 3.41-

4.20 which were all interpreted as "High", meaning that the external factors has a high

level of influence to the Grade 10 students section preferences as a whole and in terms of

peer's influences, parent's influences and financial status. As affirmed to the study of

Ahmed et al., 2017 the career choice of the students was influenced by the level of their

social status, financial resources, affordability, and future employability.


Table 3. The level of peer pressure in the academic performance of Marciano M. Patricio

National High School Grade 10 Student's academic performance..

Mean Description SD

Positive peer 76.00 4.3 0.66

pressure

Table 3. The level of peer pressure in the academic performance of Marciano M. Patricio

National High School Grade 10 Student's academic performance.

Mean Description SD

peer pressure 3.38 1.

In this table Negative peer pressure is the influence a person faces to do something they wouldn't

normally do or don't want to do as a way of fitting in with a social group. People often face negative

peer pressure to drink alcohol, do drugs, or have sex.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The socio-demographic profile, including age, sex, and family income, offers a critical backdrop for understanding experiences with peer pressure. Most respondents were aged 16-17 (86.8%), with more female students (59.6%) participating. The family income varied, influencing students' vulnerability to peer pressure. Higher income families reported distinct peer pressure experiences influencing academics more compared to lower-income families, highlighting socio-economic variations in experiencing peer pressure .

Peer pressure is perceived to have a high level of influence on the academic performance of Grade 10 students at Marciano M. Patricio National High School. The study highlights external factors such as peer influences, parent's influences, and financial status all interpreted as 'High' influence levels (mean scores: peer influences 3.70, parent's influences not explicitly mentioned, financial status 4.07) which suggests that these factors significantly affect students' academic choices and performance .

The findings suggest educators should focus on mitigating negative peer influences while bolstering positive influences to enhance academic performance. Understanding students' socio-demographic factors can guide personalized interventions. Educators might foster environments where parental involvement complements school efforts, adapting strategies to different income levels to reduce disadvantage impacts, thereby maximizing academic achievements and student well-being .

Respondents with higher family incomes (10,000 and above) experience peer pressure differently from those with lower incomes. The study indicates financial status impacts peer pressure dynamics, where higher income families' students report high levels of influence from peer and parent pressures (financial status mean of 4.07), which subsequently affects their academic performance and school section preferences .

Younger students aged 14-15 are less represented (13.2%), but face pressure distinct from older students (16-17 years old, 86.8%), who are at a crucial age for identity formation and susceptibility to peer influence. This age group experiences strong external influences, impacting their academic and personal choices, thereby indicating a heightened vulnerability to peer pressure at these formative years .

Descriptive analysis provides a fundamental understanding by detailing the socio-demographic profiles and baseline peer pressure statistics. In contrast, inferential analysis goes further by evaluating significant differences and relationships, showing how age, sex, and family income influence peer pressure experiences and academic outcomes, leading to broader generalizations beyond the sample .

Parents' influence holds significant sway, slightly higher than peer influences, on students' academic preferences. The mean score for parent's influences implies a similar or higher level of impact as peers, suggesting that Grade 10 students weigh parents' guidance heavily when making academic choices, corroborating findings by Ahmed et al. on social influences .

Section allocation influences peer pressure by grouping students into social environments where peer influence varies. For instance, some sections like 10B and 10C show distinct dynamics in peer interactions leading to varied academic influences, as noted by the distribution of students in these sections. Sections with a strong peer influence culture may exhibit higher levels of external pressure impacting academic performances .

Slovin’s Formula was employed to analyze the data, with the formula n = N / (1 + Ne2), where 'n' is the number of samples, 'N' is the total population, and 'e' is the error tolerance level. This formula helped determine the sample size needed for the research .

Negative peer pressure compels students to engage in undesirable activities to fit in, whereas positive peer pressure encourages academic and personal growth by pushing students toward beneficial challenges. Descriptive data indicate that positive peer pressure positively impacts students' academic performances with a high mean score (4.3), suggesting that it has a more structured influence than negative peer pressure, which lacks a similar beneficial impact .

You might also like