Skill Development and Unemployment in India
Uploaded by
Rudra DevaSkill Development and Unemployment in India
Uploaded by
Rudra DevaCommon questions
Powered by AIThe 'Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana' (PMKVY) is a government initiative designed to provide free skill training to India's youth. Key components of the PMKVY include government-covered training fees, short-term training programs lasting 150 to 300 hours, placement assistance by training partners, and the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) to certify individuals with existing skills. PMKVY aims to address the skill gap and enhance employability among the youth, although it faces challenges like low job placement rates, with only 15% of trained individuals securing employment .
The 'Skill India' initiative has faced significant challenges in effectively addressing the skill gap and employing the country's youth. Although it aims to train 300 million people by 2022, only 25 million had been trained by the end of 2018. Issues such as mismanagement, low fund utilization due to lack of candidates, and low job placement rates for trainees (dropping from over 50% to 30%) contribute to its limited effectiveness. Even with initiatives like the Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY), only 15% of those trained secured jobs. Moreover, inadequacies in training capacity and a weak industry interface further hinder its success .
The main challenges facing skill development in India include insufficient training capacity, lack of entrepreneurship skills, low industry interface, low student mobilization, and employers' unwillingness to recruit. These challenges hinder employment opportunities because the training provided is not sufficient to ensure job placement, and there is a low conversion rate of trainees to entrepreneurs, as only 24% of trainees started their business post-training. Additionally, most training institutes lack strong industry connections, which negatively impacts placement records and salary offers. The low awareness about skill programs among youth and limited investment appetite from industries also contribute to high unemployment rates .
The unemployment rate among educated individuals and those with formal training tends to be higher than the general youth unemployment rate. Specifically, 33% of formally trained 15-29-year-olds were jobless according to the PLFS for 2018, which surpasses the general unemployment rate among 15-29-year-olds of 23.7%. This indicates that despite having education and training, these individuals are facing greater challenges in securing employment compared to their untrained counterparts .
Government expenditure on education and training plays a critical role in shaping the success of India's skill development initiatives. The decline in government allocation for school education from 2.81% of the budget in 2013-14 to 2.05% in 2018-19 has created an alarming situation that undermines the foundation needed for effective skill training. Without adequate funding, skill development programs struggle to reach their full potential and face challenges such as insufficient training capacity and low job placement rates. Therefore, increased government investment in education is essential to prepare the ground for successful training and better employability outcomes .
The 'National Skill Development Mission' (NSDM) aims to create a coordinated approach to skill training across India by fostering convergence across sectors and states. It seeks to harmonize skill training activities and expedite decision-making processes to achieve skilling at scale with speed and standards. Through initiatives like the Skill India Portal, NSDM integrates data from central ministries, state governments, private training providers, and corporates, facilitating a unified skill development ecosystem .
The skill training participation rate in India is significantly lower compared to developed countries, with only 2.3% of the workforce having undergone formal skill training. In contrast, countries like the UK, Germany, USA, Japan, and South Korea have participation rates of 68%, 75%, 52%, 80%, and 96% respectively. This low participation rate contributes to a skill shortage in the Indian job market, where 48% of employers report difficulties filling vacancies. Consequently, this skill gap leads to higher unemployment rates, even among educated individuals, and limits the growth and competitiveness of Indian industries .
Increasing industry interface in India's training institutes could significantly enhance employment outcomes by aligning skill training programs with market demands. This would ensure that students gain relevant industry-specific skills, improving their employability upon course completion. Stronger connections between training institutes and industries could lead to improved placement records and better salary offers, addressing the current gap between skills acquired through training and those needed in the workforce. Ultimately, this could reduce unemployment rates by creating a job-ready workforce matched to the needs of employers .
To improve the quality and standards of skill development training in India, several measures have been introduced. These include reforms to the Apprenticeship Act of 1961 to simplify the engagement of apprentices, the dual system of training inspired by Germany for industry exposure, and the roll-out of new-age courses such as smart healthcare and 3D printing. Additionally, the creation of the Indian Skill Development Services and the establishment of the Indian Institute of Skills aim to raise the stature of skill training to match that of prestigious institutions like IIMs and IITs. These initiatives collectively focus on enhancing training quality and relevance to industry needs .
The 'Dual System of Training' adopted from Germany offers potential benefits for India's skill development programs by providing students with industry-led training and exposure, thereby bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. This model enhances employability by ensuring that trainees acquire skills directly relevant to industry needs. However, challenges include the necessity for robust partnerships between industries and training institutes and an alignment of curricula with industry standards. Infrastructure and institutional readiness are also critical to effectively implement this system and maximize its benefits .