0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views5 pages

Gun Control Research Insights

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views5 pages

Gun Control Research Insights

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1

Gun control research

Student’s Name

Course

Institution

Date

Professor
2

Gun control research

Newman, B. J., & Hartman, T. K. (2019). Mass shootings and public support for gun control.

British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1527-1553.

[Link]

The authors’ research on mass shootings and public support for gun control raise vital questions

about these tragic events that impact public policy and mass opinion. The article

integrates contextual trajectories, insight focus events, and perceived threats of public

deaths by calling for more support in controlling continuous deaths and making of severe

impacts of gun violence more salient. Drawing shreds of evidence from numerous data

sources on mass shootings and gun violence, the authors of this journal pair massive N-

data surveys among Asians, whites, Latinos, and African American young populations to

demonstrate the increasing proximity of public deaths and the need to support more strict

gun control measures. The authors indicate that the effects of mass killing do not vary

due to partnership but rather as salient related factors such as recency, magnitude, and

repetition of the same gun control policies. Therefore, this peer-reviewed journal will

help provide contextual analysis of existing gun policies, demand for policy change, and

egregious violence among different sets of individuals. The authors of this journal,

Newman and Hartman, are recognized American scholars.

Toch, H., & Lizotte, A. J. (2019). Research and policy: The case of gun control. In Psychology

and social policy (pp. 223-240). Taylor & Francis.9781315793030

Toch and Lizotte’s book research on gun violence and gun control policy argue that it is

challenging to end gun-related crime as most of the United States population has access
3

to this dangerous weapon. This research suggests that reducing the number of licensed

gun dealers is an amicable solution to reducing gun availability. Drawing evidence from

real experimental studies and tests across the United States, for instance, interviewing the

high school-age population of African Americans, whites, Asians, and Latinos, the

authors of this book provide special documentation of gun control measures that will

reduce violence and the growth of gang activities. Therefore, with this empirical evidence

and insights, this book will critically assess barriers, availability, and destructive urges in

understanding gun control and violence across the United States. The book is analyzed by

Hans Toch and Lizotte, distinguished criminologists and psychology experts. Besides, the

book provides evident facts using images and data sets to explain the lethality and

brutality of gun possession among the public.


4

Reflection

A credible source is vital in evaluating information; therefore, I fully understand the

questions required when preparing my research sources. One essential question I ask myself is

who are the sources of information or the authors, and are they clear to general the audience?

Thus, it is easier to assess biased information with this question, especially when addressing

sensitive audiences. The depth and objectivity of the sources are vital because a reliable source

provides a summary of essential facts discussed in the entire journal, book, article, or any other

form of the data source.

This assessment of the source's credibility is beneficial in my academic progress, let

alone the research process, because it helps match important information with the topic

requirement for good research. Since research begins with wanting to know about something,

preliminary evaluations play a vital role in understanding, analyzing, problem-solving, and

decision-making for potentially credible solutions. Therefore, this evaluation plays a pivotal role

in the entire process of research formulation.


5

You might also like