0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views3 pages

Network Design Assignment Guidelines

Uploaded by

buffettmorandini
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views3 pages

Network Design Assignment Guidelines

Uploaded by

buffettmorandini
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

FIT9137 S1 2024 Assignment 2 – Network

Design PPT Presentation & Report – Marking Guide


Submission Guidelines:
● This assessment task is done individually, and you will be required to work to apply your
knowledge, to analyze network design topics.
● In this assessment you will develop a critique PowerPoint presentation on an RFP
Request for Proposal on the network design.
● This will cover the first four learning outcomes of the unit.
● All submissions are to be made via Moodle, where Turnitin is enabled.
● Assignments not submitted through Moodle will not be considered. Submissions must
be made by the due date. Assignments left in draft mode will also not be accepted.

The Turnitin similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of academic integrity
issues. Turnitin will check websites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class member
submissions for plagiarism. If this is a concern, you will have a chance to change your
assignment and re-submit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due
date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed, you cannot make re-submissions and
you will need to accept the similarity score as there will be no chance for changing. Thus, plan
early and submit early to take advantage of this feature. You can upload files multiple times in
draft mode, but please remember we only see the final submission, and the date and time you
submitted will be recorded.

Submission files:
● Your document should be a single pdf/PPT document containing your presentation
slides. In addition, you will be submitting the Video presentation file along with your
presentation slides.
● When you submit the assignment in Moodle, please make sure the submission is not left
in the draft mode. Before the expiry of the deadline make sure, the submission is made
final. If the submission is left in draft state, it will be deemed as NOT submitted and will
NOT be marked.

Warning: Important Submission check for every student: It is students’ responsibility to check
if their submitted work is markable by our teaching team. It is recommended that every student
immediately download their own work (e.g., recorded video/PDF file, etc) before finalising their
submission, and check if the assignment would be downloadable/readable/markable by a tutor.
If the teaching team is unable to mark your submission, your submission may receive a mark of
zero. Once you complete this check, make sure to finalise your submission by the due date and
time.
PPT Presentation – Marking
The following is suggested as presentation slides structure, but you can make it
instinctive and adapt to your requirements:
● Title page
● A Brief Summary of Problem Definition
● Important Information and Diagram listed in Section 2.1 (see assignment detail sheet)
● Conclusions and Recommendations
● References (You would usually stop here in your recorded video)
● Appendix (This may contain information listed in Section 2.2 and can only be included in
your slides not in video).
Note: Turnitin will be used to check for Plagiarism; disciplinary action will be taken
within the Monash Academic Integrity & Misconduct School policy and laws.

Allocation of Marks
Student ID’s Names

Assignment Assessment description Marks Marks Scored


Part-I: Network Design components based on the
Assignment specifications, relevancy, related
articles, technical design details and specifications
70
used, and other design requirements and clarity in
the design of all the other relevant network
components

Part-II: Presentation – Literature review with


relevancy to the topic selected, quality of PPT slides,
visual presentation, explanation, participation in
presentation with clear understanding of their
work, video and audio being clear. Note that the
30
students should show prowess in explanation,
knowledge and understanding while presentation.
Finally, the recording should be clear with student’s
voice and video with the recording showing the
presenters presence/face in the video.
100
General Assessment Rubric
Exceptional Admirable Acceptable Unsatisfactory

Extremely well
organized report; Presented in a thoughtful manner; Somewhat organized; ideas were Choppy and confusing; format
Presentation (30) logical format that there were signs of organization, not presented coherently, and was difficult to follow;
was easy to follow; and most transitions were easy to transitions were not always transitions of ideas were
flowed smoothly from follow, but at times ideas were smooth, which at times abrupt and seriously distracted
one idea to another unclear (15-24) distracted the reader (10-14) the reader (0-9)
and cleverly
conveyed; the
organization
enhanced
effectiveness of the
report (25-30)
Totally accurate and Mostly accurate and complete; Somewhat accurate and Completely inaccurate and
Completeness complete; all relevant
(30) a few inconsistencies, errors or complete; more than a few incomplete; many
information was
lack of information (15-24) inconsistencies, errors or lack of inconsistencies, errors or lack of
precise and explicit
information (10-14) information (0-9)
(25-30)
Showed detailed
understanding of topic. Showed above average
Went beyond to understanding of topic. Did a very Showed only a basic Exhibited little or no
Correctness (40) research information; good job of researching; utilized understanding of topic. Used the understanding of topic. Did not
solicited material in materials provided to their full material provided in an utilize resources effectively; did
addition to what was potential; solicited more than 6 acceptable manner, but did not little or no fact gathering on the
provided; brought in types of research to enhance report; consult any additional resources topic (1-14)
personal ideas and at times took the initiative to find (15-21)
information to enhance additional information (22-34)
report; and utilized
more than 8 additional
resources to support
report (35-40)

(End)

Common questions

Powered by AI

To achieve an exceptional rating, a student's presentation must be extremely well-organized and logically formatted, with smooth transitions that enhance effectiveness. It should also be presented thoughtfully, demonstrating a clear understanding of the topic and integrating personal insights and additional resources beyond those provided .

The key components to include in the network design critique presentation are: a title page, a brief summary of the problem definition, important information and diagrams as listed in Section 2.1 of the assignment detail sheet, conclusions and recommendations, and references. An appendix may also be included in the slides but not in the recorded video .

Turnitin helps maintain academic integrity by checking assignments against websites, journal articles, the web, and other student submissions to detect plagiarism. The similarity score informs students and instructors of potential integrity issues, allowing students to resubmit before the deadline if necessary. This process ensures originality and accountability in submissions .

Failure to comply with submission guidelines or deadlines may result in the assignment not being marked. Specific penalties include receiving a mark of zero if the submission is unreadable or left in draft mode past the deadline. Additionally, plagiarism issues detected by Turnitin could lead to disciplinary actions per Monash Academic Integrity policies .

The marking guide evaluates correctness based on detailed understanding of the topic, including the use of additional resources to support the report. Submissions must show evidence of going beyond the provided material by including personal ideas and more than eight additional resources. Points are allocated on a scale where an exceptional submission exhibits these qualities .

Students should ensure their submission is not left in draft mode and that it is finalized by the due date and time. It is recommended to download their submission to verify it is readable and markable. If not properly checked, submissions that cannot be marked by the teaching team may receive a mark of zero .

Submitting early allows students to utilize Turnitin's similarity score and make necessary changes before the deadline. If resubmission is needed to address similarity issues or improve the work, this can only occur before the cut-off time. Early submission also provides time to verify the submission's markability by downloading and reviewing it .

Elements contributing to a presentation being 'choppy and confusing' include a difficult-to-follow format and abrupt transitions between ideas, which seriously distract the reader. These issues indicate poor organization and clarity .

Students are expected to utilize more than eight additional resources to enhance their network design report. These resources should be beyond the provided materials and demonstrate in-depth research and personal input into the topic. This approach helps in meeting the expectations for correctness .

Conclusions and recommendations summarize the analysis and provide actionable insights and future directions based on the network design critique. They should be formulated by synthesizing the information presented in the problem definition, supporting data, and diagrams, ensuring they are logical and evidence-based .

You might also like