Network Design Assignment Guidelines
Network Design Assignment Guidelines
To achieve an exceptional rating, a student's presentation must be extremely well-organized and logically formatted, with smooth transitions that enhance effectiveness. It should also be presented thoughtfully, demonstrating a clear understanding of the topic and integrating personal insights and additional resources beyond those provided .
The key components to include in the network design critique presentation are: a title page, a brief summary of the problem definition, important information and diagrams as listed in Section 2.1 of the assignment detail sheet, conclusions and recommendations, and references. An appendix may also be included in the slides but not in the recorded video .
Turnitin helps maintain academic integrity by checking assignments against websites, journal articles, the web, and other student submissions to detect plagiarism. The similarity score informs students and instructors of potential integrity issues, allowing students to resubmit before the deadline if necessary. This process ensures originality and accountability in submissions .
Failure to comply with submission guidelines or deadlines may result in the assignment not being marked. Specific penalties include receiving a mark of zero if the submission is unreadable or left in draft mode past the deadline. Additionally, plagiarism issues detected by Turnitin could lead to disciplinary actions per Monash Academic Integrity policies .
The marking guide evaluates correctness based on detailed understanding of the topic, including the use of additional resources to support the report. Submissions must show evidence of going beyond the provided material by including personal ideas and more than eight additional resources. Points are allocated on a scale where an exceptional submission exhibits these qualities .
Students should ensure their submission is not left in draft mode and that it is finalized by the due date and time. It is recommended to download their submission to verify it is readable and markable. If not properly checked, submissions that cannot be marked by the teaching team may receive a mark of zero .
Submitting early allows students to utilize Turnitin's similarity score and make necessary changes before the deadline. If resubmission is needed to address similarity issues or improve the work, this can only occur before the cut-off time. Early submission also provides time to verify the submission's markability by downloading and reviewing it .
Elements contributing to a presentation being 'choppy and confusing' include a difficult-to-follow format and abrupt transitions between ideas, which seriously distract the reader. These issues indicate poor organization and clarity .
Students are expected to utilize more than eight additional resources to enhance their network design report. These resources should be beyond the provided materials and demonstrate in-depth research and personal input into the topic. This approach helps in meeting the expectations for correctness .
Conclusions and recommendations summarize the analysis and provide actionable insights and future directions based on the network design critique. They should be formulated by synthesizing the information presented in the problem definition, supporting data, and diagrams, ensuring they are logical and evidence-based .