0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views1 page

Standalone Screens in Angola's Girassol Field

Uploaded by

Raed fouad
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views1 page

Standalone Screens in Angola's Girassol Field

Uploaded by

Raed fouad
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

174 Standalone Screens

A further modern example of the successful use of standalone screens is found in


Angola with the deepwater Girassol field (Delattre et al., 2004; Petit and Iqbal,
2007). Here, the uniformities are reasonably low (D40/D90 between 1.8 and 7.7 and
averaging 3), but laminated shales are present and cut by the wells giving a net-to-
gross of 50–70%. Wire-wrapped standalone screens are used in high-angle wells.
Frac packs are preferred for lower-angle wells, stacked reservoirs or for fine sands.
Base pipe screens of 6 5/8 in. are used to limit horizontal pressure drops, and this
required the use of 9 1/2 in. reservoir sections and 10 3/4 in. production casing.
Originally, large shale sections were isolated with ECPs, but this technique has now
been abandoned as rock testing identified that the shale intervals would creep and
self isolate without forming excess quantities of fines. Wire-wrapped screens were
chosen because of their self-cleaning design. Testing identified no advantage with
the higher inflow area of premium screens. The mud is thoroughly conditioned
(210 mesh) before the screens are run with some finer solids mud (310 mesh)
spotted across the open hole. A feature of these high-rate wells is a rigorous,
systematic clean-up approach (step rates of 2000 bpd) to ensure that stable arches
form at low rates where velocities and erosion rates are low. PLTs have shown an
even flow along the well – the key to minimising screen erosion. A uniform inflow
profile would equate to a maximum radial velocity of 0.07 ft/sec compared with
erosion requiring velocities of a few feet/second. Given the expense of performing
PLTs, skin factors from pressure build-up analyses can be used to predict the
effective percentage contribution along the well length. After five years of
production, the separators were cleaned and the sand excavated was consistent with
sand produced through screen gaps. Indeed correctly designed standalone screens
(and expandable screens) will likely produce continuous fine sand. This feature
needs to be communicated to those engineers designing the surface/subsea facilities.

3.5.3. Testing and selection of screens and completion fluids


Given that the use of uniformity and fines content guidelines is now, where possible,
being replaced by mechanical testing using real screen and formation samples, the
question arises how these tests should be performed. The development of bridging
against a screen can be simulated as can plugging of the natural sand pack or
screen along with solids production through the screen. For a standalone screen
(as opposed to a gravel pack or compliantly expanded screen), the rock will
generally fail and be transported to the screen. A slurry test is therefore appropriate
for the selection of screens. These tests have the advantage of being able to compare
dissimilar types of screens, that is, wire-wrapped versus woven ‘nominal’ screens.
Various attempts have been made to compare the performance of different filtration
technologies, for example, precise glass micro-beads or using screen performance
curves (Underdown et al., 1999; Constien and Skidmore, 2006), but they all suffer
due to the uniqueness of formation sand and how different types of screens respond
to the ranges in sand particles.
Several rules of thumb are available for screen sizing. These are widely used for
wire-wrapped screens or the equivalent-sized pre-pack and premium screen where
the equivalence has been assessed. Coberly (1937) suggested a criterion of 2  D10

Common questions

Powered by AI

Standalone screen tests simulate bridging against a screen, plugging of the natural sand pack or screen, and solids production through the screen, allowing for the appropriate selection of screens. Such tests are advantageous because they enable comparison between dissimilar screen types, like wire-wrapped versus woven screens, despite the uniqueness of formation sand which affects screen performance in varying sand particle ranges. These tests highlight the mechanical reliability of the screen by using real screen and formation samples, creating a practical basis for decision making .

Wire-wrapped screens in the Girassol field offer a design that promotes self-cleanliness without requiring the expansive inflow area provided by premium screens, which testing found unnecessary. This advantage is particularly important in handling the often complex nature of the formation sands and ensuring efficient sand control and long-term reliability, contributing to reduced operational costs and maintenance needs .

In the Girassol field, mud conditioning (using 210 mesh, with finer solids mud of 310 mesh spotted across the open hole) is critical to prevent clogging and ensure efficient operation of wire-wrapped standalone screens. This thorough conditioning process minimizes the inclusion of large particles that could block the screens, thereby maintaining effective filtration and sand control .

A uniform inflow profile minimizes screen erosion in high-rate wells of the Girassol field by ensuring even flow distribution along the well. This balance reduces localized high flow velocities that can cause erosion. Stable arches that form at lower rates help maintain these uniform profiles by providing structural support to the formation, thus protecting screens from wear induced by excessive flow turbulence and velocity variations .

In the Girassol field, the use of ECPs was abandoned because rock testing indicated that the shale intervals would creep and self-isolate without generating excess fines. This natural ability to isolate effectively negated the need for ECPs, optimizing the process by removing this step .

A slurry test is appropriate for the selection of standalone screens because it effectively simulates conditions where the formation rock fails and is transported to the screen. Unlike gravel packs or compliantly expanded screens, standalone screens must handle entire solids and formation fragments. Slurry tests provide insights into how screens will perform under realistic flow conditions, offering a reliable method for assessing their capability to manage physical loads and sand production .

Wire-wrapped standalone screens are more suitable for high-angle wells in the Girassol field due to their self-cleaning design that efficiently manages the flow and prevents screen erosion. The systematic clean-up approach with step rates of 2000 bpd ensures the formation of stable arches at low rates, minimizing flow velocities and erosion. Additionally, the use of wire-wrapped screens was preferred over premium screens because testing identified no advantage in the higher inflow area provided by premium screens .

Comparing different filtration technologies presents challenges due to the uniqueness of formation sand and the diverse responses of screens to various sand particle ranges. This uniqueness makes it difficult to establish standardized comparison criteria, thus complicating decision-making. The variances in sand composition and behavior necessitate customized testing and evaluation for each specific setting, limiting broad applicability of comparative results and requiring detailed case studies for accurate assessments .

Pressure build-up analyses offer a cost-effective alternative to Performing Production Logging Tests (PLTs), allowing the prediction of effective percentage contribution along the well length. In the Girassol field, this method ensures continuous monitoring and management of inflow profiles without incurring the expenses associated with frequent PLTs, enhancing the understanding of production dynamics and optimizing well management .

The continuous production of fine sand through screen gaps implies that surface or subsea facilities must be designed to handle this persistent presence of fines. This requires robust separation and handling systems to effectively manage the sand, ensuring that equipment wear and maintenance burdens are minimized. It is crucial to communicate this characteristic to engineering teams involved in designing the infrastructure to prevent operational issues .

You might also like