0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views9 pages

Structural Analysis for Forrester Center

Uploaded by

jason I
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views9 pages

Structural Analysis for Forrester Center

Uploaded by

jason I
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Rev0b

Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20


Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/1

CONNECTION:-C007 (Connection along grid line "F" between grid line "15"& "17"
in roof framing plan - Ref dwg. S2.2.)
(Code:- ASD 15th Edition)

LOADS :- Vertical shear


Incoming_Beam  "HSS14X4X1/2" V  26kip (Half UDL)

3/8" THK SHEAR PLATE


(13/16" X 1" SSL HOLES)

1/2
#
5/16 (CJP)
5/16 1/4
45° HSS 14X4X1/2 (LLV)
HSS 5X5X5/16

(TYP)
1"
14

(TYP)
121" 5/16
4"

1
(TYP) 2"
1"

1/2" THK CLOSURE PLATE


4"

1/4
1/4
(TYP)
(MIN)
5"
8

1/2

3/8" THK WEB PLATE


@ BEAM C/L

#
AVOID PLATE EXTENSION AT TOP WALL AND PROVIDE
CJP WELD,IF PLATE EXTENSION & FILLET WELD IS NOT
ACCEPTABLE AT THIS LOCATION

Notes:-

All bolts are 3/4" dia, grade A325 N type.

All bolt holes in web plate are STD & SSL holes (13/16" X 1") in shear plate.

Weld electrode is E70XX.

All HSS are A500-Grade C and connection plates are grade A36.
Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/2

Sectional properties :-
Column  "HSS5X5X5/16"
2
dc  5  in bfc  5  in tc  0.313  in tcdes  0.291  in Ac  5.26  in

Incoming_Beam  "HSS14X4X1/2"
2
db  14  in bfb  4  in tfb  0.5  in tfbdes  0.465  in Ab1  15.3  in

Material properties :-
Yield strength of A36 material Fyc  36ksi UItimate strength of A36 material Fuc  58ksi

Yield strength of A500 grade C Fyh  50ksi UItimate strength of A500 grade C Fuh  62ksi
material (Rectangular) material (Rectanglular)
Nominal shear strength of A325 bolt Fnv  54  ksi Design strength of weld FEXX  70ksi

Bolt properties :-
Bolt diameter d  0.75in
Bolt grade (A325 or A490) BGr  "A325"

Connection type (N or SC or X) Type  N


Hole type (in web plate) Hole  "STD"
Hole type (in shear plate) Hole1  "SSL"
Thickness of shear plate ts  0.375in

Bolt spacing S  4in


End clearance ecl  1in
End distance (Vertical) ev  1.25in

End distance (Horizontal) eh  1.5in

Thickness of closure plate tcp  0.5in


Thickness of web plate ts2  0.375in

Diameter of hole Dh  0.8125  in

Length of slot Dh1  1in


2
π d 2
Area of bolt Ab  Ab  0.442  in
4
Shear capacity of bolt Scap  0.5Fnv  Ab Scap  11.93  kip

Check for Bolts :-


Number of bolt Rows nr  3
Number of bolt column nc  1

Total number of bolts n  nr  nc n3


Dh1  d
Eccentricity b/w CG of bolt group and force e  ecl  eh  e  2.625  in
acting point 2
Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/3

Coefficient C  2.241

Shear capacity of bolt group Fs  C  Scap Fs  26.73  kip

F.s(26.73 kip) > V(26 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for bearing/tearing capacity of shear plate/ web plate:-


tmin  min t s ts2 
  Dh  
Bearing / tearing capacity at T1  min 1.2  d  tmin  Fuc 0.6   ev    tmin  Fuc Scap T1  11.01  kip
extreme bolt   2  
Bearing / tearing capacity at
intermediate bolt
  
T2  min 1.2  d  tmin  Fuc 0.6  S  Dh  tmin  Fuc Scap T2  11.93  kip

C
Bearing / tearing capacity of the shear plate
 
Ra  nc T1  nr  1 T2 
 n  Ra  26.05  kip

R.a(26.05 kip) > V(26 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for shear capacity of Incoming HSS wall :-

Clear depth 
h  db  2  2.25  tfb  h  11.75  in
2
Gross shear area Agn  h  tfbdes Agn  5.464  in

Web plate buckling coefficient k v  5 (For unstiffened web)

Es  29000ksi

h Es
Web shear coefficient Cv  1 if  1.10  k v  Cv  1
tfbdes Fyh

Es
1.10 kv
Fyh Es h Es
if 1.10 kv   1.37 kv
h Fyh tfbdes Fyh
tfbdes

1.51Es  k v h Es
if  1.37 kv
2 tfbdes Fyh
 h  F
t  yh
 fbdes 
Shear capacity Fap1  2  0.4  Agn  Fyh  Cv Fap1  218.55  kip

F.ap1(218.55 kip) > V(26 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for shear capacity of shear plate/ web plate :-

 nr  1  S  2ev  tmin


2
Gross shear area Ag  Ag  3.94  in

 1  2
Net shear area An  Ag  nr Dh  in  t An  2.953  in
 16  min

Shear capacity 
Fcap  min 0.3An  Fuc 0.4  Ag  Fyc  Fcap  51.38  kip

[Link](51.38 kip) > V(26 kip): Therefore O.K.


Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/4

Check for block shear capacity of shear plate/ web plate:-

 nr  1  S  ev  tmin


2
Gross shear area Agv  Agv  3.469  in

 n  0.5  D  1 in  t 
 r  h 16  min 2
Net shear area Anv  Agv  Anv  2.648  in

  1 
Net tension area


Ant  eh  nc  0.5  Dh1 
 16  min

in  t Ant  0.363  in
2

Ubs  1 (Reduction Coefficient ) (Refer J4.3 AISC 15th Ed)

Block shear capacity  


Bcap  min 0.3Agv  Fyc 0.3Anv  Fuc  Ubs  0.5  Ant  Fuc Bcap  48.00  kip

[Link](48 kip) > V(26 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for thickness of shear plate :-


Depth of shear plate Dp   nr  1  S  2  ev Dp  10.5  in

C1  7.852  in

Moment strength of bolt group Mmax  1.11  Fnv  Ab  C1 Mmax  207.93  kip  in

d 1
Maximum thickness of shear plate Tpmax   in if nc = 1  eh  2  d Tpmax  0.44  in
2 16
6Mmax
if nc  1
2
Fyh  Dp
[Link](0.44 in) > t.s(0.375 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for combined flexural and shear stress of shear plate/ web plate (Gross ) :-

Eccentricity between first column of Dh1  d


e1  ecl  eh  e1  2.625  in
bolt and connection interface 2

Clear depth of shear plate 


Dp  nr  1 S  2  ev  Dp  10.5  in
2
Gross shear area Agv  Dp  tmin Agv  3.937  in

Shear capacity Vcap  0.4  Agv  Fyc Vcap  56.7  kip

 D 2  t 
p min 3
Plastic section modulus Zmod    Zmod  10.34  in
 4 
Moment capacity of shear plate Mcap  0.6  Zmod  Fyc Mcap  18.6  kip  ft
2
 V    V  e1 
2
Ratio of combined flexural R1    R1  0.304
 Mcap 
and shear stress  Vcap 
1 > R.1(0.304): Therefore O.K.
Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/5

Check for combined flexural and shear stress of shear plate/ web plate( Net ) :-
 n  1  S  2e   1 
 r 
2
Net shear area Anv  v nr Dh  in  t Anv  2.953  in
  16  min

Shear capacity Vcap  0.3  Anv  Fuc Vcap  51.384  kip

 t  D 2   D  1 in  S  n 2 
 min  p  h 16  r 
      7.383  in3
Net Plastic modulus Zneteve  
of the shear plate  4 
  2  1   1   
2
  2  in 
 min  p  h 16   r
t  D  D  in  S  n  1   Dh 
  16    3
Znetodd     7.639  in
 4 

c  mod nr 2 

3
Net plastic modulus of the shear plate Znet  Zneteve if c = 0 Znet  7.639  in

Znetodd if c = 1

Moment capacity of shear plate Mcap  0.5  Znet  Fuc Mcap  18.46  kip  ft

2  V e  2
 V 

1
Ratio of combined flexural R1    R1  0.351
 Mcap 
and shear stress  Vcap 
1 > R.1(0.351): Therefore O.K.

Check for buckling capacity of shear plate :-


2
Dp  ts
3
Elastic section modulus Smod  Smod  6.89  in
6

First bolt distance



db  nr  1  S 
dbd  dbd  3  in
2

  e1    dbd 
Cb1   3  ln  1  Cb1  1.153
  Dp    Dp 

Lateral torsional buckling modification factor Cb  Cb1 if Cb1  1.84 Cb  1.84

1.84 otherwise

Young's modulus Es  29000ksi


1.9  Es  Cb
Critical buckling stress Fcr  Fcr  517.27  ksi
 e1  Dp 
 
 t 2 
 s 
Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/6

Plastic bending momemnt Mp  Fyh  Zmod Mp  516.8  kip  in

Ms  V  e1 Ms  68.25  kip  in

Yielding of the plate


 e1  Dp   0.08  Es 
Mn  
0.6  min Mp 1.6  Fyh  Smod   2    F 
if
 ts  
yh 

   e1  Dp  Fyh   0.08  Es   e1  Dp   1.9  Es 


0.6 min Cb  1.52  0.274       Fyh  Smod Mp if   
   t 2  Es    Fyh   t 2   Fyh 
   s     s 
 e1  Dp   1.9  Es 
0.6 min  Fcr  Smod Mp if   Mn  310.08  kip  in
 t 2   Fyh 
 s 
M.n(310.08 kip-in) > M.s(68.25 kip-in): Therefore O.K.

Check for weld b/w shear plate and supporting column :-


Length of weld  
Lw  nr  1  S  2  ev Lw  10.5  in

V kip
Shear force per inch on weld FL  FL  1.24 
2  Lw in
 FL 5 
Size of fillet weld required D  max   ts  16 D  3.75  in
per 16th of inch  0.707  0.3FEXX 8 

Adopt 1/4 inch FW  FL 


6.19    16 ksi
 0.707  0.3FEXX 
Minimum thickness required for tmin  tmin  0.142  in
connection material Fuc

t.s(0.375 in) > [Link](0.142 in): Therefore O.K.

 FL 
3.09    16 ksi
Minimum thickness required for HSS wall
 0.707  0.3FEXX 
tmin  tmin  0.066  in
Fuh
[Link](0.291 in) > [Link](0.066 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for weld b/w web plate and closure plate :-


Length of weld
  
Lw1  min db  nr  1  S  2ev
 Lw1  10.5  in

V kip
Shear force per inch on weld FL  FL  1.238 
2Lw1 in

 Dh1  d 
Induced moment due to vertical shear M2  V   2  eh  ecl  0.5in   M2  120.25  kip  in
 2 
Dispersion length Ddis  tfbdes  2.5  tcp Ddis  1.715  in
Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/7

M2
Couple force Cf  Cf  8.91  kip
db  tfb

Cf kip
Tension/ Compression force FT  FT  2.6 
per inch on weld 2Ddis in

2 2 kip
Resultant force per inch on weld R  FL  FT R  2.877 
in
 FT 
θ  atan  θ  64.51  deg
 FL 
 R 5 
Size of weld D  max   in  16 D  5  in

 0.707  0.31  0.5  sin ( θ) 1.5   FEXX 16 
 

Adopt 5/16 inch FW
R  16
3.09 
0.707  0.31  0.5  sin ( θ)   FEXX
1.5 
Minimum thickness of closure plate tmin   ksi tmin  0.116  in
Fuc

[Link](0.5 in) > [Link](0.116 in): Therefore O.K.


R  16
6.19 
0.707  0.31  0.5  sin ( θ)   FEXX
1.5 
Minimum thickness of web plate tmin   ksi tmin  0.232  in
Fuc

t.s2(0.375 in) > [Link](0.232 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for axial capacity of web plate @incoming HSS :-


Total load At1  Cf At1  8.907  kip

Axial capacity 
Acapt1  min 0.6  Ddis  ts2  Fyc 0.5  Ddis  ts2  Fuc  Acapt1  13.89  kip

A.capt1(13.89 kip) > A.t1(8.91 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for weld b/w closure plate and HSS bottom wall :-

Available length of weld 


Ddis1  min t s2  5tcp bfb  2  2.25  tfb  Ddis1  1.75  in

 Dh1  d 
Induced moment due to vertical shear M3  V   2  eh  ecl  0.5in  tcp   M3  133.25  kip  in
 2 
M3
Couple force Cf1  Cf1  9.87  kip
db  tfb
Cf1 kip
Tension/ Compression force FT  FT  5.64 
per inch on weld Ddis1 in

 FT 1 
Size of weld D1  max   in  16 D1  8  in
 0.707  0.3FEXX 2 
 
Adopt 1/2" Fillet Weld
Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/8

3.09  D1
Minimum thickness of closure plate tmin   ksi tmin  0.426  in
Fuc

[Link](0.5 in) > [Link](0.426 in): Therefore O.K.


3.09  D1
Minimum thickness of bottom HSS wall tmin   ksi tmin  0.399  in
Fuh
[Link](0.465 in) > [Link](0.399 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for axial capacity of top/ bottom HSS wall :-


Total load to HSS wall At2  Cf1 At2  9.87  kip

Axial capacity 
Acapt2  min 0.6  Ddis1  tfbdes  Fyh 0.5  Ddis1  tfbdes  Fuh  Acapt2  24.41  kip

A.capt2(24.41 kip) > A.t2(9.87 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for weld b/w closure plate and HSS vertical wall :-
Available length of weld Lw2  db  2  2.25  tfb Lw2  11.75  in

V kip
Shear force per inch on weld FL  FL  1.106 
2Lw2 in

 FL 5 
Size of fillet weld D3  max   in  16 D3  5  in
 0.707  0.3  FEXX 16 
 
Adopt 5/16" Fillet Weld
3.09  D3
Minimum thickness of closure plate tmin   ksi tmin  0.266  in
Fuc
[Link](0.5 in) > [Link](0.266 in): Therefore O.K.

3.09  D3
Minimum thickness of Vertical HSS wall tmin   ksi tmin  0.249  in
Fuh
[Link](0.465 in) > [Link](0.249 in): Therefore O.K.

Check for HSS column punching shear :-


 Dh1  d 
Induced moment due to eccentricity Mind  V   2  eh  ecl  0.5in   Mind  10.02  kip  ft
 2 
2
0.5  Fuh  tcdes  Lw
Moment capacity of HSS section Mch  Mch  16.58  kip  ft
5
[Link](16.58 kip-ft) > [Link](10.02 kip-ft): Therefore O.K

Check for ductility(Rectangular):-


Fyh
Dutility ratio Fduct  Fduct  0.81
Fuh

For ASTM A500 grade C, ductility ratio is acceptable


Client : STEELWORKS OF THE CAROLINAS Date : SEP- 20
Project : The New Forrester Center for Calc by : GSK
Behavioral Health Cked by : KVP
Job no : Revision : 00
Calc no : C007/9

Check for HSS Wall slenderness under shear loading (Rectangular):-


Young's modulus Es  29000 ksi

Width and thick ratio


 
max dc bfc  3  tcdes
s  s  14.18
tcdes

Es
Slenderness ratio of HSS a  1.40  a  33.72
Fyh
a(33.72) > s(14.18): Therefore O.K.

Check for HSS Wall slenderness:-

 dc bfc 
Slenderness ratio a  max    a  17.18
 tcdes tcdes 
a(17.18 ) < 40: Therefore O.K.

Check for incoming HSS beam wall local crippling :-


Bearing length N  ts2 N  0.375  in

  tfbdes 
1.5
2 6N  Es  Fyh  tcp
Crippling strength Acri  0.5  0.8  tfbdes 1   Acri  162.48  kip
 bfb  tcp   tfbdes
[Link](162.48 kip) > C.f1(9.87 kip): Therefore O.K.

Check for incoming HSS beam wall local yielding :-

Yielding strength Ayie  


0.67  Fyh  tfbdes 5  tcp  ts2  if 5  tcp  ts2  bfb Ayie  44.79  kip

0.67  Fyh  0.5Ab1 otherwise

[Link](44.79 kip) > C.f1(9.87 kip): Therefore O.K.

End of calculation.

You might also like