0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views6 pages

Community Development Methods Explained

Uploaded by

Amna Zaid
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views6 pages

Community Development Methods Explained

Uploaded by

Amna Zaid
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Social work:

Definitions

Social work is a professional service based upon scientific knowledge and skills in human relation
which assists individuals alone or a group to obtain personal and social interaction and independence. It
is usually performed by social agency or by a specific organization.

(W.A Fried landor)

Social work is a discipline involving the application of social theory and research methods to study and
improve the lives of people, groups, and societies. It incorporates and uses other social sciences as a
means to improve the human condition and positively change society's response to chronic problems.

Origin of Social work

Social work has its roots in the struggle of society to deal with poverty and the resultant problems.
Therefore, social work is intricately linked with the idea of charity work; but must be understood in
broader terms. The concept of charity goes back to ancient times, and the practice of providing for the
poor has roots in all major world religions.[1]

Types of methods in Social work

Community.

Traditionally a "community" has been defined as a group of interacting people living in a common
location
Community development Method
Community;

Traditionally a "community" has been defined as a group of interacting people living in a


common location

Community Development;

 Community development, informally called community building, is a broad term


applied to the practices and academic disciplines of civic leaders, activists, involved
citizens and professionals to improve various aspects of local communities.

 The process of developing active and sustainable communities based on social justice
and mutual respect. It is about influencing power structures to remove the barriers that
prevent people from participating in the issues that affect their lives.

 Community workers (officers) facilitate the participation of people in this process. They
enable connections to be made between communities and with the development of
wider policies and programmes.

 Community Development expresses values of fairness, equality, accountability,


opportunity, choice, participation, mutuality, reciprocity and continuous learning.
Educating, enabling and empowering are at the core of Community Development.”

(Community Development Exchange)

A process of developing or building up communities of men and women to enable


empowerment, self-sufficiency and control over their environment. ...

[Link]/[Link]

History
Community Development has been a sometimes explicit, sometimes implicit goal of community people,
aiming to achieve, through collective effort, a better life, and has occurred throughout history. In the
18th Century the work of the early socialist thinker Robert Owen (1771-1851), sought through
Community Planning, to create the perfect community. At New Lanark and at later utopian communities
such as Oneida in the USA and the New Australia Movement in Australia, groups of people came
together to create intentional utopian communities, with mixed success. Such community planning
techniques became important in the 1920s and 1930s in East Africa, where Community Development
proposals were seen as a way of helping local people improve their own lives with indirect assistance
from colonial authorities.
Community development, often linked with Community Work or Community Planning, is often formally
conducted by non-government organisations (NGOs), universities or government agencies to improve
the social well-being of local, regional and, sometimes, national communities. Less formal efforts, called
community building or community organizing, seek to empower individuals and groups of people by
providing them with the skills they need to effect change in their own communities. [14] These skills often
assist in building political power through the formation of large social groups working for a common
agenda. Community development practitioners must understand both how to work with individuals and
how to affect communities' positions within the context of larger social institutions.

Scott Peck Contribution in community Development.

In The Different Drum: Community-Making and Peace, Scott Peck argues that the almost
accidental sense of community that exists at times of crisis can be consciously built. Peck
believes that conscious community building is a process of deliberate design based on the
knowledge and application of certain rules.[18] He states that this process goes through four
stages:[19]

1. Pseudo-community: Where participants are "nice with each other", playing-safe, and presenting
what they feel is the most favourable sides of their personalities.
2. Chaos: When people move beyond the inauthenticity of pseudo-community and feel safe
enough to present their "shadow" selves. This stage places great demands upon the facilitator
for greater leadership and organization, but Peck believes that "organizations are not
communities", and this pressure should be resisted.

3. Emptiness: This stage moves beyond the attempts to fix, heal and convert of the chaos stage,
when all people become capable of acknowledging their own woundedness and brokenness,
common to us all as human beings. Out of this emptiness comes

4. True community: the process of deep respect and true listening for the needs of the other
people in this community. This stage Peck believes can only be described as "glory" and reflects
a deep yearning in every human soul for compassionate understanding from one's fellows.

Community building that is geared toward citizen action is usually termed "community
organizing."[21] In these cases, organized community groups seek accountability from elected
officials and increased direct representation within decision-making bodies. Where good-faith
negotiations fail, these constituency-led organizations seek to pressure the decision-makers
through a variety of means, including picketing, boycotting, sit-ins, petitioning, and electoral
politics. The ARISE Detroit! coalition and the Toronto Public Space Committee are examples of
activist networks committed to shielding local communities from government and corporate
domination and inordinate influence.

Community organizing is sometimes focused on more than just resolving specific issues.
Organizing often means building a widely accessible power structure, often with the end goal of
distributing power equally throughout the community. Community organizers generally seek to
build groups that are open and democratic in governance. Such groups facilitate and encourage
consensus decision-making with a focus on the general health of the community rather than a
specific interest group. The three basic types of community organizing are grassroots organizing,
coalition building, and "institution-based community organizing," (also called "broad-based
community organizing," an example of which is faith-based community organizing, or
"congregation-based community organizing")

Aims

Development Principles is to provide a framework for Council and its staff to use in its everyday practices

to ensure individuals, communities and networks are connected with one another by:

• Providing opportunities for residents to meaningfully participate in decision making

processes that affect their community.

• Supporting individuals and communities

through the provision of resources and

fostering of partnerships between individuals

and within communities.

• Assisting with the development of strong and

resilient communities that have the ability to

identify and meet the communities’ needs,

achieve self-reliance, contribute to solutions

and support their own advocacy efforts.

Principles

It is intended that the following principles will be

reflected in the practices of Council and its staff.

Inclusiveness – Provide the wider community with

opportunities to meaningfully participate in

information gathering, planning, direction setting and

decision making regarding outcomes that affect the

communities’ development. An ultimate goal is that

communities would drive this process.


Collaboration – Establish and foster partnerships that

aim to achieve positive outcomes for all residents.

Council aims to assist communities in finding

solutions to issues that are important to the lives of

individuals, families and communities. This includes

developing networks between people, encouraging

different communities to work together and building

relationships with and between those different

communities.

Capacity building – Support and strengthen

individuals, families and communities to identify

needs and develop solutions at a local level. This

may involve advocacy, empowerment, education,

awareness raising and distribution of resources to

individuals and communities.

Equity – Ensure that opportunities and resources

available to the community are distributed in a just

and equitable manner according to community

needs. In addition, all communities should have the

right to access all Council services and resources

without discrimination. This includes ensuring

Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islander and

marginalised groups in the community have an equal

say.

Responsiveness – Ensure the evolving nature and

constancy of change within the community are

responded to efficiently and effectively in line with

community development methodologies and

practices. This will enable the demands of the


community to be met in a relevant and timely

manner.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Community organizing empowers individuals by building skills necessary for effecting change, promoting leadership development, and fostering a collective identity. By focusing on grassroots organizing and forming coalitions, participants can collectively push for changes, influencing local governance and policy. This empowerment shifts traditional power dynamics, as it distributes power more equally throughout the community. Community organizers prioritize inclusiveness and democratic governance, facilitating consensus decision-making that challenges existing power structures, thus providing otherwise marginalized groups a voice in decision-making processes .

The principle of 'responsiveness' in community development involves adapting strategies to effectively meet the changing needs and demands of communities. This means constantly monitoring social dynamics and implementing community development methodologies that are flexible enough to address emerging issues promptly. By doing so, practices remain relevant and capable of addressing the specific contexts and challenges that arise within different communities. Responsiveness ensures that community development efforts are not static but evolve in tandem with the communities' development, thus allowing for continuous improvement and alignment with community aspirations and goals .

Non-government organizations (NGOs) play a crucial role in community development and organizing by providing resources, expertise, and support infrastructures necessary for effective community empowerment and development. They often act as intermediaries that facilitate communication between communities and larger governmental and institutional bodies. NGOs aid in capacity building by equipping community members with skills, organizing frameworks, and tools essential for self-reliance and advocacy. Their role extends to coordinating efforts for political engagement and empowerment initiatives which seek accountability from decision-makers, thus contributing to a more equitable society .

Community planning during the 1920s and 1930s in East Africa was inherently linked to the social and political changes of the period, particularly as it served as an attempt to empower local populations to improve their lives with the support of colonial powers. This dual-purpose approach reflects the complexities of colonial rule, where community development was co-opted both as a form of social control and as a genuine attempt to improve conditions for local people. By proposing community development initiatives, colonial authorities aimed to indirectly assist local people, reflecting an early form of participatory development that would later become central to modern community organizing and empowerment methods .

The historical implementation of community development in utopian communities like New Lanark and the New Australia Movement provides several lessons: the importance of idealism coupled with practical strategies, the necessity of adaptability to real-world conditions, and the challenges of maintaining long-term sustainability and cohesion in intentional communities. These experiments in social planning highlighted both the potential for transformative social organization when collective goals are pursued and the difficulties in overcoming diverse individual interests and external societal pressures. New Lanark's relative success under Robert Owen demonstrated the impact of well-structured communal efforts, while the varied outcomes of the New Australia Movement reflected difficulties in exporting such models across different cultural and geographic settings .

Community organizing models like grassroots and coalition building promote political power and change by harnessing collective action and diverse networks to pursue common goals. Grassroots organizing builds from the ground up, focusing on community engagement and local issues, thus ensuring that actions are representative of the community's genuine needs. Coalition building, on the other hand, brings together diverse groups to amplify their influence, often transcending single-issue frameworks to address broader systemic changes. These methods are effective in creating sustained advocacy efforts and generating widespread support, enabling communities to assert their rights and influence policymaking .

Scott Peck's theory of community building involves a four-stage process: pseudo-community, chaos, emptiness, and true community. Each stage represents a deeper level of interaction and authenticity within the group. In the 'pseudo-community' stage, members are polite and inauthentic, focusing on surface harmony. The 'chaos' stage follows, where real issues and differences come to the forefront, often requiring strong leadership to manage. 'Emptiness' is when individuals let go of their preconceived notions and stereotypes, leading to vulnerability and genuine acceptance. Finally, 'true community' is achieved when these stages lead to deep respect and listening, enabling genuine emotional connections and understanding, described by Peck as 'glory,' reflecting a universal longing for empathy .

Peck's concept of 'emptiness' in community building facilitates deeper relationships by encouraging members to let go of their defenses and preconceived perceptions, allowing for vulnerability and authenticity. This stage moves beyond the chaos of conflicting interests, enabling individuals to recognize and accept their own wounds and those of others. Such mutual recognition fosters empathy and compassion, essential for deep, meaningful connections. By collectively experiencing and embracing this 'emptiness,' the community can transition into 'true community,' characterized by genuine respect and understanding, which strengthens communal bonds and resilience .

'Capacity building' plays a pivotal role in community development by enabling individuals, families, and communities to identify their own needs and develop localized solutions. It involves providing education, raising awareness, and distributing resources that empower community members to take initiative and lead efforts for improving their circumstances. By fostering self-reliance and autonomy, capacity building enhances resilience, allowing communities to effectively address challenges and advocate for themselves, ultimately leading to a stronger, more coherent community framework capable of sustaining long-term well-being .

Equity in community development ensures that resources and opportunities are distributed according to the specific needs of the community, focusing on fairness rather than equality. This involves actively evaluating and addressing disparities, ensuring marginalized and disadvantaged groups have access to the same services and opportunities as other members. In practice, this means prioritizing communities that have historically been underserved, such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, to ensure they can participate equally in societal development. The focus on equity within community development also ensures that the allocation of resources is done with a view to redressing imbalances, thus fostering a more inclusive society .

You might also like