0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views4 pages

Servo System Reliability Analysis

Uploaded by

mdbmdb123
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views4 pages

Servo System Reliability Analysis

Uploaded by

mdbmdb123
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 4: Exercise Questions

1. A hydraulic system is comprised of five components having constant failure rates


(days): λ1=0.001, λ2=0.005, λ3=0.0007, λ4=0.0025, and λ5=0.00001. Find the
MTTF, standard deviation and system design life if a reliability of 0.99 is desired.

2. An air conditioning compressor operates once for an average time of 20 minutes


each hour. While operating, it has experienced a failure rate of 0.01 failures per
operating hour, and while idle has experienced a dormant failure rate of 0.0002
failures per idle hour. The probability that the compressor fails on demand is 0.03.
What is the reliability of the compressor in day long operation?

3. A flashlight contains two batteries of each having an MTTF 5 operating hours


(consider constant failure rate).

• What is the probability of battery failure occurring within the first 2 operating
hours?
• If failed batteries are immediately replaced, what is the probability of more
than one failure occurring during the first 5 operating hours.

4. A microwave transmitter has exhibited a constant failure rate of 0.00034 failures


per operating hour. Which gives non-acceptable design life (0.95 reliability) of
150 hours. A second redundant transmitter is added (parallel). What is the
reliability of the system for 30 days of operation? What is design life of the new
system? What will be the hazard rate function of this redundant system?

5. A specially designed welding machine has a non-repairable motor with a constant


failure rate of 0.05 failures per year. The company has purchased two spare
motors. If the design life of the machine is 10 year, what is the probability that the
two spares will be adequate?

Reflective Questions

1. State whether the following statements are true or false.

(a). The occurrence of snow storms in St. John’s can be modeled by an


exponential distribution.
(b). The corrosion of residential hot water pipes can be modeled by constant
failure rate model.
(c). The reliability at MTTF of a component having CFR is constant.
(d). The system will have an exponential failure distribution if both
redundant components are CFR.

2. Consider a piping system having CFR, where two identical pipes are carrying
natural gas (designed to operate at 100 barg) to the refining unit. One is operating

1
for 25 years and the other is recently replaced (with a new one). If there is a
pressure surge of 120 barg in the system, which one will fail first?

3. What is the difference between a two-parameter exponential distribution and an


exponential distribution with a burn-in period?

4. How will you determine the number of spare parts in inventory analysis if the
time between failures is exponential?

Solutions to Exercise Questions

1. CFR system with the following failure rates:

1 = 0.001 , 2 = 0.005
3 = 0.0007 , 4 = 0.0025
5 = 0.00001

Since the components follows CFR,

n
s =  i
(i). System failure rate, i =1

= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 0.00921
1 1
(ii). System MTTF, MTTFs = = = 108.58days
s 0.00921
(iii). Design life for a system reliability of 0.99,

R(t ) = e−s t des =0.99


− ln(0.99)
 tdes = = 1.09days
0.00921

2. Failure on demand, with CFR

Operating time, to = 20 min .


Idle time, ti = 40 min .
Operating failure rate, o = 0.01
Idle failure rate, i = 0.0002
Failure on demand, p = 0.03

2
ti t p
eff = i + o o +
t o + ti t o + ti t o + ti

40 20 0.03
= * 0.0002 + * 0.01 + = 0.033467 / hour
60 60 1
−  eff *t
Reliability for 24 hrs of operation, R (t ) = e
R(24) = e−0.033467*24 = 0.4479

1
3. (i). CFR System, MTTF = = 5hrs

1 1 1 1
1 = = and 2 = =
MTTF1 5 MTTF2 5
s = 1 + 2 = 2 / 5 = 0.40
Reliability for first 2 hrs of operation, R(2) = e−s t
R(2) = e−0.40*2 = 0.4493
Therefore, failure probability, F (2) = 1 − R(2)
F (2) = 1 − 0.4493 = 0.5506
(ii). If the failed batteries are immediately replaced, then the failure follows a
Poisson distribution. Therefore,

F (2) = 1 − [ P(0) + P(1)]

 1 ( t ) i   (0.2 * 5) 0 (0.2 * 5)1 


= 1 − e −t    = 1 − e −0.2*5  + 
 i =1 i!   0! 1! 
= 0.2642

4. Active redundant system with:

1 = 0.00034 and, 2 = 0.00034

R(t ) = 1 − (1 − e − t ) 2 = 2e − t − e −2t

R(t ) = 2e − 0.00034t − e − 0.00068t

Reliability over 30 days (30*24=720hrs),

3
R(720) = 2e−0.00034*720 − e−0.00068*720 = 0.95285
1.5 1.5
MTTF = = = 4411.7hrs
 0.00034
For a single component, R1 (720) = e−0.00034*720 = 0.7828 , 22% increase in
reliability due to redundancy.

f (t ) dR(t ) 1
Hazard rate function,  (t ) = =− .
R(t ) dt R(t )

 (1 − e− t ) 0.00034(1 − e −0.00034t )
  (t ) = =
(1 − 0.5e − t ) (1 − 0.50e − 0.00034t )

5. The expected number of failures over the life (10 yrs) of machine (based on
Poisson distribution) = t = 0.05 *10 = 0.50

s
The probability of s or fewer failures over 10 yrs, Rs (t ) =  pn (t )
n =0
2
Therefore, the probability of 2 or fewer failures in 10 yrs, R2 (t ) =  pn (t )
n =0
−0.5
2
e 0.5n
R2 (t ) = 
n=0 n!
0.25
= e − 0.5 [1 + 0.50 + ] = 0.9856
2

Let Y3 be the time of third failure. Then, Y3 has a gamma distribution with k = 3
and  = 0.05 . Therefore, the expected time to obtain 3 failures is 3 / 0.05 = 60 yr .
The probability that the third failure will occur within 10 yr is obtained from,

k −1
(t ) i
FYk (t ) = 1 − e − t  , where, k = 3
i =0 i!

 0.50 0.51 0.52 


= 1 − e − 0.50  + +  = 0.0144
 0! 1! 2! 

Observe that 0.0144 = 1 − 0.9856 , the probability of 2 or fewer failures in 10 yr is


complementary to the event that the third failure occurs within 10 yr.

Common questions

Powered by AI

For redundant components, reliability R(t) = e^(-2*λ*t) for each transmitter. Given λ = 0.00034 and 30 days = 720 hours, the reliability for a single transmitter R_single = e^(-0.00034*720) = 0.7828. For the redundant system, the reliability is approximately R_system = e^(-0.00068*720) = 0.95285 .

A two-parameter exponential distribution includes the scale parameter (λ) and a location parameter that shifts the distribution along the timeline, allowing modeling of systems with a deferred start. An exponential with a burn-in period includes only the scale parameter but presets a time period before the exponential function becomes applicable, typically to account for early-life failures or conditioning effects .

The failure probability for each battery within 2 hours is found using the reliability function R(t) = e^(-λt), where λ = 1/5. So, for 2 hours, R(2) = e^(-0.4 * 2) = 0.6703, thus the failure probability for one battery is 1 - 0.6703 = 0.3297. For two independent batteries, the probability of at least one failing is 1 - (0.6703 * 0.6703) = 0.5506 .

The overall system failure rate for a set of independent components in series is obtained by summing the individual failure rates: λs = λ1 + λ2 + λ3 + λ4 + λ5. Here, for given rates: λ1=0.001, λ2=0.005, λ3=0.0007, λ4=0.0025, and λ5=0.00001, the system failure rate is λs = 0.00921 .

To calculate the MTTF for the system, first determine the system failure rate by summing the individual failure rates: λs = λ1 + λ2 + λ3 + λ4 + λ5 = 0.001 + 0.005 + 0.0007 + 0.0025 + 0.00001 = 0.00921. The MTTF is the inverse of this system failure rate: MTTF = 1/λs = 1/0.00921 = approximately 108.58 days .

Determine the mean time between failures (MTBF) using the given exponential rate, calculate the expected demand during the lead time, factoring in the confidence level for desired reliability, and use these to establish the reorder points and safety stocks. Monte Carlo simulations or stochastic models are often used along with historical failure data adjustments to optimize inventory levels .

Redundancy generally lowers the effective hazard rate for the entire system while increasing system reliability. Specifically, for microwave transmitters with identical components, the effective hazard rate decreases because the failure of one component does not lead to system failure immediately. Consequently, system reliability improves significantly, observed as a 22% increase due to redundancy, though the exact hazard rate needs derivation from the combined survival function .

The likelihood of failure under a pressure surge for components with CFR is tied to accumulated 'age.' The older pipe, having been subject to longer stress and wear, retains a higher inherent risk of failure despite similar immediate conditions. The degradation over 25 years increases its probability of failure first versus the new pipe .

Reliability is calculated using the effective failure rate which accounts for both operational and idle periods. For 24-hour operation, effective failure rate λeff = (0.01 * (20/60)) + (0.0002 * (40/60)) = 0.033467 failures per hour. Reliability R(t) over 24 hours is then R(24) = e^(-λeff * 24) = e^(-0.033467 * 24) = 0.4479 .

The expected number of failures over 10 years, based on a Poisson distribution, is λt = 0.05 * 10 = 0.5. The probability of 2 or fewer failures (including the initially installed motor and two spares being exhausted) is found by summing Poisson probabilities for 0, 1, and 2 failures: P(X ≤ 2) = e^(-0.5) * (0.5^0/0! + 0.5^1/1! + 0.5^2/2!) = 0.9856 .

You might also like