0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views2 pages

Class 8 Rational Numbers Exercise

Uploaded by

Sudipto Dutta
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views2 pages

Class 8 Rational Numbers Exercise

Uploaded by

Sudipto Dutta
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Class 8 Rational Number Exercise 1.

1
1. Using appropriate properties, find
(i) -2/3 × 3/5 + 5/2 – 3/5 × 1/6 (ii) 2/5 × (- 3/7) – 1/6 × 3/2 + 1/14 × 2/5
Solution: Solution:
-2/3 × 3/5 + 5/2 – 3/5 × 1/6 2/5 × (- 3/7) – 1/6 × 3/2 + 1/14 × 2/5
= -2/3 × 3/5– 3/5 × 1/6+ 5/2 (by commutativity) = 2/5 × (- 3/7) + 1/14 × 2/5 – (1/6 × 3/2) (by
= 3/5 (-2/3 – 1/6)+ 5/2 commutativity)
= 3/5 ((- 4 – 1)/6)+ 5/2 = 2/5 × (- 3/7 + 1/14) – 3/12
= 3/5 ((–5)/6)+ 5/2 (by distributivity) = 2/5 × ((- 6 + 1)/14) – 3/12
= – 15 /30 + 5/2 = 2/5 × ((- 5)/14)) – 1/4
= – 1 /2 + 5/2 = (-10/70) – 1/4
= 4/2 = – 1/7 – 1/4
=2 = (– 4– 7)/28
= – 11/28
2. Write the additive inverse of each of the following:
(i) 2/8 (iv) 2/-9 = -2/9
The Additive inverse of 2/8 is – 2/8 The additive inverse of -2/9 is 2/9
(ii) -5/9 (v) 19/-16 = -19/16
The additive inverse of -5/9 is 5/9 The additive inverse of -19/16 is 19/16
(iii) -6/-5 = 6/5
The additive inverse of 6/5 is -6/5
3. Verify that: -(-x) = x for:
(i) x = 11/15 (ii) -13/17
We have, x = 11/15 We have, x = -13/17
The additive inverse of x is – x (as x + (-x) = 0). The additive inverse of x is – x (as x + (-x) = 0).
Then, the additive inverse of 11/15 is – 11/15 (as Then, the additive inverse of -13/17 is 13/17 (as
11/15 + (-11/15) = 0). 13/17 + (-13/17) = 0).
The same equality, 11/15 + (-11/15) = 0, shows The same equality (-13/17 + 13/17) = 0, shows
that the additive inverse of -11/15 is 11/15. that the additive inverse of 13/17 is -13/17.
Or, – (-11/15) = 11/15 Or, – (13/17) = -13/17,
i.e., -(-x) = x i.e., -(-x) = x
4. Find the multiplicative inverse of the following:
(i) -13 (iv) -5/8 × (-3/7) = 15/56
Multiplicative inverse of -13 is -1/13. Multiplicative inverse of 15/56 is 56/15.
(ii) -13/19 (v) -1 × (-2/5) = 2/5
Multiplicative inverse of -13/19 is -19/13. Multiplicative inverse of 2/5 is 5/2.
(iii) 1/5 (vi) -1
Multiplicative inverse of 1/5 is 5. Multiplicative inverse of -1 is -1.
5. Name the property under multiplication 6. Multiply 6/13 by the reciprocal of -7/16.
used in each of the following:
(i) -4/5 × 1 = 1 × (-4/5) = -4/5 Reciprocal of -7/16 = 16/-7 = -16/7
Here 1 is the multiplicative identity. According to the question,
(ii) -13/17 × (-2/7) = -2/7 × (-13/17) 6/13 × (Reciprocal of -7/16)
The property of commutativity is used in the 6/13 × (-16/7) = -96/91
equation.
(iii) -19/29 × 29/-19 = 1
The multiplicative inverse is the property used
in this equation.

7. Tell what property allows you to compute 1/3 × (6 × 4/3) as (1/3 × 6) × 4/3.
Solution:
1/3 × (6 × 4/3) = (1/3 × 6) × 4/3
Here, the way in which factors are grouped in a multiplication problem supposedly does not change the
product. Hence, the Associativity Property is used here.
8. Is 8/9 the multiplication inverse of – ? Why or why not?
Solution:
– = -9/8
[Multiplicative inverse ⟹ product should be 1]
According to the question,
8/9 × (-9/8) = -1 ≠ 1
Therefore, 8/9 is not the multiplicative inverse of – .

9. If 0.3 is the multiplicative inverse of


? Why or why not?
Solution:
= 10/3
0.3 = 3/10
[Multiplicative inverse ⟹ product should be 1]
According to the question,
3/10 × 10/3 = 1
Therefore, 0.3 is the multiplicative inverse of
.

10. (I) The rational number that does not have a reciprocal is 0.
Reason:
0 = 0/1
Reciprocal of 0 = 1/0, which is not defined.
(ii) The rational numbers that are equal to their reciprocals are 1 and -1.
Reason:
1 = 1/1
Reciprocal of 1 = 1/1 = 1, similarly, reciprocal of -1 = – 1
(iii) The rational number that is equal to its negative is 0.
Reason:
Negative of 0=-0=0

11. Fill in the blanks.


(i) Zero has no reciprocal.
(ii) The numbers -1 and 1 are their own reciprocals
(iii) The reciprocal of – 5 is -1/5.
(iv) Reciprocal of 1/x, where x ≠ 0 is x.
(v) The product of two rational numbers is always a rational number.
(vi) The reciprocal of a positive rational number is positive.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Zero has no reciprocal because division by zero is undefined; for any number to have a reciprocal, the product of the number and its reciprocal must equal one. Since reciprocal is defined as 1/number, attempting to create such a reciprocal for zero would involve division by zero, which is undefined in mathematics. Hence, zero's lack of a reciprocal is significant as it highlights the boundary of rational operations .

The concept of multiplicative identity (which states that any number multiplied by 1 remains unchanged) and multiplicative inverse (where a number multiplied by its reciprocal equals 1) are demonstrated in -19/29 × 29/-19 = 1. Each fraction is the reciprocal of the other, so they multiply to 1, which is the multiplicative identity. This equality highlights the function of inverses in simplifying calculations .

The concept of additive inverse is crucial in verifying that -(-x) = x. For the rational number x = -13/17, its additive inverse is 13/17 because -13/17 + 13/17 = 0. Similarly, the additive inverse of 13/17 is -13/17. This shows that the negation of the additive inverse, -(-x), returns to the original number x, confirming the property for -13/17 .

The commutative property allows the terms in the expression 2/5 × (-3/7) - 1/6 × 3/2 + 1/14 × 2/5 to be rearranged. By taking advantage of this property, the expression can be reorganized into 2/5 × (-3/7) + 1/14 × 2/5 - 1/6 × 3/2, which pairs similar terms together, facilitating a more straightforward application of arithmetic operations and simplifying the calculation process .

To determine if 0.3 is the multiplicative inverse of 10/3, the product of 0.3 and 10/3 must equal 1. Transforming 0.3 to a fraction gives 3/10. Multiplying 10/3 by 3/10 results in (10/3) × (3/10) = 30/30 = 1, thus confirming that 0.3 is indeed the multiplicative inverse of 10/3 as their product equals the multiplicative identity .

The distributive property allows for the grouping of like terms in the expression -2/3 × 3/5 + 5/2 - 3/5 × 1/6. By adjusting the order and grouping, the expression is transformed into 3/5(-2/3 - 1/6) + 5/2, which simplifies the calculation process by combining the terms -2/3 and -1/6 under a common factor of 3/5 before resolving them, leading ultimately to -15/30 + 5/2 and further simplifying to 2 .

Determining the multiplicative inverse of a negative fraction, such as 15/56, is essential for simplification and solving equations where one needs to 'undo' the effect of the fraction’s original value. The inverse, 56/15, when multiplied by 15/56, yields 1, demonstrating the fundamental property of inverses which allows cancellation in equations. Understanding this concept is crucial in various mathematical operations where reversal of multiplication is needed .

The associativity property permits the re-grouping of the factors in a multiplication scenario without altering the end result. In the expression 1/3 × (6 × 4/3), it allows for reassociating the terms to (1/3 × 6) × 4/3, illustrating that regardless of how the numbers are grouped in multiplication, the product remains constant. This flexibility is essential in mathematical operations as it simplifies complex calculations by strategically grouping terms .

Identifying rational numbers equivalent to their reciprocals, specifically 1 and -1, underscores their unique roles in rational number operations. For these numbers, multiplying by their reciprocals does not change their value: 1's reciprocal is 1/1 = 1, and -1's reciprocal is -1/-1 = -1. This distinct property distinguishes them from other rational numbers and aligns with the definition of multiplicative identity, thereby making them pivotal in equations and problem-solving .

The property that a rational number equals its negative is exclusive to zero because only zero maintains equality with its additive inverse. By definition, the negative of a number x is -x; both x and -x sum to zero. For zero, its negative is -0, which is trivially equal to 0, whereas for any other number, the negative is distinct. This asserts zero's unique position among rational numbers .

You might also like