CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction
The researcher on this chapter will be looking at the contribution of other scholars on the
subject under study. This chapter will give an account of what have been published on this
topic by accredited scholars and researchers. Many scholars have written different articles
and come up with different opinions and views on the effectiveness of housing cooperatives
specifically in Harare. This chapter will reveal the related literature to the study with the view
to provide an analytic insight into the research problem. The research done so far among
others which will be the major points of this chapter will include.
Conceptual Framework
Conceptual definition of modes of housing provision
Systems or modes of housing provision can be defined by the processes through which such
provision is achieved. A useful analytical tool for identifying and examining these processes
is the concept of structures of provision which is based on the identification of social
relations and interactions of agents involved in all aspects of housing provision. The key to
understanding the processes involved in land and property development, including housing, is
identified as the relationship between the interests, strategies and actions of agents involved
in land development and the socioeconomic and political framework including values
regarding land, property, buildings and the environment which governs or structures their
decisions. There is, therefore, a need to understand the `relation between structure, in terms of
what drives the development process and produces distinctive patterns in particular periods,
and agency, in terms of the way individual agents develop and pursue their strategies' (Healey
and Barret, 1990:90). The former relates to the framework created by the economic and
political organisation of the country, interventions of the state at the macro and micro
economic levels and the social and economic values of the society regarding the built
environment. The latter, on the other hand, relates to land owners, investors, developers,
consultants, public sector planning officers, politicians, community groups and any other
agents involved in land development (Keivani and Werna 2001:69). The buying of land from
the original owner at minimum possible prices and, secondly, the successful development of
land for housing at the right time and right place maximises the development value of the
site. Therefore, housing production by firms is entirely reliant on the overall speculative
strategy of the firm and not the housing shortage in the country.
Developments in the Zimbabwean Real Estate Land Development Industry
In Zimbabwe, Section 22 of the Regional, Town and Country Planning (RTCP) Act (Chapter
29:12) of 1996 succinctly asserts that the real estate development is the altering of the
character of the use of any land or building, whether fixed, movable or collapsible
(Government of Zimbabwe, 1996). Players in the real estate development in Zimbabwe can
be broadly viewed as public agencies and private sector agencies. Public agencies include the
Environmental Management Agency (EMA), Department of Physical Planning (DPP), the
Deeds Registry Office, and the Department of Surveyor General’s Office. The private sector
has been much involved in the development process as developers, financiers, and entities on
property valuation and management. As the real estate development is considered a lucrative
business local individuals are engaging themselves with the sector, and thus making it a
competitive terrain. In addition, there are service providers (for example, the Zimbabwe
Electricity Supply Authority), financial institutions (these include commercial banks,
building societies, insurance and pension funds companies), and landowners, building
contractors as well a number of professionals such as spatial planners, architects, and
engineers. “There is a lack by the service provision agencies to increase supply and be able to
meet the existing high demand for infrastructure facilities” Real estate development plays a
pivotal role in the growth of macro economies worldwide. Although numerous public
housing programs were undertaken in Zimbabwe, the housing deficit in the country has never
been significantly reduced (Rahimian, Goulding, Akintoye & Kolo, 2017). Real estate
development is widely regarded as a creative process focused on value added (Mustorpha et
al., 2019; Olsson et al., 2015) and it occurs when land utilization is changed from one type to
another (Mustorpha et al., 2019).
National Housing Policy of Zimbabwe
From 1980, Zimbabwe has removed the majority of structural factors constraining access to
decent and affordable housing. The country’s cumulative experience in terms of enacting
laws, establishing institutions and implementing different programs has created the basis for
an inclusive national housing policy. The 2011 National Housing Policy is deemed “The
Housing Stakeholders’ Policy” because it culminates from an intensive consultative process
that commenced with meetings with stakeholders from February 2009 to May 2009 and the
housing symposium held at the end of May 2009 to map up critical areas of need and draw up
a plan of action for the National Housing Convention which was held in October 2009 to
formulate a National plan of action on housing development NHP of Zimbabwe (2011). This
policy has encompassed quiet a number of actors and interest groups which includes building
societies, pensions and provident funds, private land developers and employers have an
important and indispensable role to play in the proposed housing dispensation. Its main
agenda being provide safe and sane housing for Zimbabwe families proper decent housing is
a human right (second generation/progressive rights) that every citizen should enjoy i.e. ‘the
right to shelter’ according to United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHCR). The
problems addressed by the policy mainly are as follows; Lack of policy coherence regarding
rural-urban integration, Inadequate investment by both the public and private sector in the
housing sector, Lack of policies to enable effective participation of other actors in housing
development, Lack of institutional capacity at all levels to implement housing projects,
Unreliable supply of affordable building materials, and Bottlenecks in the land delivery
process. The ministry of Housing and Social amenities is the one in change of monitoring the
policy Simmons (2003).
Housing Situation in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe stands as one of the Sub-Saharan African countries with highest property prices. A
report by Cardinal Corporation (2018) reveals that development costs, construction costs and
government taxes and fees are contributors to exorbitant property prices in Zimbabwe.
Nevertheless, it has been reported that demand for properties continue to rise as individuals
and companies seek to hedge their investments against spiralling inflation (Tome, 2020).
Tome (2020) observes that as inflation reached 500% in Zimbabwe as of early 2020,
individuals with huge sums of money have been compelled to invest it in property so as to
safeguard the value of their money. Nevertheless, it has been reported that demand for
properties continue to rise as individuals and companies seek to hedge their investments
against spiraling inflation (Tome, 2020). This has created a mismatch between supply and
demand of properties. This mismatch is partly exacerbated by poor performance of real estate
development finance. This include the non-availability of funds and bureaucratic bottlenecks
in many of the financial institutions which obstruct in their quest for funds (Chirisa et al.,
2019). With the current cash crunch in the country, it is difficult to get cash from the banks
for development and as such giving bottlenecks on the developers’ intended projects (Chirisa
et al., 2019). The liquidity crisis in Zimbabwe since 2008 has starved many property
development projects from investment and left various opportunities in this sector untapped
(Maphosa et al., 2019).
Challenges to Public Housing Delivery in Zimbabwe
Most real estate developers find it difficult to raise the capital needed to initiate and complete
any residential development, and so must borrow from banks and other financial institutions
(Owusu-Ansah, Soyeh and Asabere 2019). Government and professional associations have
made significant progress in reducing the housing deficit in Zimbabwe. Adequate financing is
deemed crucial in the delivery of housing projects. Being that one of the responsibilities of
the government is to provide acceptable housing for its citizens, adequately catering for this
within the budget is necessary. However, findings of this study show that the allocations
made available in the budget for providing housing infrastructure for citizens are inadequate.
This inadequacy can be attributed to the unstable nature of the Zimbabwe economy with
inflation rate getting to above 14% and the budget deficit 12% of gross domestic product
(Hawkins and Piling, 2017). Investors and lenders prefer an economy that is stable for
investment and decisions can be taken without too much uncertainty. This is not the case with
Zimbabwe as the uncertainty in the country’s economy makes it difficult for investors and
lenders to invest. Findings of this study are in tandem with the submission of Taruvinga and
Mooya (2016) which revealed that the main reason for the shortfall in provision of low-
income housing by the government in most developing countries is due to large economic
constrictions and also unrealistic budgets that cannot be maintained.
Perspectives on Project Success in Real Estate Development
According to Udechukwu and Olusola (2016), real estate can be defined as the earth’s surface
which extends downward to the center of the earth and upward to infinity, they include those
things that are permanently attached by nature or by people. A real estate project is
considered successful when it passes four success test criteria; when it is completed within
specified time, cost, quality specified standards and client’s satisfaction met (Ifediora et al
2019:75). Nzekwe, et al, (2015) however posed at pertinent question which is; can a project
which conformed to time and cost projections be adjudged as successful even when it has
been poorly received by the client? Whichever way we see real estate project success, our
concern should be to ensure that projects succeed, this must be done by identifying the factors
that constraints its implementation success and also find out the extent they affect success in
a bid to making sure subsequent or anticipated failures is brought to barest minimum.
Globalization has resulted in corporate real estate management becoming a source of
competition both locally and internationally. However, such exposure comes with a price.
Role of Real Estate Developers in Housing
The job of the real estate developers is to acquire land, develop it and then sell them or put
them on lease/rent. The Real Estate Developers are also responsible for marketing of
properties and lease and re lease of buildings and land as stands. The Real Estate Developers
need to get public approval for all the jobs they do. They mostly coordinate with engineers,
city planners, contractors, architects and surveyors to ensure perfect planning and execution
of a property development project. the role of private real estate development companies who
build for profit has become increasingly important in Zimbabwe’s housing supply. Before
any housing development can take place in a market economy, real estate developers must
consider a broad range of factors, both market and institutional. Among the market factors are
construction costs, cost and availability of financing, current and future house prices and the
level of market demand on completion, which is determined by time on the market, interest
rate, GDP per capita, unemployment rate and inflation rate (Hutchison and Disberry, 2015;
Owusu-Ansah, 2014). Within each context real estate development is concerned with
innovations, such as introducing new forms of development finance, setting up new types of
development partnerships, or incorporating sustainable solutions within development
processes.
Theoretical framework
Neoliberalism theory
Neoliberalism is an ideology and policy model that emphasizes the value of free market
competition. Although there is considerable debate as to the defining features of neoliberal
thought and practice, it is most commonly associated with laissez-faire economics. Globally,
the rolling out of neoliberal policies has led to a plethora of harmful socioeconomic
consequences, including increased poverty, unemployment, and deterioration of income
distribution (Rotarou and Sakellariou 2017Collins et al. 2015). Therefore this provides
justification for private sector intervention in the economy by playing a part in the provision
of housing. In land development there has been monopoly of government over land
ownership and it has failed to develop it distribute it to citizens so that everyone has
affordable housing. Using the ideas of neoliberalism private sector can operate in a free
market economy and has come in place using their privately owned land to redistribute it
through subdivisions thereby covering the housing gap in the country.
Hartmann (2016:2145) states that “neoliberalism typically refers to minimal government
intervention, laissez-faire market policies, and individualism over collectivism which has
been adopted by and pressed upon the majority of national governments and global
development institution; However, (Garnham (2017) argues that decreasing public spending
and government involvement in the welfare of people through the rhetoric of choice and
freedom has a harmful impact on people’s wellbeing. The biggest conceptual challenge is that
neoliberal ideology adopts the language of freedom and choice, increased foreign
investments, and open markets and trade to progress policies that lead to privatisation of
basic needs such as education, healthcare, water, electricity and housing. The rich can often
afford these services and can compete fairly in the free market, but the poor unable to afford
health care, education or decent housing are left marginalized.
Empirical Review
Real estate land development in Zambia
Currently like any other urbanizing country, the Zambian housing sector is experiencing
challenges of shortages in decent and affordable housing and the growth of unplanned
settlements. These shortages are mostly attributed to inefficiencies of the housing market to
meet the housing demand, lack of sustainable housing finance and population increase.
According to a study conducted by Zambia Institute of Policy Analysis and Research
(ZIPAR) in 2014, Zambia has a housing stock of 2,500,000 units and an annual housing
production of 73,000 units which is below the expected annual production of 222,000 units
per year. The current housing production has lead to a housing deficit of 1,539,000 as at 2014
and failure to increase housing production might lead into a deficit of 3,328,904 units by
2030. This housing shortage especially in urban areas over the years has been worsened due
to the post-independence rural-urban migration. According to the Central Statistics Office,
Zambia's population in urban areas has over the recent years increased drastically from
3.4million people in 2000 to 6.7milion in 2016. This growth shows a 41% increase in the
urban population. In urban areas the hindering factors to housing development include,
limited capacity of sustainable public-private partnerships to deliver affordable housing,
prohibitive land prices and lack of financing mechanisms. These challenges are more
pronounced among the low income urban households, con-straining them from formal
ownership of decent housing (Nyemba, E,N and Deka, B 2018:8). The housing development
policy environment in Zambia is still in its infancy stage with most of its legislation under
review or recently implemented. Zambia has over the years developed policies and Acts to
foster the development and supply of low cost affordable housing for its population
especially in urban areas but these policies have yielded little results due to high land prices
and costly building materials. The following are among legislation that supports the housing
sector in Zambia; Housing Policy, Urban and Regional Planning Act, Legislation on Land, as
well as the establishment of National Housing Authority (NHA). According to Nyemba E, S
and Deka, B (2018:11) in 2015, the review of the policy began with expectations that the new
policy would be a better blue print for housing development and responsive to challenges of
access to land, housing finance, social services and technological options that have for a long
time been hindering the housing sector from functioning effectively. Secondly, the reviewed
policy would further enhance the creation of an environment that is suitable for the
participation of both the public and private sector in the provision of affordable housing. The
emergence of real estate agents in the Zambian property market has led to distortions in the
markets such as lack of general organisation in the sector. These distortions have been
worsened by the withdrawal of local authorities’ role in the determination of rentals ever
since the government sold all the state-owned houses to sitting tenants and the lack of
inclusive financial instruments such as mortgages for purchasing properties such as housing
and land. Nyemba, E,N and Deka, B (2018:15) noted that the existing free market policies in
the country has led to property buyers lacking some form of protection against exploitation
from both sellers and agents in the real estate market. With such distortions, there is need for
regulations in the fledging market.
Real Estate Land Development in South Africa
The post-apartheid government has made strides in promoting social development, having
started with promulgating the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP), which is
aimed at promoting economic growth and eradicating poverty, exclusion and inequality
(Noyoo 2005; Patel 1991; 2005). Despite the RDP housing initiative, it is argued that the
human rights prospects of the homeless and the informal settlements dwellers have not been
adequately met in line with expectations (Rust, Tanya, and Napier 2009). In its endeavor to
redress the housing shortage and socio-economic rights deficits for the poor citizens (Rust,
Tanya, and Napier 2009), the government initiated the RDP programme to roll out subsidised
housing to the largely black majority citizens. As already alluded to, this housing program
was informed by the Constitution and the RDP policy. The housing backlog reportedly
stands at 2.3 million houses and is growing by around 178 000 houses a year. Neither the
public nor the formal private sector appears to be able to close this gap. Municipalities ensure
that, within the framework of national and provincial legislation and policy constituents
within their jurisdictional areas have access to adequate housing. They initiate, plan, co-
ordinate and facilitate appropriate housing development within their boundaries, either by
promoting developers to undertake projects or by playing the role of developer. In South
Africa agricultural land cannot be subdivided into residential stands thus real estate
developers in South Africa have to acquire land through municipalities or other private land
that is not intended for agriculture. Despite this proven demand for housing township
developers often struggle to obtain finance for their developments. The building plan
approval process can be lengthy, and they often borrow money from family and friends to
finish their developments. Most take out a personal loan from a bank at some point, but as
first instalments are usually due after 30 days and it can take up to three months before
tenants are able to move in this is not an ideal solution. Noyoo and Sobantu (2017) argue that
housing delivery hugely contributes towards social development hence it should always be
viewed from the rights-based perspective in order to promote equality, social justice, human
rights and dignity.
Gaps in Literature
Some scholars failed to recognize that most real estate land developers and local authorities
are no longer playing their roles of providing affordable housing to the citizens because of the
challenges that they are encountering during the process such as slow approval of subdivision
permits and too much beauractratic procedures in the land development process. Almost all
local authorities in Zimbabwe in the present day are failing to provide serviced land and
housing for their citizens and this has been a challenge that many scholars who have failed to
recognize it. Real estate land developers in Zimbabwe are facing internal problems like
corruption, abuse of funds and fraud as there have been many cases of land barons robbing of
citizens their hard earned money which has made citizens fear engaging them. This study
complements other studies and it focuses on key on housing issues in which most scholars are
interested in this modern world.
Chapter Summary
The researcher on this chapter was assessing other scholarly views on the role being played
by real estate land developers in provision of housing. From this chapter the researcher can
note some of the gaps that had been left by other researchers. This chapter provided the
theoretical framework supporting the variable under study and the neoliberalism theory was
used. It also gave a look into the situation of Zambia and South Africa on the housing issue in
relation to real estate land developers. This chapter therefore managed to discover the
literature gap.