Fi

rePr
o
Fi
reSuppr
essi
onSyst
em
A Complete Solution Portfolio
FirePro deliver a broad range of fire suppression systems and solutions
for a multitude of applications in all industries. FirePro’s state of the art
condensed aerosol fire extinguishing units are matched with certified
monitoring panels, controllers, detection systems, alarms and all other
related accessories. Moreover, technical brochures, manuals and software
tools accompany each unit and system installation. In addition, we provide
constant after-sales technical support and training where required.

Focus on High Quality Cost Effective & Practical

FirePro products are certified and listed FirePro systems are ideal for both
by Underwriters’ Laboratories (UL) in the conventional and non-conventional
United States, as well as by the BSI and applications. Moreover, they can
KIWA in Europe. Furthermore, they are be applied in situations which are
manufactured under strict international considered to be technically or
quality and environmental management financially challenging for other
standards and requirements. All FirePro technologies.
product lines are complemented by an
equally advanced range of detection Support & Expertise
and control technologies. In the highly regulated market of fire
suppression, we match our products
Environment Friendly with up to date information pertaining to
Technology fire engineering standards, applications
FirePro units are manufactured with a and worldwide support. Our global
certified product life of 15 years, they distribution network is comprised of
are friendly to the environment and eco- trained and certified professionals ready
systems. They are non-toxic, have zero to design, supply, install and maintain the
ozone-depletion potential and do not full range of FirePro products. FirePro and
contribute to global warming. its partners currently protect key assets in
more than 110 countries worldwide.

FirePro and Partners are Reinventing Fire Suppression.

Product Catalogue 3
 FP-2000

A22 Product Catalogue

 FP-2000 FP-2000T
Product Code: 10149 Product Code: 10317
Product Description: FirePro Fire Product Description: FirePro Fire
Extinguishing Generator FP-2000. Extinguishing Generator FP-2000T.
Features: Features:
• UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved • UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved
• Carbon-Steel casing Red-coated • This model can be activated by a
Bulb Thermal Activator.
• Carbon-Steel casing Red-coated

FP-2000S FP-2000TS
Product Code: 10392 Product Code: 10623
Product Description: FirePro Fire Product Description: FirePro Fire
Extinguishing Generator FP-2000S. Extinguishing Generator FP-2000TS.
Features: Features:
• UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved • UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved
• Stainless steel casing • This model can be activated by a Bulb
Thermal Activator
• Stainless steel casing

TECHNICAL INFORMATION
Model FP-2000 / FP-2000S / FP-2000T / FP-2000TS
Thermal
Electrical (Minimum pulse voltage: 1.5 VDC,
Activation method
Minimum pulse current: 0.6 A, Minimum
pulse duration: 0.5 s)
Activator type Heating element with 2.3 ohm resistance
Current intensity to be tested Maximum 5 mA
Weight (gross) 15500 g (excluding bracket)
Mass of FPC compound 2000 g
Operational discharge time 10 - 15 seconds
Discharge length 3.5 m
Dimensions 300 mm x 300 mm x 185 mm
Fire class A, B, C

Operating temperatures: -54ºC to +54ºC | Generators are provided complete with brackets

Product Catalogue A23

 FP-4200

A26 Product Catalogue

 FP-4200T FP-4200TS
Product Code: 10338 Product Code: 10644
Product Description: FirePro Fire Product Description: FirePro Fire
Extinguishing Generator Extinguishing Generator
FP-4200T. FP-4200TS.
Features: Features:
• UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved • UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved
• This model can be activated by a • This model can be activated by a
Bulb Thermal Activator. Bulb Thermal Activator.
• Carbon-Steel casing Red-coated • Stainless steel casing.

TECHNICAL INFORMATION
Model FP-4200T / FP-4200TS
Thermal
Electrical (Minimum pulse voltage: 1.5 VDC,
Activation method
Minimum pulse current: 0.6 A, Minimum
pulse duration: 0.5 s)
Activator type Heating element with 2.3 ohm resistance
Current intensity to be tested Maximum 5 mA
Weight (gross) 25000 g (excluding bracket)
Mass of FPC compound 4200 g
Operational discharge time 15 - 20 seconds
Discharge length 5m
Dimensions 300 mm x 300 mm x 300 mm
Fire class A, B, C

Operating temperatures: -54ºC to +54ºC | Generators are provided complete with brackets

Product Catalogue A27

 FP-5700

A28 Product Catalogue

 FP-5700 FP-5700T
Product Code: 10151 Product Code: 10319
Product Description: FirePro Fire Product Description: FirePro Fire
Extinguishing Generator FP-5700. Extinguishing Generator FP-5700T.
Features: Features:
• UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved • UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved
• Carbon-Steel casing Red-coated • This model can be activated by a
Bulb Thermal Activator.
• Carbon-Steel casing Red-coated

FP-5700S FP-5700TS
Product Code: 10394 Product Code: 10625
Product Description: FirePro Fire Product Description: FirePro
Extinguishing Generator FP-5700S. Fire Extinguishing Generator
Features: FP-5700TS.
• UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved Features:
• Stainless steel casing • UL, KIWA, and BSI Approved
• This model can be activated by a
Bulb Thermal Activator.
• Stainless steel casing.

TECHNICAL INFORMATION
Model FP-5700 / FP-5700S / FP-5700T / FP-5700TS
Thermal
Electrical (Minimum pulse voltage: 1.5 VDC,
Activation method
Minimum pulse current: 0.6 A, Minimum
pulse duration: 0.5 s)
Activator type Heating element with 2.3 ohm resistance
Current intensity to be tested Maximum 5 mA
Weight (gross) 26400 g (excluding bracket)
Mass of FPC compound 5700 g
Operational discharge time 15 - 20 seconds
Discharge length 8.4 m
Dimensions 300 mm x 300 mm x 300 mm
Fire class A, B, C

Operating temperatures: -54ºC to +54ºC | Generators are provided complete with brackets

Product Catalogue A29

B30 Product Catalogue
FirePro-Kentec
Sequential Activator

Product Code: 10173

Product Description: FirePro-Kentec
Sequential Activator - Standard Box
(FP-SA/GEN3.0)

Product Code: 10486

Product Description: FirePro-Kentec
Sequential Activator - Larger Box
(FP-SA/GEN3.0M8)

FEATURES
• UL Compatibility Test Approval
• Up to 2 FirePro Generator units, supervised
• Extinguishing Panel, Releasing Line supervision
• LED ‘Fault’ indicator

PRODUCT OVERVIEW
Provides connection from the Sigma A-XT Panel to the
Aerosol Generators using four-conductor cabling. A maximum
of 20 FirePro Sequential Activators can be connected to each
extinguishing line.

Product Catalogue D47

 FWSA7.EX6960 - Fixed Condensed Aerosol Extinguishing
System Units Certified for Canada

Fixed Condensed Aerosol Extinguishing System Units Certified for Canada

See General Information for Fixed Condensed Aerosol Extinguishing System Units Certified for Canada

FIREPRO SYSTEMS LTD EX6960

8 Faleas Str
4101 Limassol, CY CYPRUS
Description Part No.

Aerosol-generating extinguishing system unit

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-20SE

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-20T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-40S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-40T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-80S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-80T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-100S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-200S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-500S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-1200

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-1200S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-1200T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-1200TS

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-2000

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-2000S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-2000T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-2000TS

FirePro condensed
Cookies on UL aerosol generator FP-3000

We use condensed
FirePro cookies toaerosol
personalize
generatorcontent and ads,FP-3000S
to provide social media features and to analyze
FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-3000T ❯ Cookie Settings ✓ Accept
our traffic. We also share information about your
FirePro
use condensed
of our aerosol
site with generator
our social media, advertisingFP-3000TS
and analytics partners.. Learn More
FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-4200T
 FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-4200TS

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-5700

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-5700S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-5700T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FP-5700TS

Mounting bracket, 20 g C20BR

Mounting brackets, 40, 80 g C4080BRS1/C4080BRS2/ C4-8RBR

Mounting brackets, 100, 200, 500 g C1-2-5ABS/C1-2-5RBR/ C1-2-5RB/ C1-2-5AS/C-1-2-5U

Mounting brackets, 2000, 3000, 1200 g B122030BRKT B122030BRKT/A

Mounting bracket, 5700 g B57BRKT/ B57BRKT/C

Installation and User Manual, Version 1.0, Revision 7 dated February 2019

For Class A surface burning and Class B and C category hazards; not for use in hazardous (classified) locations. Temperature range -54 to +54°C.

Description Part No.

Aerosol-generating extinguishing system unit

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-20SE

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-20T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-40S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-40T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-80S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-80T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-100S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-200S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-500S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-1200

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-1200S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-1200T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-1200TS

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-2000

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-2000S

Cookies on UL
FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-2000T
We use cookies to personalize content and ads,
toFirePro
provide condensed aerosol features
social media generator and to analyze FBN-2000TS
❯ Cookie Settings ✓ Accept
our traffic.
FirePro We also
condensed share
aerosol information about yourFBN-3000
generator
use of our site with our social media, advertising
FirePro
and condensed
analytics aerosol generator
partners.. Learn More FBN-3000S
 FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-3000T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-3000TS

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-4200T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-4200TS

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-5700

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-5700S

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-5700T

FirePro condensed aerosol generator FBN-5700TS

Mounting bracket, 20 g C20BR

Mounting brackets, 40, 80 g C4080BRS1/C4080BRS2/C4-8RBR

Mounting brackets, 100, 200, 500 g C1-2-5ABS/C1-2-5RBR/ C1-2-5RB/ C1-2-5AS/C-1-2-5U

Mounting brackets, 2000, 3000, 1200 g B122030BRKT B122030BRKT/A

Mounting bracket, 4200, 5700 g B57BRKT/ B57BRKT/C

FireBan - Installation and User Manual, Version 1.0, Revision 1.0, dated February 2019.

For Class A surface burning and Class B and C category hazards; not for use in hazardous (classified) locations. Temperature range -54 to +54°C.

Trademark and/or Tradename: "FirePro", "FireBan", ,

Last Updated on 2019-02-25

The appearance of a company's name or product in this database does not in itself assure that products so identified have been manufactured under UL's Follow-
Up Service. Only those products bearing the UL Mark should be considered to be Certified and covered under UL's Follow-Up Service. Always look for the Mark
on the product.

UL permits the reproduction of the material contained in the Online Certification Directory subject to the following conditions: 1. The Guide Information,
Assemblies, Constructions, Designs, Systems, and/or Certifications (files) must be presented in their entirety and in a non-misleading manner, without any
manipulation of the data (or drawings). 2. The statement "Reprinted from the Online Certifications Directory with permission from UL" must appear adjacent to
the extracted material. In addition, the reprinted material must include a copyright notice in the following format: "© 2020 UL LLC"

Cookies on UL
We use cookies to personalize content and ads,
to provide social media features and to analyze
❯ Cookie Settings ✓ Accept
our traffic. We also share information about your
use of our site with our social media, advertising
and analytics partners.. Learn More
 19th October 2018

REF: CP-19/10/2018

Dear FirePro Partners and Associates,

FirePro (Powdered Aerosol E) has been included on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) SNAP list of acceptable substitutes as suitable for use in “Normally Occupied Areas”.

The U.S. EPA, administers the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program, which identifies
and evaluates substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) in specific end-uses based on
assessment of their health and environmental impacts.

The US EPA decision, published in the US Federal Register Vol. 83, No. 193 on Thursday, October 4,
2018, confirms that the FirePro condensed aerosol fire suppression agent (indicated as Powdered
Aerosol E) has successfully passed the review for physiological effects and that it is now listed as
acceptable for use in total flooding fire suppression applications, in “Normally Occupied Areas”.

The US EPA SNAP list has consequently been updated, and lists FirePro as acceptable for use in
“Normally Unoccupied Areas” as well as in “Normally Occupied Areas”.

The EPA requires that “powdered aerosols” intended for use in total flooding systems undergo a review
for physiological effects, before they can be listed as acceptable for use in normally occupied areas
(Refer to Q9 on EPA site via Link).

Ozone-depleting substances (ODS) are being phased out of production as a result of a series of
international environmental regulations, established through intense diplomatic and legislative efforts
that have taken place over the past three decades, including the Montreal Protocol and the Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA).

EPA’s risk screen indicates that the use of FirePro (Powdered Aerosol E) will be less harmful to the
atmosphere than the continued use of ODS and substitutes commonly used in this sector, as it is less
harmful to the ozone layer, has a lower climate impact as well as a shorter atmospheric lifetime (ALT).

The post-activation products of FirePro (Powdered Aerosol E) do not contain Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOC), so impact on local air quality from the release of the FirePro agent, is not a concern.

EPA’s risk screen indicates that the use of FirePro (Powdered Aerosol E) does not pose a significant
toxicity risk to personnel, end-user and or the general population.

The pre- and post-activation constituents of FirePro (Powdered Aerosol E) have a negligible Global
Warming Potential, lower Climate Impacts and shorter ALT (Atmospheric Life Time) than those
predicted for other substitutes and other commonly used substitutes such as halocarbon agents.

Thus, according to the EPA the use of FirePro (Powdered Aerosol E) would result in substantially less
harm to the climate and ozone layer than the continued use of commonly used ODS (Ozone Depleting
Substances) substitutes as total flooding agents.

You may access the related FirePro US EPA SNAP listing for Occupied Areas by using the following
links, redirecting you on the related sections of the US EPA website:
 1. EPA SNAP Substitutes for Total Flooding Agents
2. Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

On the EPA website search for “Powdered Aerosol E (Fire Pro)” as per below.

General Engineering Requirements

NFPA 2010, Standard for Fixed Aerosol Fire Extinguishing Systems requires a warning of a pending
discharge and a time delay prior to agent release to allow for the safe egress of occupants from the
protected space, to minimize the occupants’ exposure to the agent.

The risk of improper activation of a FirePro extinguishing system is low because all the FirePro systems
installed in Normally Occupied Spaces are fitted with a cross-zone fire detection system, that includes
a pre-discharge alarm and time delay, sufficient to allow personnel evacuation prior to the system
discharge, as required by the NFPA 2010 standard. The NFPA 2010 also requires a supervised
‘disconnect switch’ installed on the releasing circuit located at the entrance of the protected space in
order to avoid unwanted discharge of an aerosol system. Additionally, the US EPA recommends
employing cross-zone detection systems and abort switches located near the exit of the protected
space.

Moreover, US EPA recommends that end-users are familiar with personnel evacuation procedures, and
for this purpose such information and procedures are clearly stated and explained in the FirePro
Installation and Use Manual.

The design of a FirePro condensed aerosol total flooding fire extinguishing system shall be prepared
only by a person qualified and experienced in designing extinguishing systems and the installed
condensed aerosol systems shall be reviewed/verified by a qualified engineer to ensure it complies to
regulations and meets the approval of the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ).

The condensed aerosol agent when used as a total flooding system in a protected space, results in
reduction of visibility that may affect the evacuation of occupants from the protected space. The
requirements of the NFPA 2010 standard are intended to minimize the safety risk related to the post-
activation reduced visibility.

Our Company provides as an additional safety feature, the “Dynamic Emergency Exit Path Signage”,
driven by the “Fire Detection System” via the command activating the optical/visual and acoustic
information once a Fire pre-alarm is identified. The “Dynamic Emergency Exit Path Signage” system
will guide occupants in the protected space to safely reach the exit doors, prior and after system
discharge.

You may also find attached with this letter a copy of the related U.S. Federal Register.
 50026 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

EPA-APPROVED IOWA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS

Applicable
Name of geographic or State submittal
nonregulatory EPA Approval date Explanation
nonattainment date
SIP provision area

* * * * * * *
(50) Lead Redesignation SIP Portions of Pottawattamie 9/18/2017 10/4/2018, [Insert Federal [EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0532;
and Maintenance Plan. County. Register citation]. FRL–9984–64–Region 7].

PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. § 81.316 Iowa.

FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING * * * * *
■ 4. In § 81.316, the table entitled
PURPOSES
‘‘Iowa-2008 Lead NAAQS’’ is amended
■ 3. The authority citation for part 81 by revising the entry ‘‘Pottawattamie
continues to read as follows: County, IA:’’ to read as follows:

IOWA-2008 LEAD NAAQS

Designation for the 2008
NAAQS a
Designated area
Date 1 Type

Pottawattamie County, IA:

Pottawattamie County (part) .............................................................................................................................. 10/4/2018 Attainment.
Area bounded by Avenue G on the north, N 16th/S 16th street on the east, 23rd Avenue on the south,
and N 35th/S 35th street on the west.

* * * * * * *
a Includes
Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
1 December 31, 2011 unless otherwise noted.

[FR Doc. 2018–21433 Filed 10–3–18; 8:45 am] ADDRESSES: EPA established a docket or courier deliveries should be sent to
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P for this action under Docket ID No. the office location at 1201 Constitution
EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118 Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004.
(continuation of Air Docket A–91–42). For more information on the Agency’s
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION All electronic documents in the docket
process for administering the SNAP
AGENCY are listed in the index at
program or criteria for the evaluation of
[Link]. Although listed in
40 CFR Part 82 the index, some information is not substitutes, refer to the initial SNAP
publicly available, i.e., Confidential rulemaking published in the Federal
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118; FRL–9984–77– Business Information (CBI) or other Register on March 18, 1994 (59 FR
OAR] 13044). Notices and rulemakings under
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Publicly available the SNAP program, as well as other EPA
RIN 2060–AG12
docket materials are available either publications on protection of
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: electronically at [Link] or stratospheric ozone, are available at
Determination 34 for Significant New in hard copy at the EPA Air Docket EPA’s Ozone Layer Protection website at
Alternatives Policy Program (Nos. A–91–42 and EPA–HQ–OAR– [Link]/ozone-layer-protection
2003–0118), EPA Docket Center (EPA/ including the SNAP portion at
AGENCY: Environmental Protection DC), William J. Clinton West, Room [Link]/snap/.
Agency (EPA). 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460. The Public SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ACTION: Determination of acceptability.
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to Table of Contents
SUMMARY: This determination of 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
acceptability expands the list of excluding legal holidays. The telephone I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes
acceptable substitutes pursuant to the number for the Public Reading Room is A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (202) 566–1744, and the telephone B. Foam Blowing
(EPA) Significant New Alternatives number for the Air Docket is (202) 566– C. Fire Suppression and Explosion
Policy (SNAP) program. This action lists 1742. Protection
as acceptable additional substitutes for
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Cleaning Solvents

use in the refrigeration and air Gerald Wozniak by telephone at (202) E. Aerosols
conditioning, foam blowing, fire 343–9624, by email at [Link]@ Appendix A: Summary of Decisions for New
suppression, cleaning solvents, and [Link], or by mail at U.S. Acceptable Substitutes
aerosols sectors. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
DATES: This determination is applicable Code 6205T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
on October 4, 2018. NW, Washington, DC 20460. Overnight

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 50027

I. Listing of New Acceptable substitutes, refer to the initial SNAP hydrofluoroolefin (HFO)-1234yf, which
Substitutes 1 rulemaking published March 18, 1994 is also known as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-
This action is limited to listing as (59 FR 13044), codified at 40 CFR part 1-ene (CAS Reg. No 754–12–1); and
acceptable additional substitutes for use 82, subpart G. SNAP decisions and the seven percent HFO–1234ze(E), which is
in the refrigeration and air conditioning, appropriate Federal Register citations also known as trans-1,3,3,3-
foam blowing, fire suppression, cleaning are found at: [Link]/snap/snap- tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No.
solvents, and aerosols sectors. This regulations. Substitutes listed as 29118–24–9).
action presents EPA’s most recent unacceptable; acceptable, subject to You may find the redacted
decision to list as acceptable several narrowed use limits; or acceptable, submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR–
substitutes throughout different SNAP subject to use conditions are also listed 2003–0118 at [Link]
end-uses. New substitutes are: in the appendices to 40 CFR part 82, under the name, ‘‘Supporting
• R–448A in ice skating rinks (retrofit subpart G. Documentation for Notice 30 Listing of
equipment only); The sections below discuss each R–448A (N–40) in Certain Refrigeration
• R–449A in ice skating rinks (retrofit substitute listing in detail. Appendix A and Air Conditioning End-Uses
equipment only); contains tables summarizing this Submission Received May 29, 2014.’’
• R–449B in ice skating rinks (retrofit action’s listing decisions. The EPA performed assessments to examine
equipment only); statements in the ‘‘Further Information’’ the health and environmental risks of
• R–450A in ice skating rinks (new column in the tables provide additional this substitute. These assessments are
and retrofit equipment); information but these are not legally available in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR–
• R–513A in ice skating rinks (new binding under section 612 of the Clean 2003–0118 under the following name:
and retrofit equipment); Air Act (CAA). In addition, the ‘‘Further
Information’’ column may not include a • ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes in Ice
• Acetone/isopentane blend in rigid
comprehensive list of other legal Skating Rinks Substitute: R–448A
polyurethane and polyisocyanurate
obligations you may need to meet when (Solstice® N–40)’’
laminated boardstock;
• Powdered Aerosol E in total using the substitute. Although you are
EPA previously listed R–448A as an
flooding fire suppression (normally not required to follow recommendations
acceptable refrigerant in a number of
occupied areas); and in the ‘‘Further Information’’ column of
other refrigeration and air conditioning
• HFO–1336mzz(Z) in electronics the table to use a substitute consistent
end-uses (e.g., July 16, 2015, 80 FR
cleaning, metals cleaning, and precision with section 612 of the CAA, some of
42053; October 11, 2016, 81 FR 70029;
cleaning and aerosol solvents. these statements may refer to obligations
July 21, 2017, 82 FR 33809).
EPA’s review of certain substitutes that are enforceable or binding under
federal or state programs other than the Environmental information: R–448A
listed in this document is pending for has an ozone depletion potential (ODP)
other end-uses. Listing in the end-uses SNAP program. In many instances, the
information simply refers to standard of zero. Its components, HFC–32, HFC–
and applications in this document does 125, HFC–134a, HFO–1234yf, and HFO–
not prejudge EPA’s listing decision for operating practices in existing industry
standards and/or building codes. When 1234ze(E) have GWPs of 675; 3,500;
these substitutes for other end-uses. For 1,430; one to four; 2 3 and one to six; 4
many of the substitutes being added using these substitutes, EPA strongly
encourages you to apply the information respectively. If these values are
through this document to the acceptable weighted by mass percentage, then R–
lists for specific end-uses, there are in this column. Many of these
recommendations, if adopted, would 448A has a GWP of about 1,390. The
other listed substitutes for the end-use components of R–448A are excluded
whose overall risk is comparable except not require significant changes to
existing operating practices. from the definition of volatile organic
that they have a lower risk in one SNAP compounds (VOC) under CAA
criterion, for example toxicity or global You can find submissions to EPA for
the substitutes listed in this document, regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s))
warming potential (GWP). However, for addressing the development of state
the end-uses addressed in this action, as well as other materials supporting the
decisions in this action, in Docket EPA– implementation plans (SIPs) to attain
those alternatives have not yet proven and maintain the National Ambient Air
feasible in those specific end-uses. HQ–OAR–2003–0118 at
[Link]. Quality Standards (NAAQS). Knowingly
For additional information on SNAP,
venting or releasing this refrigerant
visit the SNAP portion of EPA’s Ozone A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning blend is limited by the venting
Layer Protection website at:
1. R–448A prohibition under section 608(c)(2) of
[Link]/snap. Copies of the full
lists of acceptable substitutes for ozone EPA’s decision: EPA finds R–448A 2 Hodnebrog ;., Etminan, M., Fuglestvedt, J.S.,
depleting substances (ODS) in all acceptable as a substitute for use in: Marston, G., Myhre, G., Nielsen, C.J., Shine, K.P.,
industrial sectors are available at Wallington, T.J.: Global Warming Potentials and
[Link]/snap/substitutes-sector. • Ice Skating Rinks (Retrofit Equipment Radiative Efficiencies of Halocarbons and Related
For more information on the Agency’s Only) Compounds: A Comprehensive Review, Reviews of
Geophysics, 51, 300–378, doi:10.1002/rog.20013,
process for administering the SNAP R–448A, marketed under the trade 2013.
program or criteria for evaluation of name Solstice® N–40, is a weighted 3 Nielsen, O.J., Javadi, M.S., Sulbaek Andersen,
blend of 26 percent hydrofluorocarbon M.P., Hurley, M.D., Wallington, T.J., Singh, R.
1 On April 27, 2018 (83 FR 18431) EPA provided (HFC)-32, which is also known as Atmospheric chemistry of CF3CF=CH2: Kinetics and
information on the Agency’s plan to address the difluoromethane (Chemical Abstracts mechanisms of gas-phase reactions with Cl atoms,
decision of the Court of Appeals for the District of OH radicals, and O3. Chemical Physics Letters 439,
Service Registry Number [CAS Reg. No.]
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

Columbia Circuit in the case of Mexichem Fluor, 18–22, 2007.

Inc. v. EPA. That decision vacated the 2015 Rule 75–10–5); 26 percent HFC–125, which is 4 Hodnebrog et al., 2013 and Atmospheric

(80 FR 42870) ‘‘to the extent it requires also known as 1,1,1,2,2- chemistry of trans-CF3CH=CHF: products and
manufacturers to replace HFCs with a substitute pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 354– mechanisms of hydroxyl radical and chlorine atom
substance’’ and remanded the rule to EPA for initiated oxidation’’, M.S. Javadi, R. S<ndergaard,
further proceedings. EPA plans to issue a proposed
33–6); 21 percent HFC–134a, which is O.J. Nielsen, M.D., Hurley, and T.J. Wellington,
rule to address the court’s vacatur and remand in also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 8,
early 2019. (CAS Reg. No. 811–97–2); 20 percent 1069–1088, 2008.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 50028 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

the CAA, codified at 40 CFR pose greater overall environmental and worst-case fractionation for
82.154(a)(1). human health risk than other available flammability, is not flammable.
Flammability information: R–448A, as substitutes in the same end-use. Toxicity and exposure data: Potential
formulated and even considering the
2. R–449A health effects of exposure to this
worst-case fractionation for
substitute include drowsiness or
flammability, is not flammable. EPA’s decision: EPA finds R–449A
Toxicity and exposure data: Potential dizziness. The substitute may also
acceptable as a substitute for use in: irritate the skin or eyes or cause
health effects of exposure to this
substitute include drowsiness or • Ice Skating Rinks (Retrofit Equipment frostbite. At sufficiently high
dizziness. The substitute may also Only) concentrations, the substitute may cause
irritate the skin or eyes or cause irregular heartbeat. The substitute could
R–449A, marketed under the trade
frostbite. At sufficiently high cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by
name Opteon® XP 40, is a weighted
concentrations, the substitute may cause vapors in a confined space. These
blend of 24.3 percent HFC–32, which is
irregular heartbeat. The substitute could potential health effects are common to
also known as difluoromethane (CAS
cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by Reg. No. 75–10–5); 24.7 percent HFC– many refrigerants.
vapors in a confined space. These 125, which is also known as 1,1,1,2,2- The AIHA has established WEELs of
potential health effects are common to pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 354– 1,000 ppm as an 8-hr TWA for HFC–32,
many refrigerants. 33–6); 25.7 percent HFC–134a, which is HFC–125, and HFC–134a and 500 ppm
The American Industrial Hygiene also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane for HFO–1234yf, the components of R–
Association (AIHA) has established (CAS Reg. No. 811–97–2); and 25.3 449A. The manufacturer of R–449A
workplace environmental exposure percent HFO–1234yf, which is also recommends an AEL of 830 ppm on an
limits (WEELs) of 1,000 ppm as an known as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene 8-hour TWA for the blend. EPA
eight-hour time-weighted (TWA) for (CAS Reg. No. 754–12–1). anticipates that users will be able to
HFC–32, HFC–125, and HFC–134a; 500
You may find the redacted meet each of the AIHA WEELs and the
ppm for HFO–1234yf; and 800 ppm for
submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– manufacturer’s AEL and address
HFO–1234ze(E), the components of R–
2003–0118 at [Link] potential health risks by following
448A. The manufacturer of R–448A
recommends an acceptable exposure under the name, ‘‘Supporting requirements and recommendations in
limit (AEL) of 890 ppm on an 8-hour Documentation for Notice 30 Listing of the manufacturer’s SDS, in ASHRAE 15,
TWA for the blend. EPA anticipates that R–449A (XP40) in Certain Refrigeration and other safety precautions common to
users will be able to meet the AIHA and Air Conditioning End-Uses. SNAP the refrigeration and air conditioning
WEELs and manufacturer’s AEL and Submission Received August 6, 2014.’’ industry.
address potential health risks by EPA performed assessments to examine Comparison to other substitutes in
following requirements and the health and environmental risks of this end-use: R–449A has an ODP of
recommendations in the manufacturer’s this substitute. These assessments are zero, comparable to or lower than the
safety data sheet (SDS), in the American available in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR–
other listed substitutes in this end-use,
Society for Heating, Refrigerating, and 2003–0118 under the following name:
with ODPs ranging from zero to 0.098.
Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) • ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes in Ice R–449A’s GWP of 1,400 is lower than
Standard 15, and other safety Skating Rinks Substitute: R–449A or comparable to that of acceptable
precautions common to the refrigeration (Opteon® XP40)’’ substitutes for ice skating rinks (retrofit),
and air conditioning industry. such as HFC–134a, R–407C, and R–
Comparison to other substitutes in EPA previously listed R–449A as an
acceptable refrigerant in a number of 507A with GWPs ranging from 1,430 to
this end-use: R–448A has an ODP of
zero, comparable to or lower than other other refrigeration and air conditioning 3,990. R–449A’s GWP is higher than the
listed substitutes in this end-use, with end-uses (e.g., July 16, 2015, 80 FR GWPs of other acceptable substitutes for
ODPs ranging from zero to 0.098. 42053; October 11, 2016, 81 FR 70029; ice skating rinks (retrofit), including R–
R–448A’s GWP of 1,390 is lower than July 21, 2017, 82 FR 33809). 401A and R–401B with GWPs ranging
or comparable to that of acceptable Environmental information: R–449A from 1,182 to 1,288.
substitutes for ice skating rinks (retrofit), has an ODP of zero. Its components, Flammability and toxicity risks are
such as HFC–134a, R–407C, and R– HFC–32, HFC–125, HFC–134a, and comparable to or lower than
507A, with GWPs ranging from 1,430 to HFO–1234yf, have GWPs of 675; 3,500; flammability and toxicity risks of other
3,990. R–448A’s GWP is higher than the 1,430; and one to four,5 respectively. If available substitutes in the same end-
GWPs of other acceptable substitutes for these values are weighted by mass uses. Toxicity risks can be minimized
ice skating rinks (retrofit), including R– percentage, then R–449A has a GWP of by use consistent with the AIHA
401A and R–401B with GWPs ranging about 1,400. The components of R–449A WEELs, ASHRAE 15 and other industry
from 1,182 to 1,288. are excluded from the definition of VOC standards, recommendations in the
Flammability and toxicity risks are under CAA regulations (see 40 CFR manufacturer’s SDS, and other safety
comparable to or lower than 51.100(s)) addressing the development precautions common in the refrigeration
flammability and toxicity risks of other of SIPs to attain and maintain the and air conditioning industry.
available substitutes in the same end- NAAQS. Knowingly venting or releasing
use. Toxicity risks can be minimized by this refrigerant blend is limited by the EPA finds R–449A acceptable in the
use consistent with the AIHA WEELs, venting prohibition under section end-use listed above because it does not
608(c)(2) of the CAA, codified at 40 CFR pose greater overall environmental and
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

ASHRAE 15 and other industry

standards, recommendations in the 82.154(a)(1). human health risk than other available
manufacturer’s SDS, and other safety Flammability information: R–449A, as substitutes in the same end-use.
precautions common in the refrigeration formulated and even considering the 3. R–449B
and air conditioning industry.
EPA finds R–448A acceptable in the 5 Hodnebrog et al., 2013 and Nielsen et al., 2007. EPA’s decision: EPA finds R–449B
end-use listed above because it does not Op. cit. acceptable as a substitute for use in:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 50029

• Ice Skating Rinks (Retrofit Equipment cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by under the name, ‘‘Supporting Materials
Only) vapors in a confined space. These for Notice 30 Listing of R–450A in
R–449B, marketed under the trade potential health effects are common to Vending Machines.’’ EPA performed an
name Forane® 449B, is a weighted blend many refrigerants. assessment to examine the health and
of 25.2 percent HFC–32, which is also The AIHA has established WEELs of environmental risks of this substitute.
known as difluoromethane (CAS Reg. 1,000 ppm as an 8-hr TWA for HFC–32, This assessment is available in Docket
No. 75–10–5); 24.3 percent HFC–125, HFC–125, and HFC–134a and 500 ppm EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118 under the
which is also known as 1,1,1,2,2- for HFO–1234yf, the components of R– following name:
449B. The manufacturer of R–449B
pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 354– • ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes for Use in
33–6); 27.3 percent HFC–134a, which is recommends an AEL of 865 ppm on an
Ice Skating Rinks Substitute: R–450A’’
also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane 8-hour TWA for the blend. EPA
anticipates that users will be able to EPA previously listed R–450A as
(CAS Reg. No. 811–97–2); and 23.2
percent HFO–1234yf, which is also meet each of the AIHA WEELs and the acceptable for use as a refrigerant in
known as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene manufacturer’s AEL and address several refrigeration and air
(CAS Reg. No. 754–12–1). potential health risks by following conditioning end-uses (October 21,
You may find the redacted requirements and recommendations in 2014, 79 FR 62863; July 16, 2015, 80 FR
submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– the manufacturer’s SDS, in ASHRAE 15, 42053).
2003–0118 at [Link] and other safety precautions common to Environmental information: R–450A
under the name, ‘‘Supporting the refrigeration and air conditioning has an ODP of zero. Its components,
Documentation for Notice 32 Listing of industry. HFC–134a and HFO–1234ze(E), have
R–449B in Refrigeration and Air Comparison to other substitutes in GWPs of 1,430 and one to six,7
Conditioning. SNAP Submission this end-use: R–449B has an ODP of respectively. If these values are
Received October 2, 2015.’’ EPA zero, comparable to or lower than the weighted by mass percentage, then R–
performed assessments to examine the other listed substitutes in this end-use, 450A has a GWP of about 600. The
health and environmental risks of this with ODPs ranging from zero to 0.098. components of R–450A are both
substitute. These assessments are R–449B’s GWP of 1,410 is lower than excluded from the definition of VOC
available in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– or comparable to that of acceptable under CAA regulations (see 40 CFR
2003–0118 under the following name: substitutes for ice skating rinks (retrofit), 51.100(s)) addressing the development
such as HFC–134a, R–407C, and R– of SIPs to attain and maintain the
• ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes in Ice 507A with GWPs ranging from 1,430 to NAAQS. Knowingly venting or releasing
Skating Rinks Substitute: R–449B 3,990. R–449B’s GWP is higher than the this refrigerant blend is limited by the
(Forane® 449B)’’ GWPs of other acceptable substitutes for venting prohibition under section
EPA previously listed R–449B as an ice skating rinks (retrofit), including R– 608(c)(2) of the CAA, codified at 40 CFR
acceptable refrigerant in a number of 401A and R–401B with GWPs ranging 82.154(a)(1).
other refrigeration and air conditioning from 1,182 to 1,288. Flammability information: R–450A, as
end-uses (e.g., October 11, 2016, 81 FR Flammability and toxicity risks are formulated and even considering the
70029; July 21, 2017, 82 FR 33809). comparable to or lower than worst-case fractionation for
Environmental information: R–449B flammability and toxicity risks of other flammability, is not flammable.
has an ODP of zero. Its components, available substitutes in the same end- Toxicity and exposure data: Potential
HFC–32, HFC–125, HFC–134a, and use. Toxicity risks can be minimized by health effects of exposure to this
HFO–1234yf, have GWPs of 675; 3,500; use consistent with the AIHA WEELs, substitute include drowsiness or
1,430; and one to four,6 respectively. If ASHRAE 15 and other industry dizziness. The substitute may also
these values are weighted by mass standards, recommendations in the irritate the skin or eyes or cause
percentage, then R–449B has a GWP of manufacturer’s SDS, and other safety frostbite. At sufficiently high
about 1,410. The components of R–449B precautions common in the refrigeration concentrations, the substitute may cause
are excluded from the definition of VOC and air conditioning industry. irregular heartbeat. The substitute could
under CAA regulations (see 40 CFR EPA finds R–449B acceptable in the cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by
51.100(s)) addressing the development end-use listed above because it does not vapors in a confined space. These
of SIPs to attain and maintain the pose greater overall environmental and potential health effects are common to
NAAQS. Knowingly venting or releasing human health risk than other available many refrigerants.
this refrigerant blend is limited by the substitutes in the same end-use. The AIHA has established WEELs of
venting prohibition under section 1,000 ppm and 800 ppm as an 8-hour
4. R–450A TWA for HFC–134a and HFO–
608(c)(2) of the CAA, codified at 40 CFR
82.154(a)(1). EPA’s decision: EPA finds R–450A 1234ze(E), respectively, the components
Flammability information: R–449B, as acceptable as a substitute for use in: of R–450A. The manufacturer of R–
formulated and even considering the 450A recommends an AEL of 880 ppm
• Ice Skating Rinks (New and Retrofit
worst-case fractionation for on an 8-hour TWA for the blend. EPA
Equipment)
flammability, is not flammable. anticipates that users will be able to
Toxicity and exposure data: Potential R–450A, marketed under the trade meet each of the manufacturer’s AEL
health effects of exposure to this name Solstice® N–13, is a weighted and AIHA WEELs and address potential
substitute include drowsiness or blend of 42 percent HFC–134a, which is health risks by following requirements
dizziness. The substitute may also also known as 1,1,1,2 tetrafluoroethane and recommendations in the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

irritate the skin or eyes or cause (CAS Reg. No. 811–97–2), and 58 manufacturer’s SDS, in ASHRAE 15,
frostbite. At sufficiently high percent HFO–1234ze(E), which is also and other safety precautions common to
concentrations, the substitute may cause known as trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropro-l- the refrigeration and air conditioning
irregular heartbeat. The substitute could ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118–24–9). industry.
You may find the redacted
6 Hodnebrog et al., 2013 and Nielsen et al., 2007. submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– 7 Hodnebrog et al., 2013 and Nielsen et al., 2007.

Op. cit. 2003–0118 at [Link] Op. cit.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 50030 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

Comparison to other substitutes in Environmental information: R–513A Flammability and toxicity risks are
this end-use: R–450A has an ODP of has an ODP of zero. Its components, comparable to or lower than
zero, comparable to other listed HFC–134a and HFO–1234yf, have GWPs flammability and toxicity risks of other
substitutes in this end-use, with ODPs of 1,430 and one to four,8 respectively. available substitutes in the same end-
ranging from zero to 0.098. If these values are weighted by mass use. Toxicity risks can be minimized by
R–450A’s GWP of 600 is lower than percentage, then R–513A has a GWP of use consistent with the AIHA WEELs,
that of other acceptable substitutes (for about 630. The components of R–513A ASHRAE 15, and other industry
new and retrofit use for ice skating are both excluded from the definition of standards, recommendations in the
rinks) such as HFC–134a, R–407C, and VOC under CAA regulations (see 40 manufacturer’s SDS, and other safety
R–507A with GWPs ranging from 1,430 CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the precautions common in the refrigeration
to 3,990. R–450A’s GWP is higher than development of SIPs to attain and and air conditioning industry.
the GWPs of other acceptable substitutes maintain the NAAQS. Knowingly EPA finds R–513A acceptable in the
for new ice skating rinks, including venting or releasing this refrigerant end-use listed above because it does not
ammonia absorption, ammonia vapor blend is limited by the venting pose greater overall environmental and
compression and carbon dioxide with prohibition under section 608(c)(2) of human health risk than other available
GWPs ranging from zero to 1. the CAA, codified at 40 CFR substitutes in the same end-use.
Flammability and toxicity risks are 82.154(a)(1).
comparable to or lower than B. Foam Blowing
Flammability information: R–513A, as
flammability and toxicity risks of other formulated and even considering the 1. Acetone/Isopentane Blend
available substitutes in the same end- worst-case fractionation for EPA’s decision: EPA finds Acetone/
use. Toxicity risks can be minimized by flammability, is not flammable. Isopentane blend acceptable as a
use consistent with the AIHA WEELs, Toxicity and exposure data: Potential substitute for use in:
ASHRAE 15, and other industry health effects of exposure to this
standards, recommendations in the substitute include drowsiness or • Rigid Polyurethane and
manufacturer’s SDS, and other safety dizziness. The substitute may also Polyisocyanurate Laminated Boardstock
precautions common in the refrigeration irritate the skin or eyes or cause Acetone/Isopentane, is a weighted
and air conditioning industry. frostbite. At sufficiently high blend of 10–30 percent acetone (CAS
EPA finds R–450A acceptable in the concentrations, the substitute may cause Reg. No. 67–64–1) and 70–90 percent
end-use listed above because it does not irregular heartbeat. The substitute could isopentane (CAS Reg. No. 78–78–4).
pose greater overall environmental and cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by You may find the redacted
human health risk than other available vapors in a confined space. These submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR–
substitutes in the same end-use. potential health effects are common to 2003–0118 at [Link]
5. R–513A many refrigerants. under the name, ‘‘Supporting
The AIHA has established WEELs of Documentation for Notice 34 Listing of
EPA’s decision: EPA finds R–513A Acetone/Isopentane blend in rigid
acceptable as a substitute for use in: 1,000 ppm and 500 ppm as an 8-hour
TWA for HFC–134a and HFO–1234yf, polyurethane and polyisocyanurate
• Ice Skating Rinks (New and Retrofit respectively, the components of R– laminated boardstock. SNAP
Equipment) 513A. The manufacturer of R–513A Submission Received August 8, 2017.’’
recommends an AEL of 653 ppm on an EPA performed an assessment to
R–513A, marketed under the trade
8-hour TWA for the blend. EPA examine the health and environmental
name Opteon® XP 10, is a weighted
anticipates that users will be able to risks of this substitute. This assessment
blend of 44 percent HFC–134a, which is
meet each of the manufacturer’s AEL is available in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR–
also known as 1,1,1,2 tetrafluoroethane
and AIHA WEELs and address potential 2003–0118 under the following name:
(CAS Reg. No. 811–97–2), and 56
percent HFO–1234yf, which is also health risks by following requirements • ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes for Use in
known as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene and recommendations in the Rigid Polyurethane and
(CAS Reg. No. 754–12–1). manufacturer’s SDS, in ASHRAE 15, Polyisocyanurate Laminated Boardstock
You may find the redacted and other safety precautions common to Substitute: Acetone/Isopentane Blend’’
submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– the refrigeration and air conditioning
industry. EPA previously listed acetone as
2003–0118 at [Link] acceptable for use as a foam-blowing
under the name, ‘‘Supporting Comparison to other substitutes in
agent in flexible polyurethane and in
Documentation for Notice 30 Listing of this end-use: R–513A has an ODP of
integral skin polyurethane (March 18,
R–513A (XP10) in Certain Refrigeration zero, comparable to other listed
1994, 59 FR 13044; February 24, 1998,
and Air Conditioning End-Uses. SNAP substitutes in this end-use, with ODPs
63 FR 9151). EPA previously listed C3–
Submission Received July 24, 2014.’’ ranging from zero to 0.098.
C6 light saturated hydrocarbons, which
EPA performed an assessment to R–513A’s GWP of 630 is lower than
include isopentane, as acceptable for
examine the health and environmental that of other acceptable substitutes for
use as a foam-blowing agent in a
risks of this substitute. This assessment new and retrofit use for ice skating
number of foam-blowing end-uses.
is available in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– rinks, such as HFC–134a, R–407C, and
(August 26, 1994, 59 FR 44240; April
2003–0118 under the following name: R–507A with GWPs ranging from 1,430
11, 2000, 65 FR 19327).
to 3,990. R–513A’s GWP is higher than
• ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes for Use in the GWPs of other acceptable substitutes
Environmental information: Acetone/
Ice Skating Rinks Substitute: R–513A’’ isopentane blend has an ODP of zero. Its
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

for new ice skating rinks, including components, acetone and isopentane,
EPA previously listed R–513A as ammonia absorption, ammonia vapor have GWPs of 0.5 and <10,
acceptable for use as a refrigerant in compression and carbon dioxide with respectively.9 Acetone is excluded from
several refrigeration and air GWPs ranging from zero to 1.
conditioning end-uses (July 16, 2015, 80 9 GWP for acetone comes from IPCC, 2007. GWP
FR 42053; May 23, 2016, 81 FR 32241; 8 Hodnebrog et al., 2013 and Nielsen et al., 2007. for isopentane is estimated based on GWP of butane
July 21, 2017, 82 FR 33809). Op. cit. from IPCC, 2007 and the relative atmospheric

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 50031

the definition of VOC under CAA recommendations in the manufacturer’s • ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes for Total
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)) SDS, and other safety precautions Flooding Systems in Occupied Spaces
addressing the development of SIPs to common in the foam-blowing industry. Substitute: Powdered Aerosol E
attain and maintain the NAAQS, while EPA finds acetone/isopentane blend (FirePro)’’
isopentane is defined as VOC under acceptable in the end-use listed above Environmental information: The
those regulations. because it does not pose greater overall active ingredients of Powdered Aerosol
Flammability information: Acetone/ environmental and human health risk E are solids both before and after use;
isopentane blend is flammable. than other available substitutes in the
Toxicity and exposure data: Potential thus, their ODP and GWP are both zero.
same end-use. The gaseous post-activation products for
health effects of exposure to this
substitute include drowsiness or C. Fire Suppression and Explosion Powdered Aerosol E also have zero ODP
dizziness. Higher concentrations may Protection and GWPs of 120 or less. The solid
cause central nervous system depression active ingredients and particulate post-
1. Powdered Aerosol E (FireProTM) activation products do not participate in
and loss of consciousness. The
substitute may also irritate the skin or atmospheric photochemical reactions
EPA’s decision: EPA finds Powdered
eyes. The substitute could cause and are not VOCs. The gaseous post-
Aerosol E acceptable as a substitute for:
asphyxiation if air is displaced by activation products are either not
vapors in a confined space. These • Total Flooding Uses organic or excluded from the definition
potential health effects are common to of VOC under CAA regulations (see 40
Powdered Aerosol E is generated in CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the
many foam-blowing agents. an automated manufacturing process
For acetone, the Occupational Safety development of SIPs to attain and
during which the chemicals, in powder maintain the NAAQS.
and Health Administration (OSHA) has form, are mixed and then supplied to
established a permissible exposure limit Flammability information: Powdered
end users as a solid contained within a Aerosol E’s post-activation products are
(PEL) of 1000 ppm and the American fire extinguisher. In the presence of
Conference of Governmental Industrial nonflammable.
heat, the solid converts to an aerosol Toxicity and exposure data: Exposure
Hygienists (ACGIH) has established a consisting mainly of potassium salts.
threshold limit value (TLV) of 750 ppm, to Powdered Aerosol E after activation
EPA previously listed Powdered may cause temporary, mild irritation of
both on an 8-hr TWA. For isopentane,
Aerosol E as acceptable subject to use the mucous membrane. If eye or skin
ACGIH has established a TLV of 600
conditions in areas that are not normally contact occurs, end users should flush
ppm on an 8-hr TWA. EPA anticipates
occupied (71 FR 56359; September 27, eyes with water or wash skin with soap
that users will be able to meet the
2006). Based on a review of additional and water. If inhaled, end users should
ACGIH’s TLVs for both components and
information from the submitter to be removed and exposed to fresh air.
address potential health risks by
support the safe use of Powdered Exposure to the post-discharge products
following requirements and
Aerosol E in normally occupied spaces, is expected to be below the relevant
recommendations in the manufacturer’s
EPA now determines that Powdered workplace exposure limits for those
SDS and other safety precautions
Aerosol E is also acceptable for use in compounds. Because it is housed in a
common to the foam-blowing industry.
Comparison to other substitutes in total flooding systems for normally hermetically sealed container, exposure
this end-use: Acetone/isopentane blend occupied spaces, and EPA is adding should not occur unless the system is
has an ODP of zero, comparable to other Powdered Aerosol E to the list of activated.
listed substitutes in this end-use, with acceptable substitutes for total flooding The post-activation components of the
ODPs ranging from zero to 0.012. uses, which would include both proposed substitute are common
For rigid polyurethane and unoccupied and occupied spaces. In a compounds that are not expected to
polyisocyanurate laminated boardstock, subsequent rulemaking EPA will exceed immediately dangerous to life or
acetone/isopentane blend’s GWP of <10 remove the previous listing as health (IDLH) levels from the National
is comparable to the GWPs of other acceptable subject to use conditions. In Institute for Occupational Safety and
acceptable substitutes for rigid the ‘‘Further Information’’ column of the Health (NIOSH) that apply to
polyurethane and polyisocyanurate tables summarizing today’s listing occupational and end use exposure.
laminated boardstock, including decisions and found at the end of this Information on additional safety
EcomateTM, CO2, HFO–1336mzz(Z) and document, we also state that use of this recommendations: The discharge of the
C3–C6 light saturated hydrocarbons agent should continue to be in aerosol results in a reduction of
with GWPs ranging from less than 1 to accordance with the safety guidelines in visibility in the protected space due to
approximately 12. the latest edition of the National Fire the uniform distribution of the
Flammability and toxicity risks are Protection Association (NFPA) 2010 particulate generated. Use according to
comparable to or lower than Standard for Aerosol Extinguishing the NFPA 2010 Standard will reduce
flammability and toxicity risks of other Systems. any safety risks due to reduced
available substitutes in the same end- You may find the redacted visibility. In addition, EPA recommends
use. Toxicity risks can be minimized by submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– that cross-zone detection systems and
use consistent with the ACGIH TLVs, 2003–0118 at [Link] abort switches located near an exit from
under the name, ‘‘Supporting the protected space be employed;
lifetimes of butane and isopentane from: Documentation for Notice 34 Listing of improved detection systems within the
Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Powdered Aerosol E (FirePro) in Fire protected space and manual abort
Climate System. IPCC/TEAP, 2005—Bert Metz,
Suppression. SNAP Submission switches outside of the space could help
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

Lambert Kuijpers, Susan Solomon, Stephen O.

Anderson, Ogunlade Davidson, Jose Pons, David de Received November 17, 2016.’’ EPA avoid inadvertent discharge.
Jager, Tahl Kestin, Martin Manning, and Leo Meyer performed an assessment to examine the In the ‘‘Further Information’’ column
(Eds.). Cambridge University Press, UK. pp 478. health and environmental risks of this of the tables summarizing today’s listing
Available from Cambridge University Press, The
Edinburgh Building Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge
substitute. This assessment is available decisions, EPA recommends the
CB2 2RU ENGLAND Available online at https:// in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0118 following for establishments
[Link]/report/sroc. under the following name: manufacturing Powdered Aerosol E and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 50032 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

filling containers to be used in total and other safety precautions common in rule that, if finalized as proposed,
flooding applications: the fire suppression industry. The would exclude HFO–1336mzz(Z) from
—Workers should use appropriate safety potential toxicity risks due to inhalation the definition of VOC under CAA
and protective equipment (e.g., exposure are common to many total regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s))
protective gloves, tightly sealed flooding agents, including those already addressing the development of SIPs to
goggles, protective work clothing, and listed as acceptable under SNAP for this attain and maintain the NAAQS (May 1,
particulate-removing respirators using same end-use. Powdered Aerosol E’s 2018; 83 FR 19026).
NIOSH type N95 or better filters) post-activation products are Flammability information: HFO–
consistent with OSHA guidelines. nonflammable, as are all other available 1336mzz(Z) is not flammable.
—A local exhaust system should be total flooding agents. Toxicity and exposure data: Potential
installed and operated to provide EPA finds Powdered Aerosol E health effects of exposure to this
adequate ventilation to reduce acceptable in the end-use listed above substitute include skin or eye irritation
airborne exposure to Powdered because it does not pose greater overall or frostbite. At sufficiently high
Aerosol E constituents. environmental and human health risk concentrations, the substitute may cause
—An eye wash fountain and quick than other available substitutes in the irregular heartbeat. The substitute could
drench facility should be close to the same end-use. cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by
production area. vapors in a confined space. EPA issued
D. Cleaning Solvents a Significant New Use Rule under the
—Training for safe handling procedures
should be provided to all employees 1. HFO–1336mzz(Z) Toxic Substances Control Act on June 5,
that would be likely to handle the 2015, to require persons to submit a
EPA’s decision: EPA finds HFO– Significant New Use Notice to EPA at
containers of the agent or 1336mzz(Z)) acceptable as a substitute least 90 days before they manufacture or
extinguishing units filled with the for use in: process HFO–1336mzz(Z) for uses other
agent. • Electronics cleaning than those described in the
—Workers responsible for cleanup • Metals cleaning Premanufacture Notice (80 FR 32003).
should allow particulates to settle • Precision cleaning EPA anticipates that HFO–
before reentering area and wear HFO–1336mzz(Z) is also known as 1336mzz(Z) will be used consistent with
appropriate personal protective (Z)-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-2-butene and the recommendations specified in the
equipment. cis-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-2-butene (CAS SDS. The WEEL committee of the
—All spills should be cleaned up Reg. No. 692–49–9). Occupational Alliance for Risk Science
immediately in accordance with good You may find the redacted (OARS) recommends a WEEL for the
industrial hygiene practices. submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– workplace of 500 ppm on an 8-hour
EPA expects that procedures 2003–0118 at [Link] TWA. EPA anticipates that users will be
identified in the SDS for Powdered under the name, ‘‘Supporting able to meet the WEEL and address
Aerosol E and good manufacturing Documentation for Notice 34 Listing of potential health risks by following
practices will be adhered to, and that HFO–1336mzz(Z) in Cleaning Solvents requirements and recommendations in
the appropriate safety and personal and Aerosol Solvents. SNAP the SDS and other safety precautions
protective equipment (PPE) consistent Submission Received June 19, 2017.’’ common to the cleaning solvents
with OSHA guidelines will be used EPA performed an assessment to industry.
during installation, servicing, post- examine the health and environmental Comparison to other substitutes in
discharge clean-up and disposal of total risks of this substitute. This assessment this end-use: HFO–1336mzz(Z) has an
flooding systems using Powdered is available in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– ODP of zero, comparable to other listed
Aerosol E. The manufacturer should 2003–0118 under the following name: substitutes in this end-use, with ODPs
provide guidance upon installation of ranging from zero to 0.033.
the system regarding the appropriate • ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes for Use in For cleaning solvents, HFO–
time after which workers may re-enter Cleaning Solvents Substitute: HFO– 1336mzz(Z)’s GWP of about nine is
the area for disposal to allow the 1336mzz(Z)’’ lower than that of other acceptable
maximum settling of all particulates. EPA previously listed HFO– substitutes, such as HFE–7200, HFE–
Comparison to other substitutes in 1336mzz(Z) as acceptable for use in 7100, HFC–365mfc and HFC–4310mee
this end-use: Powdered Aerosol E has an several refrigeration and air with GWPs ranging from 59 to 1,640.
ODP of zero, comparable to other listed conditioning and foam-blowing end- HFO–1336mzz(Z)’s GWP is higher than
substitutes in this end-use, with ODPs uses (October 21, 2014, 79 FR 62863; or comparable to the GWPs of other
ranging from zero to 0.048. July 16, 2015, 80 FR 42053; May 23, acceptable substitutes for cleaning
For total flooding agents, Powdered 2016, 81 FR 32241). solvents, including acetone,
Aerosol E’s GWP of 0 (and 1 to 120 for Environmental information: HFO– methoxytridecafluoroheptene isomers
certain post-activation products) is 1336mzz(Z) has an ODP of zero. It has (MPHE), and trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-
lower than that of other acceptable a 100-year GWP of about nine.10 HFO– trifluoroprop-1-ene with GWPs ranging
substitutes, such as HFC–227ea, other 1336mzz(Z) is a VOC, and it is not from less than 1 to 7.
HFCs, and some HCFC fire exempted from the definition of VOC Flammability and toxicity risks are
suppressants, with GWPs which range under CAA regulation (see 40 CFR comparable to or lower than
from about 1,550 to 14,800. Other 51.100(s)) addressing the development flammability and toxicity risks of other
acceptable substitutes in this end-use of SIPs to attain and maintain the available substitutes in the same end-
have comparable GWPs ranging from use. Toxicity risks can be minimized by
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

NAAQS. EPA has issued a proposed

zero to one, such as water, inert gases, use consistent with the OARS WEEL,
and a number of other powdered aerosol 10 Baasandorj, M., Ravishankara, A.R., recommendations in the manufacturer’s
fire suppressants. Burkholder, J.B., Atmospheric Chemistry of (Z)- SDS, and other safety precautions
CF3CHÕCHCF3: OH Radical Reaction Rate
Toxicity risks can be minimized by Coefficient and Global Warming Potential, Journal
common in the cleaning solvents
use consistent with the NFPA 2010 of Physical Chemistry A, 2011, 115, 10,539–10,549, industry; moreover, those risks are
standard, recommendations in the SDS, 2011. common to many cleaning solvents,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 50033

including many of those already listed several refrigeration and air HFO–1336mzz(Z)’s GWP is higher than
as acceptable under SNAP for this end- conditioning and foam-blowing end- or comparable to the GWPs of other
use. uses (October 21, 2014, 79 FR 62863; acceptable substitutes for aerosol
EPA finds HFO–1336mzz(Z) July 16, 2015, 80 FR 42053; May 23, solvents, including acetone, MPHE, and
acceptable in the end-uses listed above 2016, 81 FR 32241). trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene
because it does not pose greater overall Environmental information: The with GWPs ranging from less than
environmental and human health risk environmental information for this 1 to 7.
than other available substitutes in the substitute is set forth in the Flammability and toxicity risks are
same end-uses. ‘‘Environmental information’’ section in comparable to or lower than
listing I.D.1. flammability and toxicity risks of other
E. Aerosols
Flammability information: HFO– available substitutes in the same end-
1. HFO–1336mzz(Z) 1336mzz(Z) is not flammable. use. Toxicity risks can be minimized by
EPA’s decision: EPA finds HFO– Toxicity and exposure data: The use consistent with the OARS WEEL,
1336mzz(Z) acceptable as a substitute toxicity information for this substitute is recommendations in the manufacturer’s
for use in: set forth in the ‘‘Toxicity and exposure SDS, and other safety precautions
data’’ section in listing I.D.1, above. common in the aerosols industry;
• Aerosol Solvents EPA anticipates that HFO– moreover, those risks are common to
HFO–1336mzz(Z) is also known as 1336mzz(Z) will be used consistent with many aerosol solvents, including many
(Z)-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-2-butene and the recommendations specified in the of those already listed as acceptable
cis-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-2-butene (CAS SDS. The WEEL committee of the under SNAP for this end-use.
Reg. No. 692–49–9). Occupational Alliance for Risk Science
EPA finds HFO–1336mzz(Z)
You may find the redacted (OARS) recommends a WEEL for the
acceptable in the end-use listed above
submission in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– workplace of 500 ppm on an 8-hour
because it does not pose greater overall
2003–0118 at [Link] TWA. EPA anticipates that users will be
environmental and human health risk
under the name, ‘‘Supporting able to meet the WEEL and address
than other available substitutes in the
Documentation for Notice 34 Listing of potential health risks by following
same end-use.
HFO–1336mzz(Z) in Cleaning Solvents requirements and recommendations in
and Aerosol Solvents. SNAP the SDS and other safety precautions List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82
Submission Received June 19, 2017.’’ common to the aerosols industry.
Comparison to other substitutes in Environmental protection,
EPA performed an assessment to Administrative practice and procedure,
examine the health and environmental this end-use: HFO–1336mzz(Z) has an
ODP of zero, comparable to other listed Air pollution control, Reporting and
risks of this substitute. This assessment recordkeeping requirements.
is available in Docket EPA–HQ–OAR– substitutes in this end-use, with ODPs
2003–0118 under the following name: ranging from zero to 0.033. Dated: September 19, 2018.
For aerosol solvents, HFO– Sarah Dunham,
• ‘‘Risk Screen on Substitutes for Use in 1336mzz(Z)’s GWP of about nine is Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.
Aerosol Solvents Substitute: HFO– lower than that of other acceptable
1336mzz(Z)’’ substitutes, such as HFE–7200, HFE– Appendix A: Summary of Decisions for
EPA previously listed HFO– 7000, HFC–365mfc and HFC–4310mee New Acceptable Substitutes
1336mzz(Z) as acceptable for use in with GWPs ranging from 59 to 1,640.

End-use Substitute Decision Further Information 1

Refrigeration and Air Conditioning

Ice skating rinks (retrofit R–448A ........... Acceptable ...... R–448A has a 100-yr global warming potential (GWP) of approximately 1,390.
equipment only). This substitute is a blend of HFC–32, which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75–10–5); HFC–125, which is also known as
1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 354–33–6); HFC–134a, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 811–97–2); HFO–
1234yf, which is also known as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-prop-l-ene (CAS Reg. No.
754–12–1); and HFO–1234ze(E), which is also known as trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118–24–9).
The blend is nonflammable.
The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) has established Work-
place Environmental Exposure Limits (WEELs) of 1,000 ppm on an eight-
hour time-weighted average (8-hr TWA) basis for HFC–32, HFC–125, and
HFC–134a; 500 ppm for HFO–1234yf; and 800 ppm for HFO–1234ze(E).
The manufacturer recommends an acceptable exposure limit (AEL) for the
workplace for R–448A of 890 ppm (8-hr TWA).
Ice skating rinks (retrofit R–449A ........... Acceptable ...... R–449A has a 100-year GWP of approximately 1,400. This substitute is a
equipment only). blend of HFC–32, which is also known as difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No.
75–10–5); HFC–125, which is also known as 1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane
(CAS Reg. No. 354–33–6); HFC–134a, which is also known as 1,1,1,2-
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 811–97–2); and HFO–1234yf, which is also

known as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg. No. 754–12–1).
The blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of 1,000 ppm (8-hr TWA) for HFC–32,
HFC–125, and HFC–134a; and 500 ppm for HFO–1234yf. The manufacturer
recommends an AEL for the workplace for R–449A of 830 ppm (8-hr TWA).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 50034 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

End-use Substitute Decision Further Information 1

Ice skating rinks (retrofit R–449B ........... Acceptable ...... R–449B has a 100-year GWP of approximately 1,410. This substitute is a
equipment only). blend of HFC–32, which is also known as difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No.
75–10–5); HFC–125, which is also known as 1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane
(CAS Reg. No. 354–33–6); HFC–134a, which is also known as 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 811–97–2); and HFO–1234yf, which is also
known as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg. No. 754–12–1).
The blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of 1,000 ppm (8-hr TWA) for HFC–32,
HFC–125, and HFC–134a; and 500 ppm for HFO–1234yf. The manufacturer
recommends an AEL for the workplace for R–449B of 865 ppm (8-hr TWA).
Ice skating rinks (new and R–450A ........... Acceptable ...... R–450A has a 100-year GWP of approximately 600. This substitute is a blend
retrofit equipment). of HFC–134a, which is also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg.
No. 811–97–2); and HFO–1234ze(E), which is also known as trans-1,3,3,3,
-tetrafluoropro-1-ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118–24–9).
This blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of 1,000 ppm and 800 ppm (8-hr TWA) for
HFC–134a and HFO–1234yf, respectively. The manufacturer recommends
an AEL for the workplace for R–450A of 880 ppm (8-hr TWA).
Ice skating rinks (new and R–513A ........... Acceptable ...... R–513A has a 100-year GWP of approximately 630. This substitute is a blend
retrofit equipment). of HFC–134a, which is also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg.
No. 811–97–2); and HFO–1234yf, which is also known as 2,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg. No. 754–12–1).
This blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of 1,000 ppm and 500 ppm (8-hr TWA) for
HFC–134a and HFO–1234yf, respectively. The manufacturer recommends
an AEL for the workplace for R–513A of 653 ppm (8-hr TWA).

Foam Blowing

Rigid polyurethane and Acetone/ Acceptable ...... Acetone/isopentane blend has no ozone depletion potential (ODP) and a 100-
polyisocyanurate lami- isopentane year GWP of approximately <10. Acetone is excluded from the definition of
nated boardstock. blend. volatile organic compounds (VOC) under CAA regulations (see 40 CFR
51.100(s)) addressing the development of state implementation plans (SIPs)
to attain and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),
while isopentane is defined as VOC.
This foam-blowing agent is flammable.
For acetone, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has
established a permissible exposure limit of 1000 ppm and the American Con-
ference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has established a
threshold limit value (TLV) of 750 ppm, both on an 8-hr TWA. For
isopentane, ACGIH has established a TLV of 600 ppm on an 8-hr TWA.

Fire Suppression

Total flooding .................... Powdered Aer- Acceptable ...... Use of this agent should be in accordance with the safety guidelines in the lat-
osol E. est edition of the National Fire Protection Association 2010 standard for Aer-
osol Extinguishing Systems.
For establishments manufacturing the agent or filling, installing, or servicing
containers or systems to be used in total flooding applications, EPA rec-
ommends the following:
—The appropriate safety and personal protective equipment (PPE) (e.g., pro-
tective gloves, tightly sealed goggles, protective work clothing, and particu-
late-removing respirators with National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health type N95 or better filters) consistent with Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines should be used during manufac-
ture, installation, servicing, and disposal of total flooding systems using the
agent;
—adequate ventilation should be in place to reduce airborne exposure to con-
stituents of agent;
—an eye wash fountain and quick drench facility should be close to the pro-
duction area;
—training for safe handling procedures should be provided to all employees
that would be likely to handle containers of the agent or extinguishing units
filled with the agent;
—workers responsible for clean-up should allow for maximum settling of all
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

particulates before reentering area and wear appropriate personal protective

equipment; and
—all spills should be cleaned up immediately in accordance with good indus-
trial hygiene practices.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 50035

End-use Substitute Decision Further Information 1

As required by the manufacturer, units installed in normally occupied spaces

will be equipped with features such as a system-isolate switch and cross-
zone detection system to reduce risk of accidental activation of an agent
generator while persons are present in the protected space. Also required by
the manufacturer is warning of pending discharge and delay in release to en-
sure egress prior to activation of the agent to reduce the risk of exposure.
See additional comments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
1. The EPA recommends that users consult Section VIII of the OSHA Technical Manual for information on selecting the appropriate types of
personal protective equipment for all listed fire suppression agents. The EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related
to the use of personal protective equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other oc-
cupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes.
2. Use of all listed fire suppression agents should conform to relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR part 1910, subpart L, sections
1910.160 and 1910.162.
3. Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the area.
4. Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance requirements.
5. The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and recycled for later use or
destroyed.

End-use Substitute Decision Further Information 1

Cleaning Solvents

Electronics cleaning, met- HFO– Acceptable ...... HFO–1336mzz(Z) has no ozone depletion potential (ODP) and a 100-year
als cleaning, precision 1336mzz(Z). GWP of approximately nine. EPA has proposed to exclude it from the defini-
cleaning. tion of volatile organic compounds under CAA regulations (see 40 CFR
51.100(s)) addressing the development of state implementation plans (SIPs)
to attain and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
This compound is nonflammable.
The Occupational Alliance for Risk Science (OARS) has established a Work-
place Environmental Exposure Limit (WEEL) of 500 ppm (8-hr TWA) for
HFO–1336mzz(Z).
This substitute is subject to a Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) section
5(a)(2) Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) (40 CFR 721.10830).

Aerosols

Aerosol solvents ............... HFO– Acceptable ...... HFO–1336mzz(Z) has no ozone depletion potential (ODP) and a 100-year
1336mzz(Z). GWP of approximately nine. EPA has proposed to exclude it from the defini-
tion of volatile organic compounds under CAA regulations (see 40 CFR
51.100(s)) addressing the development of state implementation plans (SIPs)
to attain and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
This compound is nonflammable.
The OARS has established a Workplace Environmental Exposure Limit
(WEEL) of 500 ppm (8-hr TWA) for HFO–1336mzz(Z).
This substitute is subject to a Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) section
5(a)(2) Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) (40 CFR 721.10830).
1 Observe recommendations in the manufacturer’s SDS and guidance for all listed substitutes.

[FR Doc. 2018–21463 Filed 10–3–18; 8:45 am] Allotments to reallot channel 17 from stations and receive over-the-air service
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Block Island, Rhode Island, to Newport, from WPXQ.
Rhode Island. The Commission also DATES: Effective October 4, 2018.
grants ION’s request to change WPXQ’s
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS community of license to Newport,
Darren Fernandez, Media Bureau, at
COMMISSION Rhode Island, amending the DTV Table [Link]@[Link]; or Joyce
of Allotments to reflect this change Bernstein, Media Bureau, at
47 CFR Part 73 while modifying WPXQ’s license to [Link]@[Link].
[MB Docket No. 18–153; RM–11801; DA 18– reflect that its community of license is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
962] Newport, Rhode Island. The new
summary of the Report and Order in MB
allotment will be mutually exclusive
Docket No. 18–153; RM–11801; DA 18–
Television Broadcasting Services; with WPXQ’s existing allotment and the
962, adopted September 18, 2018, and
Block Island and Newport, Rhode reallotment will result in a preferential
released September 18, 2018. The full
Island arrangement of allotments pursuant to text of this document is available for
the Commission’s second allotment public inspection and copying during
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission. priority by providing Newport its first normal business hours in the FCC’s
local television service. The reallotment Reference Information Center at Portals
ACTION: Final rule.
will cause no public harm because II, CY–A257, 445 12th Street SW,
SUMMARY: At the request of ION Block Island will continue to be served Washington, DC 20554, or online at
Television License, LLC (ION), the by five full power commercial and one [Link] To request
Commission amends the DTV Table of full power non-commercial television materials in accessible formats (braille,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 03, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 04OCR1
 Significant New Alternative Policy

SNAP List Listed

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for

Ozone-Depleting Substances--Fire Suppression and Explosion
Protection

Direct Final Rule – Acceptable Substitute:

Powdered Aerosol E (FirePro)

The official EPA document, issued by the Federal Register, is available at Vol. 71, No.
187/ Wednesday, September 27, 2006/ Rules and Regulations.

Under paragraph II, Listing Decisions: Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection – Total
Flooding, at pages 56363/56364.

C. Powdered Aerosol E (FirePro) – Acceptable subject to use conditions.

December 5, 2016

FirePro Systems LTD

Ghigo Gianfilippi de Parenti
6, Koumandarias Street & Spyrou Araouzou
Tonia Court No. 2, 1st Floor 3036
Limssol, Cyprus 54080

Our Reference: FILE EX6960, PROJECT 4787407118

Subject: STATUS UPDATE- LISTING INVESTIGATION FOR 15-YEAR LIFE OF

AEROSOL GENERATING FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM UNITS

Dear Ghigo:

This letter is to inform you that we have successfully completed UL Project 4787407118 to
conduct agent aging tests for 15-yr life. A copy of the data generated under this project has been
attached for your online records.

Also, all UL-Listed units previously manufactured under this file and volume also are certified for
the 15-yr product life, as no changes affecting the product life have been made.

In no event shall UL be responsible to anyone for whatever use or non-use is made of the
information contained in this Report and in no event shall UL, its employees or its agents incur
any obligations or liabilities for damage, including, but not limited to, consequential damages
arising out of or in connection with the use, or ability to use, the information contained in this
Report. Any information and documentation involving UL Mark services are provided on behalf of
Underwriters Laboratories LLC (UL) or any authorized licensee of UL.

Should you have any questions or comments regarding this project, please contact me.

Prepared by:

Eric Haberichter
UL Sr. Project Engineer
Fire Suppression
[Link]@[Link]
 Test report

Organization: Celanova LTD (FirePro)

Test date: March 10th, 2005.
Test location: CFS Holding at Oud-Beijerland the Netherlands.
Present during testing: Mr R. Reijns of CFS / Fire Pro and Mr. P.E. Vosholof Kiwa.
Kiwa project number: K21744
Product: FirePro fixed fire extinguishing components
Kiwa certificate: K21744
Guideline: BRL-K23001/03 (2004-11-30) “Fixed fire extinguishing components based on dry
aerosols”
Number of pages in this report: 2 (first version UK)

The following tests have been performed:

§2.2.6 Thermal aging of the SFEA and electrical igniter

The product (SFEA and discharge system) has a design lifespan of 15 years if stored in a dry, non corrosive environment.

Assessment method
The lifespan is determined by thermal aging. The assembly comprising the extinguishing agent and igniter is tested in its original
container. The container is placed in a temperature controlled room in which the temperature can be cycled (aging cabinet). The
following test is then undertaken.
The aging cabinet is set to -10°C and 50°C (± 2°C) and alternates between these temperatures every 4 hours. Once cycle amounts
to a full transition from -10°C to 50°C and then back to -10°C within 8 hours. Fifty cycles are completed, after which the fire
extinguishing performance of the agent is determined in accordance with section [Link].

Note:
This test is used for several materials of construction. The stability of the molecular structure of the material is tested by the
temperature cycles. During each cycle the material passes the dew point which will lead to condensation on the exterior of the
object. During the cold period this may lead to freezing in hairline cracks in the material which may affect the structure of the
material. In use the components are not exposed to rain, i.e. they are not exposed to a full water load, but they may be affected by
condensation, which is simulated by this test. This thermal aging method is adopted in several standards to obtain information
about the long-term behavior of materials in the short term. The effect of this on the fire extinguishing performance is realistic and
functional.
This test is indicative. The Evaluation Guideline refers to the design lifespan; however the product certificate does not include
information about this parameter.

§[Link] Extinguishing object EN2, Class C, gas

A triangular sand bed burner to EN13283 filled with two layers of sand and gravel. A controlled volume of propane gas is blown
through the sand bed burner.
After ignition the propane gas shall have a thermal power of 30 kW. The total burning time shall be 2 minutes.
The objects to be extinguished shall be placed in the centre of the test room at floor level. The fire extinguishing components shall
be suspended in accordance with the supplier’s specifications and distributed as specified by the supplier.
After the end of the activation of the fire extinguishing agent the room shall remain closed for at least 10 minutes. During this
period the cell shall be monitored for signs of active fire and signs of spontaneous ignition, based on the temperature
measurements in the vicinity of the fire cell.
After this period the cell shall be inspected visually for signs of active fire and signs of active ignition without the presence of the
fire extinguishing agent. Any signs of fire shall be described in the report. The temperature after extinguishing shall be decisive.
Visible fire is considered as a sign of spontaneous ignition, but solely smoke is not.
The gas burner shall have a thermal cut-out which independently interrupts the flow of gas when the burner is extinguished

Instruments:
Weights = IT3000, no 032484.
Humidity / temperature = VoltCraft HT100, no. 030205024.

FirePro tests according BRL-K23001/03 of March 10th, 2005 1 of 2

 Test report

Further information:

Class C for type test.

Adequate ventilation, i.e. 20.7% O2 ± 0.5% O2.
Room is 80,2m3 Ventilation area and position during extinguishing is 0.1% of the volume of the room, distributed evenly across
the room. Air flow through the room is natural. Direction and homogeneity of the Agent discharge is visual monitored.
Activation electrical through the Firepro activator.
Specifications activator according to P14, version 7 of Celanova and must have a resistance within the range 1.6 – 3.6Ω, both
values included.

Aging period 12 November – 29 November 2004 - 16 December 2004.

Type, serial number Weight before Weight after Extinguishing time Difference %
en production date activation in gram activation in gram E-Resistance in gram
Firepro 200 1407 1250 5 sec. 157 78,5
Object 1 - M4262 2,2 ohm
September 2004. Serial
number 24091

Firepro 200 1400 1247 5 sec 147 73,5

Object 3- M4262 2 ohm
September 2004. Serial
number 24091

Remarks
Object 1. The test has been performed standard cyclic frequency.
Object 3. The test has been performed with the double cyclic frequency.
The 2 FirePro components, that were thermal aged at the lab of TNO Delft, were packaged and sealed by TNO Delft.
The TNO seals of the packaging were opened in the presence of auditor Peter Voshol of Kiwa.

Evaluation
Both the samples did comply with the requirements.

FirePro tests according BRL-K23001/03 of March 10th, 2005 2 of 2

EC Conformity to Type based on Quality Assurance of the Production
Process
EC Conformity to Type based on Quality Assurance of the
No. BSI/MED/PC/560437
Production Process
This is to certify that: FirePro Systems Ltd
8 Faleas Str.
Agios Athanasios Industrial Area
Limassol
CY-4101
Cyprus

Holds Certificate Number: BSI/MED/PC/560437

In respect of:

MED/3.46 - Equivalent fixed gas fire extinguishing systems for machinery spaces (aerosol systems)

on the basis that BSI carried out the relevant Production Quality Assurance procedures for the equipment identified
above which was found to be in compliance with the Marine Equipment Directive (MED) 2014/90/EU and Regulation
(EU) 2020/1170, subject to any conditions in the schedule attached hereto. The attached schedule of approval forms
part of this certificate.

For and on behalf of BSI, a Notified

Body for the above Directive
(Notified Body Number 0086): Chris Lewis - Certification Director, Product Certification

First Issued: 2010-08-20 Latest Issue: 2020-11-06 Expiry Date: 2023-11-15

Page: 1 of 3

First Issued: 2010-08-20 Latest Issue: 2020-11-06 Expiry Date: 2023-11-15

Page: 1 of 3
This certificate has been issued by and remains the property of BSI Assurance UK Ltd, Kitemark Court, Davy Avenue, Knowlhill, Milton Keynes MK5 8PP, United
Kingdom and should be returned immediately upon request.
To check its validity telephone +44 (0) 345 080 9000. An electronic certificate can be authenticated online.

BSI Assurance UK Limited, registered in England under number 7805321 at 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL, UK.
A member of BSI Group of Companies.
EC Conformity to Type based on Quality Assurance of the Production
Process
No. BSI/MED/PC/560437

Schedule of Approval

Manufacturing Address: FirePro Systems Limited

8 Faleas Street
Agios Athanasios Industrial Area.
Limassol
CY-4101
Cyprus

Product Description

Product Certificate Issue Notified

Model
Designation No. Date Body
MED/3.46 FP20S, FP20SE, FP40S, FP80S, FP100S, FP200S,
FP500S, FP1200, FP1200S, FP2000, FP2000S,
FP3000, FP3000S, FP5700 & FP5700S aerosol
BSI/A.1/3.46/560436 06/11/2020 0086
generating fire extinguishing system unit with dry
condensed extinguishing agent, Fire Rating Type A
&B

Certificate Amendment Record and BSI internal Review relating to this Certificate

Issue date Comments BSI Review No.

August 2010 First Issue 0086:10:7498125

March 2012 Updated to include minor changes to some drawings 0086:12:7816195

September 2012 Updated to include Model FP20SE 0086:11:7901867

September 2013 Updated to include variant Models FP1200S, FP2000S, 0086:13:8030465

FP3000S & FP5700S
February 2015 Drawing update to reflect name change of raw material 0086:15:8198703

January 2017 Drawing Updated, some new drawing added 0086:17:8636068

November 2020 Updated to include regulation (EU) 2020/1170 & updated User 0086:20:3307537
Manual

First Issued: 2010-08-20 Latest Issue: 2020-11-06 Expiry Date: 2023-11-15

Page: 2 of 3
This certificate has been issued by and remains the property of BSI Assurance UK Ltd, Kitemark Court, Davy Avenue, Knowlhill, Milton Keynes MK5 8PP, United
Kingdom and should be returned immediately upon request.
To check its validity telephone +44 (0) 345 080 9000. An electronic certificate can be authenticated online.

BSI Assurance UK Limited, registered in England under number 7805321 at 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL, UK.
A member of BSI Group of Companies.
EC Conformity to Type based on Quality Assurance of the Production
Process
No. BSI/MED/PC/560437

Schedule of Approval

Conditions of Certification

i) This BSI/MED/PC/560437 certificate remains valid unless cancelled or revoked, provided the conditions listed below
are complied with and the equipment remains satisfactory in service
ii) This certificate loses its validity if the manufacturer makes any changes or modifications to the approved quality
system, which have not been notified to, and agreed with the notified body named on this certificate and/or after
lapse of time, withdrawal or revocation of the EC Type Examination (Module B) Certificate.
iii) The equipments detailed above are to be manufactured in accordance with Conformity to Type Based on Quality
Assurance of the Production Process (Module D) Certificate of the Marine Equipment Directive.
iv) If the specified standards are amended during the validity of this certificate, the product type are to be re-
approved prior to it being supplied to vessels to which the amended standards apply.
v) Production tests are to be conducted in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Directive and be
recorded by the manufacturer in accordance with the approved Conformity to Type Based on Quality Assurance
of the Production Process (Module D) Certificate of the Marine Equipment Directive.

vi) This certificate authorises the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community in
conjunction with the EC Type Examination (Module B) Certificate of the equipment listed in the scope to affix the
"Mark of Conformity" (wheelmark).
vii) Each equipment is to have the “Mark of Conformity” affixed and be issued with a “Declaration of Conformity”.
Example for the Application of the "Mark of Conformity":

0086/YYYY

"Wheelmark" Format yyyy Last four digits of year mark affixed.

0086 Notified Body number undertaking surveillance module.

First Issued: 2010-08-20 Latest Issue: 2020-11-06 Expiry Date: 2023-11-15

Page: 3 of 3
This certificate has been issued by and remains the property of BSI Assurance UK Ltd, Kitemark Court, Davy Avenue, Knowlhill, Milton Keynes MK5 8PP, United
Kingdom and should be returned immediately upon request.
To check its validity telephone +44 (0) 345 080 9000. An electronic certificate can be authenticated online.

BSI Assurance UK Limited, registered in England under number 7805321 at 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL, UK.
A member of BSI Group of Companies.
 Client: Project Management: Lead Designer: Supv. Consultant: Contractor:

TRANSMITTAL SHEET
Project Name AMC Al Mahkan Mall, Dawadmi, Riyadh Project No. 1154

To Eng. Ishak Hussain (PM‐HCO) From C&P

Company Al Hamdan Consulting Office Date 15‐Dec‐20

Transmittal No. 1154‐AMC‐DAW‐TS‐774 Rev. No.

Submitted for
Approval Review\Comments As per Request Filing

Further Action For Your Information Issued for Tender Other

Enclosed Material

Technical Data/Equipment Selection Print‐out(s)

Photos\Transparency A4 A3 A2 A1 A0

Zip Disk __________ Drawing(s) \ Plan(s) \ Designs(s)

Flash Memory(s) Paper Document(s)

CD(s) Other MS

Please find enclosed the following Documents\Drawing:

S\N Remarks

1 Aerosol System (FirePro - WBE) 1154-AMC-DAW-MS-M-38

Received By
Submitted By Name &
Signature
Date 15‐Dec‐20 Date
 Client: Project Management: Lead Designer: Supervision Consultant: Contractor:

MATERIAL SUBMITTAL
Reference No. Date New Submittal
1154-AMC-DAW-MS-M-38 1 5 1 2 2 0 2 0 Resubmittal

Project Name: AMC Al Mahkan Mall, Architectural Electrical Civil Others

Dawadmi, Riyadh Structural Mechanical Interior Design

Please find enclosed the following documents:

Description Manufacturer Supplier Catalogue/Sample Material lead in time

Catalogue
Data Sheets
Watar Al Benaa Safety
1 Aerosol System FirePro Selection Sheet
Equipment (WBE)
Calculation Sheet
Layout Drawings

Note: Intended for Projector Rooms in Auditoriums 1,2,3

The submittal documents are in strict conformity with the design drawings and the specification. Any minor deviations are indicated in the
submitted documents. This review does not relieve the Contractor of his responsibilities under the terms of the Contract nor authorize additional
compensation.
Approved by Contractor's Project Manager:

Name: Engr. M. Reyad Signature: _______________ Date: 15-Dec-20

Consultant's Comments :
We do not recommend the condensed aerosol fire extinguishing system for projector rooms due to the potential
adverse effects of agent particulate residue on sensitive equipment and other objects present in projector room. The
determination of acceptability for occupied space shall be confirm by condensed aerosol suppression system Manufacturer.

If its in client interest to use the condensed aerosol fire extinguishing system, we recommend to consider the
points mentioned above and review the type of equipment within protected room.

Status A Approved C Revise & Resubmit N No Action

B Approved as noted D Disapproved

Consultant: Client's Representative:

Dan Zabat
Name: __________________ Name: __________________

DZ
Signature: _______________ Signature: _______________
16/12/2020
Date: ___________________ Date: ___________________
 Client: Project Management: Lead Designer: Supv. Consultant: Contractor:

TRANSMITTAL SHEET
Project Name AMC Stars Avenue, Jeddah KSA Project No. 39600

To Engr. Aled Morris (PM‐HCO) From C&P

Company Al Hamdan Consulting Office Date 18‐Feb‐21

Transmittal No. AMC‐STR‐CNP‐HCO‐TML‐01074 Rev. No.

Submitted for
Approval Review\Comments As per Request Filing

Further Action For Your Information Issued for Tender Other

Enclosed Material

Technical Data/Equipment Selection Print‐out(s)

Photos\Transparency A4 A3 A2 A1 A0

Zip Disk __________ Drawing(s) \ Plan(s) \ Designs(s)

Flash Memory(s) Paper Document(s)

CD(s) Other MS

Please find enclosed the following Documents\Drawing:

S\N Description\Title Ref. No. Rev. No. Remarks

Fire Suppression System for Projection Areas

1 AMC-39600-STR-CNP-MS-ME-00048-R02 2
(WBE)- Revised

Received By
Submitted By
Name & Signature

Date 18‐Feb‐21 Date

 ----·- . ·� ..--
-- --�..--.-·- ....,.,_�
MODC>N O ..:::a...._o
.
.. , -'
Material Submittal Form

I I I I I
-
Submittal Ref. JDH4-02-004-AYN-TS0-0-MECH-MAC-0167 Revision 01 Date 09/01/2021
Program Title: MODON Oasis in Jeddah Industrial Area - Jeddah 4 �W. I 13 / tA°J'....
Project Title: Infrastructure Packages A,B,C and D k--�Y A �
Client: Saudi Industrial Property Authority - MODON � gi:c:EW�O '(�\

ill·=
Consultant: ] Worley Parsons - WP's I Contractor I Al Ayuni lnvestm1;�end Contracti�9.,9P '$
I -
"'ll \D..\1 ,.,.. '
Discipline □ Civil □ Architecture I Mechanical □ Electrical \5,�tner\.jj·�r\e':, ..
�>>- �
,o#,1 ..

Material Details List of En'&l6i91" P i;:;,..,\c1.,')'Y

Specs./ BOQ / Drawings Cop1 ~ :.-�
Reference ✓ spec's

Specified Material .
Fire Alarm Fighting System ✓ Compliance Sheet

Proposed Material
Fire Alarm Fighting System No
Samoles
Manufacturer/ Local
Supplier Water for Safety Co. ✓ Others (Test Report)
Use for Pump Station MCC Building, ✓ Data Sheet
Remarks

Contractor Signature (s):

QA/QC Manager: Mohammad Sobhi

Received By Engineer:

Name Mr. Ahmed El Sharif Signature

Submittal Status:
D A-A roved roved with Commerits 0 C- Revise and Resubmit
Engineer's Comments:

Approved by (Engineer)
Received By
Contractor
Distribution:
D Engineer 0 Contractor D Others(Specify)

Required MODON approval: Yes: D No: D

MODON Approval
b:

Form Ref.: .......................... Page 1 of1

Form Rev: (.......... )
Form Issue Date: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 OWNER CONSULTANT CONTRACTOR

S/�MI
�1.:;iL.<u..1/,Li�lol.!>).lolll
S•[Link]•[Link],1..

PROJECT NAME SAMI PROJECT No.:

LOCATION: RIYADH FRONT : ti;-JI

BUILDING NAME: General :�I..---,..!

MATER/AL/EQUIPMENT SUBMITAL
.:,� JJ...,...--. ,...,JjJ

New Submittal Submittal No.: 0035 : t:�I �.J Previous Submittal#

Resubmittal Submittal Dale: 2518/2020 C::!Jull Previous Submittal Date:

PURPOSE OF SUBMITTAL �1.:,.. ..,...,.i1 For Information For Comments • For Approval
.oi...,i,... .:.Us,.:,,.. J�!
DISCIPLINE ..,....iJ+Jl..,.._..;.;11 CIVIL 0 ARCHITECTURE D �j"""' STRUCTURAL D ..,iw.;1 HVAC D �
PLUMBING D <r'-" ELECTRICAL D COMMUNICATIONS & INFORMATION 0 ..:.[Link]..J..:O�I
OTHER SPECIALITY: Fire Fighting • �I .i,,.w •4Y.:�l .,....._. �

ATTACHMENTS
• CATALOGUE D DRAWING • CERTIFICATE D SAMPLE • [Link] D CALCULATIONS
wL...._,i..._.....,,..._..,:;s � ����

MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT Note : Please use the attachment in case Items are more than the provided space.
No. of Attachments:
Sr. No. Name, No. and description Origin Manufacturer/ Supplier Specification Standard Appr. St■ tu,
Rev. No.
�---�1, �J,J �JJ ,-..-..I '-..:..Wt.1-.!.,t JJ,_____.Jy�I [Link]...at,.,..1\,-j.J u4_,.JI O'\;wl �I ',JI.,,

Aerosol System A cyprus Watar al-benaa for saftey 15300 As per data sheet

Contractor's Remarks We clarify that above Submittal is strictly adhered with contract specifications except otherwise
[Link])J as stated below : w. � _,s:., i.. 1"' ..w1 .oll.........,1_,.., i..� i..1_;.11 f_;.1.. "'...:.11 c:,� JJ\[Link]
Exceptions

CONTRACTOR PROJECT MANAGE

Signature
Consultant's Approval of the above materials does not relieve the contractor from his contr ctual obligations.
Recommendations '-;"'�I ...
i...1_;.11 .:,.. JJ\[Link] � j w\l,l,;,.,JI ''-""1
IJJ�'!l��.J'

Revise and resubmit No Action

Approval Status
..,llJl,..iilJI .,�,:..,,,,.i
��
W :::.::;:.�s Noted Disapproved Returned for Incompletion of Information
Resubmrttal is not required

REF. IN: :.i.;IJ Signature: : �,.JI REF. OUT: :;Jl..a Signature:

Date: Date:

JL/tlv\ �66-<.VW
(5;.() �- �(L' - --zo

.,,,-
_____
;�
 OWNER CONSULTANT CONTRACTOR

S/�MI
�1.:;iL.<u..1/,Li�lol.!>).lolll
S•[Link]•[Link],1..

PROJECT NAME SAMI PROJECT No.:

LOCATION: RIYADH FRONT : ti;-JI

BUILDING NAME: General :�I..---,..!

MATER/AL/EQUIPMENT SUBMITAL
.:,� JJ...,...--. ,...,JjJ

New Submittal Submittal No.: 0035 : t:�I �.J Previous Submittal#

Resubmittal Submittal Dale: 2518/2020 C::!Jull Previous Submittal Date:

PURPOSE OF SUBMITTAL �1.:,.. ..,...,.i1 For Information For Comments • For Approval
.oi...,i,... .:.Us,.:,,.. J�!
DISCIPLINE ..,....iJ+Jl..,.._..;.;11 CIVIL 0 ARCHITECTURE D �j"""' STRUCTURAL D ..,iw.;1 HVAC D �
PLUMBING D <r'-" ELECTRICAL D COMMUNICATIONS & INFORMATION 0 ..:.[Link]..J..:O�I
OTHER SPECIALITY: Fire Fighting • �I .i,,.w •4Y.:�l .,....._. �

ATTACHMENTS
• CATALOGUE D DRAWING • CERTIFICATE D SAMPLE • [Link] D CALCULATIONS
wL...._,i..._.....,,..._..,:;s � ����

MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT Note : Please use the attachment in case Items are more than the provided space.
No. of Attachments:
Sr. No. Name, No. and description Origin Manufacturer/ Supplier Specification Standard Appr. St■ tu,
Rev. No.
�---�1, �J,J �JJ ,-..-..I '-..:..Wt.1-.!.,t JJ,_____.Jy�I [Link]...at,.,..1\,-j.J u4_,.JI O'\;wl �I ',JI.,,

Aerosol System - FIREPRO WBE A cyprus Watar al-benaa for saftey 15300 As per data sheet

Contractor's Remarks We clarify that above Submittal is strictly adhered with contract specifications except otherwise
[Link])J as stated below : w. � _,s:., i.. 1"' ..w1 .oll.........,1_,.., i..� i..1_;.11 f_;.1.. "'...:.11 c:,� JJ\[Link]
Exceptions

CONTRACTOR PROJECT MANAGE

Signature
Consultant's Approval of the above materials does not relieve the contractor from his contr ctual obligations.
Recommendations '-;"'�I ...
i...1_;.11 .:,.. JJ\[Link] � j w\l,l,;,.,JI ''-""1
IJJ�'!l��.J'

Revise and resubmit No Action

Approval Status
..,llJl,..iilJI .,�,:..,,,,.i
��
W :::.::;:.�s Noted Disapproved Returned for Incompletion of Information
Resubmrttal is not required

REF. IN: :.i.;IJ Signature: : �,.JI REF. OUT: :;Jl..a Signature:

Date: Date:

JL/tlv\ �66-<.VW
(5;.() �- �(L' - --zo

.,,,-
_____
;�
 Engineering Affairs Administration J9l_;.,oll..9 ��I 6Jj..1ll oJiJj
Project Engineering � &-Jw...ll�
Execution and SupeNision Unit \)Ai'ill., ul.;-!,'il �
FR12-PD-001
�
Issuing Number:
ii :::),oll ciJljg :_;[Link] �_;
:&l;l:.31
Date: Ministrv of Health I /

1--� - ---------- --
Submittal i.:.iLl;.i:i:i .1�1
----------- -------------- -

ProJect:
I Medical Records Management Development .,,.WI ..:.,�I .>.># t_.l.A,o :t,.,,.W I
Contract No.·
I �!,WI J.,WI J�l 4$"_,.:,
PO#: TND13125-0 .i,...;.11/..[Link] !"'J

Contractor· .J_,l,,,ll Submittal No. ;..,._u.J\ !"'J

Integrated Solutions for Business
Consultant: =�JW....)11 Date: 21/12/2020 : \°,! ..[Link] D!/�

(Drawing No.: ............ ... .......................................... ........................ ......... ....... .hb...JJ f9J) Drawing o .kw.. Sample o � ,l..J.J:.)I\�
:Other o oft. Re-SubmittaI rev. ( ) •r-ll ,Lo.:;.,;J o,t..j D Specification 181 ulo.,oly Submittal Type

Construction o ¥Ll..i) Mechanical o W� Low current o �I Jl;.[Link] �t,, Electrical Power o 5J..WI �l_p ,1..�)11 JG..
<9.'.r" W� rl.2u : Other 181 oft. Finishing o u� Fleld

J,5'_,JI L..:..WI � ,.w1

Supplier Origin Powder Aerosol • Dry <i'r" W� a.._,l:,.;-.. :ui.,.,_,JI
Quantity
- FIREPRO Description7
WBS a..)l..JI ..:.,1_,,)I •t.,ll _,:;_, :C_,.:, v.-'J-'i
,fa 5 tliiiJl, c'Y" fa 600 4->l.....,, �})II J,ot>J <GlkJ.. J,ot> t" Fire Pro t,--)1 ,y,
, BRL-K23001/4, UL2775, NFPA 2010J [Link] tl9..ul ,y, ..l.o:w> �I :Details J.-Lal
,<1,> '-"'WI ..u_,..,.JI_, �\ J;.,oliuj ulo_,h.o ?::.)_,..;.)J t" dSJ"'J

� ..\-I �-.
•·-- Ii'
---- ... ·, '

([Link]) t,.,,.WI .r...,,_.

Stamp �l Signature t,,-i_,:ill Date D!/W\

' --
Contractor Project Manager
.�
"'
', k' �·- 21/12/2020 <r'[Link].>l��
' c:::;;;.--
-e
- --- --- --------- -- ------ ----------- ------ ----.

[- --- --
Approved .wl_,..JI A
Approved with comments ..:.,lb-:>L, ,_. a..;i,.. 8
Returned to contractor for comments incorporation ..:.,llo,,.)WI JL.S::t.,.)I J_,LWJ ,W C
Rejected "".,...,.. R
I
;7�4·� )t' �. -
:comments

*·
..:.,l,b.:>L,

-�.2_<>).,� !:. \� LJ l t--., , c.5l.� �\. bdJ ;i �

, ( \'>
,� i �eca ·(_;: ! � �
,
; �

/l
Date iw,WI Signature .,__;�( Name .....,)11 Pos1tion/Dept. ,.....ill/�_,J\
/_i..---...- ( .,,.WI ½...JI) t_,.,,.WI .r...,,_.
(. .C. - / \C../ c:_ 'z._ �\ 0-->)I,¥ If
� Project Manager
\ e .c ,/ \C.. / c_"L.
� V \�)\ r' \......-,·1 I(' ' .9 .i,_,.J,...J!, J)rl,�I � �J
Head of Execution and Supervision Unit

The above approval dose not relieve the contractor of any contract obligations, whether for � I..,> •l,.-.u.,JI ..:.,l..!;<)1.:,.o J_, [Link] � )I o�I �\ � llii,..Jl
coordination, compliance, or quality with the contract terms and conditions _ ,_ ,� •J_,5'.WI .,,,_,;.11_, o,_p.JI _,i ..:.,� Jl:.l...)11 _,\ �I
.u.,J\ .lo_,,.:,
(J,[Link]) t,.,,.WI ,r..lA
Contractor Project Manager

'i �IQIJIJJ...£..!il..OJI Q..iJ1.0

� KING A-BDULLAH MEDICAL cni