0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views2 pages

Raja Ram Mohan Roy's Christian Appeal

Note on Indian Theologian

Uploaded by

K. Lalthazuala
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views2 pages

Raja Ram Mohan Roy's Christian Appeal

Note on Indian Theologian

Uploaded by

K. Lalthazuala
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Raja Ram Mohan Roy (1772-1833)

Introduction

- Roy was known as ‘the Father of Modern in India’ mainly because of his social reform. He was not a
baptized Christian but he is said to be the first India to have written seriously and extensively on Christian
theological themes.
- He was basically a neo- Hinduist, the pioneering Hindu social reformer, very much influenced by the ethical
teaching of Jesus Christ. Hence, he was also a pioneer in Indian Christian theology but it is to be noted that
he, with KC Sen, represent Hindu interpretation of Christian faith.

Life and Work:

- Boyd aptly named the chapter in which he discussed Roy and Sen as ‘the Gospel and Indian renaissance.
Both of them were interpreting Christian faith in the context of Indian renaissance, the period during which
there were many reforms in Hinduism due to the influence of Christianity as well as the works of Christian
missionaries.
- He was a Bengali Brahmin but set off at the age fifteen wandering as far as Tibet in search of religious truth
as he did not find satisfaction in Hinduism. He was strongly influenced by the faith of Islam in the direction of
unity of God and the meaninglessness of idol-worship and by the moral teaching of Jesus Christ.
- He published ‘The Precepts of Jesus’ in 1820 to enlist Hindu intellectuals in the cause of moral reform.
Western Missionaries criticized his writings in their journal, the Friends of India and he replied in a series of
Appeals to the Christian Public.
- In 1815 Roy established a society called *Atmiya Sabha (Spiritual Association); formed Unitarian Mission in
1821 with William Adam but not successful. In 1828 he founded a society to retorm Hindu society, Brahma
Sabha, which later changed into Brahma Samaj.
- In 1830 he visited England and died in Bristol in 1833.

His Theology:

- Roy’s theology can be said as a confluence of three religious faith namely Islam, Christianity and Hinduism.
He was attracted and influenced by the ‘only-ness of God’ and ‘the meaninglessness of idol-worship’ as
taught by Islam. He was very much attracted and influenced by the moral teaching of Jesus Christ. At the
same time he was a Hindu, faithful to the Monism of Upanishads.
- He then tried compromised these religious teachings, basically Monism of Upanishad and the Sermon on
the Mount. “There is only one divine being’ seem to be the overarching theology of Roy and became the
frame of interpretation of religious faith.
- Christology: Roy was attracted by the ethical teachings of Jesus Christ, not by Christian dogma. He
regarded Jesus Christ as a great moral teacher and messenger from God but denies his divinity.
- The title ‘son of God’ for him did not mean divinity but rather expressed the created nature of Jesus Christ
and ‘I and my Father are Oneʼ implied ‘subsisting concord of will not identity of being. He was taking up
Arian position of natural inferiority of the Son to the Father. He holds that Jesus is merely delegated with
power from God, but does not posses that power intrinsically.
- He accepted the doctrine of virgin birth, divorcing it from any belief in the personality of Holy Spirit as that
would mean the Godhead having had intercourse with a human female. Not deny miracles even
resurrection, but not so much important. He rejected the two-nature theory, as God (the Spirit) cannot have
direct contact with matter.
- Regarding the Work of Jesus Christ, Roy believed that the saving of Jesus Christ was accomplished through
his teaching and his death is simply the supreme illustration of his moral teachings. He rejected the
vicarious suffering and sacrificial suffering because:
- (a). God is impassable, and Jesus could not suffer in his divine nature and thus it is inconsistent to argue
that Jesus is divine at the same time suffer;
- (b) If Jesus suffered vicariously in his human nature, innocent for the guilty, it is inconsistent with divine
justice;
- (c) The attempt to represent human blood of that of God in human form as an indispensable for sin is
unscriptural. Hence, Jesus the innocent one died as a supreme illustration of his teachings.
- The way of salvation is to follow the precepts of Jesus, do this and you shall live’. Following the precepts of
Jesus is, for Roy, ‘the best and only means of obtaining the forgiveness of sins, the favour of God, and
strength to overcome our passion and to keep his commandment.
- The Holy Spirit: Roy did not accept the Holy Spirit as a Person of Godhead or possessing personality or
deity at all, he did not regard as self-existent and distinct personality. For him the Holy Spirit is the holy
influence and power of God.
- The Trinity: He was a strong monotheist and Unitarian; he was always against the Trinitarians. He felt to
include Christ and Holy Spirit, as ‘Persons’ in the Godhead was polytheism.
- For him God the Father is the only God in the true sense of the term, the sole object of worship, Jesus
Christ is a Mediator or messenger who explains the will of God, and Holy Spirit is the holy influence or
power from God form which we should expect direction in the path of righteousness.

Conclusion:

- Roy was the first Indian to raise serious theological objections to Christian missionaries and propose his
own version of Christianity on the basis of rationalist and monist interpretation of biblical evidence.
According to C.F. Andrew, some leading Bengali Christian acknowledged that they owed the beginning of
their faith in Christ to the study of The Precepts of Jesus.
- He was monist or monotheist, Unitarian who attacked polytheism of Hinduism and the Christian doctrine of
Trinity. He rejected the divinity of Jesus but regarded him as messenger from God. He did not accept the
Holy Spirit as a distinct personality but regarded merely as the holy influence or power of God.
- Jesus was not God but a great teacher from who explain the will of God, and the salvifie work of Jesus
depend on his teaching not in his death and resurrection. His death is a
- Supreme illustration of his precepts. Salvation is to be obtained by following the precepts of Jesus. Salvation
is thus to be earned by merit.
- Roy came very near to the teaching of Jesus, but did not comprehend the central dogma and preaching of
Christianity that is Jesus is the Lord and God, who died on the cross to save human being.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Raja Ram Mohan Roy significantly influenced the Indian Renaissance by interpreting Christian faith in a way that resonated with Hindu intellectuals and advocated for social reform. His works, including 'The Precepts of Jesus,' engaged Hindu intellectuals in moral reform debates and challenged prevailing religious dogmas. By critiquing both polytheistic aspects of Hinduism and certain Christian doctrines, he encouraged a rationalist approach to religion, contributing to reforms in Hindu society such as reducing idol worship. His ideas helped catalyze a broader movement of religious and social reformation in India, emphasizing the importance of ethical living and interfaith understanding .

Raja Ram Mohan Roy's critiques on Christianity deeply reflect his Indian cultural and religious background, particularly his neo-Hinduist and monotheistic inclinations. His rejection of Christian doctrines such as the divinity of Christ and the Trinity can be seen as an effort to harmonize Western religious ideas with Indian monistic traditions found in the Upanishads. Roy's emphasis on the ethical teachings of Jesus aligns with the moral frameworks prominent in Indian religions. His inscription of rationalism and reliance on moral precepts rather than dogma suggest an inclination to reconcile and rationally synthesize Eastern and Western philosophies, underscoring a broader cultural renaissance during his time .

Raja Ram Mohan Roy reconciled his attraction to the ethical teachings of Jesus with his rejection of Christian dogma by focusing on Jesus' moral teachings as universal precepts, rather than accepting traditional doctrinal tenets such as the divinity of Jesus or the Trinity. He viewed Jesus as a moral exemplar and emphasized following his teachings as the means to achieve salvation and divine favor, rather than adherence to orthodox Christian beliefs. This approach allowed Roy to appreciate the moral framework offered by Jesus' teachings, which he saw as aligning with his rational and Unitarian beliefs, without accepting what he considered unscriptural dogmatic elements of Christianity .

Raja Ram Mohan Roy's rejection of vicarious suffering and sacrificial atonement had profound implications for his theological stance and his interpretation of Christianity. He argued that if God is impassable, Jesus' suffering could not coincide with divinity, thus opposing the orthodox view of Christ's sacrificial role. Additionally, he saw vicarious suffering as incompatible with divine justice since it would mean an innocent suffering for the guilty, which he deemed inconsistent. This rejection further positioned Roy's interpretation of Christianity as one focused on moral teachings as the way to salvation rather than on the sacrificial death and resurrection of Christ, aligning with his Unitarian beliefs .

'The Precepts of Jesus' was a significant work by Raja Ram Mohan Roy aimed at enlisting Hindu intellectuals in the cause of moral reform. It emphasized the ethical teachings of Jesus rather than Christian dogma. This text had a notable impact on some Bengali Christians, who credited it with the inception of their faith in Christ. Roy's rationalist and monist interpretation of biblical evidence resonated with readers, encouraging them to view Jesus as a moral teacher whose teachings offered a path to salvation. 'The Precepts of Jesus' thus played a role in both critiquing missionary Christianity and promoting a form of Christian faith that aligned with Roy's reformist ideals .

Raja Ram Mohan Roy adopted a Unitarian position regarding the Holy Spirit, viewing it not as a distinct person of the Godhead but as the holy influence or power of God. This view contrasts sharply with traditional Trinitarian doctrine, which regards the Holy Spirit as the third person of the Holy Trinity, co-equal and co-eternal with God the Father and God the Son. For Roy, attributing personality or deity to the Holy Spirit amounted to polytheism, which contradicted his strong monotheistic beliefs. His interpretation highlighted his commitment to a rationalist and monotheistic understanding of divinity .

Raja Ram Mohan Roy's beliefs reflected a confluence of religious teachings from Islam, Christianity, and Hinduism. From Islam, he was influenced by the concept of the unity of God and rejected idol worship. From Christianity, he embraced the moral teachings of Jesus while rejecting Christian dogma. As a Hindu, he was faithful to the monism of the Upanishads, emphasizing that 'there is only one divine being,' a view that shaped his religious interpretations. Roy's theology attempted to blend these elements into a coherent worldview, leading him to form his own version of Christianity based on rational and monist interpretations .

Raja Ram Mohan Roy objected to the Christian doctrine of the Trinity on the grounds that it was essentially polytheistic. He was a strong monotheist and Unitarian, who believed that only God the Father was the true object of worship. Roy did not accept the Holy Spirit as a distinct person of the Godhead; rather, he viewed it as the power or holy influence of God. Likewise, he regarded Jesus Christ merely as a mediator or messenger who communicated God's will, not as divine. He thus opposed the idea of including Christ and the Holy Spirit in the Godhead as distinct 'Persons' .

Raja Ram Mohan Roy viewed Jesus Christ primarily as a moral teacher and messenger from God, rather than as divine, which is a departure from traditional Christian beliefs. He denied the divinity of Christ, instead interpreting the title 'Son of God' as indicative of Jesus' created nature and taking an Arian position indicating the natural inferiority of the Son to the Father. He also rejected the two-nature theory that Christ could not suffer as divine, and thus viewed Christ's death as a supreme illustration of moral teachings rather than a vicarious sacrifice for sin .

Raja Ram Mohan Roy's establishment of the Atmiya Sabha and Brahmo Sabha played a crucial role in Hindu social reform. The Atmiya Sabha (Spiritual Association) focused on fostering dialogue and reflection on religious and philosophical issues, encouraging a shift from superstitious practices to more rational and ethical religious beliefs. The Brahmo Sabha, later transformed into the Brahmo Samaj, directly aimed to reform Hindu society by promoting monotheism and opposing idolatry, caste discrimination, and other regressive social customs pervasive at the time. These institutions became platforms for advocating educational, social, and religious reforms, significantly shaping the progressive movement within Hinduism .

You might also like