0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views9 pages

Quality Research Proposal Writing Guide

Uploaded by

customizeddp98
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views9 pages

Quality Research Proposal Writing Guide

Uploaded by

customizeddp98
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

How to Write a Quality Research Proposal

Most students and beginning researchers do not fully understand what a research
proposal means, not do they understand its importance .To put it bluntly, one`s research is
only as a good as one`s proposal. An ill-conceived proposal dooms the project even if it
somehow gets through the Thesis Supervisory committee. A high quality proposal, on the
other hand, not only promises success for the project, but also impresses your thesis
committee about your potential as researcher.

A research proposal is intended to convince others that you have a worthwhile


research project and that you have the competence and the work plan to complete it.
Generally, a research proposal should contain all the key elements involved into the research
process and include sufficient information for the readers to evaluate the proposal study.

Regardless of your research area and the methodology you choose, all research
proposals must address the following, what you plan to accomplish, why you want to d o it
and how you are going to do it.

The proposal should have sufficient information to convince your readers that you
have an important research idea, that you have a good grasp of the relevant literature and the
major issues, and that your methodology is sound.

The quality of your research proposal depends not only on the quality of your
proposed project but also on the quality of your proposal writing .A good research project
may run the risk of rejection simply because the proposal is poorly written. Therefore, it pays
if your writing is coherent, clear and compelling.

1
Relationship of Open & Close Influence Strategies with
Job Satisfaction and Moderating Effect of Sales
Performance among Sales People in Pharmaceutical
Industry of Islamabad and Rawalpindi

By

Murtaza Ali Qureshi

125-MSBA/Isb/Feb12

A Research Proposal Submitted to the Faculty of Management Sciences,


National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

(PhD/MSBA)

Supervisor Name:
______________________________________

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES


NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MODERN LANGUAGES
ISLAMABAD
SEPTEMBER, 2014

2
Research Title

Capital Each Letter

Relationship of Spiritual Leadership withWorkplaceBehavior


in Retail Marts of a Local City of Pakistan
A title should summarize the main idea of the manuscript simply and, if possible, with style. It
should be a concise statement of the main topic and should identify the variables or theoretical issues
under investigation and the relationship between them in given industry/sector/section. An example of
a good title is "Effect of Transformed Letters on Reading Speed in Among Local University
Students."

The title should be typed in uppercase and lowercase letters, centered between the left and
right margins, and positioned in the upper half of the page.

1. Introduction
The main purpose of the introduction is to provide the necessary background or
context for your research problem. How to frame the research problem is perhaps the biggest
problem in proposal writing.

If the research problem is framed in the context of a general, rambling literature


review, then the research question may appear trivial and uninteresting. However the same
question is placed in the context of a very focused and current research area, its significance
will become evident.

However, try to place your research question in the context of either a current “hot” area
or an older area that remains viable. Secondly you need to provide a brief but appropriate
historical backdrop. Thirdly, provide the contemporary context in which your proposed
research question occupies the central stage. Finally, identify “key players” and refer to the
most relevant and representative publications. In short, try to paint tour research question in
broad brushes and at the same time bring out its significance.

The introduction typically begins with a general statement of the problem area, with a
focus on a specific research problem, to be followed by the rational or justification for the
proposed study. The introduction generally covers the following elements:

3
1. State the research problem, which is often referred to as the purpose of the study.
2. Provide the context and set the stage for your research question in such a way as to
show as its necessity and importance.
3. Present the rationale of your proposed study and clearly indicate why it is worth
doing.
4. Briefly describe the major issues and sub-problems to be addressed by your research.
5. Identify the key independent and dependent variables of your experiment.
Alternatively, specify the phenomenon you want to study.
6. Set the delimitation or boundaries of your proposed research in order to provide a
clear focus.
7. Provide delimitations of key concepts. (This is optional.)

Therefore, introduction section must cover the following heads:

1.1 Background of the study

1.2 Problem Statement

1.3 Research Questions

1.4 Research Objectives

1.5 Significance of the Study

1.6 Scope of the Study (It covers delimitation)

2. Literature Review
Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introduction section. However, most
professors prefer a separate section, which allows a more thorough review of the literature.

The literature review serves several important functions:

1. Ensure that you are not “reinventing the wheel”.


2. Gives credit to those who have laid the groundwork for your research.
3. Demonstrates your knowledge of research problem.
4. Demonstrates your understanding of the theoretical and research issues related to your
research question.
5. Shows your ability to critically evaluate relevant literature information.
6. Indicates your ability to integrate and synthesize the existing literature.
7. Provides new theoretical insights or develops a new model as the conceptual
framework for your research.
8. Convinces your reader that your proposed research will make a significant and
substantial contribution to the literature (i.e., resolving an important theoretical issue
or filling a major gap in the literature)

4
Most students’ literature reviews suffer from the following problems:

• Lacking organization and structure.


• Lacking focus, unity and coherence.
• Being repetitive and verbose.
• Failing to site influential papers.
• Failing to keep up with recent developments.
• Failing to critically evaluate cited papers.
• Citing irrelevant or trivial references.
• Depending too much on secondary sources.
Your scholarship and research competencies will be questioned if any of the above
applies to your proposal.

There are different ways to organize your literature review. Make use of subheadings to
bring order and coherence to your review. For example, having established the importance of
your research area and its current state of development, you may devote several subsections
on related issue as: theoretical models, measuring instruments, cross cultural and gender
difference, etc.

It is also helpful to keep in mind that you are telling a story to an audience. Try to tell it in
a stimulating and engaging manner. Do not bore them, because it may lead to rejection of
your worthy proposal. (Remember professors and scientists are human too.

2. Literature Review covers the following:

2.1 Clearly showing the relationship among study variables

2.2 Identify Research Gap

2.3Construct the schematic diagram of TheoreticalFramework

2.4 Mention Hypotheses showing the relationship of variables with consist to


research title

2. Research Design & Methodology


Method section is very important because it tells your Research Committee hoe you
plan to tackle your research problem. It will provide your work plan and describe the
activities necessary in completion of your project.

The guiding principal for writing the Method section is that it should contain
sufficient information for the readers to determine whether methodology is sound. Some even

5
argue that a good proposal should contain sufficient details for another qualified researcher to
implement the study.

You need to demonstrate your knowledge of alternative methods and make the case
that your approach is the most appropriate and most valid way to address your research
question.

Please note that your research question may be best answered by qualitative research.
However, since most mainstream psychologists are still biased against qualitative research,
especially the phenomenological variety, you may need to justify qualitative method.

Furthermore, since there are no well-established and widely accepted canons in


qualitative analysis your method section needs to be more elaborate than what is required for
traditional qualitative research. More importantly the data collection process in qualitative
research has a far greater impact on the result as compared to quantitative research. That is
another reason for greater care in describing how you will collect and analyze your data.
(How to write the method section for qualitative research is a topic for another paper.)

Research Design & Methodology

3.1 Population

3.2 Sample Technique

3.3 Unit of Analysis

3.4 Sample Size

3.5 Data Collection Methods

3.6 Detail of data Collection Instrument

3.7 Data Collection Procedure

3.8 Data Analysis Software and Statistical Methods

4. Discussion:
It is important to convince your reader of the potential impact of your proposed
research. You need to communicate a sense of enthusiasm and confidence without
exaggerating the merits of your proposal. That is why you also need to mention the
limitations and weaknesses of the proposed research, which may be justified by time and
financial constraints as well as by the early developmental stage of your research area.

6
5 .Time Frame to Complete Research Thesis
6. References

(Add those reference which you thoroughly read and cited in literature review, don’t do copy
paste references from research papers)

7. Appendix (attach your questionnaire)

COMMON MISTAKES IN PROPOSAL WRITING

1. Failure to provide the proper context to frame the research question


2. Failure to delimit the boundary conditions for your research
3. Failure to cite landmark studies
4. Failure to accurately present the theoretical and empirical contributions by other
researchers
5. Failure to stay focused on research question
6. Failure to develop a coherent and persuasive argument for the proposed research
7. Too much detail on minor issues, but not enough detail on major issues
8. Too much rambling—going “all over the map” without a clear sense of direction.
(the best proposals move forward with ease and grace like a seamless river.)
9. Too long or too short
10. Failing to follow the APA style of writing
11. Slopping writing –poor grammar

7
Brief Research Proposal Contents Suppose To Be Covered in a High
Quality Research Proposal
1. Introduction

1.1 Background of the study

1.2 Problem Statement

1.3 Research Questions

1.4 Research Objectives

1.5 Significance of the Study

1.6 Scope of the Study (It covers delimitation)

2. Literature Review

2.1 Clearly showing the relationship among study variables

2.2 Identify research gap

2.3Construct the schematic diagram of Theoretical Framework

2.4 Mention Hypotheses showing the relationship of variables with consist to research
title

3. Research Design & Methodology

3.1 Population

3.2 Sample Technique

3.3 Unit of Analysis

3.4 Sample Size

3.5 Data Collection Methods

3.6 Detail of data Collection Instrument

3.7 Data Collection Procedure

3.8 Data Analysis Software and Statistical Methods

4. Discussion:

5 .Time Frame to complete your research thesis

8
6. References

7. Appendix (attach your questionnaire)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Number of Pages:
1. MBA & MSBA >9 pages, Excluding Title Pages, Forms
References & Questionnaire
2. Ph.D. > 11pages, Excluding Title Pages, Forms References &
Questionnaire
Formatting Requirements
• 1stLevel Heading: 12 font size Centered,+ Boldface+ Uppercase and Lowercase
Heading(font style: New Time Roman)
• 2ndLevel Heading: 12 font size + Flush right side of the page +
Boldface+Uppercase and Lowercase Heading (font style: New Time Roman)
• 3rdLevel Heading: 12 font size Indented+ boldface + lowercase paragraph
heading ending with a period (font style: New Time Roman) [all level headings
must be properly numbered]
• 4thLevel Heading: indented+ boldface +italicized + lowercase paragraph heading
• 5thLevel Heading:Indented+Italicized + lowercase paragraph heading
• Body text 12 font size (font style: New Time Roman)
• Line space 1.5
• Paragraph starts with one indent
• One line gap between paragraphs
• Page number at right bottom
• No right justification (Left aligned)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Common questions

Powered by AI

A research problem should be framed within the context of general focus to avoid appearing trivial. It should be placed in a contemporary context or a 'hot' research area, providing a brief historical background and identifying key players and publications. The problem should highlight the study's significance, serve as the foundation for the rationale of the study, and set the stage to show its necessity and importance .

A good title in a research proposal succinctly summarizes the main idea of the study while incorporating style. It should identify the main topic, variables, or theoretical issues and clarify their relationships in the relevant industry or sector. Structurally, it should be concise, centered between margins, and typed in uppercase and lowercase letters. A well-crafted title enhances the proposal's clarity and attractiveness, encouraging engagement from evaluators .

A poorly written proposal can lead to project rejection or failure even if the project itself has potential. This may occur because evaluators interpret poor presentation as a lack of preparation or understanding of the research field, undermining confidence in the researcher's competence. Additionally, consistently submitting subpar proposals can damage the researcher's academic reputation and hinder opportunities for funding or collaboration .

This section demonstrates how the research problem will be tackled, shaping the project's work plan and justifying the chosen methods. It should include the population, sampling techniques, unit of analysis, sample size, data collection methods, details on the data collection instruments, data collection procedure, and methods for data analysis, including software and statistical methods used. The methodology must provide enough detail for evaluators to assess the soundness of the approach and even allow replication by other researchers .

A well-structured introduction should include the background of the study, problem statement, research questions, research objectives, significance of the study, and the scope of the study, which involves setting delimitation. These components collectively provide a comprehensive overview of the research proposal, outlining the necessity and scope of the proposed study .

A quality research proposal is critical because it establishes the research project's potential for success and convinces evaluators of the researcher's competence and plan. An ill-conceived proposal can doom the project, while a well-written one promises success and impresses the thesis committee by showcasing the researcher's potential. A good proposal must address what the researcher plans to accomplish, why it is important, and how it will be executed. Poorly written proposals risk rejection regardless of the project's merit .

Common mistakes include failing to provide the proper context for the research question, omitting delimitation of boundary conditions, not citing landmark studies, inaccurately presenting theoretical and empirical contributions, lacking focus on the research question, having an incoherent argument, and including excessive or insufficient detail. These mistakes are significant as they can lead to misunderstandings of the research's significance, potential, and feasibility, ultimately increasing the risk of proposal rejection .

Aligning the scope of study with relevant literature is important because it ensures the research fills a gap or advances the field while avoiding duplication of existing work. It provides a framework for understanding the theoretical and empirical landscape, demonstrates the researcher's knowledge, and positions the proposed study within an academic narrative, thereby highlighting its significance and potential contribution .

Delimitations are significant as they set the boundaries and focus of the proposed research, helping to clarify what the study will and will not cover. This focus allows for a clear path to be developed for addressing the research question and ensures the proposal remains directed and manageable. Delimitations help to define the scope and limit the study to specific variables, contexts, or conditions, making it feasible and targeted .

The literature review in a research proposal ensures that the researcher is not 'reinventing the wheel,' it credits previous work, demonstrates the researcher's understanding and critical evaluation of relevant literature, and shows the ability to integrate existing insights. Common errors include lack of organization and focus, being repetitive, failure to cite key studies, not keeping up with recent developments, and over-reliance on secondary sources .

You might also like