0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views2 pages

FATF Global Standards Overview: Module 1

Uploaded by

DEDY KURNIAWAN
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views2 pages

FATF Global Standards Overview: Module 1

Uploaded by

DEDY KURNIAWAN
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Module 1 – Main Takeaways

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is the global standard setter in Anti-Money Laundering (AML),
Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) and Countering Proliferation Financing (CPF).
To begin with, learners should understand the definition of money laundering (ML), terrorist
financing (TF), and proliferation financing risk (PF):

• ML is the process of concealing the illicit origin of proceeds of crime.


• TF is the financing of terrorist acts and terrorists and terrorist organisations.
• PF Risk refers strictly and only to the potential breach, non-implementation or evasion of the
targeted financial sanctions (TFS) obligations referred to in Recommendation 7.
The FATF Recommendations set out a comprehensive framework of measures countries should
implement to combat ML/TF/PF. There are 40 Recommendations grouped into seven categories:

• AML/CFT Policies and Coordination (R.1 & 2)


• ML and Confiscation (R. 3 & 4)
• TF and PF (R.5 – 8)
• Preventive Measures (R.9 – 23)
• Transparency and Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons and Arrangements (R.24 & 25)
• Powers and Responsibilities of Competent Authorities, and Other Institutional Measures (R.
26 – 35)
• International Co-operation (R.36 -40)
For its assessment of effectiveness, the FATF has adopted eleven Immediate Outcomes:

• IO 1: Risk, Policy and Co-ordination


• IO 2: International Co-operation
• IO 3: Supervision and Preventive Measures for Financial Institutions (FIs) and VASPs
• IO 4: Supervision and Preventive Measures for DNFBPs
• IO 5: Legal Persons and Arrangements
• IO 6: Financial Intelligence
• IO 7: ML Investigation and Prosecution
• IO 8: Confiscation
• IO 9: TF Investigation and Prosecution
• IO 10: TF Preventive Measures and Targeted Financial Sanctions
• IO 11: PF Preventive Measures and Targeted Financial Sanctions
The mutual evaluation (ME) process is central to the FATF’s mission to combat ML/TF/PF. It holds all
countries of the FATF Global Network to the same standard, as all countries’ AML/CFT/CPF systems
are evaluated against the FATF Standards and Methodology in line with the Universal Procedures.

Introduction to the FATF Global Standards, Methodology and Procedures – Module 1 1


Characteristics of the ME process:

• FATF MEs are in-depth country reports analysing the implementation and effectiveness of
measures to combat ML, TF and PF.
• The reports are peer reviews, where experts from members of the FATF Global Network
assess another country.
• MEs provide focused recommendations to further strengthen countries’ AML/CFT/CPF
system.
• The ME process is a strictly confidential process.
All FATF members and FATF-Style Regional Body (FSRB) members are assessed and rated against the
FATF Standards and Methodology based on two rating scales:

• Technical Compliance ratings (i.e., Compliant; Largely Compliant; Partially Compliant; Non-
Compliant; Non-Applicable)
• Effectiveness ratings (i.e., High Level of effectiveness, Substantial Level of effectiveness,
Moderate Level of effectiveness, Low Level of effectiveness)
One of the main objectives of the mutual evaluation process is to help countries improve their
AML/CFT/CPF system.
Assessors should recommend measures the country should take to improve its AML/CFT/CPF system.
Assessors should determine whether the recommendations are key for enhancing effectiveness or
technical compliance. If they are, these Key Recommended Actions (KRAs) should be noted
separately from other recommendations. There should be at most 2-3 KRAs per IO, including any KRA
that concerns a related Recommendation under an IO.

Introduction to the FATF Global Standards, Methodology and Procedures – Module 1 2

Common questions

Powered by AI

Targeted financial sanctions (TFS) obligations are significant in combating proliferation financing by directly targeting the financial networks and resources of entities involved in proliferation activities, thus limiting their ability to finance such operations. FATF Recommendation 7 addresses these obligations, ensuring countries implement measures to prevent and detect evasion or non-compliance, thereby strengthening efforts to control proliferation risks .

Immediate Outcomes in the FATF framework are specific, tangible objectives that measure the extent to which AML/CFT systems achieve desired results in practice. By focusing on 11 outcomes like risk management, international cooperation, supervision, and enforcement measures, they provide a structured evaluation of effectiveness. This outcomes-based approach allows for targeted improvements and highlights operational success, ensuring anti-money laundering measures are not just in theory but effectively implemented .

Countries face several challenges in achieving high technical compliance and effectiveness, including the need to harmonize complex legal and regulatory frameworks with international standards, ensuring efficient inter-agency coordination, and maintaining up-to-date systems to monitor new threats and vulnerabilities. Additionally, balancing resources and training personnel to implement and sustain these measures is demanding. Rapidly evolving financial technologies and networks can also complicate enforcement, making it difficult to keep compliance and effectiveness at desired levels .

The FATF Recommendations facilitate international cooperation by establishing a framework that obliges countries to implement measures for exchanging information, conducting mutual legal assistance, and cooperating across jurisdictions. Recommendation categories emphasize international collaboration to ensure consistent and synchronized approaches in preventing and effectively countering money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing globally .

The FATF Mutual Evaluation process enhances global compliance by conducting in-depth, peer-reviewed country reports assessing the implementation and effectiveness of measures to battle ML, TF, and PF. This process not only rates countries based on technical compliance and effectiveness but also provides focused recommendations for improvements. By holding all countries to the same standard and suggesting 2-3 Key Recommended Actions per Immediate Outcome, the ME process aims to bolster the global AML/CFT/CPF system .

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is primarily responsible for setting global standards to combat money laundering (ML), terrorist financing (TF), and proliferation financing (PF). The FATF provides a comprehensive framework that consists of 40 Recommendations divided into categories like AML/CFT policies, ML and TF measures, and international cooperation. The FATF also conducts mutual evaluations to assess countries' compliance with these standards .

Effectiveness ratings measure how well countries implement anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures in practice, categorizing them from high to low effectiveness. Technical compliance assesses whether the necessary legal and institutional frameworks comply with FATF standards. Both ratings are necessary because high technical compliance does not automatically translate into effective implementation; therefore, assessing both dimensions provides a comprehensive overview of a country's AML/CFT/CPF capability .

Secrecy in the FATF Mutual Evaluation process is crucial as it maintains the integrity and impartiality of the reviews by preventing external influence and manipulation. This confidential environment allows assessors to provide frank assessments and recommendations, ensuring that countries are held accountable and encouraged to genuinely improve their AML/CFT/CPF frameworks without the pressure of public scrutiny before official findings are disclosed .

The core categories of the FATF Recommendations are: AML/CFT Policies and Coordination, ML and Confiscation, TF and PF, Preventive Measures, Transparency and Beneficial Ownership, Powers and Responsibilities of Competent Authorities, and International Co-operation. Collectively, these categories provide a comprehensive framework to establish legal, regulatory, and operational measures at national and international levels, creating a robust system to deter financial crime through preventive strategies and legal enforcement .

Peer reviews in FATF Mutual Evaluation reports involve experts from different member countries assessing each other's AML/CFT/CPF systems. This collaborative and knowledgeable approach ensures diverse perspectives and comprehensive expertise inform the reviews, contributing to unbiased, accurate, and credible evaluations. Peer reviews increase reliability as they leverage collective experience and ensure that the resulting recommendations are practical and internationally acceptable .

You might also like