UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
STUDIES FOR QUANTITY SURVEYING
COLLEGE OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT
BACHELOR OF QUANTITY SURVEYING (HONS) (AP224)
BQS568 (SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION)
(Semester Mac – July 2024)
ASSIGNMENT 2 (GROUP)
1.0 COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
Upon completion, students should be able to:
CO1 Explain the various process and types of sustainable construction (C5)
CO2 Integrate the economic aspects of sustainable construction (A4)
CO3 Present information clearly and appropriately well to the targeted audience (A2)
CO4 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of sustainable process through presentation (A3)
SCENARIO:
“IT’S TIME TO ZERO IN on WASTE MANAGEMENT”. This statement stated that the construction industry should embark
a zero waste in any construction project. This campaign has been announced targeted for zero waste at construction site
by 2030. Holistic waste management is highlighted as one of the strategies in adopting sustainable consumption and
production concepts. Incentives have been promised to spur private sectors to established recycling plants. A quick guide
from Department of Environment (DOE) shows how door, bricks, lighting fixtures and stairway banisters can be resold. For
instance, glass can be recycled into fibreglass or used in place of sand for paving. Asphalt can be turned back into aggregate
and reused. It is believed that this part of sustainable construction waste management aims to reduce the emission intensity
of greenhouse gases by 40%.
TASK
Based on the above statement, each group will be assigned a topic pertaining management of zero construction waste in
Malaysia construction industry. The topics are as follows:
Group 1: Legislation for Construction Waste Management in Malaysia
Group 2: Sustainable waste management - onsite incentives & green technology tax incentives
Group 3: Ways to dispose of waste (Reduction of waste through pre-planning, incentivising contractors and
preparation for deconstruction)
Group 4: Ways to dispose waste (3R construction waste reduction, the imposition of 3R through law and design
for disassembly, reuse & adaptability
Group 5: Innovations in construction site waste management
Group 6: How modular construction could achieve zero construction site waste management?
In a group of 5 to 6 students, accomplish the project with submission of a report form consisting of:
a) Identify the definition, criteria/features of the topics.
b) Explain the main agenda from the government towards sustainable construction site waste management.
c) Explain the processes/products/attributes related on the selected topic.
d) Give an example on the processes/products/attributes on the selected topic.
e) Include case study where necessary.
f) Explore the advantages and benefit of the topic selected.
f) Critical and analytical review of selected topic.
Requirement of the assignment:
1. Create a one-page A1 interactive poster that describes all the above-mentioned task, using your own creativity
and ideas. The poster must include:
a. Introduction to the topic given.
b. Contents
c. Conclusion/ summary
d. List of references (Proper citation and referencing is compulsory) – at the end of the
video. The references must at least based on five references.
2. You are encouraged to use any application software to be included in assisting your poster presentation, such as
PowToon, Sparkol, Animoto, Animaker, Biteable, Moovly, etc. or any other software that suit your preference.
3. Content of the poster must be in English.
4. The text on the poster must be clear and easily readable.
ASSESSMENT
Assessment of the assignment will be based on the followings:
• Content of the poster presentation and oral presentation.
• Completeness of the topic
• Critical and analytical review based on your findings of the abovementioned topic.
SUBMISSION DATE
Submission (30%) : Week 14. Strictly no marks will be given for late submission.
Presentation 10% Week 14 (during class)
Content in English : English
ISSUANCE DATE: WEEK 10
SUBMISSION AND PRESENTATION DATE: WEEK 14
Rubric Grouping Assignment (Report 30%)
Marks (M)
Marks Weighted Marks
Criteria
Allocated 1 – Poor and Need Obtained
2 - Fair 3-Good 4-Fairly Good 5 - Excellent
Improvement
The introduction is not
The introduction is less The introduction is
interesting; the audience is Interesting introduction Very interesting introduction,
Introduction 15% interesting and addressed appropriately interesting, M/5 x15%
not addressed and poor addressed well audience addressed audience well
the audience addressed audience
presentation
Information and examples are
Information and examples Information and examples Information and examples are
less than adequate for Information and examples are
Are lacking or not well are lacking or not well appropriately organized
Content, assignment. Slightly complete organized systematically,
chosen for the topic. Not a chosen for the topic. Less systematically, accurately,
Conclusion and 35% and systematic organization. accurately, relevantly and M/5 x 35%
systematic organization complete and systematic relevantly and completely.
References An average summary is completely. A clear summary is
and incomplete. A organization. A minimum However, the summary is
provided content is just provided
summary is not provided. summary is provided. provided
adequate for assignment.
The critical review The critical review
The critical review The critical review The critical review
explanations are fairly explanations reflect
explanations are weak explanations with minimal explanations are reasonable
reasonable expectational degree of student
and difficulty in explanation in and able to
Critical Review 10% explanation in understanding M/5 x 10%
understanding how to understanding how to understand how to
understanding how to and able to
relate items to the topic. relate items to the topic. relate items to the topic.
relate items to the topic. relate items to the topic.
One or two of the Most of the graphics or objects
Several of the graphics or
One or two graphics or graphics or objects used in the video reflect an
objects used in the video reflect
The student did not make or objects were made or used in the video exceptional degree of student
an exceptional degree of student
Creativity 25% customize any of the items on customized by the student, reflect student creativity in their creation and/or M/5 x 25%
creativity in their creation and/or
the topic. but the ideas were typical creativity in them display. The clear and attractive
display. Clear voice recordings
rather than creative. creation and/or display. Voice tone of voice recordings were
were included.
recordings were included included.
It is clear how different elements
The student's The student gives a reasonable
The student gives a The student gives a included (process, features,
explanations are weak explanation of how most
minimal fairly reasonable concept, systems, strategies
Attention to and illustrate difficulty elements in the video are related
15% explanation of how explanation of how etc.) are related to the topic. For M/5 x 15%
Details understanding how to to the topic. For many of the
most elements in the most elements in the most items, the relationship is
relate items to the topic. items, the relationship is clear
poster is related to the topic poster is related to the topic. clear without a separate
topic. without a separate explanation.
explanation from the poster.
TOTAL MARKS 100% *TOTAL MARKS WILL BE REDUCED TO 30% /100%
Rubric (Presentation Grouping - 10%)
Weighted Marks
Marks Marks (M)
Criteria Obtained
Allocated
1 – Poor and Need Improvement 2 - Fair 3-Good 4-Fairly Good 5 - Excellent
Very interesting content
Interesting content and it covers
It includes essential and it covers all the
It includes basic knowledge all but not that in depth topic
The content includes minor details and information about the topic, topics in depth with
Content 35% about the topic. The content with details and few examples. M/5 x35%
it has several mistakes in the facts but ih has 1-2 mistakes in details and examples.
seems to be good. The knowledge of the topic is
the facts. The knowledge of the
fairly excellent.
topic is excellent.
The uses ideas from other The presentation shows
The presenter uses ideas from other The presentation shows certain The presentation shows
people (quoting them), but great originality. The
Originality 15% people without quoting them. Or the originality. It shows the use of originality. The ideas are M/5 x 15%
there is little evidence of ideas are truly creative
idea was seen somewhere before. new ideas and of shrewdness. creative and witty.
original ideas. and witty.
A lot of different shots,
On or two different shots, Several (3-4) different shots, More than 4 different shots,
camera angles, sound
camera angles, sound camera angles, sound effects camera angles, sound effects
effects and/or an
Little effort has been made to provide effects and/or an adequate and/or an adequate use of and/or an adequate use of
Videography – adequate use of zooming
25% variety to the video. Poor quality of use of zooming providing zooming providing variety in the zooming providing variety in the M/5 x 25%
interest & clarity providing variety in the
video variety in the video. Quality video. The quality of the video is video. Most of the quality of the
video. The overall quality
of the video and the focus not very good but overall focus video and the focus were
of the video and the
are not good. was excellent. excellent.
focus were excellent.
It is clear how different
elements included
The student's The student gives a reasonable (animations, pictures,
The student gives a
explanations are weak The student gives a explanation of how most entries, exits in the
fairly reasonable
Attention to and illustrate difficulty minimal explanation of how elements in the video are related video) are related to the
15% explanation of how M/5 x 15%
Details understanding how to most elements in the to the topic. For many of the topic. For most items, the
most elements in the
relate items to the topic. video is related to the topic items, the relationship is clear relationship is clear
video is related to the topic.
topic. without a separate explanation. without a separate
explanation from the
video.
Demonstrate no communication skills. Demonstrate ineffective Selectively demonstrates Demonstrate effective oral Demonstrates
Does not offer ideas, ask questions, or oral and/or written effective oral and/or written and/or written communication professionalism in all
Leadership participate in discussion or meetings. communication skills (e.g communication. Shares skills. Share responsibility for situations, conversations
10% M/5 x 10%
Quality uses improper grammar or responsibility for completing the creation and application of and documents.
slang). Less act in offering tasks. Offer ideas or asks ideas, activities and projects. Demonstrate ability to
ideas, asking questions, or questions sporadically.
participate in discussion or work with peers and
meetings. lecturer.
TOTAL MARKS 100% *TOTAL MARKS WILL BE REDUCED TO 10% /100%