Understanding Total Quality Management
Understanding Total Quality Management
TQM is defined as both philosophy and a set of guiding principles that represent the
foundation of continuously improving organisation. It is the application of quantitative
methods and human resources to improve all the process within the organisation and exceed
customer needs now and in the future.
Definition of quality
One of the important issues that business has focused on in the last two decades is
quality. The other issues are cost and delivery. Quality has been widely considered as a
key element for success in business in the present competitive market. Quality refers to
meeting the needs and expectations of customers. It is important to understand that quality
is about more than a product simply working properly.
Quality refers to certain standards and the ways and means by which those standards
are achieved, maintained and improved. Quality is not just confined to products and
services. It is a homogeneous element of any aspect of doing things with high degree of
perfection. For example Business success depends on the quality decision making.
EVOLUTION OF QUALITY
Define Quality .
QUANITIFICATION OF QUALITY
Q= P / E
P = Performance
E = Expectations
Q = Quality
DIMENSION OF QUALITY
Quality has 2 dimensions. These dimensions are product and service quality.
4. Conformance: meeting specifications, industry standards,. (E.g. ISI specs., emission norms)
5. Reliability: consistency of performance over a specified time period under specified
conditions.
6. Durability: extent of useful life, sturdiness.
7. Maintainability/Serviceability: ease of attending to maintenance, repairs.
8. Efficiency: ratio of output to input. E.g. mileage, braking distance, processing time.
9. Aesthetics: sensory characteristics, e.g. appearance, exterior finish, texture, color, shape,
etc.
10. Reputation: subjective assessment based of past performance, brand image, industry
ranking.
11. Safety: in items like pressure cookers, electrical items, toys, cranes, etc.
DIMENSION OF QUALITY
Product quality Service quality
Performance Time
Features Timeliness
Usability Completeness
Conformance Consistency
Reliability Accessibility/Convenience
Durability Accuracy
Maintainability/Serviceability Responsiveness
Efficiency Courtesy
Aesthetics Competency/Expertise
Reputation
Safety
2. Focus on customer – who is the customer – internal and external, voice of the customer,
do it right first time and every time.
3. Involvement and utilization of entire work force – All levels of management
4. Continuous improvement – Quality never stops, placing orders, bill errors, delivery,
minimize wastage and scrap etc.
5. Treating suppliers as partners – no business exists without suppliers.
6. Performance measures – creating accountability in all levels
TQM DEFINITION
3. TQM is people - focused management system that aims at continual increase in customer
satisfaction at continually lower cost. TQM is a total system approach (not a separate area of
program), and an integral part of high level strategy. It works horizontally across functions
and departments, involving all employees, top to bottom, and exceeds backwards and forward
to include the supply chain and the customer chain.
TQM Framework
1. Create and publicize to all employees the aims and purposes of the organization.
2. Adopt the new philosophy (of customer satisfaction, continuous improvement, defect
prevention, management-labour cooperation, etc.).
3. Stop dependence on inspection to achieve quality. (Managers must understand how
variation affects their processes and take steps to reduce the causes of variation.
Workers must take responsibility for their own work).
4. End the practice of awarding business on the basis of price tag alone. (Costs due to
inferior materials/components increase costs in the later stages of production.
Suppliers themselves are part of the whole system and hence should be treated as
long-term partners).
5. Improve constantly and forever the system of production and service .(Aim for small,
incremental, continuous improvements – not merely in the area of production but also
covering transportation, maintenance, sales, service, administration, etc. – all areas of
the organization).
6. Institute training. (Employees need the proper tools and knowledge to do a good job,
and it is management’s responsibility to provide these. Training not only improves
quality and productivity, but also enhances workers’ morale).
7. Adopt modern methods of supervision and leadership. (Managers, Supervisors should
act as coaches, facilitators and not as policemen).
8. Drive out fear. (Fear in work manifests as fear of reprisal, fear of failure, fear of
change, fear of the unknown. Fear encourages short-term, selfish thinking, not long-
term improvement for the benefit of all).
9. Break down barriers between departments and individuals. (Promote teamwork).
10. Eliminate the use of slogans and exhortations. (Workers cannot improve solely
through motivational methods when the system in which they work constrains their
performance. On the contrary, they will become frustrated, and their performance will
decrease further).
11. Eliminate work standards, numerical quotas, and MBO. (Numerical quotas reflect
short-term perspectives and do not encourage long-term improvement. Workers may
shortcut quality to reach the goal. The typical MBO system focuses on results, not
processes, and encourages short-term behavior).
12. Remove barriers to pride in workmanship. (Treating workers as commodities; giving
them monotonous jobs, inferior tools; performance appraisals, management assuming
it is smarter than workers and not using the workers’ knowledge and experience to the
fullest extent).
13. Encourage education and self-improvement for everyone.
14. Take action to achieve the transformation. (The TQ philosophy is a major cultural
change,and many firms find it difficult. Top management must take the initiative and
include everyone in it).
Joseph M. Juran, Ph.D. (1904- ). Born in Romania. His parents migrated to the USA.
Worked at Western Electric [Link] 1924 to 1941. There he got exposed to the concepts
of Shewhart.
Contributions:
In 1951, he published ‘Quality Control Handbook’ which is still a standard reference for
quality control departments in organizations.
Traveled to Japan in 1954 to teach quality management to the Japanese at the invitation of
the Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers (JUSE). Juran and Deming introduced the
concept of SQC to the Japanese. Helped the Japanese to improve quality to
unprecedented levels.
He popularized the concept of Fitness for Quality – comprising of Quality of Design,
Quality of Conformance, Availability (reliability), Safety and Field Service.
Along with Deming, he introduced the concept of ‘Quality Assurance’.
He formulated a Quality Planning Roadmap.
Quality Planning Roadmap.
1. Identify your customers,
2. Find out their needs,
3. Translate them into technical requirements,
4. Develop the product,
5. Develop and validate the process,
6. Translate the resulting plan to the operating personnel.
He advocated the accounting and analysis of quality costs to focus attention on quality
problems.
He emphasized that upper management in particular needed training and experience in
managing for quality. At the operational level, his focus was on increasing conformance
to specifications through the elimination of defects, supported by statistical analysis.
Founded Juran Institute in 1979 to provide training, consulting services for improving
business performance and attaining quality leadership.
His book ‘Managerial Breakthrough’ (1964) presented the concept of ‘Universal
Breakthrough Sequence (or Breakthrough improvement), which has now evolved
into Six Sigma, the basis for quality initiatives worldwide.
Juran described quality from the customer perspective as having two aspects:
Higher quality means a greater number of features that meet customers’ needs.
Freedom from trouble’ – higher quality consists of fewer defects.
Juran is recognized as the person who added the human dimension to quality – broadening
it from its statistical origins, and thus helping develop the concept of TQM.
Many organizations, especially small ones with niche products, are comfortable with
their current state. They are satisfied with their current level of performance and profits.
Organizations with this culture will see little need for TQM until they begin to lose market
share.
Awareness comes about when (a) the organization loses market share or (b) TQM is
mandated by the customer, or (c) management realizes that TQM is a better way to run a
business and compete in domestic and world markets.
Once an organization embarks on TQM, the following are some of the major obstacles
encountered in implementation:
Lack of management commitment: Management does not allocate sufficient time and
resources for TQM implementation. The purpose is not clearly, consistently
communicated to all personnel. Management’s compensation is not linked to quality
goals such as failure costs, customer complaints, and cycle time reduction.
Inability to change organizational culture: Even individuals resist change; changing
an organization’s culture is much more difficult and may require as much as 5 years
or more. Exhortations, speeches, slogans are effective only in the short run.
Improper planning: Absence of two-way communication of ideas during the
development of the plan and its implementation.
Lack of continuous training and education.
Inadequate use of empowerment and teamwork.
Lack of employee involvement.
Non-cooperation of first-line managers and middle management.
Lack of clarity in vision.
Emphasis on short-term results.
Setting of unmanageable, unrealistic goals.
Bureaucratic system.
TQM is considered as a quick-fix solution to current problems.
Treating suppliers as adversaries to be manipulated, taken advantage of Adversarial relationship
between workers/unions and management. Motivating employees through fear of punishment.
Failure to continually improve. Tendency to sit back and rest on one’s laurels. Rigidly sticking to one
‘success formula’. Lack of access to data and results. Paying inadequate attention to internal and
external customers. Ineffective measurement techniques for key characteristics of the organization.
Inability to understand the changing needs and expectations of customers. Absence of effective
feedback mechanism.
LECTURE NOTES
UNIT 1
1.1 Meaning of Quality
The mission statements answer the following questions: Who we are? Who are the
customers? What we do? Andhow we do it? It is the usually a one paragraph statement which
describes the function of the organization. It provides a clear statement of purpose for
employees, customers and suppliers.
Example: To meet customers ‘transportation and distribution needs by being the best at
moving their goods on time, safely and damage free. CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS
Vision Statement:
It is a short declaration of what an organization aspires to be tomorrow. It is the ideal
state that might never reached but which you continuously strive to achieve.
Example: We will be the preferred provider of safe, reliable, and cost-effective products and
services that satisfy the electric-related needs of all customer segments.
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Quality Policy:
The Quality Policy is a guide for everyone in the organization as to how they should
provide products and service to the customers. The common characteristics are Quality is first
among equals. Meet the needs of the internal and external customers. Equal or exceed the
competition. Continually improve the quality. Include business and production practices. Utilize
the entire work force
Consumer's opinion of a product's (or a brand's) ability to fulfil his or her expectations. It
may have little or nothing to do with the actual excellence of the product, and is based on the
firms (or brand's) current public image (see corporate image), consumer's experience with the
firm's other products, and the influence of the opinion leaders, consumer's peer group, and
others.
Customer Satisfaction:
Customer – A person who buys the product or service or even a consumer who may
become future customer Satisfaction
1. Understanding customer needs
2. Defining quality
3. Teboul Model – Penetration
4. Customer satisfaction is a process never ending
Teboul Model – Penetration
Finds dissatisfaction
Dissatisfied customer normally tend to report and register complaint Priority for quality
Match between organization perceptions of quality to that of customer Comparison with
competitors
Evaluation by customers who would have known the competitors Customer needs
The real needs of customers is known directly from the customer Scope for improvement
Future enhancement in terms of quality
Sources of Feedback
1. Comment Card – card attached with the warranty to get the basic information. Asking reasons
for the purchase of product or service.
2. Questionnaire – Most popular. Mostly close ended and few open questions. Time consuming.
Analyze and interpret data.
3. Focus Group – Select few customer, call for a meeting and discuss and collect data from them.
Also ask them what their expectation is. Incentive for participation is assured in advance so that
the customer is comfortable and not forced to participate.
4. Toll Free Numbers – Free telephone customer can call for assistance, register complaints
5. Customer Visit – It is very effective as customer is put on top priority but at the same time
consuming, costly and customer interest.
6. Report Card – giving a grading sheet to the customer regarding the organization. Very
effective, customer is at pride that he could evaluate the product or service.
7. Internet – Online and email feedback. Though easy but not 100% reliable source and lot of
misrepresentation and lags seriousness on the part of the consumer.
8. Employee feedback – Untapped source of effective information. Customer says what is
happening employees say why it is happening. Reactive to proactive approach
9. Mass Customization – make instant changes to the requirement of the customer. Dress
materials, computer, furniture etc.
Handling complaints
1. Investigate the complaint promptly both positive and negative
2. Develop procedure for complaints, recording, actions to be taken, inform the staffs
3. Categories the complaints – product, service, cost, ambience etc
4. Senior managers must have direct involvement
5. Communicate the process of handling the complaints to all staffs
6. Provide regular complaints reports – complaints received, decisions taken etc
7. Identify customer expectations before hand
During the 1950‘s the concept of ―Quality Cost‖ emerged. Different people assigned
different meanings to the term. Some people equated quality cost with the cost of attaining
quality; some people equated the term with the extra incurred due to poor quality.
But, the widely accepted thing is ―Quality cost is the extra cost incurred due to poor or
bad quality of the product or service‖.
Quality costs are the costs associated with preventing, detecting, and remediating product
issues related to quality.
Quality costs do not involve simply upgrading the perceived value of a product to a
higher standard. Instead, quality is creating and delivering a product that meets the expectations
of a customer.
Thus, if a customer spends very little for an automobile, he will not expect leather seats
and air conditioning - but he will expect the vehicle to run properly.
Quality costs are generally considered to fall into four categories, which are:
Prevention costs.
The cost incurred in keeping failure and appraisal costs to a [Link] incur a
prevention cost in order to keep a quality problem from occurring. It is the least expensive type
of quality cost, and so is highly recommended.
Prevention costs can include proper employee training in assembling products and
statistical process control (for spotting processes that are beginning to generate defective goods),
as well as a robust product design and supplier certification.
Appraisal costs. The cost incurred in determining the degree of conformance to quality
requirement. As was the case with a prevention cost, you incur an appraisal cost in order to keep
a quality problem from occurring. You do so through a variety of types of inspection. The least
expensive is having production workers inspect both incoming and outgoing parts to and from
their workstations, which catches problems faster than other types of inspection. Other appraisal
costs include the destruction of goods as part of the testing process, the depreciation of test
equipment, and supervision of the testing staff.
Internal failure costs. The cost associated with defects that are found prior to transfer of the
product to the customer. You incur an internal failure cost when a defective product is produced.
This appears in the form of scrapped or reworked goods.
Scrap
Rework
Re-inspection
Re-testing
Material review
Downgrading
External Failure costs. The cost associated with defects that are found after product is
shipped to the customer. You also incur an external failure cost when a defective product was
produced, but now the cost is much more extensive, because it includes the cost of product
recalls, warranty claims, field service, and potentially even the legal costs associated with
customer lawsuits. It also includes a relatively unquantifiable cost, which is the cost of losing
customers.
TQM is defined as both philosophy and a set of guiding principles that represent the
foundation of continuously improving organisation. It is the application of quantitative methods
and human resources to improve all the process within the organisation and exceed customer
needs now and in the future.
Total Quality Management is an effective system for integrating the quality development,
quality maintenance and quality improvement efforts of various groups in an organization
continuously, so as to enable marketing, engineering, production and service at the most
economic levels which allow for full customer satisfaction.
Importers new to the world of overseas manufacturing and quality control inspection are often
inundated with a variety of quality control terms that seem to have the same meaning.
For example, some importers confuse “product testing” with “product inspection”. And what’s
the difference between “inspection” and “quality control”? Don’t all of these processes involve
checking and examining a product?
Can you conduct both quality inspection and testing at the same time and location? Can your
supplier carry out both these processes for you, or do you need to manage either independently
(related: 4 Ways Importers Conduct Product Inspection [eBook])? How many units do you need
to check to get a reliable assessment of product quality?
In fact, product inspection and product testing generally refer to two different steps in a broader
quality control strategy. So let's explore the difference between these two quality management
options available to you and see how they might fit into your quality control plan.
HOW DO QUALITY INSPECTION AND TESTING DI FFER?
Product testing and product inspection address different quality concerns for importers evaluating
their product. Are there scratches on the screen of your tablet PC? Are there skipped stitches in
your woven garment? These are the kinds of questions product inspection can help answer about
your products.
Do you need to know the chemical composition of the paint your supplier is using to coat your
furniture? Or whether your children’s toy meets U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission standards? Product testing will likely be the relevant avenue for answering these
questions.
Product testing, often known as lab testing, typically involves testing a product against a specific
standard or regulation in a certified laboratory. Whereas product inspection often involves
checking a random sample of an order for compliance with a buyer’s requirements and
specifications.
The other key purpose of product inspection is to help you identify and address any quality
defects in your products before they reach your customers. Inspectors often use an acceptance
sampling method like AQL to inspect a random sample of the total order quantity. The inspector
can typically classify quality defects based on their severity and issue a clear “pass” or “fail”
result for the order using AQL.
Hire a third-party inspection company: Independent inspection firms can often inspect a wide
range of products and issue a comprehensive report for a reasonable fee. They typically follow industry-
standard inspection processes and should have strict integrity policies to ensure reliable results.
Hire full-time inspectors: These are local employees hired by your company and paid on a salary
basis to inspect your products. In order to hire local employees, you’ll often need the resources to legally
set up an office abroad.
Send a company representative abroad or inspect yourself: You might feel you can inspect
products better according to your own standards and requirements. But high time and travel costs can make
this an impractical option if you need frequent inspections for large order volumes.
Most suppliers in Asia are familiar with each of the above product inspection approaches. Notify
your supplier about your inspection requirements when placing your order, including when
inspection must occur and who will conduct it. This will help your supplier to prepare for
inspection and minimize any pushback before shipment.
The main drawback of PSI is it often happens too late to address any of the quality defects or
issues the inspector finds in the shipment. Depending on the types of problems found and how
soon the goods need to leave the factory, there may not be enough time to replace or rework the
affected units. PSI also does little to prevent defects in an order.
Product inspection can offer different benefits at different production stages. Inspecting earlier in
production can help you identify any quality issues before they affect the majority of an
order. Incoming quality control on raw materials or components and a during production
inspection when 15-80 percent of the goods are manufactured are two common options available
to importers.
Your product’s intended use and attributes: Some products inherently carry more risk than
others. Some examples are children’s products or products that will be ingested or come in contact with
food or beverages.
Claims you’ve made in marketing your product: Have you made specific promises about your
product’s quality or performance? Samples can be rigorously tested for durability or performance in
comparison to leading competitors, also known as benchmarking.
Regulations governing your product type in your market of sale: Mandatory safety regulations,
like REACH or CPSIA standards, govern products that can potentially cause serious harm to end users.
Compliance is a legal requirement in many markets.
Obtaining a product sample helps you ensure your supplier understands your requirements and
can meet your quality standards. Some importers even request a product sample when negotiating
with suppliers to assess and compare potential suppliers’ production capabilities.
If you plan to test units from mass production, quality control inspectors can often pull a few
production units during inspection and then either:
Having your inspectors pull samples at the factory ensures the samples are truly random and
representative of the entire order. Relying on factory staff to pull samples carries the risk that
workers will “cherry pick” samples known to be compliant, in better condition or otherwise not
representative of the order.
Sending a product sample to a laboratory for testing can help you verify materials and components
used in the sample and assess safety and performance. You may need to test each SKU, especially
if they are manufactured with different materials. But testing just a few units of each SKU is
usually adequate, as materials and production processes are typically consistent across an order.
Can your supplier reliably perform lab testing at their own facility?
It’s true that some factories have sophisticated facilities to accommodate certain kinds of on-site
lab testing. But while valuable, it’s important not to overestimate the accuracy of these test results
from such a lab.
Factory labs usually are not certified by official accrediting bodies, such as the ANSI-ASQ
National Accreditation Board (ANAB) or the International Accreditation Service, and certainly
cannot be considered independent third parties. In several markets, like the EU and United States,
national governments require these accreditations for brands to import and sell products there.
Another important consideration is the competence and experience of the workers carrying out
testing. Factory employees generally won’t be as qualified and reliable as the skilled technicians
employed by more professional, accredited testing labs.
Fraudulent product testing results from a factory
Just as factory self-inspection presents a conflict of interests, so too does relying on your
manufacturer to test their own products. Factories might even forge favorable testing results or
desired certifications.
For example, one furniture importer we’ve worked with told us their factory openly suggested
applying fake labeling to “certify” their office chair cushions were flame retardant.
Testing laboratory TUV Rheinland has actually published a “blacklist” of such fraudulent
suppliers who have used their certification mark without authorization, falsified a test report or
created a fake report or certificate.
Supplier qualification, often involving auditing suppliers for ISO9001 or other relevant
compliance frameworks and evaluating product samples
Developing a quality manual that reflects customer and retailer standards
Analyzing customer feedback, complaint and return data for ongoing quality improvement
Taking corrective and preventative action to improve quality, for instance, through root cause
analysis and process improvement
Managing any product recalls and liability risks
Quality inspection and testing are both essential for an overall effective quality control strategy.
But preventing quality issues in your products should start at the very beginning of sourcing and
negotiating with suppliers, well before inspection.
Now you have a clearer picture of the difference between product inspection and product testing
and between inspection and quality control. If you still have some uncertainties, don’t worry. The
reference table below outlines some of the major differences to help you keep
track.
Implementing quality inspection and testing will certainly come at an upfront cost to your
importing business. But most importers find the preventative cost of these pales in comparison to
the potential cost of a lawsuit or product recall resulting from quality issues they might otherwise
overlook.
In statistical quality control, statistical techniques are used to prevent defects and improve the
process of manufacturing a certain item. The first step in preventing defects is through a process
known as inspection. Inspection involves visually looking over the product for any imperfections
or issues that may arise. Inspectors then determine if there will be any additional action taken on
the product. In order to ensure that no defective products make it to market, several of these
inspections must take place throughout the entire production process.
A Statistical Quality control system performs inspection, testing and analysis to conclude
whether the quality of each product is as per laid quality standard or not. It’s called ‘‘Statistical
Quality Control’’ when statistical techniques are employed to control quality or to solve quality
control problem. SQC makes inspection more reliable and at the same time less costly. It controls
the quality levels of the outgoing products.
Statistical process control is a technique of quality control which uses statistical approaches to
monitor and regulate a process. This helps to guarantee that the process runs effectively,
generating more criterion items with less wastage.
A procedure that evaluates output compared to a benchmark and taking appropriate action when
differences arise. SPC utilizes a variety of techniques, including run charts, control charts, an
emphasis towards continuous improvement, & experiment design.
There are two major types of quality control: statistical and non-statistical. Statistical quality
control is the process of taking measurements in order to evaluate a manufacturing process. Non-
statistical quality control measures the end product itself to ensure it meets certain requirements.
Statistical Quality control is the process of identifying errors in a product or service and taking
steps to correct them. Quality control personnel are responsible for ensuring that everything
produced by an enterprise meets acceptable standards. Businesses use statistical methods to
analyze data, predict outcomes and improve performance.
SQC should be viewed as a kit of tools which may influence related to the function of
specification, production or inspection.
Statistics
Statistics entails a substantial quantity of data. Or simply, the joint study of collection, analysis,
interpretation and presentation of large quantities of data.
Statistical tools
Quality
“a feature of technical feasibility at lowest possible cost” , or “degree of excellence that fits the
requirements of the clients”. Quality is described as “the sum total of qualities and behaviors of
goods and services that meet hidden and visible consumer expectations.”
Control
Quality control is a critical technique for ensuring that goods or services meet a predetermined
standard of quality. Quality control is becoming a significant instrument and essential element in
every successful enterprise to guarantee standard quality. Peters and Waterman identified quality
as an essential component of success in 1982.
Thus, quality control is the use of suitable methods and actions to achieve, maintain, and improve
the quality of goods and services, as well as to meet customer requirements for pricing, safety,
availability, dependability, and usability, among others.
The approach uses statistical methods based on probability theory to set standards of quality and
maintain them in the most affordable way.
(1) To decide about the standard of Quality of a product that is easily acceptable to the customer.
The principle tools and techniques of statistical quality control are as follows :
The quality of a product is important to the company that produces it. Quality control is the
measurement and comparison of characteristics (or parameters) of a product against pre-
established standards to ensure that the product meets requirements for use.
Statistical quality control involves analysis of data, both qualitative and quantitative, about
processes, products, suppliers or services to assess their degree of conformance to specifications
or standards. It also refers to the techniques used in the application of this analysis.
Crayola is a well-known crayon manufacturer with a worldwide reputation, and they are often
regarded as the world’s top manufacturer of crayons and other art materials for children. The only
way Crayola has been able to achieve and retain this kind of notoriety is by ensuring that all of
their goods are of superior quality. They must maintain high quality standards for almost all of
their goods in order to retain their worldwide reputation as a leading company.
Now, something as basic as crayons is not the first thing that comes to mind when thinking of
high quality, but being the greatest at everything in the world takes meticulous attention to detail
as well as many rigorous procedures to ensure that the quality is maintained.
Crayola manufactures over 3 billion crayons each year, which equates to nearly 12 million
crayons produced per day on an annual basis. This is a disproportionately large number of crayons
especially goods that must adhere to very high quality requirements. Then, what is their method of
doing this?
One of the most important factors in ensuring that an organization as productive as Crayola may
keep running and produce goods that are always improving upon their high quality is to maintain
an information-driven strategy that would be concentrated on constant improvements.
For example, Crayola use Minitab Statistical Software to assist them in their data analysis so that
they may enhance their manufacturing line and procedures. Minitab assists the business in
maintaining a comprehensive statistical analysis of their data and in visualizing the data’s
progression.
Crayola adopted Lean Principles for their projects in 2008 and was able to save more than $1.5
million. Since then, the company has not looked back. Minitab has been used for a number of
years to analyze and improve their statistical quality control, and they have had tremendous
success with it.
Quality control charts depict measures of quality for processes or for products. They show the
deviation, if any, from the set, ideal standards or specifications for a product or a process.
Quality control is an extremely important activity for any business that is engaged in
manufacturing products. If a company’s products are produced with uneven quality, it can
negatively impact the company’s sales.
For example, consider a company that makes and sells bottled beverages. Now think about what
might happen if a production machine that affixes the caps to the bottles gets a little bit out of
whack, so that it begins affixing approximately one-third of the bottle caps in such a way that it
becomes nearly impossible, or at least extremely difficult, for consumers to remove the cap from
the bottle. It doesn’t take too many instances of an occurrence such as that before the company
begins to lose a lot of customers.
Therefore, companies set rigorous specification standards for both manufacturing processes and
for the finished products that they produce. They then set in place quality control procedures. One
of the procedures is commonly to take random samples and create quality control charts that
reveal how much deviation exists from the specification standards for a product.
If significant deviations from specifications are revealed, the company can take whatever action is
needed to correct any problems – such as recalibrating a machine that affixes caps to bottles – and
restore the desired level of uniform quality.
Quality control charts can be created and used to examine either a single variable or multiple
variables related to the desired quality of a product or process. For example, a toy manufacturing
company may wish to use quality control charts to monitor (1) the smoothness of the edges of the
toy and (2) the fit of the toy’s packaging.
As long as the samples show deviations that are only within the range bordered by the upper and
lower quality control lines, then that indicates good quality control, that products are being
produced with the desired level of uniform quality. It is referred to as being “in control.”
However, if the results show many samples with plot points above or below the upper or lower
quality control lines, respectively, it indicates significant variation in product or process quality
that needs to be addressed. Wide variations from specifications indicate being “out of control.”
Source
While the use of quality control charts is most frequently associated with manufacturing processes
and manufactured products, they can be applied to many other things as well. Following are some
other potential applications for the use of quality control charts.
1. Employee Retention Rates
Finding, hiring, and training new employees is an expensive and time-consuming process for a
company. Therefore, it is to a company’s advantage to retain good employees as long as possible.
A quality control chart can be constructed that compares a company’s actual employee turnover
rate to its desired rate. If the chart reveals an excessively high turnover rate, then the company can
do further investigation to find the cause(s) of the high turnover rate, and then make changes
designed to reduce the rate.
2. Returns on Investments
Quality control can also be applied to examine returns on your investments, checking the extent to
which individual investments in your portfolio either outperform or underperform compared to
your expected investment returns.
Wide variations in investment results, either up or down, may indicate that your
current investment portfolio carries a higher degree of risk than the risk level that you are
comfortable with. Outperforming and underperforming investments can also be examined for
common characteristics that may help you identify future investments that offer a higher
probability of obtaining maximum profits.
3. E-commerce websites
Quality control charts can be used to monitor the processes and functionality of an e-commerce
website. For example, anyone engaged in such a business would do well to monitor the number of
instances where there is some type of glitch in the website’s operation that causes a customer to
abandon the process of making a purchase. By monitoring the quality of the website’s operational
performance, any problems or issues that arise can be quickly addressed before they lead to a
substantial decline in revenues.
Acceptance Sampling:
Sampling is the tool or technique of statistical quality control. Webster defined a sample as a
product to represent the quality of the whole lot. Frequently, we in our daily life come in contact
with sampling.
For example, if we purchase a bag of potatoes, only a few potatoes can be observed from the
whole bag however we draw an inference about the whole bag by only inspecting a few. If these
look alright, it is assumed that all the potatoes in that bag will be alright.
The basic concept of sampling lies in testing the samples for acceptance or rejection. Some
products such as electric bulbs, radio valves, razor blades, bolts etc. require to be subjected to
destructive tests so as to ascertain their life.
A cent percent inspection and destructive testing of such type of products cannot be possible and
also sometimes the cost of cent percent inspection is extremely high. So for such problems
acceptance sampling can be widely used.
In this method samples are collected at regular interval and subjected for inspection.
For the purpose of acceptance, inspection is carried out at many stages in the process of
manufacturing. These stages may be: inspection of incoming materials and parts, process in-
spection at various points in the manufacturing operations, final inspection by a manufacturer of
his own product and finally inspection of the finished product by the purchaser.
Inspection for acceptance is generally carried out on a sampling basis. The use of sampling
inspection to decide whether or not to accept the lot is known as Acceptance Sampling.
A sample from the inspection lot is inspected, and if the number of defective items is more than
the stated number (the number is decided using statistics after a decision is taken about confidence
level depending upon the place of application of the product and its criticality) known as
Acceptance Number, the whole lot is rejected.
The purpose of Acceptance Sampling is, therefore, to decide whether to accept or reject the lot. It
does not control the quality during the process of manufacturing.
Acceptance Sampling is very widely used in practice due to the following merits:
3. Because of its economy, it is possible to carry out sample inspection at various stages.
Acceptance number is evaluated using sampling plan and confidence level.
4. The 100 percent inspection is not possible, where quality can be tested only by destroying the
items. In such case, sampling inspection is the only solution.
This, RQL helps in real protection against unsatisfactory material, reaching the customer. RQL or
LTPD can also be expressed by the minimum number or percentage of defective pieces in a “bad
lot”. This can also be termed as ‘Limiting Quality Level’ (LQL).