Deductive Reasoning and Argument Forms
Uploaded by
game94049Deductive Reasoning and Argument Forms
Uploaded by
game94049Common questions
Powered by AIA deductive argument claims the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises, meaning if all premises are true, the conclusion must be true . An inductive argument, however, claims the conclusion follows from the premises with a certain degree of probability, meaning it is more likely that the conclusion is true if the premises are true .
Yes, an argument can be valid even with false premises if the logical structure follows a valid form. For instance, "If the moon is made of cheese, then mice live on the moon. The moon is made of cheese. Therefore, mice live on the moon." This is logically valid as it follows Modus Ponens, but the premises are false .
For a conditional statement, the antecedent is a sufficient condition for the consequent, while the consequent is a necessary condition for the antecedent . In a bi-conditional statement, known as "p if and only if q," a property p is both a sufficient and necessary condition for another property q. This establishes a bidirectional dependency where either statement can lead to the conclusion .
The necessary condition for Chan Tai Man to maintain his student status is the payment of his tuition. This can be expressed conditionally as: If Chan Tai Man is to maintain his student status, then he must pay tuition. Without paying, maintaining the status is impossible, establishing tuition payment as necessary .
De Morgan's laws transform negations of conjunctions and disjunctions. Negation of a conjunction (A and B) becomes Not A or Not B, and negation of a disjunction (A or B) becomes Not A and Not B. For example, "Fish and bear's paw cannot both be attained" becomes "Not (Fish and bear's paw) equivalent to Not Fish or Not bear's paw" .
This argument is invalid because the conclusion is not a logical necessity from the premises given. The first premise associates A with B. The conclusion introduces D with no logical connection shown in the premises; thus, it assumes a relationship without evidence. As such, it fails proper syllogistic structure .
A bi-conditional statement is true when both conditions are either true or false simultaneously. For example, the statement "Someone is a bachelor if and only if someone is unmarried" is logically true because bachelorhood and unmarried status are equivalent for true statements; however, adding "and someone is a man" complicates the sufficiency necessary for the bi-conditional statement, serving as a true condition if aligning accurately .
Two invalid deductive argument forms are identified: Denying the Antecedent and Affirming the Consequent. Denying the Antecedent suggests that if 'if A then B' is true but A is false, B must also be false. Affirming the Consequent posits that if 'if A then B' and B is true, then A must be true. Both forms fail to guarantee the truth of the conclusion .
The argument is unsound because it is invalid. The premises do not lead necessarily to the conclusion, as being human does not infer being a university professor, violating the rules of logical necessity in deductive reasoning .
The relationship can be reconstructed with three conditional statements: 1) If social media reshapes how information spreads, then the trend of anti-politician occurs. 2) If the trend of anti-politician occurs, then amateur politicians can win the election. 3) Therefore, if social media reshapes information, it is a necessary condition for amateur politicians' victory .