Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
Division of City Schools
Sorsogon City
Sorsogon National High School
Senior High School
S.Y. 2023-2024
Practical Research 1
Student Teacher: ALYZA PEARL A. DREU Date: March 26, 2024
Class: Grade 11 Avant Garde – Arts and Design
I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standard The learners demonstrates understanding of the criteria in
selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature.
B. Performance Standard The learner is able to select, cite, and synthesize properly
related literature.
C. Learning Competency MELC:
The learner selects relevant literature
D. Learning Objectives At the end of the lesson, learners are expected to:
1. Identify credible sources of information
2. Differentiate literature from studies and foreign from
local studies
3. Paraphrase a related literature using the two types
of in-text citation
II. CONTENT Review of Related Literature and Studies
III. Learning Resources
A. References Practical Research 1 Quarter 1 - Module 4: Learning from
Others and Reviewing Literature - DepEd
B. Learning Materials Whiteboard marker, projector, laptop
C. Applications/Websites YouTube, Microsoft PowerPoint, Canva, Pinterest
IV. PROCEDURE
PRELIMINARIES
Greetings
Prayer
Reminder on Class Rules and Regulations
MOTIVATION A MEMOIR ON MY THIRST FOR KNOWLEDGE
The students will look back to the time in their life when
they were so eager to learn something and write down what
method they did to satisfy their desire to know such a
thing. The teacher selects students to read their memoir.
OBJECTIVES The teacher asks the class to guess the following objectives:
Learning Objectives:
1. Identify credible sources of information
2. Differentiate literature from studies and foreign
from local studies
3. Paraphrase a related literature using the two
types of in-text citation
PRESENTATION & DISCUSSION PICTURE ANALYSIS
Students will examine the picture.
The teacher then connects the meaning of the picture
to the lesson.
There are a lot of sources out there, and it can be hard to
tell what’s credible and what isn’t at first glance.
Evaluating source credibility is an important information
literacy skill. It ensures that you collect accurate
information to back up the arguments you make and the
conclusions you draw.
How to identify a credible source?
The 5 components of the CRAAP test
Currency: Is the source up-to-date?
Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research?
Authority: Where is the source published? Who is
the author? Are they considered reputable and
trustworthy in their field?
Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are
the claims cited correctly?
Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing
this source?
Here are some research solutions for evaluating the
weaknesses of your sources.
Where to find credible sources?
Consider starting with:
Encyclopedias
Textbooks
Websites with .edu or .org domains
Research-oriented magazines like ScienceMag or
Nature Weekly.
Related literature Vs. Related studies
Related literature often includes a wide range of
materials such as books, journal articles, websites,
etc., while related studies focuses on specific
academic research from journals or other scholarly
sources. From researchers or from official public
offices, and thesis from different universities and
libraries.
Foreign Literature Vs. Local Literature
Foreign literature refers to research conducted in a
country or countries other than the researcher's
home country or institution. Local literature focuses
on research conducted within the researcher's own
country or region.
Here is a sample format of foreign and local
literature.
Every time you quote or paraphrase someone else’s work in
your paper, you must include who wrote the work.
There are two types of in-text citations in APA format:
parenthetical and narrative.
Parenthetical citations include the author(s) and the date
of publication within parentheses. Both the author and the
date, separated by a comma. A parenthetical citation can
appear within or at the end of a sentence. Narrative
citations intertwine the author as part of the sentence with
the date of publication (in parentheses) following. In rare
cases, the author and date might both appear in the
narrative. In this case, do not use parentheses.
PARENTHETICAL or NARRATIVE in-text citation?
Students will identify whether the example is a
PARENTHETICAL or NARRATIVE in-text citation.
1. Falsely balanced news coverage can distort the
public’s perception of expert consensus on an issue
(Koehler, 2016). Answer: PARENTHETICAL
2. Modern architecture systems still rely on dynamic
principles (Moseley, 2016). Answer:
PARENTHETICAL
3. Koehler (2016) noted the dangers of falsely balanced
news coverage. Answer: NARRATIVE
4. It could also be said that citing is sometimes
perplexing (Patterson, 2019). Answer:
PARENTHETICAL
5. Lee and Richards (2016) investigated the risks
inherent in drinking tap water. Answer: NARRATIVE
GENERALIZATION As a student and a researcher, why is evaluating
source credibility an important information literacy
skill?
V. EVALUATION
Written Task (Group Activity)
With your respective groups, paraphrase the given related literature or information using
one of the two types of APA in-text citation. Write this on a one half crosswise.
VI. ASSIGNMENT
Create a Foreign and Local literature based on your own research.
Prepared by:
ALYZA PEARL A. DREU
Student Teacher
Checked by:
ROLAN B. GAÑ0
Subject Teacher/Cooperating Teacher