0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views4 pages

Multivariable Calculus Problem Set Solutions

This document contains solutions to problems from a multivariable calculus problem set. It includes determining the parametric equations for points on moving objects, finding parameterizations of curves on surfaces, and calculating distortions caused by shadows.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views4 pages

Multivariable Calculus Problem Set Solutions

This document contains solutions to problems from a multivariable calculus problem set. It includes determining the parametric equations for points on moving objects, finding parameterizations of curves on surfaces, and calculating distortions caused by shadows.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

18.

02 Problem Set 3, Part II Solutions

1. (b) To get to the point P , start at the origin, add the vector �0, 2� to go
up to the center of the disk at t = 0; then add the vector �t, 0� to get to the
center of the disk at time t; and finally (do what it takes to) shift over by one
unit at an angle θ = t/2, measured clockwise from the vertical (see below).
How to do that last move? Just add the vector −�sin(t/2), cos(t/2)�, as can
be seen by from a sketch.
−→
Combining, we get OP (t) = �0, 2� + �t, 0� + �− sin(t/2), − cos(t/2)� or
r = r(t) = �t − sin(t/2), 2 − cos(t/2)�.
The reason that the angle is θ = t/2 after time t is as follows: the center of
the disk has moved t units to the right. Since the disk rolls without slipping,
the horizontal distance it travels is equal to r θ = the circular arclength
“unrolled” by the disk, where r is the radius and θ the central angle in
radians. Since r = 2 and the horizontal distance is t, we get t = 2θ.
(c) See applet. The shape of of the curve is an elongated periodic ‘wave’
created by the up-and-down movement of the point as the wheel moves to
the right.

2. (a) r(t) is clearly in the plane through O defined by u and v. But | r(t) |2
= (u cos(t) + v sin(t)) · (u cos(t) + v sin(t)) = cos2 (t) + sin2 (t) = 1 since
u · u = v · v = 1 and u · v = 0 by assumption. So r(t) sweeps out the unit
circle centered at O in P.
b) We need to find two orthogonal unit vectors u and v which lie in the plane
given by x + 2y + z = 0; then we can use the result of part(a). To get the
first one, we can use take any vector orthogonal to n = �1, 2, 1�, i.e. any
vector u1 = �p, q, r� with p + 2q + r = 0, and then make it a unit vector.
We’ll pick �1, −1, 1� to get u = √13 �1, −1, 1�. To get v, we can just take the
cross- product of u1 × n, and then also make it a unit vector. This gives v1
= �1, −1, 1� × �1, 2, 1� = 3�−1, 0, 1� and then v = √12 �−1, 0, 1�. With these
choices we get
1 1
r(t) = √ �1, −1, 1� cos(t) + √ �−1, 0, 1� sin(t),
3 2
1 1 1 1 1
or x = √ cos(t) − √ sin(t), y = −√ cos(t), z = √ cos(t) + √ sin(t).
3 2 3 3 2
Note: other choices for u1 will give other vectors v and the resulting equa­
tions will look different, but they will be equivalent (i.e. give the same curve
C).

1
3. a) Any such line L� must have direction vector �a, b, c� which is normal to
�1, 2, 1�. So we must have
a + 2b + c = 0.
Since the line L� passes though O, we can write the equation of L � in the
point-direction form: x = a t, y = b t, z = c t, and then use the equation
a + 2b + c = 0 above, we get

x = a t, y = b t, z = (−a − 2b) t.

But L� is described redundantly: scaling a and b equally gives an equivalent


equation. To remove this redundancy, we need to look at two cases: either
b = 0 in which case we get the line x = t, y = 0, z = −t, or b =
� 0 in which
case we may divide through by b to get

x = α t, y = t, z = (−α − 2) t

where the parameter α corresponds to a/b.


b) Since these lines all pass through O, they can be described by their unit
direction vectors. The fact that the lines all lie in P means that their direction
vectors all lie in P. The tips of these unit vectors (considered as origin
vectors) form a circle. So we have a circle’s worth of lines through O lying
in P.
Note that the family of lines described algebraically in part(a) is a one-
parameter family, with α as the parameter, and that this is consistent with
the geometric fact that we have 1-dimensional circle of lines.

4. (a) Let Pt be the shadow of the point (cos t, sin t, 2) on the plane Pα :
my + z = 0 for an arbitrary but temporarily fixed value of t. See figure.

2
(b) Let Pt be the intersection of the line Lt joining (0,0,4) to (cos t, sin t, 2)
with the plane Pα . Let u be the parameter for Lt , then the vector-parametric
equation for Lt is given by
� t (u) = �0, 0, 4� + u�cos t, sin t, −2�
Lt : R

(since direction vector for Lt is �cos t, sin t, 2� − �0, 0, 4�).


Pt = Lt ∩ Pα : substitute x = u cos t, y = u sin t,�z = 4 − 2u into my + z =�0 →
mu sin t+(4−2u) = 0 → u∗ = 2−m4sin t → Pt = 2−m 4 cos t
, 4 sin t , −4m sin t (af­
sin t 2−m sin t 2−m sin t
� t = the answer given (with m = tan α).
ter simplification). Thus �rα (t) = OP
(c) α = 0, so �r0 (t) = �2 cos t, 2 sin t, 0� is indeed an enlarged circle in the x-y plane.
√ sin t
|�rα (t) − �r0 (t)| = 2 5m| 2−m sin t
| (for m > 0, after simplification). That gives
the following differences:

t = 0 t =√ π/2 t = π t =√3π/2
2 5m 2 5m
0 2−m
0 2+m


2 5m
So the largest value is 2−m
.
(The following paragraph is extra) To put this in perspective, if α = .1 rad (so
m = .1003 . . . ), then this distortion is 0.236 . . . linear units. More generally,
for small α, m √ is pretty close
√ to α, αso weα can approximate the maximum
α/2 2
distortion by 2 5 1− α = 5α(1 + 2 + ( 2 ) + · · · ) (geometric series), or
√ 2
5α + O(α2 ).

3
MIT OpenCourseWare
[Link]

18.02SC Multivariable Calculus


Fall 2010

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: [Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

The family of lines passing through O has direction vectors that are orthogonal to (1, 2, 1), meaning they satisfy a + 2b + c = 0. Parameterizing these lines involves writing them as (x, y, z) = t(a, b, −a − 2b) and introducing a parameter α = a/b for when b ≠ 0. This creates a one-parameter family of lines forming a circle of direction vectors, consistent with the geometric description of a circle of lines passing through O in the plane .

Choosing different vectors for u1, which are orthogonal to n = (1, 2, 1), impacts the set of possible orthogonal vectors v through the cross-product and subsequent normalization. However, these variations only affect the appearance of the parametric equations, but all versions are mathematically equivalent, representing the same curve C due to the inherent properties of orthogonality and the unit circle .

As the disk rolls without slipping, the horizontal displacement equals the arc length unrolled, establishing the relationship t = rθ in terms of time t and central angle θ. Given radius r = 2, the path equation r(t) = (t - sin(t/2), 2 - cos(t/2)) emerges, with t/2 being the angle derived from the equivalence of linear and angular displacements, representing the trochoidal motion .

For small angles α, the distortion is approximately 2√5α due to the linear approximation of m, the slope, as α. The formula 2√5m/(2-m sin t) becomes dominated by α. Therefore, in a small angle regime, the approximation proceeds via a geometric series expansion leading to linear distortional behavior and quantified distortion as 2√5α plus higher-order terms .

Setting α = 0 in the vector-parametric equation results in r0(t) = (2 cos t, 2 sin t, 0), describing an enlarged circle in the x-y plane. This transformation indicates that the original plane alignment results in purely planar motion without any z-component, representing rotation about the origin in a larger circle .

Utilizing a one-parameter family of lines ensures simplicity and clarity in describing a circle of lines through a point. The parameter α denotes the direction's finer adjustments, showing varied orientations within the plane. This approach highlights how the cone or family of potential lines aligns with the geometrical constraint, leading to a circle of direction vectors, each line uniquely aligned with each other within the geometrical plane description, inherently supporting diverse geometric configurations .

The intersection of a line Lt, parameterized as (0, 0, 4) + u(cos(t), sin(t), -2), with plane Pα, defined by my + z = 0, is found by substituting the parametric values into the plane equation and solving for u. This results in u = 2/(m sin(t)), and by substituting u back into Lt’s equation, the intersection point is obtained .

The unit vectors u and v define the plane through the origin by being orthogonal and lie in a plane where x + 2y + z = 0. They help to describe a unit circle centered at the origin in that plane by ensuring that the motion described as r(t) = u cos(t) + v sin(t) maintains a constant radius 1, which ensures uniform circular motion .

Scaling ensures that direction vector representation is unique and reduced to a meaningful form, since lines are invariant under scalar multiplication of direction vectors. When describing lines in a plane, removing redundancy by scaling means condensing direction vectors to unit or normalized form, eliminating equivalent descriptions and simplifying calculations; it creates a standardized form that matches geometric expectations .

To derive the parametric representation of the position vector, start from the origin and move up by vector (0, 2) to the center of the disk. Add vector (t, 0) for the horizontal movement of the disk center at time t. Finally, add (-sin(t/2), -cos(t/2)) to account for one unit shift at an angle θ = t/2, measured clockwise from vertical. The angle t/2 arises because the horizontal distance traveled by the disk equals the arc length unrolled, implying t = 2θ with a radius r = 2 . Thus, the position vector is r(t) = (t - sin(t/2), 2 - cos(t/2)).

You might also like