100% found this document useful (1 vote)
24 views2 pages

Ball Thrust Bearing Stress Analysis

The document provides an example problem to calculate stresses in a ball thrust bearing under an axial load. It gives properties of the bearing materials and balls, and calculates contact patch size, maximum pressures and stresses, and depth of maximum shear stress. All stresses are calculated for both the balls and races since they are the same material.

Uploaded by

igualdi53
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
24 views2 pages

Ball Thrust Bearing Stress Analysis

The document provides an example problem to calculate stresses in a ball thrust bearing under an axial load. It gives properties of the bearing materials and balls, and calculates contact patch size, maximum pressures and stresses, and depth of maximum shear stress. All stresses are calculated for both the balls and races since they are the same material.

Uploaded by

igualdi53
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MACHINE DESIGN - An Integrated Approach, 4th Ed.

Example 7-1-1

EXAMPLE 7-1

Stresses in a Ball Thrust Bearing


Problem: A ball thrust bearing with 7 balls is loaded axially across its races through the balls. What is
the size of the contact patch on a race and what are the stresses developed in balls and races?
What is the depth of the maximum shear stress in a ball?
Given: Ball diameter d  0.3937 in Number of balls N  7
Race curvature R1  0.5 d R2  ∞ in
Total axial load Ftot  151  lbf Load per ball F  21.571 lbf
The parts are hardened steel. Therefore:
6
E  30 10  psi ν  0.28
Assumptions: The 7 balls share the load equally. The rotational speed is sufficiently slow that this can be
considered a static loading problem.
Solution: See Mathcad file EX0701.

1. We need to first determine the size of the contact patch, for which we need to find the geometry constant
and material constants from equations 7.9a and b.

  
1 1 1 1
Geometry constant B    B  2.54 in (a)
2  R1 R2 

Note the infinite radius for R2.


2
1ν 8 1
Material constants m1  m1  3.072  10 (b)
E psi
m2  m1
Note both materials are the same in this example. The material and geometry constants can now be used in
equation 7.9d.
1
Contact patch 3
 3 m1  m2 
radius a    F a  0.00581 in (c)
8 B 

where a is the half-width (radius) of the contact patch. The circular contact patch area is then
2 4 2
Contact area A  π a A  1.059  10 in (d)

2. The average and maximum contact pressure can now be found from equations 7.8c and d.
F
Average pressure p avg  p avg  203724 psi (e)
A
3
Maximum pressure p max   p avg p max  305586 psi (f)
2
3. The maximum normal stresses in the center of the contact patch at the surface are then found using equations
7.11c and d.
Axial σzmax  p max σzmax  305586 psi (g)

1  2 ν
In-plane σxmax    p max σxmax  238357 psi (h)
2
σymax  σxmax

[Link]
MACHINE DESIGN - An Integrated Approach, 4th Ed. Example 7-1-2

4. The maximum shear stress and its location under the surface are found from equations 7.12b and c.

1  2 ν
   ( 1  ν)  2  ( 1  ν)
p max 2
Max shear stress τyzmax   (i)
2  2 9 
τyzmax  103152 psi

Depth at max 2  2 ν
shear stress zτmax  a  zτmax  0.0037 in (j)
7  2 ν

5. All of the stresses found so far exist on the centerline of the patch. At the edge of the patch, at the surface,
there will be a shear stress of
1  2 ν
τxy   p max τxy  44819 psi (k)
3

and a tensile stress of the same magnitude.

6. Since both parts are the same material, all of the stresses apply to both.

[Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

The maximum shear stress τ_yzmax occurs inside the ball beneath the contact patch and is influenced by the contact pressure and material properties. The location of the maximum shear stress is determined by a specific formula that accounts for the half-width of the contact patch, Poisson's ratio, and geometric factors. Here, the formula suggests that the depth z_τmax can be approximated as z_τmax = a * (2/((2ν + 9)(1 + ν))), where a is the contact patch radius. For this example, the maximum shear stress τ_yzmax is 103152 psi, and it occurs at a depth z_τmax of 0.0037 inches, just beneath the surface .

Calculated stresses, such as contact pressures, axial, in-plane, and maximum shear stresses, play a critical role in the design process of ball thrust bearings. These values help engineers determine if the bearing can handle expected loads without exceeding material strength limits, ensuring reliability and performance. Design parameters, including the size of the contact patch, material selection, and geometric proportions, are adjusted based on stress calculations to minimize deformation and fatigue risks. This understanding allows for optimizing bearing dimensions and materials to extend operational life while maintaining cost-efficiency .

Material properties, specifically the elasticity modulus (E) and Poisson's ratio (ν), significantly influence the calculation of both average and maximum contact pressures. The average contact pressure p_avg is calculated by dividing the load per ball F by the contact area A, where A is derived from the contact patch radius considering material properties. The maximum contact pressure p_max is 1.5 times the average contact pressure. A higher elasticity modulus increases the resistance to deformation, which affects pressure distribution. In this scenario, the average contact pressure p_avg is 203724 psi, and the maximum contact pressure p_max is 305586 psi, resulting from the given material properties E = 30x10^6 psi and ν = 0.28 .

The size of the contact patch in a ball thrust bearing is significant as it determines the stress distribution and contact pressures between balls and races. It is calculated using the geometry constant B and material constant m1. The geometry constant B is derived from the radii of curvature R1 and R2 as B = 1/(1/R1 + 1/R2), considering R2 is infinite, simplifying the equation. The material constant m1 is defined as 1 minus the product of the Poisson's ratio and elasticity modulus. The contact patch radius, a, is determined by combining these constants in a specific formula: a = (3/8 * (m1 + m2) * B * F)^(1/3). For this example, it results in a contact patch radius a of 0.00581 inches. This radius defines the half-width of the contact patch, which governs the contact area calculation .

Cumulative stress from multiple balls in a thrust bearing impacts both performance and longevity by affecting load distribution and increasing localized stress. As each ball shares the total axial load, the precision of load sharing is crucial in avoiding overstress on individual balls or uneven wear. Variations in ball size, misalignment, or material imperfections can lead to disproportionate stress buildup, accelerating material fatigue or deformation. Understanding cumulative stress allows design adjustments to ensure even distribution and optimize bearing materials and dimensions, directly affecting bearing performance and operational lifespan .

In the design of thrust bearings, both axial (σ_zmax) and in-plane stresses (σ_xmax and σ_ymax) are crucial for understanding the stress states that components experience under load. Axial stress relates directly to the force exerted perpendicularly to races and impacts elements' durability against axial loads. In-plane stresses influence the material's response to radial forces, affecting operational reliability and fatigue life. These stresses can be computed directly from maximum contact pressure, as shown by σ_zmax = -p_max and σ_xmax = σ_ymax = 1/2 * (1 + ν)p_max. In this scenario, the axial and in-plane stresses reached -305586 psi and -238357 psi, respectively, underlying the multi-axial stress environment .

Evaluating the structural integrity of a ball thrust bearing under static loads involves several factors: the load distribution across the balls, material properties (elasticity modulus and Poisson's ratio), and geometry. The contact pressures, both average and maximum, inform the stress levels on the balls and races. Shear and tensile stresses must be analyzed for potential stress concentrations that could lead to failure. The material's resistance to deformation and stress distribution must also be considered in the maximum shear stress location and magnitude. Accurate calculations help ensure each component withstands the designated loads without excessive deformation or failure .

Symmetry in material and geometric properties simplifies the stress analysis of ball thrust bearings by allowing assumptions that reduce complexity. Assuming material symmetry ensures uniform distribution of properties like elasticity modulus and Poisson's ratio across the contact area, enabling reliable stress calculations without the need for variable adjustment specific to each load point. Geometric symmetry means uniform radii and contact dimensions, simplifying equations like those for contact patch size and shape. Therefore, stress analysis benefits from predictability and easier interpretation of results when these symmetries are in place .

Shear stress at the edge of the contact patch, τ_xy, is critical as it indicates potential sites for crack initiation or material failure, especially under cyclic loading, impacting the longevity and reliability of the thrust bearing. High shear stresses can cause adhesive wear or surface fatigue, leading to premature bearing failure. The stress is calculated using τ_xy = 1/2 * (1 - ν)p_max. This value, 44819 psi here, represents the shear intensity at the very edge, where material properties and operational conditions such as loading and rotation velocities come into play to influence potential degradation .

In a static loading problem, the rotational speed is considered sufficiently slow to minimize its impact on stress analysis. The assumption allows focus on static load-induced stresses, overlooking dynamic forces such as centrifugal effects or vibration-induced loads. Thus, the calculated contact pressures, axial, and shear stresses purely reflect the static interaction between the races and balls. This deliberate exclusion highlights the role speed might play in generating additional stresses in operational settings and its exclusion allows for simplified static condition analysis .

You might also like