Introduction:
It’s no mystery that medical students and staff have moments that are imprinted in
their memories forever, some even shape their future, one of those very first
moments are the subject of this study today, stepping into the dissecting room;
frightening yet fascinating, one can only wonder what goes through a student’s
mind once they experience their first human cadaver dissection, anxiety and fear
at the first glance are given, but what about the things that stay after? That
imprinted memory we’re speaking about; will that memory affect their future
actions and the way they deal with their patients? How about their sleeping
pattern at first? Would they embrace the experience if it was optional?
The use of cadavers as a learning tool has always been important throughout
history, in the school of Alexandria, the practice of anatomic dissection was the
dominant means of learning anatomy and it was considered the first place where
dissection was done in a regular and systematic way.[1] nevertheless, some may
argue that in the mean time this type of learning tool has been replaced by new
technologies that remove the need for true human dissection, and thus spare the
students from different kinds of emotions and responsibilities.
This study takes place in one of the middle eastern countries: Jordan, where
religions and beliefs play an important and determining role in taking almost
every decision, the study aims to discuss the controversy of the human dissection
through the eyes of the medical students themselves, by asking them questions
that allow them to express their takes on the forensic medicine in Jordan in
general, and their own experience in the morgue in specific.
Many previous studies had focused on the mentality of a group of students
towards the autopsy itself, yet only a few had proposed changes that would make
a student’s experience in that exact field better, this study will not only include
the students’ opinions towards their own experiences, it will also propose changes
1
that aim to make the exposure of a twenty or twenty one years old student to a
human autopsy easier and better to digest without taking away the fundamental
uses and benefits of the forensic medicine course itself.