0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views5 pages

RDM Practices in Uttar Pradesh Universities

The document discusses a research proposal to analyze current practices of research data management in central universities of Uttar Pradesh using the FAIR approach. The objectives are to understand awareness, policies, priorities and challenges regarding research data management. A survey methodology is proposed to collect data from the universities.

Uploaded by

dpebhu86
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views5 pages

RDM Practices in Uttar Pradesh Universities

The document discusses a research proposal to analyze current practices of research data management in central universities of Uttar Pradesh using the FAIR approach. The objectives are to understand awareness, policies, priorities and challenges regarding research data management. A survey methodology is proposed to collect data from the universities.

Uploaded by

dpebhu86
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Research Proposal

Analyzing Current Practices of Research Data Management in Central


Universities of Uttar Pradesh: FAIR Approach Toward a Comprehensive
Framework

Submitted By:

Avanish Kumar Tiwari

Department of Library and Information Science


Central University of Himachal Pradesh

2023
Introduction
Research is crucial for society's scientific advancement and prosperity (Satija et al., 2014), and
research data is indeed the primary component that conveys the research findings and
implications (AlJaradat, 2021; Tenopir et al., 2020). Open science has become the new
paradigm for research and Research Data Management (RDM) supports open science through
the standardized organization of research data for access, reuse and long-term preservation. One
of the most significant impacts of RDM is the establishment of reproducibility through
facilitation of verifiable results. In the process of achieving reproducibility, social elements such
as openness and desire to share and learn are also involved. RDM contribute directly and
indirectly to the reproducibility process, acting as a catalyst for open science

Research data refers to all different kinds of data which are generated during the course of any
kind of research work. These are valuable resources gathered by the earlier researchers at the
expense of much time and money. Very often, a research process includes the generation of a
huge amount of data which serves as a tool for validating the findings of the research work. Data
generated during the course of a research work are valuable resources and if properly stored
these resources can be accessed, referred, re-evaluated for academic and research purposes in
future (Tripathi et al., 2017).

Reichmann et al. (2021) presented the state of RDM practices in an institutional context by
adopting triangulation of surveys and interviews at a medium-sized Austrian university. They
collected data on various important aspects of RDM like types and quantity of data produced,
data handling practices which includes data sharing, data re-use etc., and obstacles related to
RDM practices. They highlighted many challenges of RDM practice and suggested that RDM
policies should be very (discipline) specific and must include the invariant principles of RDM,
such as FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable). This study finds that RDM is
now considered more of an administrative task and not as an aspect of good research practice as
previously considered by the researchers.

Objective
The objective of the study is to answer the following research questions, which will be aimed at
6 central universities of Uttar Pradesh and LIS professionals working there:

What is the level of awareness about RDM and related concepts e. g. research interview?

What is the status of RDM policy and infrastructure at the institutional level?

What are the priorities for these libraries in terms of implementing various RDM advisory and
technical services in the near future?

What are the reasons for the low-level implementation of RDM services?
What are the most important skills for delivering these services, and how are these libraries
assisting their staff in acquiring them?

What are the most significant drivers and challenges for the future implementation of RDM
services?

Analyzing the best practices available in field of RDM worldwide and come up with a feasible
solution.

METHODOLOGY:
The primary research method for the study will be a survey, questionnaire and observation. The
structured Questionnaire will be designed keeping in view of the above stated objectives and
scope consisting open ended and closed ended [Link] questionnaire included different
type of questions such as dichotomous (Yes/No), multiple choice questions, and opinion
questions. Every question has been so framed well that it should be easy to understand and take
little time of students and library staff to provide the needed information.

SCOPE
In order to realize the above objectives, tentatively the scope of the study will be the 6 central
universities of Utter Pradesh given on the website of the Ministry of Education;

University Location Established Specialization


Aligarh Muslim Aligarh 1920 General
University
Banaras Hindu Varanasi 1916 General
University
University of Allahabad Prayagraj 1887 General
Babasaheb Bhimrao Lucknow 1996 General
Ambedakar University
Rajeev Gandhi National Raebareli 2013 Aviation Science
Aviation University
Rani Lakshmibai Jhansi 2014 Agriculture
Central Agricultural
University
References

Patel, D. (2016). Research data management: a conceptual framework. Library review, 65(4/5),
226-241.

Satija, M. P., Madalli, D. P., &Dutta, B. (2014). Modes of growth of subjects. Knowledge
Organization, 41(3), 195–204

Tripathi, M., Shukla, A., &Sonkar, S. K. (2017). Research Data Management practices in
university libraries: A study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 37(6),
417.

Whiteley, L., &Sandøe, P. (2020). RCR-A Danish textbook for courses in Responsible Conduct
of Research. K. K. Jensen (Ed.). University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource
Economics.

Satija, M. P., Madalli, D. P., &Dutta, B. (2014). Modes of growth of subjects. Knowledge
Organization, 41(3), 195–204

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., ...&
Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and
stewardship. Scientific data, 3(1), 1-9.

Savage, J. Engaging Researchers with Data Management: The Cookbook.

Yu, F., Deuble, R., & Morgan, H. (2017). Designing research data management services based
on the research lifecycle–A consultative leadership approach. Journal of the Australian Library
and Information Association, 66(3), 287-298.

Singh, N. K., Monu, H., &Dhingra, N. (2018, February).Research data management policy and
institutional framework. In 2018 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and
Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS) (pp. 111-115). IEEE.

Queralt-Rosinach, N., Kaliyaperumal, R., Bernabé, C. H., Long, Q., Joosten, S. A., van der
Wijk, H. J., ... &Roos, M. (2022). Applying the FAIR principles to data in a hospital: challenges
and opportunities in a pandemic. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 13(1), 1-19.

Bailo, D., Jeffery, K. G., Atakan, K., Trani, L., Paciello, R., Vinciarelli, V., ...&Spinuso, A.
(2022). Data integration and FAIR data management in Solid Earth Science. Annals of
Geophysics, 65(2), DM210-DM210.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The study proposes engaging library staff and researchers by increasing awareness of RDM's importance, aligning RDM services with researchers' needs, and building competencies through ongoing training initiatives. Additionally, fostering a culture that values data management as part of scholarly excellence is essential for overcoming current challenges and promoting active participation in RDM implementation .

Discipline-specific RDM policies are significant in effective data management as they address the unique data handling, storage, and sharing requirements of different research fields. This ensures that the FAIR principles are applied in a manner that respects the nuances and specific needs of each discipline, leading to improved data interoperability and reusable research outputs. Without these tailored policies, there is a risk of implementing a one-size-fits-all approach that may not effectively support data management practices across varied scientific domains .

The FAIR principles enhance Research Data Management by ensuring that data is Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable, thus facilitating better data sharing and utilization across research communities. However, challenges in implementing these principles include data heterogeneity and the need for bespoke policies tailored to specific disciplines, which can complicate standardization and interoperability efforts within institutions .

The potential drivers for future RDM services implementation include the growing emphasis on data sharing mandates from funding bodies, the evolution of standards for data management, and the increasing recognition of RDM's role in enhancing research quality and integrity. These factors collectively create an environment where universities are incentivized to develop robust RDM frameworks to remain aligned with global research trends .

Social factors like openness and willingness to share critically influence reproducibility by encouraging collaborative validation and iterative verification of research findings. These social dynamics support a transparent research environment where findings can be reliably reproduced, increasing trust in scientific conclusions and facilitating further scientific advancement through shared learning experiences .

Research Data Management (RDM) is crucial for advancing open science as it provides standardized organization of research data, facilitating access, reuse, and long-term preservation. This enables reproducibility by supporting verifiable results, which is a cornerstone of open scientific inquiry. Furthermore, RDM promotes openness, sharing, and learning, thus acting as a catalyst for conducting more transparent and collaborative research .

Avanish Kumar Tiwari proposes a methodological approach that involves surveys and questionnaires, employing both open-ended and closed-ended questions to gauge the state of RDM practices. This method aims to collect comprehensive data on institutional policies, infrastructure, and awareness among library staff and researchers, facilitating an analysis of current challenges and identifying priority areas for improvement .

Integrating RDM practices throughout the research lifecycle ensures that data management considerations are addressed from the onset of a project to its completion. This foresight enables more accurate data collection, efficient data handling during research, and improved dissemination and reuse post-research. Such seamless integration not only enhances the reproducibility and verifiability of research outcomes but also maximizes the long-term value and impact of the data generated, contributing to more robust and reliable scientific advancements .

Essential skills for delivering RDM services include understanding data management best practices, knowledge of the FAIR principles, technical capabilities in data curation, and data stewardship. Universities are expected to support staff in acquiring these skills through targeted training programs, workshops, and collaborative opportunities that enhance practical understanding and technical know-how .

The low-level implementation of RDM services in central universities of Uttar Pradesh is attributed to a lack of awareness, inadequate infrastructure, and insufficient policy support at the institutional level. There is also a notable perception of RDM as purely an administrative task rather than a crucial aspect of research practice, which may contribute to its limited adoption .

You might also like