PH103 Summative Assignment Guidelines
Uploaded by
56thpw242wPH103 Summative Assignment Guidelines
Uploaded by
56thpw242wCommon questions
Powered by AI'Brilliant work' is defined by not only meeting all criteria for distinction and outstanding work but also developing a genuinely original position . In contrast, 'outstanding work' also meets the criteria for distinction but focuses on making suitably original observations or criticisms without necessarily being as groundbreaking as 'brilliant work' .
Self-evaluative commentaries in PH103 are assessed on a scale of 0 to 3, where 3 denotes sustained and serious reflection on feedback, showing substantial improvement akin to high-level students at LSE . This is distinguished from an average response (score of 1 or 2) by depth of reflection and evidence of improvement, with lesser scores indicating more significant room for improvement .
'Excellent work' entails addressing the topic with clarity and precision, rigorous and thorough analysis of concepts, arguments, and positions, as well as cogent argumentation with novel presentation and structure features. The student must also demonstrate considerable mastery of relevant literature and background readings .
The PH103 Summative Assignment requires two main components: Part I, which involves revising or rewriting one of the formative essays or writing a new essay on a provided question, and Part II, which is a self-evaluative commentary using a specified template . Extensions to the deadline are rare because they can only be granted in verifiable exceptional circumstances, suggesting a focus on ensuring fairness and maintaining academic integrity .
When choosing to rewrite a formative essay for the PH103 summative assignment, a student must consider the feedback received on the original essay and how to address and incorporate it for improvement. They must also adhere to the original word limit of 1500 words, including all footnotes but excluding the bibliography .
The self-evaluative commentary is significant as it requires students to reflect on the feedback received and the improvements made to their essays, emphasizing critical thinking and reflective learning . This component is strictly limited to 750 words and must follow a provided template, being included in a single Word document along with the essay .
A student who has not written a formative essay must write a new summative essay to meet the course requirements, showing understanding and engagement with the course material . As an alternative, students can utilize commentary options explained in the template, showing critical reflection and understanding through different means .
The PH103 course ensures anonymity and fairness by requiring students to omit their names on the coursework, using only their 5-digit candidate number instead . This prevents bias and maintains objectivity in grading. Additionally, specific instructions are given for submission to ensure consistency and fairness across evaluations .
Essays failing to satisfy the assessment criteria for a satisfactory level (50-59) may have issues such as inadequate organization, errors of understanding, lack of analysis and critical reflection, or failure to support arguments with reasons . Such essays may earn a lower mark and reflect inadequacy in understanding or engaging with the material .
The template for the PH103 self-evaluative commentary guides students in structuring their reflections and ensures uniformity and focus in addressing feedback . Its importance lies in standardizing the assessment process, thereby allowing the evaluators to assess the quality of reflection consistently across different students, while also encouraging students to critically engage with feedback systematically .