0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views2 pages

Differential Cross Section in QED

This document provides an exercise on calculating the differential cross section for the process of electron-muon scattering using the Standard Model of Particle Physics. It gives steps to use Feynman rules, helicity states, and relativistic kinematics to derive an expression for the cross section in terms of the scattering angle.

Uploaded by

angyruizh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views2 pages

Differential Cross Section in QED

This document provides an exercise on calculating the differential cross section for the process of electron-muon scattering using the Standard Model of Particle Physics. It gives steps to use Feynman rules, helicity states, and relativistic kinematics to derive an expression for the cross section in terms of the scattering angle.

Uploaded by

angyruizh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

UNIVERSIDAD DE CANTABRIA, DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA MODERNA

Standard Model of Particle Physics


Extra Exercise chapter 4

Question 1. Using the amplitudes for the helicity states, estimate the differential cross section
for the process e + µ → e + µ, following the next steps:

1. Using Feynman rules for QED show that the lowest order matrix element is:
e2
Mf i = − g µν [ū(p 3 )γµ u(p 1 )][ū(p 4 )γν u(p 2 )]
(p 1 − p 3 )2

2. Working in the center-of-mass system of reference and writing the four-momenta of


µ µ
the initial and final electrons as p 1 = (E 1 , 0, 0, p) and p 3 = (E 1 , psi n(θ), 0, pcos(θ)), show
that the currents associated to the electron for the 4 helicity combinations can be writ-
ten as:

u¯↓ (p 3 )γµ u ↓ (p 1 ) = 2(E 1 c, ps, −i ps, pc)


u¯↑ (p 3 )γµ u ↓ (p 1 ) = 2(ms, 0, 0, 0)
u¯↑ (p 3 )γµ u ↑ (p 1 ) = 2(E 1 c, ps, i ps, pc)
u¯↓ (p 3 )γµ u ↑ (p 1 ) = −2(ms, 0, 0, 0)

where s = si n(θ/2) y c = cos(θ/2).

3. Explain why the effect of applying the parity operator P = γ0 is:

P u ↑ (p, θ, φ) = u ↓ (p, π − θ, π + φ)

Using this property, estimate the currents associated to the muons for the different he-
licity combinations.

4. In the relativistic case E >> M , show that the matrix element squared for the case in
which both the incident electron and muon are left-handed, is given by:

4e 2 s 2
|M LL |2 =
(p 1 − p 3 )4

where s = (p 1 + p 2 )2 . Find the expressions for M RR , M RL y M LR .

1
5. In the relativistic limit show that the differential cross section for this process, in the
non-polarized cases (average of all helicity combinations) is given in the center-of-
mass system of reference by:

d σ 2α2 1 + 1/4(1 + cos(θ))2


=
dΩ s (1 − cos(θ))2

Please try to be brief in your answers.

And do not get frustrated if the exercise is hard.

Just write me an e-mail if you don’t know how to proceed.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Evaluating differential cross-sections for unpolarized cases is critical because it provides averaged interaction probabilities without specific helicity states. This calculation is essential for practical experiments where polarization states are often not controlled. In the relativistic limit, the unpolarized differential cross-section for the process \(e +\mu \rightarrow e +\mu\) is \(\frac{2\alpha^2}{s}\frac{1+1/4(1+\cos(\theta))^2}{(1-\cos(\theta))^2}\), crucial for comparing theoretical predictions with experimental data .

Angular dependency in cross-sections like \(d\sigma/d\Omega\) for electron-muon scattering arises from terms \(\cos(\theta)\) influencing interaction probabilities and is structured by the helicity states’ currents like \(\bar{u}_\downarrow(p_3)\gamma^\mu u_\downarrow(p_1)\) and \(\bar{u}_\uparrow(p_3)\gamma^\mu u_\uparrow(p_1)\). The dependencies reflect angular momentum conservation and the symmetry of the interaction as described by Feynman diagrams .

Considering relativistic limits is crucial because most particle physics processes occur at high energies where \(E > M\). In such conditions, simplifications apply, such as ignoring mass compared to energy, allowing direct evaluation of quantities like the matrix element squared \(|\mathcal{M}_{LL}|^2\), which is \(4e^2s^2/(p_1 - p_3)^4\), critical for experimental and theoretical congruence .

Symmetry and conservation laws such as charge conservation and angular momentum play pivotal roles in the derivation of the matrix element \(\mathcal{M}_{fi} = - e^2/(p_1 - p_3)^2 g^{\mu\nu}[\bar{u}(p_3)\gamma^\mu u(p_1)][\bar{u}(p_4)\gamma_\nu u(p_2)]\). These principles guide the application of Feynman rules in QED, ensuring the correct construction of interaction amplitudes consistent with relativistic quantum field theory .

Averaging over helicity states accounts for unpolarized scenarios common in experiments, smoothing out individual angular momentum contributions from specific helicity combinations. This leads to general expressions like \(d\sigma/d\Omega = 2\alpha^2/s (1+1/4(1+\cos(\theta))^2)/(1-\cos(\theta))^2\), ensuring theoretical models accommodate realistic initial particle conditions and yielding results applicable to typical high-energy physics experiments .

In Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), the currents for the four helicity states of electrons are derived using the Feynman rules and the properties of spinors. They are given by: \(\bar{u}_\downarrow(p_3)\gamma^\mu u_\downarrow(p_1) = 2(E_1c, ps, -ips, pc)\); \(\bar{u}_\uparrow(p_3)\gamma^\mu u_\downarrow(p_1) = 2(ms, 0, 0, 0)\); \(\bar{u}_\uparrow(p_3)\gamma^\mu u_\uparrow(p_1) = 2(E_1c, ps, ips, pc)\); \(\bar{u}_\downarrow(p_3)\gamma^\mu u_\uparrow(p_1) = -2(ms, 0, 0, 0)\). The parity operator \(P = \gamma^0\) transforms \(u_\uparrow(p, \theta, \phi)\) to \(u_\downarrow(p, \pi-\theta, \pi+\phi)\). This transformation is used to estimate the muon currents for various helicity combinations .

Feynman rules are critical for systematically deriving interaction amplitudes relating to probability transitions in quantum processes. They provide a standard methodology to construct matrix elements like \(\mathcal{M}_{fi} = - e^2/(p_1 - p_3)^2 g^{\mu\nu}[\bar{u}(p_3)\gamma^\mu u(p_1)][\bar{u}(p_4)\gamma^\nu u(p_2)]\), essential for computing cross-sections and interpreting experimental outcomes .

The matrix element squared \(|\mathcal{M}_{LL}|^2\) for both the incident electron and muon being left-handed is derived as \(4e^2s^2/(p_1 - p_3)^4\) where \(s = (p_1 + p_2)^2\). This expression results from evaluating QED matrix elements for specific helicity states, indicative of angular momentum conservation and particle interactions symmetry in collisions .

The center-of-mass system simplifies calculations by setting the total momentum to zero, making energy expressions symmetry straightforward. For processes like \(e +\mu \rightarrow e +\mu\), using this frame facilitates straightforward expressions for four-momenta and angular distributions, aiding in deriving the differential cross-section \(d\sigma/d\Omega\).

The parity operator \(P = \gamma^0\) inverts spatial coordinates, transforming spinor states like \(u_\uparrow(p, \theta, \phi)\) to \(u_\downarrow(p, \pi-\theta, \pi+\phi)\). This reversal impacts the calculation of muon currents, affecting amplitudes and helicity interactions. Is crucial for correct theoretical predictions in particle interactions, ensuring parity considerations are upheld in QED calculations .

You might also like