Probabilistic Reliability Analysis Guide
Probabilistic Reliability Analysis Guide
Reliability Analysis
44.1 Introduction
Reliability assessment involves determining, generally using statistical methods, the total electric inter-
ruptions for loads within a power system during an operating period. The interruptions are described by
several indices that consider aspects such as:
+ Probabilities or expectancies are expressed as a fraction or as time per year ([h/a], [min/a]).
Network reliability assessment is used to calculate expected interruption frequencies and annual in-
terruptions costs, and to compare alternative network designs. Reliability analysis is an automation
and probabilistic extension of contingency evaluation. For such analysis, it is not required to pre-define
outage events, instead the tool can automatically choose the outages to consider. The relevance of
each outage is considered using statistical data about the expected frequency and duration of outages
according to component type. The effect of each outage is analysed automatically such that the
software simulates the protection system and the network operator’s actions to re-supply interrupted
customers. Because statistical data regarding the frequency of such events is available, the results can
be formulated in probabilistic terms.
Note: Reliability assessment tools are commonly used to quantify the impact of power system equip-
ment outages in economic terms. The results of a reliability assessment study may be used
to justify investment in network upgrades such as new remote control switches, new lines /
transformers, or to assess the performance of under voltage load shedding schemes.
This chapter deals with probabilistic Network Reliability Assessment. For information on PowerFactory's
deterministic Contingency Analysis, refer to Chapter 27 (Contingency Analysis).
The reliability assessment functions can be accessed by selecting Reliability toolbar from the Change
Toolbox icon (¥ ) as illustrated in Figure 44.1.1.
Reliability Asessment
Show Contingencies
Contribution to Reliability Indices
l 1 Create Load States
|
{ v ) i (O O oY O (&G
I
Contingency Analysis
Quasi-Dynamic Simulation
Simulation RMS/EMT
Modal/Eigenvalue Analysis Fault Trace
Protection and Arc-Flash Analysis Controls
Cable Analysis Reliability
Power Quality and Harmonic Analysis Reports
Optimal Power Flow / Unit Commitme Report
Transmission Network Tools Recovery
Scheme
Distribution Network Tools
Outage Planning
Probabilistic Analysis
[ Reliability Analysis I
Figure 44.1.1: Reliability Toolbar Selection
The basic user procedure for completing a reliability assessment consists of the following steps as
shown in Figure 44.1.2. Steps on the left are compulsory, while steps on the right are optional and can
be used to increase the detail of the calculation.
Double Earth
Faults
w Transformers
Busbars
Create Stochastic H'otecnonlSmteh Opfionai; Define
Models Failures Load
Ccmon
Mode Failures
“Opti at
Protection -
Devices . .-
Switch Stages
M anual, Auto)
Optional: Create
Actuallon Time Maintenance
Pl
Power
Restoration
Optional: Specify
Define Loads Constralnls
‘ntevruptlon
Priority, Load
transfer shedding
Run
Reliability
Assessment
The Reliability Assessment procedure considers the network topology, protection systems, constraints
and stochastic failure and repair models to generate reliability indices. The technical background of the
procedure and Stochastic Models is described in this section.
Note: A quantity is said to be stochastic when it has a random probability distribution. A simple example
of a stochastic quantity is the expected repair duration for an item of equipment, which is based
on the total number of repairs and repair duration. This measured data can be used to build
Stochastic Models, and perform analysis using statistical calculation methods.
The generation of reliability indices, using the Reliability Assessment tool also known as 'reliability
analysis’, consists of the following:
« Failure modelling.
+ Load modelling.
« Statistical analysis.
+ Reporting.
Satistical Evaluation
The reliability analysis calculation flow diagram is depicted in Figure 44.2.1. The failure models describe
how system components can fail, how often they might fail and how long it takes to repair them when
they fail. The load models can consist of a few possible load demands, or can be based on a user-
defined load forecast and growth scenarios.
The combination of one or more simultaneous faults and a specific load condition is called a 'system
state’. Internally, PowerFactory$ system state generation engine uses the failure models and load
models to build a list of relevant system states. Subsequently, the Failure Effect Analysis (FEA) module
analyse the faulted system states by simulating the system reactions to these faults. The FEA takes the
power system through a number of post-fault operational states that can include:
«+ Voltage constraint alleviation by load shedding (only available when 'Distribution’ is selected within
the reliability command Basic Options).
The results of the FEA are combined with the data that is provided by the system state generation mod-
ule to create the reliability statistics including indices such as SAIFI, SAIDI and CAIFI. The system state
data describes the expected frequency of occurrence of the system state and its expected duration.
However, the duration of these system states should not be confused with the interruption duration. For
example, a system state for a line outage, perhaps caused by a short-circuit on that line, will have a
duration equal to the time needed to repair that line. However, if the line is one of two parallel lines then
it is possible that no loads will be interrupted because the parallel line might be able to supply the full
load current.
Even if the loads are interrupted by the outage, the power could be restored by network reconfiguration
- by fault separation and closing a back-feed switch. The interruption duration will then equal the
restoration time, and not the repair duration (equivalent to the system state duration).
A stochastic reliability model is a statistical representation of the failure rate and repair duration time
for a power system component. For example, a line might suffer an outage due to a short-circuit. After
the outage, repair will begin and the line will be put into service again after a successful repair. If two
states for line A are defined as 'in service’ and 'under repair’, monitoring of the line could result in a time
sequence of outages and repairs as depicted in Figure 44.2.2.
s1 R1| S2 |R2|S3|R3| 54
* Ll
T, T B e Ts I t
Figure 44.2.2: Line availability states are described by the status of the line (in service or under repair).
Each of these states lasts for a certain time.
Line A in this example fails at time T1 after which it is repaired and put back into service at T2. It fails
again at T3, is repaired again, etc. The repair durations are also called the 'Time To Repair’ or 'TTR'.
The service durations S, = 71,9, = T3 — T, etc. are called the 'life-time’, "Time To Failure’ or 'TTF’.
Both the TTR and the TTF are stochastic quantities. By gathering failure data about a large group of
similar components in the power system, statistical information about the TTR and TTF, such as the
mean value and the standard deviation, can be calculated. The statistical information is then used to
define a Stochastic Model.
There are many ways in which to define a Stochastic Model. The so-called 'homogeneous Markov-
model’ is a highly simplified but generally used model. A homogeneous Markov model with two states
is defined by:
« availability, P = TTF/(TTF+TTR);
DIgSILENT PowerFactory 2020, User Manual 1055
CHAPTER 44. RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
* unavailability Q, = TTR/(TTF+TTR);
The availability is the fraction of time when the component is in service; the unavailability is the fraction
of time when it is in repair; and P+Q = 1.0.
Reminder: TTRis the 'Time To Repair’, and TTF is the 'Time To Failure’.
Example
If 7500 monitored transformers were to show 140 failures over 10 years, during which a total of 7360
hours was spent on repair, then:
140 1 .
= 107500 a - M00LT (44.1)
S = 5 = 536a
ITF (44.2)
oTTR TG0
= 575 h = 52,6k = 0,006 (44.3)
-
=R et
TG (4a.4):
536 0,999980 .
P =
= 55550006 09008 (44.5)
0.006 _min
Q= 550006 % 0 (44.6)
« System indices.
These indices are separated into frequency/expectancy indices and energy indices. Furthermore, there
are indices to describe the interruption costs.
Load point indices are calculated for each load (ElmLod), and are used in the calculation of many
system indices. This section describes the simplified equations for the reliability indices. However,
note that the PowerFactory reliability assessment calculations use more complex calculation methods.
Nevertheless, the simplified equations shown here can be used for hand calculations or to gain insight
into the reliability assessment results.
In the definitions for the reliability indices, the following parameters are used:
Note: The parameters ACIF, ACIT, LPIF and LPIT are only calculated and considered if the duration of
the outage is longer than the time value “Calculation of SAIFI/SAIDI according to IEEE 1366”, that
is set within the Advanced Options of the Reliability Assessment command.
(44.11)
where
For unsupplied loads, or for loads that are shed completely, frac; x = 1.0.
For loads that are partially shed, 0.0 <= frac; < 1.0.
SAIFI System Average Interruption Frequency Index, in units of [1/C/a], indicates how often the average
customer experiences a sustained interruption during the period specified in the calculation.
SAIFI_P Average Interruption Frequency (Contracted Power), in units of [1/a], indicates how often there
are contracted power interruptions during the period of the calculation.
CAIFI Customer Average Interruption Frequency Index, in units of [1/A/a], is the mean frequency of
sustained interruptions for those customers experiencing sustained interruptions. Each customer
is counted once regardless of the number of times interrupted for this calculation.
ASIFI Average System Interruption Frequency Index, in units of [1/a], The calculation of this index
is based on load rather than customers affected. ASIFI can be used to measure distribution
performance in areas that supply relatively few customers having relatively large concentrations
of load, predominantly industrial/commercial customers
SAIDI System Average Interruption Duration Index, in units of [h/C/a], indicates the total duration of
interruption for the average customer during the period in the calculation. It is commonly measured
in customer minutes or customer hours of interruption.
SAIDI_P Average Interruption Duration (Contracted Power), in units of [h/a], indicates the total duration
of contracted power interruptions during the period of the calculation.
CAIDI Customer Average Interruption Duration Index, in units of [H], is the mean time to restore service.
ASIDI Average System Interruption Duration Index, in units of [h/a], is the equivalent of SAIDI but based
on load, rather than customers affected.
ASAI Average Service Availability Index, this represents the fraction of time that a customer is con-
nected during the defined calculation period.
MAIFI Momentary Average Interruption Frequency Index, in units of [1/Ca], evaluates the average
frequency of momentary interruptions. The calculation is described in the IEEE Standard 1366
'IEEE Guide for Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices’.
S TPCONTIF;
SAIFI_P = FACT Unit : 1/a (44.17)
ASUT = 72&7::8
{E (g (44.22)
MAIFI = % (44.26)
LPENS, = ACIT;
- (Pd; + Ps;) in MWhja (44.27)
Where
Pd, is the weighted average amount of power disconnected
Ps; is the weighted average amount of power shed at load point i.
ENS Energy Not Supplied, in units of [MWh/a], is the total amount of energy on average not delivered
to the system loads.
SES System Energy Shed, in units of [MWh/a], is the total amount of energy on average expected to
be shed in the system.
AENS Average Energy Not Supplied, in units of [MWh/Cal], is the average amount of energy not
supplied, for all customers.
ACCI Average Customer Curtailment Index, in units of [MWh/Ca], is the average amount of energy not
supplied, for all affected customers.
ENS
AENS = sC in MWh/Ca
/ 44.31
(44.31)
in MWh/Ca (44.32)
LPEIC is defined as
where
LPEIC,
is the average interruption cost for load point i and contingency case k, considering the load point
interruption costs function and the assessed distribution of the durations of the interruptions at
this load point for contingency case k. The interruption costs are calculated differently for different
cost functions. All cost functions express the costs as a function of the interruption duration. For
cost functions expressed in money per interrupted customer, the number of interrupted customers
is estimated for each interruption as the highest number of customers interrupted at any time
during the whole interruption duration.
EIC Expected Interruption Cost, in units of [M$/y], is the total expected interruption cost.
IEAR Interrupted Energy Assessment Rate, in units of [$/kWh], is the total expected interruption cost
per not supplied kWh.
Eic
[EAR = in $/kWh (44.35)
In PowerFactory, Reliability Assessment uses a System State Enumeration to analyse all possible
system states, one by one. A fast 'topological' method is used which ensures that each possible
system state is only analysed once. State frequencies (average occurrences per year) are calculated
by considering only the transitions from a healthy situation to an unhealthy one and back again. This
is important because the individual system states are analysed one by one, and the (chronological)
connection between them is therefore lost.
The enumerated calculation method is fast for quick investigation of large distribution networks, but does
not compromise accuracy. Exact analytic averages are calculated. Distributions of reliability indices,
however, cannot be calculated. For example, the average annual unavailability in hours/year can be
calculated, but the probability that this unavailability is less than 15 minutes for a certain year cannot be
calculated.
The state enumeration algorithm can include independent failures, simultaneous (n-2) failures, common
mode failures, numerous load states and planned outages.
An overview flow diagram for the reliability assessment by state enumeration is shown in Figure 44.2.3.
Figure 44.2.3: Overview Flow Diagram for Reliability Assessment by State Enumeration
After the State Enumeration is complete, each simulated system state can be viewed using the 'tracing
tool’ on the Reliability Toolbar, see Section 45.2 for more information.
Prior to starting a Reliability Assessment Calculation, you must setup the Network Model with specific
reliability data models. This chapter discusses the following procedures:
Stochastic Failure models define the probability that a component will fail and when it does fail, the mean
time to repair the component. The following Stochastic failure models are supported by PowerFactory:
It is possible to define a Stochastic Model for every busbar and terminal within the network. The
Stochastic Model can be defined either through the object type or through the object element. If you
want to use the same Stochastic Model for a number of different busbars/terminals then you should
define it through the object type. Alternatively, if you want to use a Stochastic Model for only one
element, then you should define it through the element Reliability page.
You can use Stochastic Models defined through types and elements together as required - the element
definition always overrides the type definition.
1. Open the dialog for the busbar type and select the Reliability tab.
2. Using the 'Stochastic Model’ selection control click the black triangle and select the option "New
project type’. The dialog for the 'Bar Type Failures’ will appear.
3. Enter the failure data for the busbar and the failure data per connection. Note that the probability
of the busbar failure is the sum of these two failure frequencies. For example a busbar with 3
connections, a failure frequency for the busbar of 0.002 and a failure frequency of 0.005 per
connection will have a total probability of failure of 0.002 + 3 - 0.005 = 0.017.
1. Open the dialog for the busbar element and navigate to the Reliability tab.
2. Using the 'Element model’ selection control click the black triangle and select the option "New
project type’. The dialog for the 'Bar Type Failures’ will appear.
3. Enter the failure data and repair time data as described above for the busbar type.
Note: If you define a stochastic element model for a busbar/terminal that also has a stochastic type
model within its corresponding type, the element model overrules the type model.
It is possible to define a Stochastic Model for every line or cable within the network. The Stochastic
Model can be defined either through the object type or through the object element. If you want to use
the same Stochastic Model for a number of different lines/cables then you should define it through the
object type reliability page. Alternatively, if you want to use a Stochastic Model for only one element,
then you should define it through the element reliability page.
To define a Stochastic Model for a line or cable type follow these steps:
1. Open the dialog for the line type and select the Reliability tab.
2. Using the Stochastic Model’ selection control click the black triangle and select the option "New
project type’. The dialog for the "Line Type Failures’ will appear.
3. Enter the Sustained Failure Frequency. Note that the probability of the line failure is determined
using this value and the length of the line. For example, a 12 km line with a Sustained failure
frequency of 0.032(1/(a - kim)) will have a failure probability of 12 - 0.032 = 0.384(1/(a)).
4. Enter the mean repair duration in hours.
5. Enter the Transient Fault Frequency. Note this parameter is used for the calculation of the MAIFI
index.
6. Press OK twice to return to the element dialog.
To define a Stochastic Model for a line or cable element follow these steps:
1. Open the dialog for the line element and navigate to the Reliability tab.
2. Using the 'element model’ selection control click the black triangle and select the option "New
project type’. The dialog for the "Line Type Failures’ will appear.
3. Enter the failure data and repair time data as described above for the line type.
It is possible to define a Stochastic Model for every transformer within the network. The Stochastic
Model can be defined either through the object type or through the object element. If you want to use
the same Stochastic Model for a number of different transformers then you should define it through the
object type reliability page. Alternatively, if you want to use a Stochastic Model for only one transformer
element, then you should define it through the element reliability page.
1. Open the dialog for the transformer type and select the Reliability tab.
2. Using the Stochastic Model’ selection control click the black triangle and select the option "New
project type’. The dialog for the "Transformer Type Failures’ will appear.
1. Open the dialog for the transformer element and select the Reliability tab.
2. Using the 'element model’ selection control click the black triangle and select the option ‘New
project type’. The dialog for the "Transformer Type Failures’ will appear.
3. Enter the failure data and repair time data as described above for the transformer type.
In PowerFactory MV Loads can provide the functionality of a built-in distribution transformer. The fault
behaviour of the distribution transformer is the same as for other transformers, except for the fact that
the load connected behind the transformer is not supplied until the end of the repair duration.
To define a Stochastic Model for a distribution transformer within the MV Load element or type, open the
dialog for the MV Load element or type and select the Reliability tab. As the failure model is based on
the transformer (StoTyptrf), the following steps are equivalent to the ones described in Section [Link].
Within a network, it is possible to define a Stochastic Model for Generation (StoGen) for every generator
class (synchronous machines, static generators, PV systems, etc.) which can be used by both Reliability
and Generation Adequacy. For further information refer to Section 46.3.1. The Stochastic Model can
be defined using the element. The failure model can contain any number of load level states; each state
representing the availability of the generator over a year. This way, complete and/or partial outages can
be modelled.
Upon execution of Reliability Assessment, PowerFactory creates a separate contingency for each
defined state. A load flow is calculated considering the reduced availability (including 0%) of the
generator, and depending on constraint violations, load shedding and/or re-dispatch of alternative
generators may result.
The Stochastic Model for Generation includes an unlimited number of states with each defined accord-
ing to:
+ Probability [%]: Probability that this state is valid (the sum of all probabilities must be 100 %)
« Frequency [1/a]: Number of incidents that cause the given state per year
+ Total Duration [h/a]: Total duration of the given state per year
1. Open the dialog for the Generator element and select the Reliability tab.
2. Using the "Stochastic Model’, click the black triangle and select the option ‘Select. ..". The dialog
for the "Equipment Types' project library will appear.
3. Click the New Object button (D_) to create a Stochastic Model for Generation object (StoGen).
The dialog for the object should appear.
A common mode failure (StoCommon) involves the simultaneous failure of two or more power system
components. An example is a distribution feeder where two lines with different voltages share the
same poles. If one or more poles fail, for example a car hits a pole, then both lines will be interrupted
simultaneously: these lines have a 'common failure mode’. Such a failure will usually be more likely
than the probability of the two lines failing independently at the same time.
In PowerFactory, it is possible to define a common mode failure object to consider such failures in the
reliability calculation. These Stochastic Models consider the common mode failure probability in addition
to the independent failure mode of each component within the model.
To define a common mode failure Stochastic Model through the single line diagram follow these steps:
2. Right-click on one of the marked elements and chose Define — Common Mode Failure.
3. To add a network element, add a cell below the last full cell by right-clicking within an empty area
of the dialog and selecting the option 'Append Rows'.
4. Double-click in the first empty cell of the 'Name' column, to open an object selection browser.
5. Use the browser to find the object that is part of the Common Mode Failure that you are trying to
define.
6. Click OK to return to the Common Mode Failure dialog.
7. Repeat steps 3-6 to add more objects to the Common Mode Failure.
8. Click the 'Failure Data’ tab and enter the Sustained Failure Frequency, Mean Outage duration and
Transient Fault Frequency data.
To define a common mode failure Stochastic Model through the Data Manager (not suitable for the first
Common Mode Stochastic Model) follow these steps:
1. Using the Data Manager, select the’Common Mode’ failures folder within the 'Operational Library’.
2. Click the New Object button (D_) to create a Stochastic Common Mode failure object (StoCom-
mon). The dialog for the object should appear.
3. Double click in the first empty cell of the 'Name’ column, to open an object selection browser.
4. Use the browser to find the object that is part of the Common Mode Failure that you are trying to
define.
6. Add a cell below the last full cell by right-clicking within an empty area of the dialog and selecting
the option 'Append Rows’.
7. Repeat steps 3-6 to add more objects to the Common Mode Failure.
8. Click the 'Failure Data’ tab and enter the Sustained Failure Frequency, Mean Outage duration and
Transient Fault Frequency data.
PowerFactory can consider the failure of the protection system to clear the fault as a stochastic proba-
bility within the reliability calculation. This is enabled by entering a 'Probability of Failure’ into the switch
object. To enter this data:
1. Open the dialog for the switch object where you want to enter the switch failure probability.
Normally switches are accessed by right clicking their containing cubicle and selecting the option
’Edit Devices'.
2. On the Reliability tab of the switch object, enter the 'Fault Clearance: circuit breaker fails to open
probability’ in percent. For example, a 5 % failure rate means that on average 1 out of 20 attempted
fault clearance operations will fail.
3. “Unnecessary backup protection maloperation” gives the probability of the backup protection
operating unnecessarily. That is, the backup protection tripping in addition to the main protection
device.
4. “Frequency of spurious protection operation” gives the probability of a relay tripping spuriously,
without any indication.
Note: PowerFactory does not distinguish between a protection system failure and a switch failure. For
example, the reason that a switch fails to open could be caused by a faulty relay, a protection
mal-grading or a faulty circuit breaker. The cumulative probability of all these events should be
entered into the switch failure probability.
A double earth fault in PowerFactory is defined as follows: a single earth fault on a component followed
by a second simultaneous earth fault on another component.
A double earth fault might occur after voltage rises on healthy phases on a feeder following a single
phase to earth fault on the feeder, causes a second phase to earth fault on the same feeder.
Double earth faults occur on lines, transformers (2 Winding and 3 Winding transformers) and busbars,
and PowerFactory supports adding the conditional probability data for double earth faults for Stochastic
Models of these components. The reliability calculation automatically generates a contingency event for
every double earth fault that meets the following conditions:
« Both objects are in the same part of the network (supplied by the same transformers).
« The star point of the transformers that supply that part of the network is isolated or compensated
(both star point grounded and Peterson Coil enabled).
The frequency for single earth faults and the probability of the second earth fault data can be entered on
the 'Earth Fault’ page of every Stochastic Model. Follow these steps to enter data for a Line Stochastic
Model:
1. Open the Stochastic Failure Model for the line (either through the reliability page of the line type
or the line elements).
. Enter the data for the conditional probability of a second earth fault
o
Note: The double earth fault is a conditional probability. Therefore, the probability of one occurring in
the network is the probability of an earth fault on component A * probability of an double earth
fault on component B
When performing a reliability calculation with the Distribution option set under 'Basic Options’, Power-
Factory requires that feeders have been defined in the model.
To create a feeder:
+ Right click on the cubicle at the head of the feeder and select the option Define — Feeder; or
« For fast creation of multiple feeders, right click the bus that the feeder/s are to be connected to
and select the option Define — Feeder. More information on feeders and feeder creation can be
found in Chapter 15: Grouping Objects, Section 15.5(Feeders).
When executing the Reliability Assessment in distribution networks with a focus on optimal power
restoration, the meshes within feeders are restricted to be of the following kinds:
In this case, the feeder is supplied from one point and the mesh is within the feeder itself.
={s
Figure 44.3.1: Mesh within feeder
In this case, the feeders are connected and therefore result in a mesh as shown in figure 44.3.2.
e
%
Figure 44.3.2: Mesh containing two feeders starting from the same terminal
A critical component of the Failure Effect Analysis (FEA), is the behaviour of the switches in the network
model. Switches in PowerFactory are classified into four different categories:
« Circuit Breakers; Typically these are automatic and controlled by relays and through remote
communications. They are used for clearing faults and for closing back-feeds for power restoration.
All switches in PowerFactory are modelled using the StaSwitch or EImCoup objects. The switch
category (CB, disconnector etc) is selected on the basic data page of the switch. The actions that
the FEA analysis takes depends on the configuration of these switches and, optionally, the location of
protection devices.
Configuration steps
To configure a switch for reliability analysis follow these steps:
1. Open the dialog for the switch and select the reliability page. This can be done directly by editing
switches modelled explicitly on the single line diagram, or for switches embedded within a cubicle,
by right-clicking the cubicle and selecting the option ’edit devices’, to access the switch.
3. Select the 'Power Restoration’ option. The following choices are available:
+ Do not use for power restoration; If this option is selected the switch can only be used for
isolation of equipment or load shedding. It will not be used by the FEA calculation to restore
power.
From Branch to Node; If this option is selected, the switch will only be used to restore power
if the post restoration power flow is in the direction from Branch to Node. The switch will not
be used for power restoration in the opposite direction.
From Node to Branch; If this option is selected, the switch will only be used to restore power
if the post restoration power flow is in the direction from Node to Branch. The switch will not
be used for power restoration in the opposite direction.
Independent of direction; If this option is selected the switch will be used to restore power
flow regardless of the direction of the post restoration power flow.
4. Enter the time to actuate switch (Stage 2 and 3 switches only); This field specifies the time taken
by the operator to actuate the switch. Note, this excludes the local access and access time if
the switch is within a substation. The total actuation time of such a switch is therefore the switch
actuation time + the substation access time + the local access time.
The complete switching times depend on the following settings:
+ Switching procedure for fault separation / power restoration (page FEA of reliability command)
+ Access time (of terminal for global terminals, of station for terminals inside stations)
« Local access time (of terminal for global terminals, of station for terminals inside stations)
« Time to open remote controlled switches (page FEA of reliability command) for remote controlled
switches
« Time to actuate switch (page reliability of switch) for any other switch.
The protection breakers/switches actuate immediately (at 0:00 minutes after the fault was applied).
— Concurrently:
+ Remote controlled switches:Are actuated at the time entered in the reliability command.
« Any other switch: Access Time + Time to actuate switch
— Sequential (previous switching time is considered):
= Remote controlled switches: Are actuated at the time entered in the reliability command.
= Any other switch:
+ If a manual switch was actuated before:
- —> If the switch is located in the same station as the switch previously actuated:
Last switch time + Time to actuate switch
- If switch is in a different substation: Last switch time + Local access time + Time to
actuate switch
- Last switch time + Access time + Time to actuate switch
A switch however, will never be closed for power restoration before the corresponding area was
separated from the fault. If an area can be separated from the fault after 15 minutes and the switch
for restoration is remote controlled (time of remote controlled switches is set to 3:00 minutes), it
will be restored after 15 minutes
Note: The Sectionalising options are only considered when the 'Distribution’ reliability analysis option
is selected under 'Basic Options’. If the "Transmission’ mode is selected, then all switches are
assumed to be remote controlled.
This section provides a general description of the load element parameters that are used by the
reliability calculation. The first sub-section describes how to input the number of customers that each
load represents and how to classify each load. The second sub-section describes how to define load
shedding and transfer parameters.
Many of the reliability indices such as SAIFI and CAIFI are evaluated based on the number of customers
interrupted. Therefore, for accurate calculation of these indices it is important to specify the number of
customers that each load represents. To do this:
Load Classification
Every load can be optionally classified into agricultural, commercial, domestic or industrial load. This
option does not affect the calculation of the reliability indices and is provided for categorisation purposes
only.
Load transfer and load shedding are used to alleviate violated voltage or thermal constraints caused
by the power restoration process. There is a distinction between load transfer for constraint alleviation,
such as described in this section, and load transfer for power restoration. Load transfer by isolating a
fault and closing a back-stop switch is considered automatically during the fault separation and power
restoration phase of the failure effect analysis.
If a violated constraint is detected in the post-fault system condition, a search begins for the loads
contributing to these overloads. The overloads are then alleviated by either:
+ Shedding some of these loads, starting with the lowest priority loads.
2. Enter the number of load shedding steps using the 'Shedding steps’ list box. For example, four
shedding steps means that the load can be shed to 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of its base value.
Infinite shedding steps means that the load can be shed to the exact value required to alleviate
the constraint.
3. Enter the 'Load priority’. The reliability algorithm will always try to shed the loads with the lowest
priority first. However, high priority loads can still be shed if the algorithm determines this is the
only way to alleviate a constraint.
4. Enter the load transfer percentage in the "Transferable’ parameter. This defines the percentage
of this load that can be transferred away from the current network. PowerFactory assumes that
the transferred load is picked up by another network that is not modelled, hence load transferring
in this way is equivalent to load shedding in terms of constraint alleviation. The difference is that
transferred load is still considered as supplied load, whereas shed load is obviously not supplied.
5. Optional: Use the selection control next to 'Alternative Supply (Load) to specify an alternative
load that picks up all transferred load.
Note: There is a critical difference between the transmission reliability and distribution reliability func-
tions. In distribution reliability all constraint alleviation is completed using switch actions, so
loads can only be fully shed (switched out) or they remain in service. However, by contrast,
the transmission reliability option can shed or transfer a percentage of the load.
When supply to a load is interrupted, there is a cost associated with the loss of supply. PowerFactory
supports the definition of cost curves for load elements using Energy Tariffs and Time Tariffs. They can
be defined using the 'Tariff’ characteristic on the reliability page of the load element, as discussed in
Chapter 18: Parameter Characteristics, Load States, and Tariffs, Section 18.5 (Tariffs).
Projects imported from previous versions of PowerFactory may include Vector Characteristics for the
definition of cost curves, which are discussed in Chapter 18: Parameter Characteristics, Load States,
and Tariffs, Section 18.2.5 (Vector Characteristics with Time Scales).
If time-based characteristics for the feeder loads, generators or both are defined so that the demand
changes depending on the study case time, these states can be considered in the reliability analysis.
Therefore, the load demand for a one year period can be discretised and converted into several so-
called 'load states’, and a probability of occurrence for each state. The Reliability Command does
not automatically generate the load states. One possibility is the specification of load characteristics
for individual loads and generators, and the second is by specification of load distribution states for
substations. The procedures for each method is described in Chapter 18: Parameter Characteristics,
Load States, and Tariffs; Sections 18.3 (Load States) and 18.4 (Load Distribution States).
The second option is the more realistic option, because only locations within the network that can
automatically clear a fault will be used by the reliability calculation to clear the simulated faults.
Note: If there is no protection device entered in the network model, there is the possibility to define a
circuit breaker to be considered as switch with protection device for reliability calculations. This
setting can be found within the circuit breakers reliability tab. “Fault Clearance: Consider as switch
with protection device”
The PowerFactory reliability calculation supports the definition and automatic inclusion of planned
network maintenance. Maintenance is implemented with a planned outage object. These objects
are found within the 'Outages’ sub-folder within the project ‘Operational Library’. The following steps
describe the procedure for creating a planned outage:
1. On the single line diagram (or within the Data Manager), select the object (or objects) that you
would like to define an outage for.
2. Right-click the selected object/s and from the menu that appears choose the option Define —
Planned Outage. The dialog box for the planned outage will appear.
3. Using the Start Time selection control ..., enter the time that the outage begins.
4. Using the End Time selection control "..., enter the time that the outage ends.
5. Optional: Adjust the Outage Type. Typically you would leave this on the default ‘Outage of Element’
option, but if you wanted to model a generator derating, then you would choose the 'Generator
Derating’ option.
Note: When the reliability calculation considers outages it creates a unique contingency case for every
contingency with the outage applied and also without the outage. For example, for a network with
two planned outages and six contingencies there will be a total of 6 - 3 = 18 contingency cases.
The reliability calculation can automatically consider voltage and thermal constraints for the power
restoration process. There are two options for specifying constraints applied to branch, terminal, and
feeder objects as follows:
Global Constraints; All network constraints are based on the constraints specified on the constraints tab
of the Reliability Command dialog.
Individual Constraints; If Individual Constraints are selected for branches, terminals, and / or feeders,
constraints should be defined by the user for each relevant object by taking the following steps:
1. Open the reliability page of the target terminal, branch (line/transformer), or feeder.
2. Enter the Max and Min Voltage limits, max loading, or voltage drop/rise for the terminal, branch,
or feeder respectively.
Reliability Analysis in PowerFactoryallows the user to consider predefined switching rules within sub-
stations according to chapter [Link]. Switching-rules are executed directly after protection operation.
The procedure for using the PowerFactory Reliability Assessment tool and analysing the results gener-
ated by the tool is described in this section.
In PowerFactory the network Reliability Analysis is completed using the Reliability Assessment com-
mand (ComRel3 (). This command is found on the 'Reliability Analysis’ toolbar.
Alternatively, the commands can be executed for a single element by right-clicking the element and
selecting Calculate — Reliability Assessment or — Optimal Power Restoration. The options for the
reliability command that are presented within its dialog are described in the following sub-sections.
A reliability assessment is started when the Execute button is pressed. The calculation time required
for a reliability assessment can range from a few seconds for a small network only considering n-1 con-
tingencies, to several hours for a large network considering n-2 contingencies. A reliability assessment
calculation can be interrupted by clicking on the Break icon (@) on the main toolbar.
The following options are available on the Basic Options page Reliability Assessment Command dialog.
Load Flow
This button is a link to the load-flow calculation command used for the analysis. The load demand is
calculated using this load-flow. In addition, its settings are used for the constraint evaluation load-flows.
Method
+ Conne: ity analysis: this option enables failure effect analysis without considering constraints.
A load is assumed to be supplied if it is connected to a source of power before a contingency, and
assumed to undergo a loss of supply if the process of fault clearance separates the load from all
power sources. Because constraints are not considered, no load-flow is required for this option
and hence the analysis will be faster than when using the alternative load-flow analysis option.
+ Load flow analysis: this option is the same as the connectivity analysis, except that constraints
are considered by completing load-flows for each contingency. Loads might be disconnected
to alleviate voltage or thermal constraints. For the transmission analysis option, Generator re-
dispatch, load transfer and load shedding are used to alleviate overloads.
« Complete year: the reliability calculation is performed for the current year specified in the 'Date/-
Time of the Calculation Case’. This can be accessed and the date and time changed by clicking
the = button.
«+ Single Point in Time: the Reliability Calculation is completed for the network in its current state
at the actual time specified by the 'Date/Time of the Calculation Case’.
Note: If load states or maintenance plans are not created and considered, then these options make no
difference because the reliability calculation is always completed at the single specified time.
Network
« Distribution: the reliability assessment will try to remove overloading at components and voltage
violations (at terminals) by optimising the switch positions in the system. If constraints occur in
the power restoration process, loads will be shed by opening available switches. This option is the
recommended analysis option for distribution and medium voltage networks.
Note: The reliability command optimises switch positions based on load shedding priorities, and
not network losses.
Transmission: thermal overloads are removed by generator re-dispatch, load transfer and load
shedding. First generator re-dispatch and load transfer is attempted. If these cannot be completed
or do not remove the thermal overload, load shedding actions will occur. Generator re-dispatch
and load transfer do not affect the reliability indices. However, by contrast, load shedding leads to
unsupplied loads and therefore affects the reliability indices.
If the checkbox is selected, new contingencies will be created. If it is unchecked, existing contingencies
from previous calculations will be used for reliability assessment.
The 'Selection’ list presents two possible options for the contingency definition. These are:
+ Whole system: PowerFactory will automatically create a contingency event for every object that
has a Stochastic Model defined.
« User Defined: Selecting this option shows a selection control. Now you can select a set of objects
(SetSelect), and contingencies will be created for each of these objects that has a Stochastic
Model defined.
In addition to the above contingency definition options, the automatic contingency definition can be
further controlled with the following checkboxes:
« Busbars/Terminals; This flag should be enabled for PowerFactory to create Busbar and terminal
contingencies.
« Lines/Cables; This flag should be enabled for PowerFactory to create Line/Cable contingencies.
« Transformers; This flag should be enabled for PowerFactory to create transformer contingencies.
+ Generators; This flag should be enabled for PowerFactory to create generator contingencies
(Load flow analysis only).
+ Common Mode; This flag should be enabled for PowerFactory to create Common Mode contin-
gencies. See section [Link] (Common Mode Stochastic Model) for more information.
Independent second failures; This flag should be enabled for PowerFactory to consider n-2 out-
ages in addition to n-1 outages. Caution: n-2 outages for all combinations of n-1 outages are
considered. This means that for a system of n contingencies there are (n - (n — 1))/2) + n,
contingencies to consider. This equation is quadratic, and so to minimise the required time for
computation this option is disabled by default.
Double-earth faults; This flag should be enabled for PowerFactory to consider double-earth faults.
See section [Link] (Double Earth Faults) for more information.
Protection/switching failures; This flag should be enabled for PowerFactory to consider the failure
to operate of protection devices or circuit breakers. See section [Link] (Protection/Switch
Failures) for more information.
[Link] Outputs
The following options are available on the Outputs tab of the Reliability command.
Results
This option allows the selection of the result element (E/mRes) where the results of the reliability
analysis will be stored. Normally, PowerFactory will create a results object within the active study
case.
Perform Evaluation of Results File
The Reliability Analysis automatically writes all simulation results to a results object specified above.
After completing the Reliability Calculation, PowerFactory automatically evaluates the results object to
compute the reliability indices. This button allows you to re-evaluate a results file that has previously
been created by this or another reliability calculation command. The benefit of this is that you do not
have to re-run the reliability calculation (which can be time consuming compared with the results object
evaluation) if you only want to recalculate the indices from an already completed calculation.
Report
Displays the form used for the output report. Report settings can be inspected and the format selected
by clicking on the = button.
Show detailed output of initial load flow and top level feeders
If this option is checked, a detailed report of the initial load flow will be printed to the output window.
[Link] Protection
Create Contingencies
These settings are the same as in “Automatic Contingency Definition”, described in section [Link].
For convenience they are displayed within this tab as well.
[Link] Restoration
The options described below will only be available if Automatic Power Restoration is selected.
Load/Generator Priorities
The two settings will be used to evaluate the element's priority value, entered by the user.
+ Lowest priority number refers to most critical load/generator: this means that higher priorities
are shed first.
+ Highest priority number refers to most critical load/generator
« Concurrent Switch Actions: it is assumed that the switching actions can be performed immedi-
ately following the specified switching time. However, a switch can be closed for power restoration
only after the faulted element was disconnected. The analogy for this mode is if there were a large
number of operators in the field that were able to communicate with each other to coordinate the
switching actions as quickly as possible. Therefore, this option gives an optimistic assessment of
the 'smart power restoration’.
Sequential Switch Actions: it is assumed that all switching actions are performed sequentially.
The analogy for this mode is if there were only a single operator in the field, who was required to
complete all switching. The fault separation and power restoration is therefore slower when using
this mode compared with the 'concurrent’ mode.
Consider Sectionalising (Distribution analysis only): if enabled, the FEA considers the switch
sectionalising stage when attempting fault separation and power restoration.
Power restoration
After the isolation of failures, parts of the network may be unsupplied. However, the network can be
reconfigured by moving the tie open point in order to restore as much power as possible (partial power
restoration). This reconfiguration might lead to violations of constraints (e.g. overloading), which should
be avoided. For each sectionalising stage of switches, the optimisation method offers three power
restoration modes:
First sectionalising is attempted using only stage 1 switches, if this is not successful then stage 1 and 2
switches are used. Finally, if this is not successful, then stage 1, 2 and 3 switches are used.
If Consider Sectionalising Actions is disabled, the stage of each switch is ignored and all switches will
be considered equally with one of the above mentioned methods.
Enhanced restoration
If this checkbox is enabled, the restoration uses a more precise algorithm to solve load flow convergence
issues during the restoration process. Setting this option can decrease the performance of the Reliability
assessment.
Whenever the start point of a feeder is de-energised after a fault ( e.g. on a HV/MV-transformer),
backward recovery can be used to resupply this feeder. Backward recovery allows the restoration
through a substation. It is started in a case where the standard recovery could not resupply all loads
after the first stage of the recovery, e.g. because of constraint violations or because of de-energised
isolated feeders. The algorithm finds the best feeder for resupplying the substation and the interrupted
feeders. This can improve the restoration quality for a loss of a substation significantly, especially, for
example, for dedicated low-load feeders between substations or isolated feeders (see figure below).
1 o,
Feeder 3
Feeder 2
The Backward recovery option, located within the “Restoration” Option, can be set as follows.
« Allow but prefer standard recovery: backward recovery is allowed, but standard recovery will be
preferred for restoration.
« Allow with user-defined preference: substations, where Backward recovery is allowed can be
selected here.
« Allow and prefer: whenever possible, backward recovery will be preferred.
44.41.5 Costs
If this option is selected, a Global cost curve for all loads can be selected. Alternatively, 'Individual cost
curve per load’ may be selected, allowing the user to define tariffs for individual loads. In both cases,
a Time Tariff or Energy Tariff may be defined, as discussed in Chapter 18: Parameter Characteristics,
Load States, and Tariffs, Section 18.5 (Tariffs).
[Link] Constraints
The settings for global constraints are defined within this page. The options are as follows:
+ Global constraints for all components: constraints specified in 'Max thermal loading of compo-
nents’ apply to all components in percent value.
«+ Individual constraint per component: the maximum thermal loading limit is considered for each
component separately. This loading limit can be found on the Reliability tab of each component.
If this option is enabled terminal voltage limits are considered by the FEA.
+ Global Constraint for all terminals: constraints specified in Lower and Upper Limit of allowed
voltage in p.u. that will apply to all terminals.
« Individual Constraint per terminal: voltage constraints are considered for each terminal sepa-
rately. These constraints can be found on the Reliability tab of each terminal.
If this option is enabled feeder voltage limits are considered by the FEA.
+ Global Constraint for all feeders: constraints specified in Maximum Voltage Drop and Rise in
percent value that will apply to all feeders.
« Individual Constraint per feeder: voltage Drop/Rise constraints are considered for each feeder
separately. These constraints can be found on the Reliability tab of each feeder.
If this option is set, the boundary constraints, applied on the boundaries “Reliability” settings are
considered during restoration.
Constraints are ignored for all terminals and components below the entered voltage level.
+ Nominal voltage below or equal to: the voltage level in kV is specified here if 'Ignore all
constraints for..." is enabled.
Note: Voltage constraints are only available when the 'Distribution’ analysis option is selected under
'Basic Options’. Thermal constraints are available when either the "Transmission’ or 'Distribution’
analysis option is selected.
[Link] Maintenance
This tab allows you to enable or disable the consideration of Maintenance based on the Planned
Outages you have defined. See Section 44.3.9, for more information on defining planned outages.
The following options are available on this page:
Consider Maintenance
If enabled, all maintenance that falls in the selected time period, whether it's a year or a single point in
time, is considered.
+ Show used planned outages: when clicked, this button will show a list of all planned outages
that will be considered by the calculation.
+ Show all planned outages: when clicked, this button will show a list of all planned outages
created in the project, including those not considered by the analysis because they fall outside of
the selected time period.
If the Reliability Calculation option 'Complete Year' is selected on the basic options page, then the
following options are available on the Load Data page.
Load Variations
Enable the relevant flag to consider load states, load distribution states or Load and Generator States
according to section 44.3.6 in the reliability calculation. The reliability calculation does not create load
states automatically. If this flag is enabled but the states have not been created, then an error will be
printed to the output window and the reliability calculation will stop. Otherwise the following two buttons
are available.
Update/creation of States
« Manually: if selected, a button 'Create load states’ will be available. When clicked, it launches
the "Load state creation’ command after closing the reliability command (see Chapter 18 for more
information on load state creation).
+ Automatically before running reliability calculation: when selected, a pointer to the load state
creation command is available.
+ Only store them in the results file: events will only be stored in the results file and not be
saved as separate events in the contingency. This minimises the number of objects created
in the database while performing calculations with many contingencies in large networks (e.g
if independent second failures or double earth faults are enabled).
« Also save them in the corresponding contingency: switch events will be saved in the corre-
sponding contingency.
+ Do not consider interruptions shorter than or equal to: this option enables the possibility to
not consider interruptions shorter than a user defined duration for the calculation of SAIFI/SAIDI
according to section [Link].
A user-defined 'Time delay in animation’ can be entered to delay the animation of power restorations
when the Jump to Last Step icon [} is pressed.
Switch/Load events
+ Delete switch events: removes all switch events associated with the contingencies stored inside
the command.
«+ Delete load events: removes all load events associated with the contingencies stored inside the
command.
This option performs an automatic correction/normalisation of the reliability indices to allow for the fact
that not all unlikely but possible contingencies have been considered in the analysis. For instance, n-3
contingencies have a non-zero probability.
Note: 'Forced outage’ refers to the unplanned removal of a primary component from the system due to
one or more failures in the system.
Parallel calculation of the Reliability Assessment is possible and can be activated on the Parallel
Computing page of the Reliability Assessment command dialog. The options provided on this page
are described below.
Parallel computation of contingencies: if the checkbox is ticked, the Reliability Assessment is exe-
cuted in parallel. Otherwise, the calculation is run sequentially.
Minimum number of contingencies: this parameter defines the minimum number of contingencies
necessary to start a parallel calculation. This means, if the number of contingencies is less than the
entered number, the calculation is run sequentially.
Parallel Computing Manager: the parallel computation settings are stored in a Parallel Computing
Manager object (SetParalman). Further information on the particular configuration is found in Sec-
tion 22.4.
Contribution means the effects of the calculated contingencies to the reliability indices of all loads or
a selection of loads. This chapter describes an optional post processing step, which can be useful to
analyse the influence of a particular component or group of components on the calculated reliability
indices. This enables the identification of components that can be targeted for upgrade to improve
reliability, or to examine the impact of improved switch automation for example. This sub-section
describes the post-processing functionality that can be used for these purposes.
1. SAIFI,
. SAIDI,
N
. ASIFI,
. ASIDI,
&
ENS,
o
EIC,
o
the Reliability Assessment Calculation has to be executed once, or it has to be ensured that the currently
activated study case contains results of a previously executed reliability analysis.
Choose the Contributions to Reliability Indices button in the Reliability Analysis toolbar menu.
Choose between the contribution to all loads or to a user defined selection of loads. Loads can be
selected according to the following groupings.
— Grids,
— Feeders,
— Zones,
— Areas.
— and General Selections.
Furthermore, it is possible to analyse the contribution of network elements to reliability indices of
one Load, which can be a General Load, LV-Loads or MV-Load.
After setting the required set, the user can execute the post process.
Note: The Contributions to Reliability Indices is a post-processing command. Once calculated the
contributions for a selection, it is possible to change the selection or re-run the command for all
Loads without executing the Reliability Assessment once again.
You can view the Reliability Assessment Load Point Indices in three ways: in the load result boxes
in single line graphic, in the data browser (Data Manager or load filter) or according to the diagram
colouring. This sub-section describes the first two of these methods. The third method is described in
chapter [Link].
After you have executed the Reliability Assessment Calculation, all loads within the Network Single Line
Graphic, will show the following load point indices:
As usual, with PowerFactory result boxes, you can hover the mouse pointer over the result box to show
an enlarged popup of the results. This is demonstrated in Figure 44.5.1
0,604 h
0200 12 [§ 15— 0,604
1176204 % || LPIF = 0,200 1/a
LPIT = 0,121 hja
LPIC = 178,204 §/a
Ld1
Figure 44.5.1: Single Line Diagram Graphic Showing the Load Point Indices Results
Note: You can show any of the calculated load point indices in the load result boxes. To do this
modify the displayed variables as described in Chapter 19: Reporting and Visualising Results,
Section 19.3 (Variable Selection)
For further analysis, which element contributes most to the reliability of a certain selection of customers,
itis possible to use the diagram colouring.
The colouring is according to results of the whole system or the selection that has been chosen as
described in chapter 44.5.1. The diagram colouring, especially for branches, terminals, MV Loads and
generators can be according to
« contribution to EIC,
« contribution to ENS,
« contribution to SAIDI,
« and contribution to SAIFI.
The colouring, especially for Loads, can be according to
In addition, there are several colouring modes that can aid you when using the reliability assessment
functions. These are:
+ Colouring according to Feeders; Use this to identify each Feeder and to see which feeder picks
up load when back-feed switches are closed.
« Colouring according to Connected Grid Components; Use this to identify de-energised sections
of the network during the fault isolation, separation and power restoration.
+ Switches, type of usage. Use this mode to check the type of switches in the system when they
are not modelled explicitly in the single line diagram.
1. Click the Diagram Colouring button @ The Diagram colouring dialog will appear.
2. Select the tab for the function you want to show the colouring mode for. For example, if you want
the feeder colouring to appear before a calculation, then select the Basic Data tab. If you want the
colouring to appear after a load-flow choose the load-flow tab.
3. Check the 3. Other box and select Topology from the drop down list.
5. Optional: To change the feeder colour settings click the colour settings button. You can double
click the displayed colours in the colour column and select a different colour for each feeder as
desired.
6. Click OK to close the Diagram Colouring dialog and save your changes.
The Connected Grid Components colouring mode displays all the network components that are elec-
trically connected together in the same colour. Other components are not coloured. To enable this
mode:
1. Click the Diagram Colouring button e, The diagram colouring dialog will appear.
5. Click OK to close the Diagram Colouring dialog and save your changes.
The Switches: type of usage colouring mode displays all switches in the network with a different colour
depending on their switch type. For instance circuit breakers will be displayed in a different colour to
disconnectors. To enable this mode:
1. Click the Diagram Colouring button e, The diagram colouring dialog will appear.
2. Select the tab for the function you want to show the colouring mode for. For example, if you want
the switch type colouring to appear before a calculation, then select the Basic Data tab. If you
want the colouring to appear after a load-flow choose the load-flow tab.
3. Check the 3. Other box and select Secondary Equipment from the drop down list.
5. Optional: To change the switch colour settings, click the colour settings button. You can double
click the displayed colours in the colour column and select a different colour for each switch type
as desired.
6. Click OK to close the Diagram Colouring dialog and save your changes.
To view the load point and system reliability indices in the Data Browser (as a selectable spreadsheet
list) , follow these steps:
1. Select the element or grouping element icon from the Network Model Manager button .
3. Click the Define Flexible Data button f, to show all available variables.
4 . Add more variables to the Selected Variables by double-clicking the variable in the Available
Variables window.
Note: Steps 3-5 are only required the first time you want to view the system reliability indices, or if you
want to change the displayed variables. PowerFactory 'remembers’ these settings within each
project.
The Report can be accessed through the Reliability Reports button ([i}) within the Reliability Analysis
tooll bar. The Report is based on the whole system or the selection that has been chosen as described
incl hapter 44.5.1. The report offers the following functionalities.
ASCII Report
+ System Summary: reports a calculation summary of the Reliability Assessment together with
calculated system indices.
+ Load Interruptions: reports the following indices for all Loads within the selection.
- TCIT
- TCIF
— AID
- LPENS
- LPIC
- ACIF
- ACIT
- AIT
- AIF
- AID
« Contribution of Component Classes: reports the contribution of Lines, Cables, Transformers,
Terminals, Generators, Common Mode Failures and Double-Earth Faults to the system-indices,
that are available for contributions mentioned in 44.5.1.
Tabular report of Contributions
This Report returns the contribution of one single element to the overall system-indices in a tabular
form. This contribution is given as absolute value and in per-cent.
In PowerFactory, element definitions override type definitions. This means if a stochastic model is defined at both the type and element level, the specifications set for the element will take precedence over those of the type .
During the restoration process in PowerFactory's reliability analysis, both voltage and thermal constraints are considered. Load shedding and load transfer are utilized to alleviate violated constraints, starting with the lowest priority loads unless necessary to shed higher priority ones. Boundary constraints and voltage constraints are considered for distribution analysis, while thermal constraints are relevant for both transmission and distribution analysis .
Switching rules are executed immediately after a protection operation during reliability analysis. They allow for predefined operational changes within substations, which can influence the reliability outcome by restoring service to affected areas faster, thus affecting the overall reliability metrics calculated .
To define a Stochastic Model for a generator element, open its dialog and select the Reliability tab. Key parameters include different load-level states, each with availability percentage, state probability, duration needed to resolve failure, frequency of incidents, and total duration of the state per year. These parameters help simulate generator availability and outages through varying states .
Specifying the number of connected customers for load elements is crucial as many reliability indices require this data for accurate calculation, such as SAIFI and CAIFI. To define this, access the target load element’s dialog, navigate to the Reliability page, and input the number of customers in the 'Number of connected customers' field .
Disabling maintenance consideration in a reliability assessment could lead to an inaccurate representation of system reliability, as planned outages related to maintenance would not be accounted for. This could result in underestimated probabilities of service outages, affecting indices like SAIFI and CAIFi .
To specify load shedding and transfer parameters, open the reliability page of the load element. Enter the number of load shedding steps and assign a 'Load priority’. The algorithm sheds loads starting with the lowest priority. Enter the load transfer percentage to define how much of this load can be transferred. These specifications help manage constraints due to overloads after fault clearance .
The probability of failure for a line or cable in PowerFactory is calculated by multiplying the sustained failure frequency by the length of the line. For instance, a line with a length of 12 km and a sustained failure frequency of 0.032 results in a failure probability of 0.384 (1/a).
To define a Busbar/Terminal Stochastic Model in PowerFactory, open the dialog for the busbar type and select the Reliability tab. Use the 'Stochastic Model’ selection control to select 'New project type’, then enter the failure data for the busbar and failure data per connection. The total probability of failure is the sum of the busbar failure frequency and the connection failure frequencies. Enter the mean repair duration and press OK twice to finalize the element dialog .
Load-flow analysis in PowerFactory considers constraints, requiring load-flows for each contingency. This can result in disconnecting loads to alleviate voltage or thermal constraints. Conversely, connectivity analysis does not consider constraints, assuming loads are supplied if connected to a power source before a contingency, allowing for a faster analysis without detailed load-flow calculations .