0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views2 pages

Architect Interview Guidelines

The document outlines requirements for conducting interviews with two architects for a midterm project, including one faculty member and one external architect, and providing questions in advance. It details phases for introductions, experiences and skills, and concludes with advice for after the interview.

Uploaded by

Trishia Señoron
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views2 pages

Architect Interview Guidelines

The document outlines requirements for conducting interviews with two architects for a midterm project, including one faculty member and one external architect, and providing questions in advance. It details phases for introductions, experiences and skills, and concludes with advice for after the interview.

Uploaded by

Trishia Señoron
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Midterm Requirement

 Conduct interviews with a minimum of two architects. Ensure that one


interviewee is a faculty member, while the other architect should be from outside
the faculty.
 It is essential for each student to select different architects to ensure diversity.
 Schedule appointments with the architects and send a set of questions well in
advance of the interview date.
 Record the interviews for documentation purposes.

Prior to the interview, the group should foster trust and establish a connection by
providing a brief introduction explaining the purpose of the interview.

It is crucial to inform the architect that their responses will be presented to the
class, and explicit approval must be obtained and recorded in the video.

Phase 1: Introduction

 Name:
 Current age:
 Background information:
~Institution where the architect earned their Bachelor of Science in Architecture
~Number of years the architect has been practicing architecture
~Notable locations where the architect has been involved in designing buildings
~Brief information about the architect's family background (e.g., perhaps the
architect is the daughter of a renowned architect who constructed a well-known
building)

Phase 2: Experiences and skills

1. What inspired your decision to become an architect?

2. Can you elaborate on your guiding principles as an architect and discuss whether they
are rooted in principles you held during your academic years?

3. Could you share your experiences during your college years?

4. What insights can you provide regarding your experiences during your apprenticeship

5. Reflecting on your journey, how did you navigate the challenges encountered during
your board exam?
6. In your architectural career, can you highlight some of the most formidable
challenges you've faced and the strategies you employed to overcome them?

7. Please showcase a few of the key projects you have been involved in throughout your
professional history.

8. In the realm of design, what types of buildings or structures have been the focus of
your expertise and experience?

9. Can you elucidate on your design philosophy and approach when initiating a new
architectural concept?

10. We are currently exploring the subject of SPP Document 208, specifically focusing on
architectural design competitions. Could you please provide insights into your
experiences with architectural design competitions, including the drawing conditions
you encountered upon participation? Additionally, I am interested in learning about any
significant developments during the course of these competitions and the potential
prizes or honoraria associated with them?”

11. What advice would you personally provide on achieving success in your professional
pursuits?

Phase 3: after the interview

The role of the interviewer:

 We have to give a small token of appreciation


 Picture together with the architect
 The interviewers must have an individual realization about the topic. we have to
video record ourselves.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Requiring explicit approval aligns with ethical standards by ensuring transparency, consent, and respect for the interviewee's rights. It guarantees that participants are fully informed about the processes and use of their information, which is crucial for maintaining integrity and trust in educational research practices .

Interviewing architects from both academic and practice backgrounds enhances diversity in learning by exposing students to a variety of perspectives and experiences in the field. Academics may offer more theoretical insights and educational trends, while practitioners provide real-world applications and current industry challenges. This dual approach ensures a well-rounded understanding of architectural practices .

The document stresses several steps for conducting interviews with architects effectively: scheduling appointments ahead, sending questions in advance, recording interviews for documentation, and establishing trust by explaining the interview's purpose and obtaining explicit approval. These steps ensure organized, respectful, and ethically sound communication .

Including background information in the interview introduction is essential as it provides context to the architect's experiences and achievements. It helps interviewers and the audience to understand the architect's perspective and journey, enriching the narrative of the interview and facilitating deeper discussions .

Scheduling appointments and sending questions in advance allows architects to prepare thoughtfully for the conversation, leading to more insightful and comprehensive responses. It respects their time and commitments, ensuring a more organized and productive interview session for both parties involved .

A personal realization or reflection after an interview allows students to internalize and critically assess the information and experiences shared by the architect. It promotes deeper learning, self-awareness, and the ability to connect academic content with real-world practice, thereby enhancing personal and professional growth .

Interviewing architects can significantly contribute to a student's professional development by enhancing their communication skills, increasing their knowledge of diverse architectural approaches, and providing firsthand insights into challenges and solutions in the field. It also facilitates networking and mentorship opportunities with experienced professionals .

Recording and obtaining explicit approval are crucial for ethical transparency and accountability in educational contexts. It ensures that the interviewee's consent is documented, respects their rights and establishes trust. This practice also aligns with ethical standards and guidelines for interviewing and recording data in academic research .

The requirement for each student to select different architects enriches the learning process by ensuring a variety of experiences and insights are brought into the educational setting. This approach prevents redundancy, promotes unique learning opportunities, and fosters an environment where diverse architectural practices and philosophies are explored .

Providing a brief introduction and building a connection are key for setting a respectful and professional tone in architectural interviews. This approach helps to establish rapport, making the architect feel valued and more open to sharing insights. It also clarifies the interview's purpose, thus facilitating smoother communication .

You might also like