Variable-Voltage Class-E Amplifiers
Variable-Voltage Class-E Amplifiers
net/publication/224715762
Conference Paper in IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium digest. IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium · July 2007
DOI: 10.1109/MWSYM.2007.380284 · Source: IEEE Xplore
CITATIONS READS
18 256
3 authors:
Bram Nauta
University of Twente
493 PUBLICATIONS 14,098 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by A.J. Annema on 22 October 2014.
Abstract- The Class-E power amplifier is widely used due paper is based on closed form expressions like those presented
to its high efficiency, resulting from switching at zero voltage in [5], [6] and [7] for Class-E PAs'. In the analysis, the finite
and zero slope of the switch voltage. In this paper, we extend dc-feed inductance (L), the switch (transistor) input/output
general analytical solutions for the Class-E power amplifier to the
ideal single-ended Variable-Voltage Class-E (Class-Evv) power capacitance (Cj,1COut) and on-resistance (Ron) (Fig. 2b) are
amplifier that switches at zero slope but not necessarily at zero all taken into account. As a result of the analysis, analytical de-
voltage. sign equations are presented showing the relation between the
The theory is verified by simulations and measurements, and input parameters and the circuit component values. It is shown
show that the peak switch voltage of Class-Evv power amplifier in this paper that Class-Evv can have up to 30% lower -
(maximum 20% less) from technologies with low-breakdown maximum 20% lower power-added efficiency2 assuming the
-
tuned at o,: Cm RL
- matchir g:
Fig. 1. Sub-optimum operation classes of Class-E PA C networcV
1096
By using the continttity of the inductor current and the ca- D. Efficiency and Output Power of Class-Evv
pacitor voltage at the sNwitch turn-off moment two independent Taking the three loss mechanisms (Pin, Pswitch, Pmatch)
equations follow that h ave the same format: shown in Fig. 2 and the existence of certain switch (transistor)
fM(p, q, X, m, a) = pai(q, m, a)X coso) + pbi(q, m,1 a) breakdown-voltage7 (VBD = z(q, m, al) VDD) into account
)the efficiency and the power on the antenna can be expressed:
+ci(q, m,
I /
al)\ = U, where
" -1-
i 1,2. CI
0*0.60 =0.3 q
Substitution of (9) and p in (8) yields q=0K
6 012
0.55 =. X 0.1; -- 1
KL (q, mn, a) (PVDD q) 2mwn
wf fo (VCon (t)- VDDVCon (t))dt 00 0.4 0.8
T. Class-E
Conventional
1.2
a 1.6 2.0 0
'1a0.4 0.8
Conventional Class-E
1.2 1.6 2.0
1097
conventional Class-E PA (a
-
I
C
I~~~~~
:1~ ~ .
In [4], an optimization procedure based upon approximations
and simulation results is given for Class-E PAs. The PAE
measurement results given in [4] (67%, for conventional Class-
E PA) is close to theoretical value given in Fig.3 (z 71%). The
difference can be attributed to the losses due to ground bonding
and dc-feed inductance; which are not taken into account in
the analytical design equations in this paper.
Fig. 3 shows the strong dependence of PAE and Pantenna
both on q and a. It can be seen in Fig. 3 that the maximum
Pantenna for Class-Evv (q = 0.6, a = 2) is 1.65 times higher
than the maximum Pant,nna for conventional Class-E PA (q =
1.2, a
have
0). Besides, for q = 0.6 Class-Evv (a = 1) can
80% more Pantenna with only 3% less PAE than
0). For the same q = 0.6,
Class-Evv (a = 2) can have 200% more Pantenna with
16% less PAE than the conventional Class-E PA (a = 0).
t6 X ZX
I
X
0, 1 and 2
_I
Z
i
I
Table 2: Measurement Results and Design Details
Design Details
(q,a,m,QL,n)
Frequency, VDD
POUT, PDC
R, r1
Lm, L, Vpeak
C, Cm
Class-E
(0,0,0.001,5,2.3)
5 MHz, 1.4 V
19.9, 29.4 mW
22Q, 67.7%
1.6, 12 uH, 4.2 V
0.26, 0.72 nF
IV. CONCLUSION
Class-Evv, 1 [
(0,1,0.001,5,2.3)
5 MHz, 1.6 V
30.4,48.4 mW
22Q, 62.8%
1.4, 12 uH, 4.2 V
0.42, 0.72 nF
Class-E PAs under the same drive, load and reliable peak
voltage conditions, with only a modest PAE penalty.
REFERENCES
Class-Evvc 2
(0,2,0.001,5,2.3)
5 MHz, 1.9 V
55.2, 108.3 mW
1098
View publication stats