0% found this document useful (0 votes)
42 views8 pages

Ship Framing Systems Explained

The document discusses different ship hull framing systems including longitudinal framing, transverse framing, and combination framing. In longitudinal framing, strength members run fore and aft while in transverse framing they run athwartships. Combination framing uses longitudinal framing in areas like the bottom and decks where it provides advantages, and transverse framing in the sides.

Uploaded by

pramod.b
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
42 views8 pages

Ship Framing Systems Explained

The document discusses different ship hull framing systems including longitudinal framing, transverse framing, and combination framing. In longitudinal framing, strength members run fore and aft while in transverse framing they run athwartships. Combination framing uses longitudinal framing in areas like the bottom and decks where it provides advantages, and transverse framing in the sides.

Uploaded by

pramod.b
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Framing Applied Research International

General arrangement of the frames


The framing system of a hull assembly may be best classified
by the way the plate panels supported by frame work are
arranged. Thus, if the plate panels formed by intersecting
longitudinal and transverse frames are arranged with their
long sides fore and aft, the hull assembly is said to be
longitudinally framed
The plate panels arranged with their short side fore and aft are
predominant in the transverse framing. Consequently, while in
a hull assembly framed on the longitudinal system the fore-
and-aft strength members are spaced closer than the strength
members running athwarships, in a transversely framed hull
assembly the apposite with the case.
Where a longitudinal system is employed the closely spaced
fore-and-aft strength members are regarded as the primary
system, and the relatively widely spaced transverse frames are
th bearers. On the other hand in a hull assembly featuring a
transverse system of framing , the closely spaced transverse
strength members are referred to as the primary system, and
the longitudinal frames are called the bearers.
Dia.

/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/[Link] 1
Framing Applied Research International

Where the frames running in the two directions are spaced


equidistantly i.e. transverse and longitudinal dimensions of
the plate panels are approximately the same, the hull
assembly is said to be framed on the mixed system or the
cellular system.

Transverse framing system


Fig 2 shows half of the midship section of a transversely
framed ship. This framing system consists of many small,
closely spaced transverse stiffeners and few larger, widely
spaced longitudinal stiffeners. The transverse stiffeners are
arranged so as to form structural rings that are closely spaced
through out the length of he ship. Tracing the ring around the
girth of the ship, we see that it consists of a deck beam under
each deck, side frames supporting the side shell plating and a
deep floor plate supporting both the bottom plating and tank
top (or inner bottom) plating. At each “corner” of the ring,
brackets connect the members beam knees at the deck beam
to the side frame connection, and margin brackets (also called
hold frame brackets) connecting side frames to the floors.
These frame rings with their brackets provide transverse
strength to the structure, helping to maintain the cross-
sectional shape of the hull but they do not contribute anything
to the ships longitudinal strength.

/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/[Link] 2
Framing Applied Research International

Dia.

Longitudinal strength in a transversely framed ship is


provided by the shell plating and inner bottom plating, by the
deck plating outboard of hatch and machinery casing
openings and by a number of large, widely spaced longitudinal
members, longitudinal deck girders support the deck beams.
Deck girders adjacent to the hatches are called hatch side
girders. In addition to providing longitudinal strength, deck
girders reduce the span (length between supports) of deck
beams so that the beams will not have to be very deep.
The longitudinals in the double bottom are the centre girder or
center vertical keel, and the side girders, located so as to be
directly beneath the deck girders to provide a rigid foundation
for pillars as necessary to support the deck girders. Additional
deck girders and side girders in double bottom provided in
ships with a large beam.

/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/[Link] 3
Framing Applied Research International

Longitudinal framing system


Dia.

The longitudinal framing system consists of many closely


spaced longitudinals supporting the plating directly and being
supported in urn by a few large, widely spaced longitudinals. A
typical tanker midship section is shown above to illustrate the
longitudinal framing system because it is in tankers that this
system in its purest form is most commonly employed. The
tanker shown has no double bottom and no intermediate
decks, and it is fitted with two longitudinal bulkhead, one is
shown in the figure. Longitudinal stiffeners spaced about 600-
900mm give direct support to the plating of the deck, sides,
bottom and bulkheads. They also contribute to the
longitudinal strength of the ship making the longitudinal

/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/[Link] 4
Framing Applied Research International

framing system more structurally efficient than the transverse


system.
The bottom longitudinal on centerline, or center girder, is
extra large and heavy, principally to carry the loads imposed
by keel blocks during dry docking very deep, heavy transverse
structures called transverse webs or web frames are
constructed at intervals of about 3 to 5 meters to provide
transverse strength and to support the longitudinals. These
heavy transverse web consist of deck, side and bottom
transverses plus a vertical web on each longitudinal bulkhead.
The side transverse and vertical web on the bulkhead are
usually tied together with one to three horizontal struts or
cross ties.

Comparison of two system


1. Although the transversely framed ships were structurally
sound and satisfactory in service, the fact that most of
their stiffeners contributed nothing to the ships
resistance to longitudinal bending meant that the
framing system was not optimal from the stand point of
structural efficiency, that is, of achieving the required
strength which most of the plate stiffeners are disposed
in the fore and aft direction, has superior structural
efficiency. In the early 1900’s the advantages of
longitudinal framing were clearly demonstrated, so it
became increasingly common, especially in oil tankers
and bulk carriers. It was not often employed in dry cargo

/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/[Link] 5
Framing Applied Research International

ships because the deep web frames or transverses,


which were spaced every 12-15 feat in the holds,
projected into the cargo space and interfered with the
efficient stowage of packaged cargo.
2. The principal advantage of the longitudinal framing
system is that the many longitudinal stiffeners serve
dual purposes they support the shell plating against
local loading caused by water pressure and cargo loads
(just as transverse pressure and cargo loads (just as
transverse frames in the transverse system do) and at
the same time they contribute to the ships resistance to
longitudinal bending (which transverse frames do not).
Therefore a longitudinal strength to a transversely
framed ships of equal size of equal size and structural
weight.
3. An additional advantage of stiffening the plating
longitudinally in the deck and bottom plating is that
longitudinally stiffened plating is more resistant to
buckling between longitudinals when the deck or bottom
is subjected to compressive stresses as it bends in a
seaway than it would be stiffened transversely.
4. A final advantage is the weight savings which arises out
of the fact that longitudinal stiffeners supporting side
shell and bulkhead plating are subjected to variable
pressures from the sea or liquid cargo. The hydrostatic
pressure on each successive longitudinal and its
associated plating increases with its depth below the
waterline or below the surface of the liquid in the tank.
/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/[Link] 6
Framing Applied Research International

Each longitudinal can be sized to withstand the


maximum pressure associated with its depth in the ship,
thus achieving an efficient use of the structural material.
This “graduated size” configuration cannot be done
effectively with transverse frames, which as a result or
overly heavy at their upper ends.
5. The drawback with a longitudinally framed ship is
difficulty which arises in the structural arrangements
near the ends of the ship. The spacing of the
longitudinals around the girth of the ship can be
maintained constant so long as the girth does not
change. As the hull narrows toward bow and stern,
however, the girth necessarily reduces and the
longitudinals become closer together. Difficulties in
construction arise when they converge so closely that
some longitudinals have to be eliminated. For this
reason, transverse framing is usually resorted to at the
bow and stern of longitudinally framed ships.

Combination framing system


1. Tankers and dry bulk carriers are framed longitudinally,
while most other ships employ a combination framing
system that exploits the best features of both traditional
systems.
2. As shown in figure, longitudinal framing is used in
bottom and decks, where the advantages of extra
longitudinal strength and resistance to compressive

/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/[Link] 7
Framing Applied Research International

plate buckling are most needed and transverse framing


is used in the sides, precluding the need for deep webs
that might inhibit efficient cargo stowage.
3. The transverse framing members shown in figure are the
deep, widely spaced transverses that support the
longitudinals in the decks and bottoms.
4. More closely spaced, smaller transverse side frames (not
shown) support the side shell plating between the deep
transverses.
5. Combination systems are employed in many types of
shops, including general dry cargo ships, container ships
and Ro/Ro ships, for example.
Dia.

/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/[Link] 8

Common questions

Powered by AI

The longitudinal framing system's ability to resist longitudinal bending is advantageous because it increases structural efficiency by utilizing stiffeners that contribute to the ship's overall strength, supporting the shell plating against both local loading and longitudinal stress . In contrast, the transverse framing system, although providing effective transverse strength, does not strengthen the ship against longitudinal forces, thus making it less efficient structurally for applications subjected to significant longitudinal stress . This efficiency makes the longitudinal system highly beneficial, particularly in tankers and bulk carriers where longitudinal strength is critical .

The framing system influences ship performance by determining structural integrity and cargo space utilization. Longitudinal framing enhances structural integrity by contributing to longitudinal strength and supporting compressive stress resistance, thus providing stronger construction for heavy-duty vessels like tankers . Meanwhile, transverse framing ensures transverse structural integrity by maintaining the cross-sectional hull shape, crucial for stability . In terms of cargo space, longitudinally framed ships maximize structural material efficiency but may experience cargo stowage issues at the bow and stern where transverse framing is preferred . Combining both systems allows for optimizing structural strengths without compromising cargo space, especially where deep webs are avoided in transverse sides .

The longitudinal framing system is structurally more efficient than the transverse system because it provides longitudinal strength and resistance to buckling, serving dual purposes of supporting shell plating against local loading and contributing to the ship's resistance to longitudinal bending, which transverse frames do not . Additionally, the longitudinal system allows for weight savings as longitudinal stiffeners can be sized according to the hydrostatic pressure relative to their depth, which is not feasible with transverse frames . Conversely, transverse framing does not contribute to longitudinal strength but consists of closely spaced transverse stiffeners that form structural rings, providing transverse strength to maintain cross-sectional hull shape . As a result, longitudinal systems are often employed in tankers and bulk carriers, while a combination of the two systems is used in ships like general dry cargo ships to exploit the best features of each .

The combination framing system exploits the longitudinal system's advantages of increased strength and resistance to buckling in the decks and bottom, while utilizing transverse systems in the sides to prevent deep webs that complicate efficient cargo stowage . By applying longitudinal framing where resistance to compressive plate buckling is vital (in bottom and decks), and transverse framing in the sides, the system maintains structural efficiency without interfering with cargo space layout, enhancing usability for diverse needs in ships like general dry cargo and container ships .

In a longitudinal framing system, transverse webs or frames are critical as they supply the transverse strength necessary to the otherwise fore-and-aft oriented strength members. These deep, heavy structures, installed at intervals, provide support to closely spaced longitudinals, ensuring the hull's transverse stability. They serve as structural reinforcements without interfering with the ship's primary longitudinal load paths, thus harmonizing the balance between longitudinal and transverse forces within the structure .

Longitudinal framing systems present challenges at the bow and stern due to the reduction in hull girth, causing longitudinals to converge closely until some have to be eliminated, resulting in construction difficulties . Consequently, transverse framing is usually resorted to at these ends of the ship because it circumvents issues related to the narrowing girth by providing structural integrity without the need to maintain constant spacing of longitudinals .

Longitudinal framing is advantageous in resisting compressive stresses as the longitudinal stiffeners enhance the ship's ability to handle compression within the deck and bottom plating as it bends, thus preventing buckling. This provides superior support when the ship navigates through rough seas . In contrast, transverse systems, while effective in maintaining hull shape, do not contribute to resisting longitudinal compressive forces as effectively due to their perpendicular orientation to the direction of such stresses, making them less efficient for maintaining surface stability under comparable conditions .

In a mixed or cellular framing system, the spacing of transverse and longitudinal frames is roughly equidistant, whereas in a purely longitudinal system, fore-and-aft strength members are closely spaced while transverse are widely spaced, and the reverse occurs in a purely transverse system . The mixed system can provide a balanced approach, potentially offering benefits of structural integrity and versatility not found in the uniform directionality of purely longitudinal or transverse systems .

Longitudinal framing systems positively impact weight distribution and structural material efficiency by allowing each longitudinal stiffener and its associated plating to be sized to withstand maximum pressure based on its depth below the waterline or tank surface, leading to a more efficient use of materials . This graduated sizing approach reduces unnecessary material use compared to the heavier, uniformly sized transverse frames, enhancing overall weight efficiency and maximizing the structural utility of materials .

A shipbuilder might opt for a combination framing system to exploit the specific advantages of both longitudinal and transverse systems. This system provides enhanced longitudinal strength and resistance to compressive stresses where needed, such as in the decks and bottom, while avoiding interference with cargo stowage by employing transverse frames in the sides. It allows for optimal utilization of structural strengths while accommodating diverse cargo and vessel requirements, making it ideal for general dry cargo, container, and Ro/Ro ships .

You might also like