0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

Group Presentation Grading Rubric

This rubric evaluates group oral presentations on a scale of 100 points across four criteria: content and mastery, PowerPoint presentation, oral delivery, and class engagement. For each criterion, performance is rated on a scale from unsatisfactory to exemplary based on elements such as understanding of the topic, research effort, accuracy, organization, visual design, communication skills, preparation, interaction with the class, and incorporation of examples.

Uploaded by

Teodoro Jervoso
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

Group Presentation Grading Rubric

This rubric evaluates group oral presentations on a scale of 100 points across four criteria: content and mastery, PowerPoint presentation, oral delivery, and class engagement. For each criterion, performance is rated on a scale from unsatisfactory to exemplary based on elements such as understanding of the topic, research effort, accuracy, organization, visual design, communication skills, preparation, interaction with the class, and incorporation of examples.

Uploaded by

Teodoro Jervoso
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

GE116 GENDER AND SOCIETY

Group Oral Presentation Performance Rubric

GROUP NUMBER OF PRESENTERS & TOPIC: ________________________________ SECTION: ________ PRESENTATION DATE: ________

Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total

1-5 points 6-15- points 15-25 points 26-30 points /30

The presentation content shows a Presentation content shows a general Presentation content shows an Presentation content shows a
lack of understanding of the topic. understanding of the topic. There is adequate understanding of the thorough understanding of the topic.
There is inadequate evidence of limited evidence of research in topic. Some research effort is The substantive research effort is
additional research. Content is locating relevant information and evident in locating relevant evident in locating relevant
confusing and/or contains frequent facts and/or supporting statements information and facts. The content information and facts. Content is
Content and inaccuracies. Required elements are made. Content contains inaccuracies, is mostly accurate and reasonably accurate and sequenced in a clear,
Mastery missing and/or randomly organized. inconsistencies, misinterpretations, organized. May contain some logical way. The presenters were
The presenters are not able to answer and/or unclear. The presenters gave inconsistencies in content or some able to answer all of the questions
any of the questions posed to them. vague/ambiguous answers to the connections made may not be pose satisfactorily.
questions. supported. The presenters were
able to answer some of the
questions.
1-5 points 6-10 points 11- 13 points 14-15 points /15
Slides generally lack visual appeal Slides generally include a mix of white Slides are effectively designed with Slides are visually well-designed, and
and, are text-heavy with little or no space, visuals, and/or text but not visual appeal including white space, aesthetically pleasing with
visuals, /or exhibit an overuse of color consistently and/or some overuse or visuals, and minimal text for the appropriate use of white space,
or animations. Media, (e.g., images), inappropriate use of color or most part. Color and animations are visuals, and minimal text, on each
if used, are rarely cited on each slide. animations. Theme (e.g., template) is used appropriately. Theme (e.g., slide. Color and animations are used
No theme is evident and the not consistently evident throughout template) is evident in the judiciously. Theme (e.g., template) is
PowerPoint presentation appears disjointed the presentation, and/or some errors presentation, for the most part, to evident throughout to produce a
Presentation rather than unified and/or frequent (grammar, punctuation, produce a cohesive presentation highly cohesive presentation.
errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or minor errors (grammar, Basically, free from errors (grammar,
spelling, formatting, etc.) on the formatting, etc.) on the slides. punctuation, spelling, formatting, punctuation, spelling, formatting,
slides The slides are not legible to The slides are not legible, especially etc.) on the slides. The slides are etc.) on the slides. The slides are
everyone. for the people at the back. majorly legible to everyone. very clear to everyone, and is eligible
form any point of view.
1-5 points 6-15 points 15-25 points 26-30 points /30
Ineffective in delivering the oral Somewhat effective in delivering the Effective in delivering the oral Highly effective in delivering a well-
presentation demonstrating below oral presentation demonstrating presentation demonstrating good polished oral presentation within the
average/poor communication skills. average communication skills. Slightly communication skills and generally time limit for the group to present.
Substantially over/under the time over/under the time limit. Some close to the time limit for the group All group members presented
Oral Delivery limit to present and/or not all members presented more than to present. All group members equally. Preparation was strongly
members presented. Lack of others. More preparation was presented and preparation was evident.
preparation was evident. Lots of dead needed. The momentum was not evident for the most part.
air are present throughout the consistent, some parts were filled
presentation. with dead air.
1-10 points 11-14 points 15-19 points 20-25 points /25
No-to-little interaction in the class Class interaction is sometimes Class interaction and participation Class interaction and
during the presentation. All the observed. Some of the reporters did are observed most of the time. Most participation are highly observed. All
reporters did not establish a student- not establish student-to-student of the reporters established of the reporters established student-
Class to-student interaction in the delivery interaction in the delivery of the student-to-student interaction in to-student interaction in the
Engagement of the report. No examples and report. Provided examples and the discussion. Provided relevant discussion. Provided relevant and
activities are integrated to encourage integrated activities, however, was examples, integrated activities that contextualized examples, and
the participation of the class. not able to connect to the topic. are easy to connect to the topic, and integrated activities that increased
helped the class in understanding the motivation of the class to
the topic. participate. Learning is evident in
class.

TOTAL /100

Comments:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

GRADED BY:

________________________________________

Group Number of Raters & Topic

You might also like