0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

Retail Method Inventory Analysis

Uploaded by

ncq6dmzmp4
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

Retail Method Inventory Analysis

Uploaded by

ncq6dmzmp4
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RETAIL METHOD

↳ ret mark
up
Cancellation

C
Cost Ratio (Conservatie)
Cost Retail
600000 =
%
6

7) Beg . Inu .
850, 000 1, 200 000
,

9, 14, 700 Ratio (Are Cost)


600
purchases 200 000 000 Cost

,000
, .
% o
,
= 6
Freightin 200, 000
--

Purchase returns (300, 000) (500 000)


,
Net Sales :

Purchase (150 , 000 Sales : 9, 500 000


Allowances >
-
,

Purchase Discounts (400, 000) - Sales returns . (1 ,


000
,
000]

Departamental transfer debit 300, 000 Employee discount :


or
500, 000

TGAS 2 Cost 000 Normal Shoplifting losses :

- Goooo
,

Net markups Normal Shrinkage


:
00 o
on

TGAS 2 Retail (Conservative) ooo


Net Markdown

TGAS & Retail (Ave


. Cost)
Ending
15, 000 , 000
Ending 2 Cost Inv. & Retail X ratio
=
Inr
. . cost

Net sales 0
000 000)
, , (conservative) =
5, 000
,
000 x 60 %

End Inv
. & retail 3, 000, 000 000 000

=
.

Ending Inr . Of Cost =

Ending In . & Retail X cost Vatio

CAre cost) =
5, 000
, 000
,
x 64 %

-200
000
,

2
)
.
cost Retail
Beg. Inventory 560, 000 Cost Ratio (Conservative)
100
1, 000 000
:

1000 %o
6
,
=

oooo
Net Purchases 6, 200 000
,

TGAS & Cost

51000300-20s e (AreCost)
450000
Net Mark Up , 000
400 -> cost Ratio
=

,
- - -

62"
TGAS & Cost 7, 600, 000
=

(conservative)
50K
Net Mark down
000) E
200 ,
30k
120K Ending Inr
. 2 Cost =
Ending Inv. .
& Retail X cost ratio

THAS & Cost 7 ,


400 , 000 (conservative ( =
2
,
000, 000 x 40 %
lAVe
.
Cost] =
1 200 , 000
,

socio
Net Sales Ending
Ending & Retail
e
Inr
. 2 Cost =
Inv. . X cost ratio

Ending In
. & Retail CAve. Cost ) = 2, 000
, 000 x 62 %
=
I 240 , 000
,

(savee e

-42Ma To en
4 2M
Not Purchases
.

Mark Up

Mark down
Net

!. 65
Beg In .
5 850M = &M
In End 3

(
.
.

6 HM
.

Net purchases 800k


=
65 %
Markup
O Net
Net Markdown -oood Im .
End =
1
,
950 , 000
GAS (RET ).
= &M
5 , 850 , 000 costs = 15 % LessInvEnd (PET)
Net sales

O (ASE cost
5, 850
,
000

InEndecost accor
Cost Retail
3
.

BayInventory roloroe.
2 000 000 Cost Ratsu
2
850 000
, ,
= , , =
%
65
8
(FIFO) 9
Net 000 000 000 000
purchages , , / ,

CD NANPEGM
LNMD = (500K)-

Ending In Retail Ratio


Inventory of
Net Mark up Lost of
Ending Cost
1 , 500, 000 =
x
- -

TGAS & Retail %


=
11 ,
500 000
,
3, ,
500
,000 x 45

(conservative) = 2 , 275 000


,

Net Mark down 2500 000) ,

-
TGAS & Retail 1 , 006 000
,

(Are 20st)

soooo
e
Net sales

Ending Inv. 2 Retail

4) Cost Retail 4 ,
200 000
,

Beg
. Inventory
1 450, 000
,
2, 000
,
000

> -600k
- (NPDRetail + NMU-N

&
Net purchases 4 200 000 4 , 400 , 000
, ,
-
000
TGAS of Cost
200
5 850 , 000 ,
Work back
,

ow
look
Gooooe
Net Mark UP

Net purces es
Net Mark down

TGAS & Retail

urovoroe
D
1000
E880
Net Sales - -
65 % -Cost Ratie
=

. &
End Im Retail

Ending Inventory & Cost =


1 , 950 , 000

1 , 950, 000 = 65 %
Ending Inventory & Ret . =

=
3 , 000 , 006

LESSTGAs &Ret =
( 9 , 000 , 000)
Net Sales =
6 000 000
, ,

COGS =
TGAS -

Inv .
End
=
5 , 850 , 060

00
450
,

You might also like