0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views5 pages

Cash Flow Matrix Setup Guide

The document describes a request for help setting up a model to forecast accounts receivable balances over time based on payment proportions. The model would take as input the payment proportions for different months after a sale (e.g. 10% paid in month of sale, 40% in month 1 after, etc.). It would then calculate the monthly cash flows and resulting receivable balances based on the input credit sales amounts and payment proportions. The requester provides the framework they have set up and is looking for the formulas to calculate the monthly cash flows within that framework based on the input payment proportions.

Uploaded by

michael odiembo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views5 pages

Cash Flow Matrix Setup Guide

The document describes a request for help setting up a model to forecast accounts receivable balances over time based on payment proportions. The model would take as input the payment proportions for different months after a sale (e.g. 10% paid in month of sale, 40% in month 1 after, etc.). It would then calculate the monthly cash flows and resulting receivable balances based on the input credit sales amounts and payment proportions. The requester provides the framework they have set up and is looking for the formulas to calculate the monthly cash flows within that framework based on the input payment proportions.

Uploaded by

michael odiembo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RefDate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

### 100% 10% 40% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%

n: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year: 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999
Month: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

n Year Month Amount


1 1999 Jan - - - - - - - - - - -
2 1999 Feb - - - - - - - - - - -
3 1999 Mar - - - - - - - - - - -
4 1999 Apr 2,000 - - - - 200 800 400 300 200 100
5 1999 May 3,000 - - - - - 300 1,200 600 450 300
6 1999 Jun 4,000 - - - - - - 400 1,600 800 600
7 1999 Jul 5,000 - - - - - - - 500 2,000 1,000
8 1999 Aug 6,000 - - - - - - - - 600 2,400
9 1999 Sep 7,000 - - - - - - - - - 700
10 1999 Oct 8,000 - - - - - - - - - -
11 1999 Nov 7,000 - - - - - - - - - -
12 1999 Dec 6,000 - - - - - - - - - -
13 2000 Jan 5,000 - - - - - - - - - -
14 2000 Feb 4,000 - - - - - - - - - -
15 2000 Mar 3,000 - - - - - - - - - -
16 2000 Apr 2,000 - - - - - - - - - -
17 2000 May - - - - - - - - - - -
18 2000 Jun - - - - - - - - - - -
19 2000 Jul - - - - - - - - - - -
20 2000 Aug - - - - - - - - - - -
21 2000 Sep - - - - - - - - - - -
22 2000 Oct - - - - - - - - - - -
23 2000 Nov - - - - - - - - - - -
24 2000 Dec - - - - - - - - - - -
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
1999 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
150 - - - - - - - - - - -
400 200 - - - - - - - - - -
750 500 250 - - - - - - - - -
1,200 900 600 300 - - - - - - - -
2,800 1,400 1,050 700 350 - - - - - - -
800 3,200 1,600 1,200 800 400 - - - - - -
- 700 2,800 1,400 1,050 700 350 - - - - -
- - 600 2,400 1,200 900 600 300 - - - -
- - - 500 2,000 1,000 750 500 250 - - -
- - - - 400 1,600 800 600 400 200 - -
- - - - - 300 1,200 600 450 300 150 -
- - - - - - 200 800 400 300 200 100
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
23 24
2000 2000
Nov Dec

- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
Hello
Will someone give me some help in setting up a model to forecast accounts
receivables. I should be something like this:
I regret the rather long-winded question but ....

Input:
B1 C1 D1
F1 G1 H1
Payment proportions 0.10 0.40 0.30 0.10 0.00
0.00

meaning that 10% of cash flows are received in the month of sale, 40% in the
first month after sale, 30% in the second month and 10% in the third month. The
model should allow to work with payment proportions extending over up to month
five after sales.

I have Start month as input in cell B2 (dd-mm-yyyy). I have entered here:


01-01-1999

Row Credit C10 D10 E10


Mth. sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May ....... Dec
15 Oct
16 Nov
17 Dec
18 Jan 2000 200 800 600 400
19 Feb 3000 300 1200 900 600
20 Mar 4000 400 1600 1200 800
21 Apr 5000 etc.
22 May 6000
23 Jun 7000
24 Jul 8000
25 Aug 7000
26 Sep 6000
27 Oct 5000
28 Nov 4000
29 Dec 3000

In C10 I have the formula: =B2


In D10 I have the formula: =EDATE($B$2, COLUMNS($A$1:A1) which I drag to M10.
In A15 I have the formula: =EDATE($B$2, -(COUNTA($B$1:$H$1)-1)).
In A16 I have the formula: =EDATE($A$15, Rows($A$1:A1) which I drag to
A29.

What I am after is some help with the formulas to calculate the monthly cash
flows (as indicated in rows 18-20).

If I enter for example 0.10; 0.40; 0.20; 015; 0.10; 0.05 in cells B1:H1
then I should have 200; 800; 400; 300; 200; 100 in cells C18: H18 etc.

Somewhere I feel it should be rather elementary, but nevertheless I can't figure


out the right formulas.

Hans Knudsen
[Link]@[Link]
Somewhere I feel it should be rather elementary, but nevertheless I can't figure
out the right formulas.

Hans Knudsen
[Link]@[Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

The sales proportion model implies that significant cash inflow lags behind sales, with most cash realized up to three months post-sale. This lag can impact financial planning, as reliance on timely cash conversion is necessary. Businesses must thus maintain liquidity buffers or short-term financing arrangements to manage operating expenses in periods with high sales but delayed cash inflow .

The payment proportions specified (10% in the month of sale, 40% in the first month after sale, 30% in the second month, and 10% in the third month) significantly dictate the cash flow pattern. For instance, a sale in January would see only 10% of its value turned into cash that same month, affecting immediate liquidity. Over 60% of the cash inflow would occur within two months after the sale, highlighting the need for efficient management to match cash inflows with outstanding payables or investments .

Utilizing historical sales data is effective for identifying patterns and seasonality, forming the basis of reliable forecasts. However, the accuracy depends on the consistency of market conditions and economic factors. If these change significantly, historical data may provide misleading forecasts, stressing the need for adaptable models and frequent updates to parameters based on current and projected economic trends .

Creating a forecasting model involves configuring complex formulas that account for time-based cash flow proportions and sales variability. Specifically, determining precise payment proportions like 0.10; 0.40; 0.30; and ensuring these proportions map accurately to the correct months require advanced spreadsheet formulas. The challenge is ensuring accuracy in projecting cash flow and adjusting the model to reflect variable sales volume and timing .

In 1999, the monthly sales figures showed a gradual increase from April to October, suggesting a progressive economic activity within the year. Starting from April with 2,000 units, there was a steady climb in sales, peaking at 8,000 units in October. This trend could indicate a recovery or boom in economic activity, possibly due to seasonal factors or improved economic conditions during these months .

Changing payment terms directly affects the receivables collection period; for instance, shortening terms leads to quicker cash inflows and improved liquidity, whereas longer terms delay cash collection. This adjustment impacts how businesses manage their working capital and plan for near-term financial obligations, requiring balanced term arrangements sensitive to both customer relationships and operational liquidity needs .

The seasonality effect is evident with rising sales figures from April to October 1999, indicative of a seasonal peak, potentially due to consumer patterns or market demand cycles. Conversely, the decline from November 1999 into 2000 suggests a downturn likely due to seasonal factors like end-of-year slowdowns. Recognizing this pattern is crucial for adjusting sales strategies and inventory management .

The data shows an increase in sales from April to October 1999, peaking at 8,000 units, followed by a decline from November 1999 through 2000, ending at 3,000 in March 2000. This fluctuation indicates potential seasonal influences on sales, but the subsequent decline could signal weakening demand or operational challenges. Entities relying on such sales might experience financial strain unless they prepare for off-peak periods or adjust operational capacity in advance .

Altering the start month directly shifts the temporal alignment of cash inflows with sales, impacting cash flow predictions. For example, if the starting point shifts to a month of historically low sales, the model might indicate liquidity shortages earlier than anticipated, necessitating adjustments in operational plans or financing arrangements .

Payment proportions play a crucial role in modeling receivables by specifying when sales revenue is realized in cash, thus affecting the timing of the collection. For example, with 10% collected in the month of sale and the remaining over the three following months, the model can project how much of the sales become cash each period, assisting in cash flow planning and identifying potential shortfalls .

You might also like