0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views13 pages

Types of Sampling Methods Explained

This document discusses different sampling methods used in research. There are two primary types of sampling methods: probability sampling, which uses random selection to make strong statistical inferences about a whole group, and non-probability sampling, which uses non-random selection based on convenience and allows easy data collection but weaker conclusions. Some examples of probability sampling methods include simple random sampling, systematic sampling, stratified sampling, and cluster sampling. Non-probability sampling methods discussed include convenience sampling and voluntary response sampling. The key is to select a sampling method that provides a representative sample to minimize bias and allow valid conclusions.

Uploaded by

rj.edge
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views13 pages

Types of Sampling Methods Explained

This document discusses different sampling methods used in research. There are two primary types of sampling methods: probability sampling, which uses random selection to make strong statistical inferences about a whole group, and non-probability sampling, which uses non-random selection based on convenience and allows easy data collection but weaker conclusions. Some examples of probability sampling methods include simple random sampling, systematic sampling, stratified sampling, and cluster sampling. Non-probability sampling methods discussed include convenience sampling and voluntary response sampling. The key is to select a sampling method that provides a representative sample to minimize bias and allow valid conclusions.

Uploaded by

rj.edge
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Sampling Methods | Types,

Techniques & Examples


Published on September 19, 2019 by Shona McCombes. Revised on June 22,
2023.

When you conduct research about a group of people, it’s rarely


possible to collect data from every person in that group. Instead,
you select a sample. The sample is the group of individuals who
will actually participate in the research.

To draw valid conclusions from your results, you have to carefully


decide how you will select a sample that is representative of the
group as a whole. This is called a sampling method. There are two
primary types of sampling methods that you can use in your
research:

Probability sampling involves random selection, allowing you


to make strong statistical inferences about the whole group.
Non-probability sampling involves non-random selection
based on convenience or other criteria, allowing you to easily
collect data.

You should clearly explain how you selected your sample in the
methodology section of your paper or thesis, as well as how you
approached minimizing research bias in your work.

 Table of contents

1. Population vs. sample


2. Probability sampling methods
3. Non-probability sampling methods
4. Other interesting articles
5. Frequently asked questions about
sampling
Population vs. sample
First, you need to understand the difference between a population
and a sample, and identify the target population of your research.

The population is the entire group that you want to draw


conclusions about.
The sample is the specific group of individuals that you will
collect data from.

The population can be defined in terms of geographical location,


age, income, or many other characteristics.

It can be very broad or


quite narrow: maybe you
want to make inferences
about the whole adult
population of your
country; maybe your
research focuses on
customers of a certain
company, patients with a
specific health condition,
or students in a single school.

It is important to carefully define your target population according


to the purpose and practicalities of your project.

If the population is very large, demographically mixed, and


geographically dispersed, it might be difficult to gain access to a
representative sample. A lack of a representative sample affects
the validity of your results, and can lead to several research biases,
particularly sampling bias.
Sampling frame
The sampling frame is the actual list of individuals that the sample
will be drawn from. Ideally, it should include the entire target
population (and nobody who is not part of that population).

Example: Sampling frame

You are doing research on working conditions at a social


media marketing company. Your population is all 1000
employees of the company. Your sampling frame is the
company’s HR database, which lists the names and contact
details of every employee.

Sample size
The number of individuals you should include in your sample
depends on various factors, including the size and variability of the
population and your research design. There are different sample
size calculators and formulas depending on what you want to
achieve with statistical analysis.

Here's why students love Scribbr's


proofreading services

Excellent
Rated 4.6 / 5 based on 3,474 reviews on

Invited

Jenny, 24 minutes ago

Die Korrektur war sehr akkurat und…

Read more

Invited

Discover proofreading & editing


Probability sampling methods
Probability sampling means that every member of the population
has a chance of being selected. It is mainly used in quantitative
research. If you want to produce results that are representative of
the whole population, probability sampling techniques are the most
valid choice.

There are four main types of probability sample.

1. Simple random sampling


In a simple random sample, every member of the population has an
equal chance of being selected. Your sampling frame should
include the whole population.

To conduct this type of sampling, you can use tools like random
number generators or other techniques that are based entirely on
chance.

Example: Simple random sampling

You want to select a simple random sample of 1000


employees of a social media marketing company. You assign
a number to every employee in the company database from
1 to 1000, and use a random number generator to select 100
numbers.
2. Systematic sampling
Systematic sampling is similar to simple random sampling, but it is
usually slightly easier to conduct. Every member of the population
is listed with a number, but instead of randomly generating
numbers, individuals are chosen at regular intervals.

Example: Systematic sampling

All employees of the company are listed in alphabetical


order. From the first 10 numbers, you randomly select a
starting point: number 6. From number 6 onwards, every
10th person on the list is selected (6, 16, 26, 36, and so on),
and you end up with a sample of 100 people.

If you use this technique, it is important to make sure that there is


no hidden pattern in the list that might skew the sample. For
example, if the HR database groups employees by team, and team
members are listed in order of seniority, there is a risk that your
interval might skip over people in junior roles, resulting in a sample
that is skewed towards senior employees.

3. Stratified sampling
Stratified sampling involves dividing the population into
subpopulations that may differ in important ways. It allows you
draw more precise conclusions by ensuring that every subgroup is
properly represented in the sample.

To use this sampling method, you divide the population into


subgroups (called strata) based on the relevant characteristic (e.g.,
gender identity, age range, income bracket, job role).

Based on the overall proportions of the population, you calculate


how many people should be sampled from each subgroup. Then
you use random or systematic sampling to select a sample from
each subgroup.

Example: Stratified sampling

The company has 800 female employees and 200 male


employees. You want to ensure that the sample reflects the
gender balance of the company, so you sort the population
into two strata based on gender. Then you use random
sampling on each group, selecting 80 women and 20 men,
which gives you a representative sample of 100 people.
4. Cluster sampling
Cluster sampling also involves dividing the population into
subgroups, but each subgroup should have similar characteristics
to the whole sample. Instead of sampling individuals from each
subgroup, you randomly select entire subgroups.

If it is practically possible, you might include every individual from


each sampled cluster. If the clusters themselves are large, you can
also sample individuals from within each cluster using one of the
techniques above. This is called multistage sampling.

This method is good for dealing with large and dispersed


populations, but there is more risk of error in the sample, as there
could be substantial differences between clusters. It’s difficult to
guarantee that the sampled clusters are really representative of the
whole population.

Example: Cluster sampling

The company has offices in 10 cities across the country (all


with roughly the same number of employees in similar roles).
You don’t have the capacity to travel to every office to
collect your data, so you use random sampling to select 3
offices – these are your clusters.

Non-probability sampling methods


In a non-probability sample, individuals are selected based on non-
random criteria, and not every individual has a chance of being
included.

This type of sample is easier and cheaper to access, but it has a


higher risk of sampling bias. That means the inferences you can
make about the population are weaker than with probability
samples, and your conclusions may be more limited. If you use a
non-probability sample, you should still aim to make it as
representative of the population as possible.

Non-probability sampling techniques are often used in exploratory


and qualitative research. In these types of research, the aim is not
to test a hypothesis about a broad population, but to develop an
initial understanding of a small or under-researched population.
1. Convenience sampling
A convenience sample simply includes the individuals who happen
to be most accessible to the researcher.

This is an easy and inexpensive way to gather initial data, but there
is no way to tell if the sample is representative of the population,
so it can’t produce generalizable results. Convenience samples are
at risk for both sampling bias and selection bias.

Example: Convenience sampling

You are researching opinions about student support services


in your university, so after each of your classes, you ask your
fellow students to complete a survey on the topic. This is a
convenient way to gather data, but as you only surveyed
students taking the same classes as you at the same level,
the sample is not representative of all the students at your
university.

2. Voluntary response sampling


Similar to a convenience sample, a voluntary response sample is
mainly based on ease of access. Instead of the researcher
choosing participants and directly contacting them, people
volunteer themselves (e.g. by responding to a public online
survey).
Voluntary response samples are always at least somewhat biased,
as some people will inherently be more likely to volunteer than
others, leading to self-selection bias.

Example: Voluntary response sampling

You send out the survey to all students at your university


and a lot of students decide to complete it. This can
certainly give you some insight into the topic, but the people
who responded are more likely to be those who have strong
opinions about the student support services, so you can’t be
sure that their opinions are representative of all students.

3. Purposive sampling
This type of sampling, also known as judgement sampling, involves
the researcher using their expertise to select a sample that is most
useful to the purposes of the research.

It is often used in qualitative research, where the researcher wants


to gain detailed knowledge about a specific phenomenon rather
than make statistical inferences, or where the population is very
small and specific. An effective purposive sample must have clear
criteria and rationale for inclusion. Always make sure to describe
your inclusion and exclusion criteria and beware of observer bias
affecting your arguments.

Example: Purposive sampling

You want to know more about the opinions and experiences


of disabled students at your university, so you purposefully
select a number of students with different support needs in
order to gather a varied range of data on their experiences
with student services.

4. Snowball sampling
If the population is hard to access, snowball sampling can be used
to recruit participants via other participants. The number of people
you have access to “snowballs” as you get in contact with more
people. The downside here is also representativeness, as you have
no way of knowing how representative your sample is due to the
reliance on participants recruiting others. This can lead to sampling
bias.

Example: Snowball sampling


You are researching experiences of homelessness in your
city. Since there is no list of all homeless people in the city,
probability sampling isn’t possible. You meet one person
who agrees to participate in the research, and she puts you
in contact with other homeless people that she knows in the
area.

5. Quota sampling
Quota sampling relies on the non-random selection of a
predetermined number or proportion of units. This is called a
quota.

You first divide the population into mutually exclusive subgroups


(called strata) and then recruit sample units until you reach your
quota. These units share specific characteristics, determined by
you prior to forming your strata. The aim of quota sampling is to
control what or who makes up your sample.

Example: Quota sampling

You want to gauge consumer interest in a new produce


delivery service in Boston, focused on dietary preferences.
You divide the population into meat eaters, vegetarians, and
vegans, drawing a sample of 1000 people. Since the
company wants to cater to all consumers, you set a quota of
200 people for each dietary group. In this way, all dietary
preferences are equally represented in your research, and
you can easily compare these [Link] continue recruiting
until you reach the quota of 200 participants for each
subgroup.

Other interesting articles


If you want to know more about statistics, methodology, or
research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles
with explanations and examples.

 Statistics

Student’s t-distribution
Normal distribution
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Chi square tests
Confidence interval
Quartiles & Quantiles

 Methodology

Cluster sampling
Stratified sampling
Data cleansing
Reproducibility vs Replicability
Peer review
Prospective cohort study

 Research bias

Implicit bias
Cognitive bias
Placebo effect
Hawthorne effect
Hindsight bias
Affect heuristic
Social desirability bias

The only proofreading tool


specialized in correcting academic
writing - try for free!
The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s
of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it
the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for
students.


Try for free

Frequently asked questions about


sampling

What is sampling? 

Why are samples used in research? 

What is probability sampling? 

What is non-probability sampling? 

What is multistage sampling? 

What is sampling bias? 

Cite this Scribbr article


If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the
citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to
automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, June 22). Sampling Methods |


Types, Techniques & Examples. Scribbr.
Cite this
Retrieved February 12, 2024, from
article
[Link]
methods/

Is this article helpful?

13925 972

Shona McCombes
Shona has a bachelor's and two master's degrees, so she's an
expert at writing a great thesis. She has also worked as an editor
and teacher, working with students at all different levels to improve
their academic writing.

Other students also liked

Population vs. Sample | Definitions, Differences


& Examples
A population is the entire group that you want to draw conclusions about while a

sample is the specific group that you will collect data from.

1009

Simple Random Sampling | Definition, Steps &


Examples
In simple random sampling, researchers collect data from a random subset of a

population to draw conclusions about the whole population.

877

Sampling Bias and How to Avoid It | Types &


Examples
Sampling bias occurs when some members of a population are systematically

more likely to be selected in a sample than others.

313

Scribbr
Our editors
Jobs
Partners
FAQ

Our services
Plagiarism Checker
Proofreading Services
Citation Generator
AI Proofreader
AI Detector
Paraphrasing Tool
Grammar Checker
Free Text Summarizer
Citation Checker
Knowledge Base

Contact
info@[Link]
 +1 (510) 822-8066


 
 

4.6

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Copyright Policy

Happiness guarantee

Common questions

Powered by AI

Sampling bias occurs when certain members of a population are more likely to be included in a sample than others, leading to samples that are not representative of the population . This can skew research outcomes, making them inaccurate or biased, and limits the generalizability of study findings . To reduce sampling bias, researchers can employ probability sampling methods, such as simple random sampling or stratified sampling, which give each member of the population an equal chance of selection . Additionally, ensuring that the sampling frame closely matches the population as a whole, and being vigilant of sources of bias such as convenience or voluntary response can further minimize its impact .

Convenience sampling involves selecting individuals who are most easily accessible to the researcher, making it one of the simplest and least expensive sampling methods. However, the main risk associated with this type of sampling is the potential for sampling bias, as it doesn't guarantee that the sample is representative of the entire population. This can lead to research findings that cannot be generalized to the population as a whole . Furthermore, since the sample subjects are usually not selected through a random process, there is a higher risk of selection bias, which can further skew results . These biases impair the validity of the research findings, as they limit the extent to which the results reflect the actual trends or behaviors of the broader population .

Quota sampling involves non-randomly selecting a predetermined number of participants from specific subgroups (strata) within the population until the quotas are filled . The main considerations include defining clear criteria for the subgroups and ensuring that the quotas reflect the proportions of these groups in the entire population. Unlike stratified sampling, where individuals are randomly selected from each stratum, quota sampling does not use random selection, which can introduce bias and compromise generalizability . The key difference lies in the selection process; quota sampling is guided by practicality and accessibility rather than ensuring random selection to achieve a representative sample .

Cluster sampling differs from stratified sampling in that it involves dividing a population into clusters, where each cluster is a mini-representation of the population, rather than creating strata based on specific characteristics. Unlike stratified sampling, where individuals are sampled from each stratum, cluster sampling involves randomly selecting entire clusters and potentially sampling within them . Cluster sampling is more advantageous in scenarios where the population is large and geographically dispersed, as it reduces the costs and logistical challenges of data collection across a wide area. However, it poses a risk of higher sampling error if clusters are not truly representative of the population .

Simple random sampling is effective for producing generalizable research results because each member of the population has an equal chance of being chosen, which minimizes bias and enhances the representativeness of the sample . This allows researchers to make strong statistical inferences about the population as a whole . The challenges include the need for a comprehensive sampling frame that accurately reflects the entire population, which can be logistically challenging to compile, especially for large populations. Additionally, purely random procedures may result in a sample that unintentionally excludes key subgroup characteristics, thus requiring larger sample sizes to ensure accurate representation .

Snowball sampling is particularly useful for accessing hard-to-reach populations where a complete list or sampling frame is unavailable. It leverages social networks by asking initial participants to refer others to the study, thus 'snowballing' the number of participants . This method is effective in qualitative research to explore under-researched groups without extensive resources or logistical challenges . However, the potential drawbacks include a lack of sample representativeness, as the selection is based on existing relationships and networks, which may skew the sample toward specific subgroups. This reliance on participant networks can introduce sampling bias, limiting the ability to generalize findings to the broader population .

Voluntary response sampling often leads to self-selection bias because participants are inherently more likely to volunteer if they have strong opinions or vested interests in the study topic . This sampling method can be biased if those who respond differ significantly from those who do not, in ways that are relevant to the study's outcome. This bias impacts the reliability of research findings by skewing results towards the views of more vocal or motivated individuals, which may not accurately reflect the population's sentiments as a whole . Consequently, the conclusions drawn may be unreliable and not applicable to the larger population, thus reducing the study's external validity .

Systematic sampling involves listing the population, assigning each a number, and selecting individuals at regular intervals along the list starting from a random point . This method is straightforward and often easier than simple random sampling, yet provides comparable results . However, if the sampling frame has an inherent pattern (e.g., ordering by work seniority), systematic sampling may inadvertently skew the sample, leading to biased outcomes that do not accurately represent the population . Patterns within the list can result in a non-representative sample, highlighting the importance of checking the sampling frame for such patterns before employing this method .

A sampling frame serves as the actual list of individuals from which a research sample is drawn . It is crucial in the research process because it represents the operational definition of the population in the study; therefore, it has a significant bearing on the sample's representativeness. A well-defined sampling frame should ideally encompass the entire target population and exclude any individuals who fall outside of it . If the sampling frame is incomplete or not accurate, it can lead to sampling bias and compromises the validity of research results. Therefore, careful consideration in defining and constructing the sampling frame is essential to ensure unbiased and generalizable study findings .

Stratified sampling enhances the representativeness of a research sample by ensuring that distinct subgroups within a population are proportionally represented. The process involves dividing the population into subgroups or strata based on key characteristics such as age, gender, income, etc., and then randomly sampling from each stratum . This method ensures that the sample accurately reflects the structure of the population, allowing for more precise generalizations and conclusions from the research data. The key steps include identifying relevant strata, determining the proportion of each stratum in the population, and then using random or systematic sampling methods to select a sample from each subgroup .

You might also like