Impact of Smart-Shaming on Students
Uploaded by
Reymond ValeraImpact of Smart-Shaming on Students
Uploaded by
Reymond Valera- Review of Related Literatures
- Smart-shaming
- Academic Performance
- Mental Health
- Shaming
- Synthesis
- References
Common questions
Powered by AIThe prevalence of smart-shaming in the Philippines is significantly influenced by cultural elements such as the concept of 'hiya,' which emphasizes modesty and discourages overt displays of intelligence. Rodriguez (2019) highlights this cultural norm, where expressions like 'mahiya ka naman' deter individuals from showcasing intellectual confidence to avoid being perceived as arrogant . These cultural values create a social environment that fosters conformity over intellectual ambition, supporting a cycle where anti-intellectual sentiments thrive under the guise of humor or humility .
Education plays a pivotal role in countering smart-shaming by promoting an environment that values intellectual diversity and fosters confidence in knowledge sharing. Khan et al. (2021) emphasize the importance of creating educational settings that enhance students' motivation and engagement without fear of ridicule . Educational institutions can contribute by cultivating a culture where intellectual efforts are recognized and rewarded, allowing students to thrive academically. This includes training teachers to identify and address smart-shaming behaviors, integrating activities that encourage collaboration and critical thinking, and building a supportive community that challenges the negative norms associated with smart-shaming .
Smart-shaming emerges in educational settings due to anti-intellectual attitudes that mock intellectual efforts under the guise of humor or sarcasm, as noted by Biana (2019). There is a societal trend, particularly in social media, where intellectualism is belittled with phrases like 'Nosebleed' or 'Dami mong alam!' These expressions are intended to shame individuals showing intellectual prowess, viewing them as elitist or aloof . Additionally, Rodriguez (2019) discusses 'hiya,' a cultural value in the Philippines, which criticizes showing too much confidence, potentially leading to public shaming when one exceeds expectations. This socially entrenched behavior encourages conformity and discourages academic excellence .
Smart-shaming negatively impacts the academic performance of students by creating an environment where intellectual efforts are mocked, leading to reduced participation and reluctance to express knowledge. Solon (2023) points out that students become hesitant to engage in class discussions and group activities, which are crucial for a robust learning experience. Such an atmosphere discourages open intellectual discourse and can demoralize students, ultimately hindering their academic performance . Furthermore, Bonita et al. (2019) highlighted that smart-shaming induces insecurities and self-doubt, further deteriorating academic engagement and outcomes .
Sarcastic expressions in smart-shaming hinder intellectual development by demoralizing students and stifling their willingness to engage in meaningful discourse. These expressions, often disguised as humor, create an environment where students feel ashamed to show their intellectual capabilities, leading to a reduced exchange of ideas. According to Cantojos (2019), even when sarcasm is intended for humor, it impedes the flow of intellectual arguments and critical thought, adversely affecting students' growth . Ultimately, this sarcasm discourages students from participating in academic dialogues, thereby limiting their learning experiences and intellectual progression .
Educational institutions could mitigate smart-shaming by fostering an inclusive environment that celebrates intellectual achievement and encourages diverse opinions. Schools should implement policies that explicitly address smart-shaming as a form of bullying. Offering workshops on empathy, inclusivity, and the value of intellectual contributions could help reshape attitudes. Institutions might also integrate activities that emphasize collaborative learning, making varied intellectual input an asset rather than a target for ridicule. Encouraging open discussions about the impacts of smart-shaming and fostering a supportive learning community can further decrease its occurrence .
Smart-shaming can significantly harm the mental health of students by fostering insecurities and leading to a decline in self-worth. According to Bonita et al. (2019), victims view smart-shaming as a form of bullying that diminishes their confidence, making them question their intelligence and abilities . Solon (2023) emphasized that persistent exposure to such negative behavior leads to anxiety and depression as students become convinced that their contributions are undervalued or irrelevant. This psychological distress limits their academic performance and can have far-reaching mental health repercussions .
Long-term effects on students frequently experiencing smart-shaming include sustained low self-esteem, chronic anxiety, and potential depression due to the constant invalidation of their intellectual efforts. Bonita et al. (2019) mention that smart-shaming leads to insecurities, creating lasting doubts about their capabilities and worth, often hindering academic and personal development . Such experiences can diminish a student's future academic engagement and motivation, potentially affecting career aspirations and lifelong learning attitudes. They may also develop a resistance to intellectual pursuits out of fear of continuous derogation .
Anti-intellectualism manifests in Philippine social media through expressions that belittle intellectual efforts and enforce conformity. Biana (2019) describes how phrases like 'Nosebleed' or 'Dami mong alam!' are used to deride individuals engaging in intellectual discourse or expressing well-reasoned opinions . These phrases reflect a cultural tendency to ridicule perceived intellectual superiority and discourage academic discussion. They are prevalent in online interactions, where users often disguise humiliation as humor, contributing to a hostile environment against intellectualism .
The concept of 'hiya' significantly impacts intellectual discourse in the Philippines by promoting modesty and discouraging open intellectual expression. It operates as a social constraint, prompting individuals to suppress displays of intelligence that might be perceived as arrogant or boastful. Rodriguez (2019) explains that public shaming is often used to moderate behavior, leading individuals to refrain from participating in intellectual discussion to avoid social alienation or criticism. This cultural value thus perpetuates a social environment where intelligence is downplayed, impeding the free flow of ideas and open discourse .
