0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views4 pages

Language Teaching Materials Development

This document outlines the schedule and requirements for an 11-session course on materials development for language teaching. [The schedule includes sessions on] course orientation, principles of materials development, approaches to materials evaluation, adapting materials for grammar, vocabulary, reading, writing, listening and speaking skills. [Students will] complete group presentations, individual assignments, a reflection paper, and a group project analyzing and adapting a coursebook. Groups will present their analysis and lesson plans, and submit a written report on their project.

Uploaded by

Khoa Lý Minh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views4 pages

Language Teaching Materials Development

This document outlines the schedule and requirements for an 11-session course on materials development for language teaching. [The schedule includes sessions on] course orientation, principles of materials development, approaches to materials evaluation, adapting materials for grammar, vocabulary, reading, writing, listening and speaking skills. [Students will] complete group presentations, individual assignments, a reflection paper, and a group project analyzing and adapting a coursebook. Groups will present their analysis and lesson plans, and submit a written report on their project.

Uploaded by

Khoa Lý Minh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT FOR LANGUAGE TEACHING

GUIDELINES
Instructor’s email address: bmbao@[Link]

1. TENTATIVE SCHEDULE (11-SESSION CLASSES)

Session Planned learning activities and


Course contents Required readings
s teaching methods
Course orientation + Project Tomlinson, B. (2014) Lecture + Discussion
launching Introduction, pp. 1 - 17 Assignment of group work
1
Introduction to materials
development
Cunningsworth, A. Lecture + Discussion + Group
The coursebook package (1995) presentation – Group 1 (A1)
Chapter 3, p. 25 – 29
2
Principles of materials
development Tomlinson, B. (2014)
Chapter 4, pp. 95 – 118
Tomlinson, B. (2014) Lecture + Discussion + Group
Chapter 1, pp. 21 – 48 presentation – Group 2 (A1)

Approaches to & principles Cunningsworth, A.


3
of materials evaluation (1995)
Chapter 1, p. 1 – 7

Tomlinson, B. (1996)
Group presentation of materials selection &
4 Submission of Assignment 1 (A2)
evaluation (Comments + Feedback) (A4)
Tomlinson, B. (2014) Lecture + Discussion + Group
5 Materials adaptation
Chapter 2, pp. 49 – 62 presentation – Group 3 (A1)
Materials for the teaching Lecture + Discussion + Group
of grammar Tomlinson, B. (2014) presentation – Group 4 (A1)
6 Chapters 16&17, pp.
Materials for the teaching 337 – 364
of vocabulary
Group presentation of materials adaptation in
7 terms of grammar & vocabulary (Comments + Submission of Assignment 2 (A2)
Feedback) (A4)
Materials for developing Lecture + Discussion + Group
reading skills Tomlinson, B. (2014) presentation – Group 5 (A1)
8 Chapters 18&19, pp.
Materials for developing 365 – 406
writing skills
Coursebook listening Tomlinson, B. (2014) Lecture + Discussion + Group
activities Chapters 20&21, pp. presentation – Group 6 (A1)
9 407 – 428
Developing material for
speaking skills
Group presentation of materials adaptation in
10 terms of 4 language skills (Comments + Feedback) Submission of Assignment 3 (A2)
(A4)
11 Final Project Presentation Oral presentation of group projects
(A4) + Peer feedback + Discussion
Notes: All groups are expected to
submit their printout full text on
session 8 for instructor’s comments.
All presentations must be ready, too.
One or two representatives from
each group will be randomly chosen
to present their output.

2. ASSESSMENT SCHEME

Assessment tasks Scores Weighting

A1. Group presentation 50 pts Midterm score 30%


A2. Assignments (3) 50 pts

A3. Reflection paper 30 pts Final score 70%


A4. Group project 70 pts
100 pts
100% (Passing Grade: 5/10)

Guidelines for the group presentation, group project, quizzes/ midterm exam and final exam:

(1) Group presentation:


● Students work together in groups of 4 to 6 to synthesize and present (using ppt. or other presentation
formats) the key points from the readings (and with examples/ illustrations to the points presented).
Each group has 15 minutes to present and 15 minutes to answer questions by the instructor and
classmates.

● The presentation must be emailed to the instructor one-day before the presentation day. All class
members must have a copy of presentation handouts (right after the group presentation).

(2) Assignments (in individuals): 3 essays (topics assigned by the instructor)


(3) Reflection paper:
Each student is required to write a reflection paper on:
 what they have learned in terms of theories (concepts & principles) and practice of selecting,
evaluating, and adapting the materials upon the completion of the project
 how the tasks in the project assist their future teaching practice
The reflection paper should be at least 500 words long. (1.5-line spacing, font size 12, and Times New
Roman font style, 1-inch margins).

(4) Group project:


● The same group of students chooses a General English coursebook to analyze and evaluate its
components (e.g. grammar content, skills, communicative tasks, etc.) of one representative
unit/chapter based on the framework for analysis & evaluation discussed in the sessions or
synthesized by the group. The group of students then adapt the selected materials and design six
lesson plans to teach vocabulary, grammar, reading, writing, listening, and speaking.
 A suggested outline of the group project paper can be:
Table of content
i. Introduction (present the background and reasons why you choose that coursebook to
analyse; and state the objectives of your analysis & adaptation of the coursebook)
ii. Theoretical framework for analysis & adaptation (briefly summarizes the key theories,
principles or framework that you will use in your analysis & adaptation of the
coursebook; and explain why you choose them as your theoretical framework)
iii. Analysis/evaluation of the coursebook (in light of the key theories, principles or
framework as synthesized in section (ii); identifying both strengths and weaknesses of the
textbook as a whole and of the chosen chapter)
iv. Adaptation of the coursebook (based on the analysis, especially the identified
weaknesses, present what and how you, as a teacher, will explore and adapt the chosen
coursebook/unit by designing 6 lesson plans; further explain why you propose such a way
of adapting the coursebook and/or supplement it with additional materials through the
design of the lesson plans)
v. Conclusion
vi. References
vii. Appendices (if any)

● This project should be written and presented in an analytical and synthetic manner that
demonstrates the writers’ logical thinking and sound argumentation.
● The main text of the paper should be between 2000-2500 words (1.5-line spacing, font size 12,
and Times New Roman font style, 1-inch margins).
Given the feedback by the instructor and peers on their oral presentation (Session 8 & 9), the group will
revise and update their written report for final submission, typically two weeks following the final class
session.
VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY-HO CHI MINH CITY
UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

FACULTY OF ENGLISH LINGUISTICS & LITERATURE


FULL-TIME PROGRAMME
----------

GROUP PROJECT

Course: Materials Development for Language


Teaching
Class code:
Student IDs: Students’ names:

Group:
Supervisor: Mr. Bui Manh Bao (M.A.)

Ho Chi Minh City, (Date)

Common questions

Powered by AI

Students may face challenges in synthesizing key points due to varying interpretations, levels of understanding, and the complexity of the source material. These issues can lead to difficulty in selecting the most relevant information to present. To address these challenges, groups should engage in collective discussion to build a shared understanding, delegate specific reading sections to individuals for deeper focus, and employ critical thinking to prioritize content. Regular feedback and rehearsal sessions can also help streamline the presentation, ensuring coherence and clarity .

Incorporating interactive group elements in presentations enhances engagement, encourages collaborative learning, and facilitates deeper understanding. It allows students to actively apply what they’ve learned, promotes critical thinking, and develops communication skills. Interactive elements also bring diverse perspectives into discussions, fostering a more dynamic and inclusive learning environment. This approach caters to varied learning styles and helps learners to consolidate knowledge more effectively through active participation .

Coursebook listening activities can be adapted to enhance speaking skills by incorporating interactive exercises such as role-plays, discussions prompted by audio content, or summarizing the audio in one's own words, which require the learner to use the language productively. Additional speaking prompts can be integrated to practice predicting, inferring, and expressing opinions based on what was heard, fostering a comprehensive development of communication skills .

Integrating theoretical frameworks with practical applications is crucial in the analysis and adaptation phase because it ensures that the modifications made to teaching materials are grounded in proven educational principles while being relevant and applicable to real-life teaching contexts. This integration facilitates a balance between innovative teaching strategies and pedagogical soundness, leading to more effective, engaging, and adaptable teaching resources that reflect both academic rigor and practical utility .

Evaluating materials for grammar and vocabulary teaching involves examining if the materials are contextually relevant and align with the learning objectives. Evaluators should assess whether the materials provide diverse and sufficient practice opportunities, incorporate authentic language use, and support the development of both implicit and explicit knowledge of the language. The evaluation should also consider the adaptability of the materials to suit various learner levels and bring innovative approaches to traditional exercises .

Evaluating coursebook components is essential to ensure that they align with pedagogical objectives, cater to the learners' diverse needs, and are conducive to effective language acquisition. It helps identify the strengths and weaknesses of the materials, allowing educators to adapt and supplement them to maximize the learning experience. Proper evaluation ensures the materials promote engagement, cater to different learning styles, and meet the curriculum requirements .

Cunningsworth emphasizes the importance of materials being comprehensive and addressing the diverse needs of learners, stressing alignment with the curriculum and teaching goals . Tomlinson, on the other hand, highlights the need for materials to facilitate language acquisition naturally and to be adaptable to various teaching and learning contexts. He focuses on the utility of materials in promoting meaningful engagement and language use .

The process involves selecting a General English coursebook to analyze and evaluate its components based on a theoretical framework discussed in class sessions. The group must identify the coursebook's strengths and weaknesses, then adapt the materials by designing lesson plans that address specific language skills such as vocabulary, grammar, reading, writing, listening, and speaking. The project should be presented analytically, demonstrate logical argumentation and be revised based on peer and instructor feedback before final submission .

A comprehensive coursebook analysis and adaptation report should include: an introduction outlining the rationale for choosing the coursebook and analysis objectives; a theoretical framework connecting analysis to key theories and principles; a detailed coursebook evaluation highlighting strengths and weaknesses; an adaptation section detailing modifications and their pedagogical justifications; and a conclusion summarizing key findings. The report should be supported by references and appendices, providing evidence and supplementary materials, demonstrating a thorough understanding of material development for language teaching .

The reflection paper component enhances understanding by allowing students to critically engage with the theories and practices involved in selecting, evaluating, and adapting teaching materials. It encourages introspection on personal learning experiences and forces students to articulate their learning process and its practical implications for future teaching. This reflective practice consolidates cognitive processes, deepens comprehension of theoretical concepts, and promotes their application in real-world teaching scenarios .

You might also like