0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views4 pages

Physical Adaptation in Language Origins

The document discusses various speculations about the origins of human language. It outlines five main theories: 1) the divine source theory which suggests language was given by God, 2) the natural sound theory which proposes that early words imitated natural sounds, 3) the social interaction theory that language developed for group coordination, 4) the physical adaptation theory linking language to evolution of vocal anatomy, and 5) the genetic theory that humans have an innate language ability due to genes. The document provides examples and evidence to analyze each theory but recognizes significant uncertainty remains around the actual origins of spoken human language.

Uploaded by

abidhanifabbasi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views4 pages

Physical Adaptation in Language Origins

The document discusses various speculations about the origins of human language. It outlines five main theories: 1) the divine source theory which suggests language was given by God, 2) the natural sound theory which proposes that early words imitated natural sounds, 3) the social interaction theory that language developed for group coordination, 4) the physical adaptation theory linking language to evolution of vocal anatomy, and 5) the genetic theory that humans have an innate language ability due to genes. The document provides examples and evidence to analyze each theory but recognizes significant uncertainty remains around the actual origins of spoken human language.

Uploaded by

abidhanifabbasi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]

net/publication/332511386

The Origins of Language

Presentation · April 2019


DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20696.14080

CITATION READS

1 113,217

1 author:

Israa Burhanuddin Abdurrahman


Tikrit University
38 PUBLICATIONS 19 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Israa Burhanuddin Abdurrahman on 18 April 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


College of Education for Women / Tikrit University
English Department

Lecturer: Dr. Israa Burhanuddin Abdurrahman

The Origins of Language

We simply do not know how language originated. We do not know that spoken language
developed well before written language. Yet we have no physical evidence relating to the
speech of our ancestors and because of this absence of evidence speculations about the
origins of human speech have been developed.
In fact, there are many ‘speculations’ about how language sterted:

1- The Divine Source


• In biblical tradition (God created Adam and whatsoever Adam called every living
creature that was the name thereof) }
• In Hindu Language came from Saravati, wife of Brama, creator of universe.
• Few experiments had been conducted to discover the origin of language. The basic
idea of the theory is that: “ If infants were allowed to grow up without hearing any
language, then they would spontaneously begin using the original God given
language”.
• The Greek historian Herodotus mentioned Psamtik as an example. During his travel to
Egypt, Herodotus heard that Psammetichus ("Psamṯik") sought to discover the origin
of language by conducting an experiment with two children. Allegedly he gave two
newborn babies to a shepherd, with the instructions that no one should speak to them,
but that the shepherd should feed and care for them while listening to determine their
first words.
• The hypothesis was that the first word would be uttered in the root language of all
people. When one of the children cried "βηκοs" (bèkos), the shepherd concluded that
the word was Phrygian because that was the sound of the Phrygian word for "bread."
Thus, they concluded that the Phrygians were an older people than the Egyptians, and
that Phrygian was the original language of men. The Phrygian language /ˈfrɪdʒiən/ was
the Indo-European language of the Phrygians, spoken in Asia Minor during Classical
Antiquity (2nd millennium BC to 5th century AD).
• King James the Fourth of Scotland carried out the same experiment and discovered the
children spoke Hebrew. The Divine Source of Language could not be confirmed.

2- The Natural Sound Source


• “ Primitive words could have been imitations of the natural sounds which early men
and women heard around them “ Examples: cuckoo, splash, bang, and boom. This
view has been called “bow-wow theory” of language origin and these words echoing
natural sounds are called “onomatopoeic words”.
• A similar suggestion: “ The original sounds of language came from naturel cries of
emotion such as pain, anger and joy. Examples: Ouch! , Ah….
• The fact that all modern languages have some words with pronunciation that seems to
echo naturally occurring sounds could be used to support this theory.

3- The Social Interaction Source (Yo-he-ho Theory)


• The sounds of a person involved in physical effort could be the source of our language,
especially when that physical effort involved several people and had to be coordinated.
The importance of yo-he-ho theory is that it places the development of human
language in some SOCIAL CONTEXT.
• Early people lived in groups. Groups offered better protection from attack. Groups are
social organization. In a group, communication is required. So human sounds were
produced.

4- The Physical Adaptation Source


• This Theory depends on the physical features human posses. Especially those that are
distinct from other creatures. Our ancestors made a very significant transition to
upright posture, with bipedal, and a revised role for the front limbs.
• The theory comes from the idea that there is a link between physical gesture and orally
produced sounds. First of all a set of physical gestures was developed as a means of
communication.
• Then a set of oral gestures specially involving the mouth developed in which the
movements of the tongue, lips and so on where recognized according to patterns of
movement similar to physical gestures.
• The focus is on the biological basis of the formation. In the evolutionary development
there are certain physical features, best thought of a practical adaptations that appear to
be relevant for speech.
• Human teeth, lips, mouth, tongue, larynx, pharynx and brain have been created in such
a way to coordinate in producing speech sounds. Their places, connections and
coordinative functions make humankind different from all the living creatures.
• Teeth=upright, not slanting outwards. Lips= have much intricate muscles. Mouth=
small. Tongue=can be used in variety o shapes. Humans can close off the airway
through the nose to create air pressure inside the mouth. Larynx=(voice box) different
position- upright posture.
• Human body parts have more than one function: Teeth, lips: chewing and sucking
producing speech sounds. Human hands: making tools and manual gestures. Brain at
work! Human brain is lateralized. It has specialized functions in in each of the two
hemispheres. Complex vocalization (Speaking) and object manipulation (making or
using tools) are very close to each other in the left hemisphere in the brain. There may
be an evolutionary connection between the language using and tool using.

5- The Genetic Source


• The innateness hypothesis is a linguistic theory of language acquisition which holds
that at least some knowledge about language exists in humans at birth. This hypothesis
supports linguistic nativism and was first proposed by Noam Chomsky.
• Facts about the complexity of human language systems, the universality of language
acquisition, the facility that children demonstrate in acquiring these systems, and the
comparative performance of adults in attempting the same task are all commonly
invoked in support.
• A human might have (Language gene) That makes him speak !!

View publication stats

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Natural Sound Source theory suggests that early human language development started with the imitation of natural sounds in the environment. This view, known as the "bow-wow theory," considers primitive words as imitative of sounds like 'cuckoo,' 'splash,' and 'bang,' with onomatopoeic words echoing these natural sounds. Additionally, it proposes language originated from natural cries of emotion such as pain or joy (e.g., 'Ouch!', 'Ah!'). The universality of onomatopoeic words among modern languages supports this theory .

The Physical Adaptation Source theory connects human biological evolution with language development by highlighting specific physical features associated with speech production. Early hominins' transition to upright posture and bipedalism facilitated physical adaptations, such as changes in the mouth, tongue, and larynx, making them capable of producing complex sounds. For instance, human teeth are upright, lips contain intricate muscles, and the mouth allows varied tongue shapes for creating air pressure. The theory also suggests a connection between gestures and verbal communication, where initial physical gestures evolved into oral gestures facilitated by evolved brain regions responsible for both tool use and speech, as demonstrated by the lateralization of the human brain .

The Genetic Source theory, associated with the innateness hypothesis, suggests that some linguistic knowledge is inborn in humans. This view posits that human beings are naturally equipped with a "language gene" from birth that enables language acquisition. The theory relies on the complexity and universality of human language systems, the ease and uniform way in which children acquire language, and the relative difficulty adults face in learning languages. Noam Chomsky first proposed this notion, which underlines linguistic nativism. The consistency in the language learning process among children across cultures bolsters this theory .

The Social Interaction Source theory, or Yo-he-ho Theory, explains language development as stemming from the coordinated physical efforts of people working together. Human sounds emerged within social contexts, as early humans lived in groups for better protection and social organization. The theory emphasizes the role of collective human activity, suggesting that sounds developed as a necessity for coordination during shared activities. According to this view, the social nature of humans and the requirement for communication within group activities were crucial for the evolution of language .

The Divine Source theory posits that language originated from a higher power or divine being. In different traditions, language is seen as a gift from the gods. In the biblical tradition, God's act of naming animals through Adam suggests God-given language capabilities. Similarly, in Hindu tradition, language comes from Saravati, wife of Brahma. The theory suggests that if infants were raised without hearing spoken language, they would spontaneously begin using this original God-given language. Historical experiments, such as those by Psammetichus and King James IV of Scotland, attempted to isolate the first language spoken by children raised without adult linguistic influence, revealing words from Phrygian and Hebrew, respectively. However, such experiments have not conclusively proven the theory .

You might also like