0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views37 pages

Essential Guide to Grant Proposals

Here are 3 common mistakes to avoid: 2) Not enough detail • Vague methods section 3) Methods don't match aims • Methods won't actually help answer research question

Uploaded by

Bramwel Wanyonyi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views37 pages

Essential Guide to Grant Proposals

Here are 3 common mistakes to avoid: 2) Not enough detail • Vague methods section 3) Methods don't match aims • Methods won't actually help answer research question

Uploaded by

Bramwel Wanyonyi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Writing a winning

grant proposal
▪ Hard facts

▪ Is this the right fit?

▪ Title
AG E N DA
▪ Background

▪ Aims and objectives

▪ Methods

▪ Theoretical framework

▪ Ethical considerations

▪ General writing tips


The hard facts
▪ Both small and large grants get rejected
▪ Every rejection hurts, because every grant
application is a massive amount of work
▪ Every grant application needs to be as perfect
as it can be
▪ “The only real deadlines are grant deadlines“

Being a renowned scientist doesn’t ensure success. On the same day that molecular
biologist Carol Greider won a Nobel prize in 2009, she learnt that her recently
submitted grant proposal had been rejected
How to choose
the right Grant topic
▪ Look at what kind of projects were
funded by this funder before – in this
case: SVRI
▪ Try to find someone who has already
been funded under this grant call by
SVRI to get an idea about what work
SVRI is interested in, what the gaps are
and potentially get in touch with existing
grantholders
▪ Try and look at successful grant
applications

[Link]
support/svri-research-grant-2022
1) Eligibility
(from SVRI) Other eligibility considerations to note:
• Organisations or consortiums can submit up to two
proposals, but only one will be funded
• Previous grantees will not be considered principal
applicants
• Institutions who have an active SVRI grant may not
apply

2) Suitability of the SVRI Grant and the specific grant


Pay close attention call to one’s own profile and research idea
- What are they looking for and is your idea matching this?
to the call

[Link]
Take your time – writing a
proposal takes time

Take into account time for proof-


How to approach reading, showing your application
to others and revisions
writing a grant Do not leave submission to the
last minute, e.g. technological
application failures, wrong version…
The process might not end with
the submission, there might be
clarifications, adjustments, …
▪ Before starting, think about an idea,
discuss it with others – colleagues, family
members, friends, etc. – until it becomes
clear and attractive
▪ Discuss approaches on how to address
your idea and put it into an application
early
Get advice from ▪ Show an early draft to others
others ▪ Multiple rounds of proof reading of the
final draft
▪ Get senior people to read and comment on
your application
▪ Often more painful if people review it who
you know than the anonymous panel!
Should clearly describe what the study is
about
Concise, convincing

Accurate, unambiguous, complete

The Title Relatively short and catchy, specific

Appealing: spark interest in readers so they


want to learn more
Use professional language (avoid rarely-used
abbreviations)
There might be requirements on the title
length
▪ What is the current state of the field
▪ Present the knowledge gaps
What matters: ▪ Include relevant preliminary data if
Background available
▪ End with what your study will do
Current state of the field

- Establish the significance of your topic


- Provide background facts/information
- Define key terminology
- Show that you are aware of the existing studies in your field
Present the knowledge gaps

- Review what is known about the issue


- Explain what information is missing about the topic
- Avoid extensive crutique of previous studies
What will this study do

- Lay out your research question/study hypothesis


- Briefly state how youur data will fill the gap(s) idenitified before
▪ Background section
- lay out the existing knowledge
- state key relevant studies in the field
- state key studies in the country the study will
take place in
- Use suitable references of key studies in the
field and literature from the country the study is
focused on → no need to over-reference!

The SVRI Grant ▪ Statement of need section


- highlight the gaps in knowledge
- state which gaps in knowledge you will
address
- stay focused on what your study can achieve
and what gaps it can address, not mention
everything possible
Read the guidance!
What matters: aims & objectives
→ Have a clear research question (study aim)

- This should not be too long and should be focused on the key
theme(s)
- It does not need to include the objectives under it – these can
be stated separately.
What matters: aims & objectives
→ Have well-defined objectives: Create specific aims and well-defined criteria to
quantify success, and keep it concise
→ If many, numbering helps clarity

→ If suitable, include hypotheses – yet make sure they are not just a duplication of
the objectives
If you complete your objectives, you
should achieve your study aim

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE AIM

RESEARCH
RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH STUDY
QUESTION
QUESTION QUESTION QUESTION QUESTION AIM
▪ Most important after the aims and
objectives
▪ They need to be easy to understand,
What matters: detailed enough to be convincing
Methods ▪ No shortcuts here!
▪ Justify why the outlined method(s) are the
right ones
Study design

Study setting

Key components Study population and sampling

of a methods Measurements
section Analysis

Ethical considerations
Location and geography

Population profile

Size

Study setting Socio-economic factors

Other relevant information

Justification (why this setting?)

More detail if unfamiliar setting


Inclusion / Exclusion criteria

Sampling design (simple random,


systematic, non-probability scheme,
...)
Study population Time frame

and sampling Date of planned fieldwork

Procedures for initial participant


contact (existence of sampling
frame)
What tools will you use to obtain the information?
(Does it depend on what kind of information?)

Experiments (e.g. Randomized Controlled Trials)

Questionnaires

Measurements / Focus Group Discussions, Key Informant


Interviews

Methodology Observation of environment

Census data

Review of records – extraction of data

Laboratory testing
What will your variables be?

▪ Outcome (dependent) variables /


endpoints
→ Describe in greater detail – particularly
if there are more complicated and/or

Variables composite variables

(if quantitative) ▪ Predictor (independent) variables /


covariates
→ Demographic characteristics are very
important – summarize if possible
Data will be entered where, in what program for
analysis

Special tools/issues in data analysis

Stratification
Data analysis &
Sub-group analysis
statistical
Analysis of potential biases (Included vs excluded
methods studies, Lost to follow-up vs. Retained participants, ...)

Collapsing of variables, transformation

Statistical significance
State by which Institutional Review Board
(IRB) ethics approval will be sought or
whether there is an exception
Vulnerable populations – may require more
explanation of procedures to ensure lack of
Ethical coercion

considerations Describe ethical issues that will arise from


any involvement of people and detail how
you will deal with those issues
Describe what structures you will put in
place to ensure strong ethical adherence,
safety and well-being of participants
and staff
1) Too much detail
• Copy pasted from protocol or another
paper
• Usually irritating and a waste of space
Common mistakes
2) Not enough detail
• Leaving out essential information
• Leaving out key details of methods
What matters:
impact
▪ Consider the impact of your work
▪ MRC: „Who could benefit in the long term? How can you
increase the chances of reaching those beneficiaries? Even if
your proposal doesn’t directly address the immediate needs
of the women, girls and children you should be able to
explain the pathway that links your work to reduce violence
against women and children.“
▪ What are your outputs?
▪ How will you disseminate your work beyond peer-reviewed
publications?
▪ Who will benefit?
Theoretical
Framework
They provide researchers with:
▪ Ability to move beyond descriptions of ‘what’ to explanations
of ‘why’ and ‘how’’
▪ Means of setting out an explanation set that might be used to
define and make sense of the data that flow from the
aim/research question
▪ A filtering tool for selecting appropriate research questions
and related data collection methods and sets the boundaries
of the work
▪ A reference point/structure for the discussion of the literature,
methodology and results
Descriptive, explanatory models
Covariate
What are
components or
aspects of the Covariate

subject of interest?
Covariate
OUTCOME
For example:
Covariate
“What are the health risks
and consequences
associated with Covariate
trafficking?”

Covariate

Dana R Thomson: Templates to develop your conceptual framework: [Link]


Ecological or social determinants

How do variables relate to


the outcome of interest?
What risk and protective
factors exist for intimate
partner violence?

Dana R Thomson: Templates to develop your conceptual framework: [Link]


Causal, hypothesis test

What contributes Exposure OUTCOME


to the effect of
interest?

For example:
“Why does alcohol use Mediating factor
lead to higher levels of
intimate partner violence” Mediating factor

Mediating factor

Dana R Thomson: Templates to develop your conceptual framework: [Link]


Relational, analytical

How do certain
variables relate to
others? Variable Variable

Mediating factor
For example:
“What is the relationship positive
between intimate partner contribution
violence and violence
against children in the negative
same household?” contribution

Dana R Thomson: Templates to develop your conceptual framework: [Link]


First version: base on your own
assumptions about your research aim
and objectives (or research questions)
Assumption

guess

Common sense

belief OUTCOME

impression

Experience

intuition

Dana R Thomson: Templates to develop your conceptual framework: [Link]


Update based on literature review
(systematic)
Evidence

Evidence
Idea 1
Evidence

Evidence
OUTCOME

Evidence

Evidence Idea 2

Evidence

Dana R Thomson: Templates to develop your conceptual framework: [Link]


▪ Reviewers score 10-30 applications. How
can you make life easy for them?
▪ Short precise, not complicated language
▪ Be clear
Writing style ▪ Formatting – white space, paragraphs,
bold headings, illustrations
▪ No spelling errors, grammatical slips and
lengthy proposals
▪ They need to fit your proposal
▪ You od not necessarily need a big name of
a person or institution
Get the right ▪ You need to trust them
partners ▪ You need to be able to actually do the
work with them
▪ Are you capable of delivering? Often a
team is judged on being realistic
▪ We can’t review proposals we don’t get
▪ Ensure that there is consistency across aim,
objective and methods
▪ Realistic budget and good explanation of it
▪ Get the formatting right – it all needs to look
nice and tidy as it shows you care
▪ Allow plenty of time
Top tips
▪ Tell a compelling story
▪ Do not pack too much into it
▪ More speculative and self-promotional than
papers
▪ Show that your ideas are worthy and exciting!
USEFUL
• WelcomeLINKs ANDofE-MAIL
and overview ADDRESSES
SVRI grant-making

The SVRI Research Grant Guidelines and FAQ in three


languages:
The SVRI Research Grant | Sexual Violence Research
Initiative

We look SVRI email address: svri@[Link]


forward to
ProposalCENTRAL online system:
receiving your [Link]
proposals
ProposalCENTRAL email address: pcsupport@[Link]

World Bank country classification by income: World Bank


Country and Lending Groups – World Bank Data Help Desk

Common questions

Powered by AI

Improving the chances of grant proposal acceptance involves several strategies. First, align your research with past funded projects by the same funding body to ensure suitability, as exemplified by analyzing previously funded projects . Effective preparation comprises early discussions with peers to refine ideas and showing early drafts to colleagues for feedback . A well-crafted title that is concise, specific, and engaging can create favorable first impressions . Methodically define clear and concise research aims and objectives, and support them with detailed methods . Ensure that the proposal's formatting is clean and free from grammatical errors, enhancing readability for reviewers who score multiple applications at once . Finally, include a consistent narrative across aims, objectives, and methods, and provide a realistic budget with a compelling rationale to show proposal worthiness and excitement .

The background section establishes the foundation for a research proposal by defining the study's context and significance. It includes a summary of the current state of the field, presenting existing knowledge and identifying gaps . The researcher should integrate relevant preliminary data, providing a robust framework for the study . Furthermore, the section should offer background facts, define key terminologies, and illustrate awareness of extant literature and studies in the field, ensuring the research question is grounded in established scholarship . This section not only sets up the rationale for the study but also positions it within the broader scholarly conversation .

A theoretical framework is crucial in a research proposal as it provides an explanatory context for the research question, allowing the investigator to link the study's aim to the collected data . It aids in explaining the relationships between different components, such as variables and outcomes, and helps in defining the scope and boundaries of the research . Constructing a theoretical framework typically involves moving beyond mere observation to define 'why' and 'how' phenomena occur . It serves as a filtering tool to choose appropriate research questions and collection methods . The first version of a theoretical framework is often based on the researcher’s assumptions, which is then iteratively refined through systematic literature reviews and evidence gathering .

The methods section justifies the research setting and sampling strategy by explaining how these choices align with the study objectives and design . It should describe the location's relevance, including geographic, socio-economic, and demographic factors that support the research aims . For sampling, the section needs to articulate the criteria for inclusion and exclusion and the logic behind the sampling design, whether random, systematic, or non-probability . Providing a reasoned argument for these choices ensures that the methods support the research question effectively, demonstrating that the approach is thoughtfully planned and executed .

Aligning aims, objectives, and methods in a research proposal is crucial as it ensures coherence and logical progression throughout the document, making it easier for reviewers to understand the research plan . Clearly defined objectives help in achieving the overarching research aim, indicating a well-structured approach . Consistency across these components demonstrates that the proposed study is feasible and methodologically sound, thus increasing confidence in the likelihood of successful project completion . This alignment not only enhances the narrative but also strengthens the arguments presented, significantly impacting the proposal's chance of success by conveying comprehensive planning and thoughtfulness to reviewers .

The methods section of a grant proposal should be detailed, easy to understand, and convincingly justify the chosen methods . This includes outlining the study design, setting, population, sampling strategy, and analysis plans . It's important to justify why the setting was chosen and ensure all procedures, like participant contact, are clear . Researchers must describe the type of data to be collected and the analytical tools to be used . This section must not overlook ethical considerations, detailing measures for participant safety and confidentiality . An overly detailed methods section could waste space, while insufficient detail might leave out essential aspects, both of which can undermine the proposal’s effectiveness .

A well-designed title significantly influences the reception of a research proposal by capturing the reader’s interest and clearly conveying the study's focus . It should be concise, convincing, unambiguous, and specific, giving a snapshot of the research's essence without unnecessary complexity . A title's appeal is crucial as it marks the first impression on reviewers, enticing them to explore the proposal further . Using professional language and adhering to requirements like length restrictions can further enhance the title's effectiveness .

Ethical considerations in a research proposal involve addressing potential ethical issues arising from human involvement, data confidentiality, and safety . Researchers must specify the ethics approval process, indicating which Institutional Review Board will oversee the proposal . Special attention is required for vulnerable populations, ensuring procedures prevent coercion and safeguard participant well-being . The proposal should clearly describe how ethical issues will be managed, such as data handling, participant consent, and risk mitigation strategies . Structures must be in place for ensuring continued ethical conduct throughout the study, reinforcing the proposal's ethical integrity .

The statement of need in a grant proposal articulates the research's significance by highlighting existing knowledge gaps and the necessity to fill them . It should identify and detail knowledge gaps that the research intends to address specifically, while remaining focused on achievable aims rather than trying to address every possible gap . This section should also contextualize the research within existing studies, mentioning key research in the field and ensuring to include pertinent literature from the specific country where the study will be conducted . Properly crafting this statement helps convince reviewers of the research's contribution to advancing the field .

When disseminating the findings of a funded research project, consider the target audience who would benefit or utilize the results, including specific stakeholders, policy-makers, or communities . It's crucial to plan for both traditional methods, like peer-reviewed publications, and additional pathways to reach broader audiences, such as public seminars or policy briefs . Understandably, proposals should address the impact and long-term benefits of the findings, outlining how they contribute to resolving pertinent issues, like reducing violence against vulnerable groups, as this enhances the project's applicability and reach . Describing these strategies in the proposal can strengthen the case for its potential impact and support .

You might also like