Scribd
Upload
13 views4 pages

Class Performance Comparison Analysis

The document contains two figures showing the marks of students from a Business class and Science class. It then provides cumulative frequency tables and analysis of the data. The analysis finds that the Science class performed better overall, with a mean of 71.5 compared to 59.2 for the Business class. The Science class also had a higher total of marks (1072.5 vs 892.5 for Business).

Uploaded by

Aidan K
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
13 views4 pages

Class Performance Comparison Analysis

The document contains two figures showing the marks of students from a Business class and Science class. It then provides cumulative frequency tables and analysis of the data. The analysis finds that the Science class performed better overall, with a mean of 71.5 compared to 59.2 for the Business class. The Science class also had a higher total of marks (1072.5 vs 892.5 for Business).

Uploaded by

Aidan K
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Presentation Of Data

FIGURE 1.0 SHOWING 5X BUSINESS CLASS’ MARKS THIS TERM:

STUDENT MARK
1 66
2 62
3 50
4 82
5 48
6 77
7 51
8 28
9 60
10 53
11 69
12 59
13 76
14 49
15 58

FIGURE 3.0 SHOWING 5Y SCIENCE CLASS’ MARKS THIS TERM:

STUDENT MARK
1 90
2 69
3 79
4 59
5 30
6 79
7 95
8 72
9 69
10 59
11 61
12 92
13 78
14 58
15 88
PRESENTATION OF DATA

FIGURE 3.0 SHOWING 5X BUSINESS CLASS’ CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY TABLE:

MARKS LOWER UPPER FREQUENCY MIDPOINT F(X) CUMULATIVE


CLASS CLASS (X) FREQUENCY
LIMITS LIMITS
41-50 40.5 50.5 4 45.5 182 4
51-60 50.5 60.5 5 55.5 277.5 4+5=9
61-70 60.5 70.5 3 65.5 196.5 9+3-=12
71-80 70.5 80.5 2 75.5 151 12+2=14
81-90 80.5 90.5 1 85..5 85.5 14+1= 15
91-100 90.5 100.5 95.5
TOTALS =15 892.5

FIGURE 4.0 SHOWING 5X BUSINESS CLASS’ CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY TABLE:

MARKS LOWER UPPER FREQUENC MIDPOINT F(X) CUMULATIVE


CLASS CLASS Y (X) FREQUENCY
LIMITS LIMITS
41-50 40.5 50.5 1 45.5 45.5 1
51-60 50.5 60.5 3 55.5 166.5 1+3=4
61-70 60.5 70.5 3 65.5 196.5 4+3=7
71-80 70.5 80.5 4 75.5 302 7+4=11
81-90 80.5 90.5 2 85..5 171 11+2=13
91-100 90.5 100.5 2 95.5 191 13+2=15
TOTALS =15 1072.5

Analysis Of Data

From the results is can be noted that:

 The Science class performs better overall than the business class, as seen in the difference in
the mean of both classes respectively. The mean of the science class was found to be (71.5)
whereas the mean of the business class was found to be (59.2), indicating a 12.7 difference
between the two classes.
 The science class was seen to have more marks when compared to business, as viewed by
the summation of their f(x) values. When comparing these f(x) values, Science was deemed
to have (180) more marks than Business.

 This is seen when comparing the Business f(x) value (892.5) to the Science f(x) value of
(1072.5). The scale of the Science marks is seen when taking away both values from each
other

FORM 5 BUSINESS CLASS

a) Mean = ∑f(x) ÷ nf

= 892.5/15

= 59.2 marks

b) Median Value = Position of Median


=½n
=½ (15)
=7.5
=Q2=

FORM 5 SCIENCE CLASS


a) Mean = ∑f(x) ÷ nf

= 1072.5/15
= 71.5
b) Mode =

c) Median = Position of Median


=½n
=½ (15)
=7.5
=Q2=

You might also like