OIML R 60-1: Load Cell Standards
OIML R 60-1: Load Cell Standards
ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE
DE MÉTROLOGIE LÉGALE
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
OF LEGAL METROLOGY
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
Contents
Foreword................................................................................................................................................. 4
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5
2 Scope ............................................................................................................................................. 5
3 Terminology (Terms and definitions) ........................................................................................ 7
3.1 General definitions ......................................................................................................... 7
3.2 Categories of load cells .................................................................................................. 9
3.3 Construction of load cells (See sections 1 and 2.1) ........................................................ 9
3.4 Metrological characteristics of a load cell...................................................................... 9
3.5 Range, capacity and output terms ................................................................................ 10
3.6 Illustration of certain definitions .................................................................................. 11
3.7 Measurement and error terms ....................................................................................... 12
3.8 Influences and reference conditions ............................................................................. 14
3.9 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 15
4 Description of load cells............................................................................................................. 16
5 Metrological requirements ........................................................................................................ 16
5.1 Principle of load cell classification .............................................................................. 16
5.2 Measuring ranges ......................................................................................................... 19
5.3 Maximum permissible measurement errors ................................................................. 19
5.4 Repeatability error ........................................................................................................ 20
5.5 Permissible variation of results under reference conditions ......................................... 20
5.6 Influence quantities (Rated operating conditions)........................................................ 21
5.7 Requirements for analog-active and digital load cells ................................................. 22
6 Technical requirements ............................................................................................................. 25
6.1 Software ....................................................................................................................... 25
6.2 Inscriptions and presentation of load cell information ................................................. 25
3
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
Foreword
OIML Draft Recommendations, Documents and Guides are developed by Project Groups linked to
Technical Committees or Subcommittees which comprise representatives from OIML Member States.
Certain international and regional institutions also participate on a consultation basis. Cooperative
agreements have been established between the OIML and certain institutions, such as ISO and the
IEC, with the objective of avoiding contradictory requirements. Consequently, manufacturers and
users of measuring instruments, test laboratories, etc. may simultaneously apply OIML publications
and those of other institutions.
International Recommendations, Documents, Guides and Basic Publications are published in English
(E) and translated into French (F) and are subject to periodic revision.
Additionally, the OIML publishes or participates in the publication of Vocabularies (OIML V) and
periodically commissions legal metrology experts to write Expert Reports (OIML E). Expert
Reports are intended to provide information and advice, and are written solely from the viewpoint of
their author, without the involvement of a Technical Committee or Subcommittee, nor that of the
CIML. Thus, they do not necessarily represent the views of the OIML.
This publication – reference OIML R 60-1:2017 – was developed by Project Group 1 of OIML
Technical Subcommittee TC 9 Instruments for measuring mass and density. It was approved for final
publication by the International Committee of Legal Metrology at its 52nd meeting in October 2017
and will be submitted to the International Conference on Legal Metrology in 2020 for formal
sanction. It supersedes the previous version of R 60 dated 2000.
OIML Publications may be downloaded from the OIML web site in the form of PDF files. Additional
information on OIML Publications may be obtained from the Organization’s headquarters:
4
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
1 Introduction
Load cells comprise a distinct element or module within other complex instruments; they do not
produce distinct quantitative values that are inherently identified or associated with denominations or
units. The data that can be extracted from a load cell is simply a measurement of change in the output
of the load cell in relation to the input. This relative change must be converted by other elements or
modules within an instrument into values that are meaningful measurements which can then be used
to identify a quantity.
Although strain gauge technology was a primary focus in the initial development of R 60, it is to be
understood that load cells that operate using other principles may also be evaluated under this
Recommendation.
2 Scope
2.1 This Recommendation prescribes the principal metrological static requirements and static
evaluation procedures for load cells used in the determination of conformity to this Recommendation.
It is intended to provide authorities with uniform means for determining the metrological
characteristics of load cells used in measuring instruments that are subjected to metrological controls.
It is acknowledged that test procedures found in OIML R 60-2 are useful in the evaluation of load
cells that are currently in service (i.e. primarily of the strain gauge design) however, there may be
variations in designs for load cells that will require additional or modified test procedures to
appropriately evaluate them. These additional test procedures may be annexed when necessary.
Except where otherwise specified, these requirements apply regardless of the technology or operating
principle employed. The requirements and evaluation procedures in this Recommendation have been
drafted to be non-specific with regard to load cell design and their operating principles.
2.2 This Recommendation utilizes the principle that several measurement errors shall be considered
together when applying load cell performance characteristics to the permitted error envelope. Thus, it
is not considered appropriate to specify individual errors for given characteristics (e.g. non-linearity,
hysteresis, effects of influence factors), but rather to consider the total error envelope allowed for a
load cell as the limiting factor. The use of an error envelope allows the balancing of the individual
contributions to the total error of measurement while still achieving the intended final result.
Note: The error envelope may be defined as the boundary of the combined individual errors (see
Table 4) as a function of the force introduced by the applied load (expressed in mass units)
over the measuring range. The combined error determined may be positive or negative and
include the effects of non-linearity, hysteresis and temperature.
2.3 “Weighing modules” as noted in OIML R 76 [1], T.2.2.7 (see R 60, Annex A, A.2.1), are not
covered by this Recommendation. Weighing instruments that include load cells and which give an
indication of mass are the subjects of separate Recommendations. While digital load cells may be
covered under this Recommendation, a load cell that produces an output consisting of more than
digital “raw counts” is not covered. In the illustration from OIML R 76 below, the scope of R 60
would not extend beyond module #3.
5
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
6 Peripheral
devices
Key(s) or
keyboard to
Printer
operate
1
2 3 4 5 7
Mechanical Further data
and electrical Analog load Data Secondary
ADC processing processing Primary
connecting cell display
elements (scaling) (e.g., tare, display
price
Data storage
device
A B C D E F
Mechanical Passive analog signal Active analog signal Digital data
Force conversion Analog / digital
part of the load cell processing processing processing
(e.g. strain
(force introduction) (linearization) (amplification) conversion (scaling)
gauges)
Analog load cells and digital load cells without data processing are within scope of OIML R 60.
Figure 2 Characterization of load cell capabilities
6
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
3.1.1
durability [VIML 5.15]
ability of a measuring instrument to maintain its performance characteristics over a period of use
3.1.2
legal metrology [VIML 1.01]
practice and process of applying statutory and regulatory structure and enforcement to metrology
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
3.1.3
load cell
measuring transducer that will produce an output in response to an applied load. This output may be
converted by another device into measurement units such as mass
[Link]
analog-passive load cell
load cell from which the output provides either measureable data or direct information representing
the measurand value
Note: The ratio between output and input may be adjustable and this type of load cell may utilize
• passive electronics (e.g. strain gauges), and
• passive temperature compensation elements
[Link]
analog-active load cell
load cell which is capable of performing the functions as described under “analog-passive” load cell
([Link]) and which also utilizes active electronics
Note: This type of load cell may utilize the active electronics for
• gaining an electronic representation of the measurand value,
• active temperature compensation, and
• similar functions being of influence to the measurand value.
[Link]
digital load cell
analog-active load cell which includes an analog to digital conversion device providing a
representation of the measurand value in some unprocessed digital format
7
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
[Link]
digital load cell equipped with further data processing (Figure 2, A–F)
analog-active load cell which includes an analog to digital conversion device providing a
representation of the measurand value in some digital format and includes further digital processing
(e.g. scaling)
3.1.4
marking [VIML 2.19]
affixing of one or more marks
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
3.1.5
metrological supervision [VIML 2.03]
activity of legal metrological control to check the observance of metrology laws and regulations
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
3.1.6
measuring transducer [VIM 3.7]
device, used in measurement, that provides an output quantity having a specified relation to the input
quantity
3.1.7
performance test
test to verify whether the load cell under test is capable of performing its intended functions
3.1.8
rated operating condition [VIM 4.9]
operating condition that must be fulfilled during measurement in order that a measuring instrument or
measuring system perform as designed
(For notes, refer to the VIM [2]).
3.1.9
sealing [VIML 2.20]
means intended to protect the measuring instrument against any unauthorized modification,
readjustment, removal of parts, software, etc.
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
3.1.10
type (pattern) evaluation [VIML 2.04]
conformity assessment procedure on one or more specimens of an identified type (pattern) of
measuring instruments which results in an evaluation report and / or an evaluation certificate
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
8
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
3.1.11
type approval [VIML 2.05]
decision of legal relevance, based on the review of the type evaluation report, that the type of a
measuring instrument complies with the relevant statutory requirements and results in the issuance of
the type approval certificate
[Link]
compression loading
applying a compressive force to the load receptor of a load cell
[Link]
tension loading
applying a tension force to the load receptor of a load cell
3.3.1
strain gauge
analog resistive element that is attached to a load cell structure and that changes resistance depending
on the deformation of the load cell structure when compression or tension forces are applied to the
load cell
3.4.1
humidity symbol
symbol assigned to a load cell that indicates the conditions of humidity under which the load cell has
been tested
3.4.2
load cell family
group of load cells which for the purposes of type evaluation are considered as one family and that are
of:
a) the same material or combination of materials (for example mild steel, stainless steel or
aluminum);
b) the same design of the measurement technique (for example strain gauges bonded to metal);
c) when used, the same principle used to attach the strain gauge to the load cell;
d) the same method of construction (for example shape, sealing of strain gauges, mounting method,
manufacturing method);
e) the same set of specifications (for example output rating, input impedance, supply voltage, cable
details); and
f) one or more load cell groups where all load cells within the group possess identical metrological
characteristics (as listed in 5.1.5 – including: class; nLC; temperature rating, etc.).
Note: The examples provided are not intended to be limiting.
9
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
3.5.1
load cell interval
subdivision of the load cell measuring range
3.5.2
load cell measuring range (for verification)
range between the maximum load of the measuring range Dmax and minimum load of the measuring
range Dmin
load cell measuring range = (Dmax – Dmin)
3.5.3
load cell output
measurable quantity into which a load cell converts the measured input quantity
3.5.4
load cell verification interval (v)
load cell interval, expressed in units of mass, used in the test of the load cell for accuracy
classification
3.5.5
maximum capacity (Emax)
largest value of a quantity expressed in units of mass, which may be applied to a load cell
3.5.6
maximum load of the measuring range (Dmax)
largest value of a quantity expressed in units of mass which can be introduced to a load cell under test
3.5.7
maximum measuring range
range of values of the quantity expressed in units of mass that may be applied to a load cell
Note: maximum measuring range is the range between maximum capacity Emax and minimum dead
load Emin
maximum measuring range = (Emax – Emin)
3.5.8
maximum number of load cell verification intervals (nLC)
maximum number of load cell verification intervals into which the maximum measuring range may be
divided
3.5.9
minimum dead load (Emin)
smallest value of a quantity (expressed in mass units) that may be applied to a load cell
10
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
3.5.10
minimum dead load output return (DR)
difference of load cell output, expressed in units of mass at the minimum dead load (Dmin), measured
before and after application of a load of Dmax
3.5.11
minimum load cell verification interval (vmin)
smallest load cell verification interval in units of mass into which the maximum measuring range
(Emax – Emin) can be divided
3.5.12
minimum load of the measuring range (Dmin)
smallest value of a quantity expressed in units of mass, applied to a load cell under test
3.5.13
number of load cell verification intervals (n)
total of load cell verification intervals into which the maximum measuring range is divided
3.5.14
relative minimum dead load output return (Z)
ratio of the maximum measuring range, to two times the minimum dead load output return, DR
Note: This ratio is used to describe multi-interval instruments.
3.5.15
relative minimum load cell verification interval (Y)
ratio of the maximum measuring range, to the minimum load cell verification interval, vmin
Note: This ratio describes the resolution of the load cell independent from the load cell capacity.
3.5.16
safe load limit (Elim)
maximum load that can be applied without producing a permanent shift in the performance
characteristics beyond those specified
3.5.17
warm-up time
time between the moment power is applied to a load cell and the moment at which the load cell is
capable of complying with the requirements
11
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
3.7.1
creep
change in load cell output occurring with time while under constant load and with all environmental
conditions and other variables also remaining constant
3.7.2
apportioning factor (pLC)
value of a dimensionless fraction expressed as a decimal (for example, 0.7) representing that portion
of an error observed in the (weighing) instrument which is attributed to the load cell alone
Note: This value is used in determining the MPE (see 3.7.10).
3.7.3
durability error [VIML 5.16]
difference between the intrinsic error after a period of use and the initial intrinsic error of a measuring
instrument
12
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
3.7.5
fault [VIML 5.12]
difference between the error of indication and the intrinsic error of a measuring instrument
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
3.7.6
fault detection output
electrical representation issued by the load cell indicating that a fault condition exists
3.7.7
hysteresis error
difference in load cell output readings for the same applied force between the reading obtained by
increasing the load from minimum load (Dmin), and the reading obtained by decreasing the load from
maximum load (Dmax)
3.7.8
initial intrinsic error [VIML 5.11]
intrinsic error of a measuring instrument as determined prior to performance tests and durability
evaluations
3.7.9
load cell intrinsic error
error resulting from a load cell, determined under reference conditions
3.7.10
maximum permissible error (MPE) [VIM 4.26]
extreme value of measurement error, with respect to a known reference quantity value, permitted by
specifications or regulations for a given measurement, measuring instrument, or measuring system
(For notes, refer to the VIM [2]).
3.7.11
measurement error [VIM 2.16)]
measured quantity minus a reference quantity value.
Note: The term “measurement error” in this Recommendation refers to load cell measurement errors.
(For additional notes, refer to the VIM [2]).
3.7.12
measured quantity (value) [VIM 2.10)]
quantity value representing a measurement result
(For notes, refer to the VIM [2]).
3.7.13
non-linearity
deviation from the average of the values of load cell signals from a straight line through zero force
applied and maximum force applied
13
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
3.7.14
repeatability error
difference between load cell output readings taken from consecutive tests under the same loading and
environmental conditions of measurement
3.7.15
resolution [VIM 4.14]
smallest change in a quantity being measured that causes a perceptible change in the corresponding
indication
(For notes, refer to the VIM [2]).
3.7.16
significant durability error [VIML 5.17]
durability error exceeding the value specified in the applicable Recommendation
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
3.7.17
significant fault [VIML 5.14]
fault exceeding the applicable fault limit value
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
3.7.18
span stability
capability of a load cell to maintain the load cell output of the load cell’s measuring range over a
period of use within specified limits
3.7.19
temperature effect on minimum dead load output
change of the signal output under minimum dead load due to a change in ambient temperature
3.7.20
temperature effect on sensitivity
change in sensitivity due to a change in ambient temperature
3.7.21
type approval mark [VIML 3.07]
mark applied to a measuring instrument certifying its conformity to the approved type
3.8.1
disturbance [VIML 5.19]
influence quantity having a value within the limits specified in the relevant Recommendation, but
outside the specified rated operating conditions of a measuring instrument
14
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
3.8.2
influence factor [VIML 5.17]
influence quantity having a value which ranges within the rated operating conditions of a measuring
instrument
(For notes, refer to the VIML [3]).
3.8.3
influence quantity [VIM 2.52]
quantity that, in a direct measurement, does not affect the quantity that is actually measured, but that
affects the relation between the indication and the measurement result
(For examples and notes, refer to the VIM [2]).
3.8.4
rated operating condition [VIM 4.9]
operating condition that must be fulfilled during measurement in order that a measuring instrument or
measuring system perform as designed
(For notes, refer to the VIM [2]).
3.8.5
reference (operating) condition [VIM 4.11]
operating condition prescribed for evaluating the performance of a measuring instrument or
measuring system or for comparison of measurement results
(For notes, refer to the VIM [2]).
3.9 Abbreviations
AC Alternating Current
CH Cyclic Humidity
DC Direct Current
DR Minimum Deadload Output Return
EMC Electro Magnetic Compatibility
EUT Equipment Under Test
IEC International Electrotechnical Commission
ISO International Organization for Standardization
I/O Input/Output
LC Load Cell
MPE Maximum Permissible Error
NH No Humidity
OIML International Organization of Legal Metrology
SH Steady-State Humidity
VIM International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms
VIML International vocabulary of terms in legal metrology
15
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
5 Metrological requirements
5.1 Principle of load cell classification
The classification of load cells into specific accuracy classes is provided to facilitate their application
to various measuring systems. In the application of this Recommendation, it should be recognized that
the effective performance of a particular load cell may be improved by compensation means within
the measuring system with which it is applied. Therefore, it is not the intention of this
Recommendation to require that a load cell be of the same accuracy class as the measuring system in
which it may be applied. Nor does it require that a measuring instrument, indicating in units of mass
for example, use a load cell which has been approved during a separate type evaluation. All data/items
found in 5.1.1 to 5.1.7 shall be specified by the manufacturer.
Table 1 Maximum number of load cell verification intervals (nLC) according to accuracy class
16
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
17
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
An example illustrating the six parts of the load cell classification is shown in Figure 4.
↓ or ↑
↑↓
↑↑
↓
C3 5/35 Class C, 3 000 intervals, compression, + 5 °C to + 35 °C
↑
18
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
↓
- 5/30 Class C, 1 000 intervals, compression, – 5 °C to + 30 °C
C1 ↑
↑
- 5/30 Class C, 3 000 intervals, tension, – 5 °C to + 30 °C
C3 ↓
19
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
0.7) by the manufacturer and shall be in the range of 0.3 to 0.8: (0.3 ≤ pLC ≤ 0.8) 1, where “m” is the
value (expressed in mass) representing the force introduced by the load applied.
MPE Load, m
The value of the apportioning factor, pLC shall appear on the OIML certificate, if the value is not equal
to 0.7. If the apportioning factor, pLC is not specified on the certificate then the value 0.7 shall be
assumed. The maximum permissible error may be positive or negative and is applicable to both
increasing and decreasing loads.
The limits of error shown include errors due to non-linearity, hysteresis and temperature effect on
sensitivity over certain temperature ranges, specified in [Link] and [Link]. Further errors, not
included in the Table 4 limits of error, are treated separately.
5.5.1 Creep
The difference between the reading taken upon the application of a maximum load (Dmax) and the
reading observed within and after 30 minutes of exposure of 90 % to 100 % of Emax shall not exceed
0.7 times the absolute value of MPE for the applied load.
Regardless of any value declared by the manufacturer for the apportioning factor, pLC, the MPE for
creep shall be determined from Table 4 using the apportioning factor, pLC = 0.7.
The difference in readings taken after 20 minutes of exposure to 90 % to 100 % of Emax and at
30 minutes of exposure to 90 % to 100 % of Emax shall not exceed 0.15 times the absolute value of
MPE.
1
Associated with apportionment of error provisions contained within OIML R 76-1, 3.5.1 and [Link] [1];
R 50-1, [Link].2 [25]; R 51-1, [Link] [26]; R 61-1, [Link] [24]; R 106-1, [Link] [28]; or R 107-1, [Link]
[27], when load cell is applied to such instruments.
20
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
Example:
Load cell class: C3 (declared by the manufacturer)
Apportioning factor: pLC = 0.7 (declared by manufacturer)
Applied load: Dmax = Emax (test specification)
Maximum difference between the reading = 0.7 × (0.7 × 1.5 v) = 0.735 v
Example:
Load cell class: C3 (declared by the manufacturer)
Apportioning factor: pLC = 0.7 (declared by manufacturer)
Applied load: Dmax = Emax (test specification)
Maximum difference between the initial reading = 0.15 × (0.7 × 1.5 v) = 0.1575 v
5.6.1 Temperature
21
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
5.6.3 Humidity
With respect to humidity conditions, this Recommendation defines 3 humidity classes: CH (cyclic
humidity - as standard), NH (no humidity), and SH (steady-state humidity). In the case of class NH or
SH, the class designation shall be marked on the load cell. In the case of class CH, class designation
marking of the load cell is not mandatory.
22
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
[Link] Faults
An analog-active load cell shall be designed and manufactured such that when it is exposed to
electrical disturbances either:
a) significant faults do not occur; or
b) significant faults are detected and acted upon.
If significant faults do occur, and the load cell is equipped with the intelligence to detect and act upon
significant faults through the instrument that the load cell is installed in, the reporting of and acting
upon significant faults would then be evaluated under the appropriate Recommendation for the
complete instrument.
Messages of significant faults should not be confused with other messages presented.
Note: A fault in value that is equal to or smaller than the load cell minimum verification interval,
vmin, is allowed.
[Link] Durability
The load cell shall be suitably durable so that the requirements of this Recommendation may be met
in accordance with the intended use of the load cell.
23
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
[Link] Disturbances
When an analog-active load cell is subjected to the disturbances specified in R 60-2, [Link] to
[Link] (also summarized in Table 5), the difference between the load cell output due to a
disturbance and the load cell output without disturbance (fault) shall satisfy the conditions in [Link].
Subclause
Characteristic
Test R 60-2, 2.10 pLC*
under test
test procedure
Immunity to conducted
[Link] Disturbance
electromagnetic fields
*Note: pLC 0.7 shall be used for analog-active load cells during influence factors tests.
24
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
6 Technical requirements
6.1 Software
Provision shall be made for appropriate sealing by mechanical, electronic and/or cryptographic
means, making any change that affects the metrological integrity of the device impossible or evident.
Any embedded programming (i.e. firmware) that influences the raw count output of the load cell will
be evaluated under the terms of this Recommendation. In addition, if the software modifies load cell
performance, not exceeding the functions of analog to digital conversion and the linearization of the
load cell output, then that software shall be evaluated under the terms in this Recommendation and in
accordance with OIML D 31:2008 [8]. Any weighing instrument function shall be evaluated under
other appropriate Recommendations for weighing instruments.
Functionality of any software which is not covered by this Recommendation, e.g. functionalities of
weighing instruments, is outside the scope of this Recommendation and is therefore not evaluated. It
may be required to undergo additional evaluations against other requirements contained in the
applicable OIML Recommendations for weighing instruments.
The requirements which are relevant to the evaluation of load cells and provided in OIML D 31:2008
[8] shall be fulfilled for the load cell by taking into account the following aspects.
a) In general, for load cells, the severity level I, examined with validation procedure A, is required.
b) For legally relevant software of digital load cells the following statements according to OIML
D 31 shall be applied.
1) The exception described in OIML D 31, 5.1.1 [8] for an imprint of the software
identification is allowed.
2) The level of conformity of manufactured devices to the approved type is according to
OIML D 31, 5.2.5 (subclause a) [8].
3) Updating the legally relevant software of a load cell in the field is possible via verified
or traced update according to OIML D 31, [Link] and [Link] [8].
4) The software documentation shall include descriptions according to the applicable
requirements of OIML D 31, 6.1.1 [8].
The validation procedures are described in OIML D 31, 6.4 [8].
If due to the limitation of the size of the load cell, it is impossible to apply all the mandatory
markings, the manufacturer’s name or trade mark, the load cell type designation, the serial number,
25
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
and the maximum capacity shall be provided as a minimum on the load cell itself. All other
mandatory information shall be provided in an accompanying document supplied by the manufacturer
and submitted to the user. Where such a document is provided, the information required in 6.2.2 shall
also be given therein.
26
OIML R 60-1:2017 (E)
↑
Tension
↓
↓
Compression
↑
Beam ↑ or ↓
↑↓
Universal
↓↑
27
INTERNATIONAL OIML R 60-2
RECOMMENDATION Edition 2017 (E)
ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE
DE MÉTROLOGIE LÉGALE
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
OF LEGAL METROLOGY
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
Contents
Foreword................................................................................................................................................. 4
1 Metrological controls ................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Liability to legal metrological controls ............................................................................... 5
1.2 Measurement standards ....................................................................................................... 5
2 Type evaluation ............................................................................................................................ 5
2.1 Scope ................................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Test requirements ................................................................................................................ 5
2.3 Selection of specimens for evaluation ................................................................................. 5
2.4 Selection of load cells within a family ................................................................................ 6
2.5 Documentation .................................................................................................................... 8
2.6 Examinations ....................................................................................................................... 8
2.7 Performance tests ................................................................................................................ 8
2.8 Rules concerning the determination of errors.................................................................... 10
2.9 Variation of results under reference conditions................................................................. 11
2.10 Test procedures.................................................................................................................. 12
2.11 Test sequence .................................................................................................................... 28
2.12 OIML certificate ................................................................................................................ 29
3
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
Foreword
OIML Publications may be downloaded from the OIML web site in the form of PDF files. Additional
information on OIML Publications may be obtained from the Organization’s headquarters:
Bureau International de Métrologie Légale
11, rue Turgot - 75009 Paris – France
Telephone: 33 (0)1 48 78 12 82
Fax: 33 (0)1 42 82 17 27
E-mail: biml@[Link]
Internet: [Link]
4
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
1 Metrological controls
1.1 Liability to legal metrological controls
2 Type evaluation
2.1 Scope
This section provides test procedures for type evaluation testing of load cells.
Wherever possible, test procedures have been established to apply as broadly as possible to all load
cells within the scope of OIML R 60.
The procedures apply to the testing of load cells only. No attempt has been made to cover testing of
complete systems that include load cells.
5
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
If during the evaluation the specimen experiences malfunction or breakage that necessitates a repair in
order to complete the test, the applicant shall verify whether this repair concerns an incident or
whether a modification will need be made to the design. In the latter case the modification shall be
applied to all specimens supplied for the test and the applicable documentation shall be updated
accordingly.
If the issuing authority has reason to believe that a modification or repair could cause a different
outcome for test result(s) than the result(s) which was observed prior to any modification, these tests
shall be repeated. The reason for repeating a test shall be given within the scope of the test report.
6
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
A difference of geometry in the area of thin places (i.e. round or oval drilling)
B difference of geometry in the area of fixing/load introduction (i.e. groove, base, offset)
C difference of geometry in the inner of fixing/load introduction (i.e. drilling, thread, dropping)
Figure 1 Examples of strain gauge-type load cell design shapes
For analog-active load cells (R 60-1, [Link]) with active electronics that do not differ between load
cells and family and for digital load cells (R 60-1, [Link]) with an additional digital converter that
does not differ between load cells and family all applicable tests shall be performed on the load cell
with the minimum, μV/vmin as input for the analog to digital converter (same principle as OIML R 76
[2], Annex C, Table 12).
Notwithstanding this requirement, the criteria for assignment of a load cell to a family and the
selection of test specimens found in 2.4.1 to 2.4.5 shall be observed.
7
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
2.5 Documentation
The documentation submitted with the application for type evaluation shall include:
a) a description of its general principle of measurement;
b) mechanical drawings (including documents on the load transmission(s) as per Annex E);
c) electric/electronic diagrams;
d) installation requirements (physical and electrical) if appropriate;
e) operating instructions that shall be provided to the user if appropriate;
f) documents or other evidence to support and demonstrate the manufacturer’s belief that the design
and characteristics of the load cell will comply with the requirements of this Recommendation;
and
g) documentation relative to software if appropriate.
If the test laboratory deems this necessary, it can require more detailed documentation; either to be
able to study the quality of the instrument, or to be able to fully define the approved type, or both.
If the manufacturer does not prescribe a specific load transmission, it will be the responsibility of the
test laboratory to decide what kind of load transmission is to be used for testing (also see Annex E).
2.6 Examinations
Examinations and testing of load cells are intended to verify compliance with the requirements of
R 60-1.
The load cell shall be given a visual inspection to obtain a general appraisal of its design and
construction and the documentation shall be studied.
In particular, the following aspects shall be examined:
a) accuracy classes and their symbols (R 60-1, 5.1.1 and [Link]);
b) maximum number of load cell verification intervals (R 60-1, 5.1.2 and [Link]);
c) load cell measuring ranges (R 60-1, 3.5.2 in);
d) apportioning of errors (R 60-1, 5.3.2 and 3.7.2);
e) construction of load cells (R 60-1, 3.3);
f) software (R 60-1, 6.1) (if applicable);
g) inscriptions and presentation of load cell information (R 60-1, 6.2); and
h) installation instructions/recommendations.
2.7.1 Purpose
The following test procedures for the quantitative determination of load cell performance
characteristics are established to ensure uniform type evaluation.
8
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
9
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
of a design which will not introduce significant thermal gradients within the load cell. The load cell
and its connecting means (cables, tubes, etc.) which are integral or contiguous shall be at the same test
temperature. The indicating instrument shall be maintained at room temperature. The temperature
effect on auxiliary connecting means shall be considered in determining the results.
2.8.1 Conditions
The limits of error shown in Table 4 in OIML R 60-1 shall apply to all load cell measuring ranges
complying with the following conditions:
n ≤ nLC
v ≥ vmin
10
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
Up to and
Greater than Classes C&D Class B Class A
including
0 kg 10 kg 10 seconds 15 seconds 20 seconds
2.9.1 Creep
A load of Dmax shall be applied as specified in [Link] – [Link], at which time an initial reading
shall be taken. The variation between the initial reading and subsequent readings of the load Dmax,
taken as specified in [Link], shall comply with the limits specified in R 60-1, 5.5.1.
11
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
12
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
13
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
14
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
15
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
2.10.5 Determination of humidity effects for load cells marked CH or not marked
This test is applied to verify compliance with the provisions in R 60-1, [Link].
16
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
The stabilizing period before and recovery period after the cyclic
exposure shall be such that the temperature of all parts of the load
cell is within 3 °C of its final value.
17
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
18
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
19
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
For load cells of class A, the provisions of the operating manual for the time following connection to
electrical supply shall be observed.
20
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
21
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
22
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
23
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
Preconditioning of the
Stabilize the load cell under constant environmental conditions
load cell
Test load The test shall be performed with one small test load only (10 v)
24
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
Preconditioning of the
Stabilize the load cell under constant environmental conditions.
load cell
Test load The test shall be performed with one small test load only (10 v).
Level 3:
Frequency range: 80 MHz* to 3 000 MHz;
Test levels
Field strength: 10 V/m;
Modulation: 80 % AM, 1 kHz sine wave.
25
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
Preconditioning of the
Stabilize the load cell under constant environmental conditions.
load cell
Test load The test shall be performed with one small test load only (10 v).
This test is not applicable for load cells without mains power
Notes
supply or other input port.
[Link] Span stability (see R 60-1, [Link]) (not applicable to class A load cells)
Test procedure in brief:
The test consists in observing the variations of the output of the load cell under reasonably constant
(±2 °C) conditions (e.g. in a normal laboratory environment) at various intervals before, during and
after the load cell has been subjected to performance tests. The performance tests shall include (as a
minimum) the temperature test. The damp heat test shall be performed when applicable but may be
performed after a series of span stability tests if the conduct of that test during the span stability test
imposes an increased risk that the principles expressed under [Link]. would be compromised. This
may be a greater concern when conducting tests on higher capacity load cells.
The load cell shall be disconnected from the mains power supply, or battery supply where fitted, two
times for at least 8 hours during the period of test. The number of disconnections may be increased if
the manufacturer specifies so or at the discretion of the approval authority in the absence of any such
consideration.
For the conduct of this test, the manufacturer’s operating instructions shall be considered.
26
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
The load cell shall be stabilized at sufficiently constant ambient conditions after switch-on for at least
5 hours, but at least 16 hours after any temperature or humidity tests have been performed.
Test duration:
28 days or the period necessary for the performance tests to be carried out, whichever is shorter, for
temperature and humidity tests.
The duration may be increased to 40 days for CH marked load cells only.
Time between measurements:
Between 1/2 day (12 hours) and 10 days (240 hours) for SH marked load cells, and 14 days for CH
marked load cells, with an even distribution of the measurements over the total duration of the test.
Test loads:
A minimum test load, Dmin; the same test load shall be used throughout the test.
A maximum test load, Dmax; the same test load shall be used throughout the test.
c) read the minimum test load output and apply the maximum test load, Dmax. Read the maximum
test load output at time intervals as near as possible to those specified in Table 1 in 2.8.3, and
return to the minimum test load, Dmin. Repeat this four more times for accuracy class B or two
more times for accuracy classes C and D;
d) determine the span measurement result, which is the difference in output between the mean max-
imum test load outputs and the mean minimum test load outputs. Compare subsequent results
with the initial span measurement result and determine the error.
Record the following data:
a) date and time (absolute, not relative);
b) temperature;
c) barometric pressure;
d) relative humidity;
e) test load values;
f) load cell outputs;
g) errors.
27
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
Apply all necessary corrections resulting from variations in temperature, pressure, etc. between the
various measurements.
Allow for full recovery of the load cell before any other tests are performed.
Where differences of results indicate a trend of more than half the allowable variation specified
above, the test shall be continued until the trend comes to rest or reverses itself, or until the error
exceeds the maximum allowable variation.
Load
[Link] – [Link]
[Link] [Link] – [Link] [Link] - [Link]
1 2 3
Time
Temperature 5 min 1h 30 min
stabilized
Figure 2 Recommended test sequence for each test temperature when all tests are carried out in the same
force-generating system
28
OIML R 60-2:2017 (E)
Load
[Link] – [Link]
[Link] – [Link]
2.10.1
Time
Temperature 1h 30 min
stabilized
Figure 3 Recommended test sequence for each test temperature for the minimum dead load output return (DR)
and creep tests when carried out in a machine different from that used for the load tests
29
INTERNATIONAL OIML R 60-3
RECOMMENDATION Edition 2017 (E)
ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE
DE MÉTROLOGIE LÉGALE
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
OF LEGAL METROLOGY
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
Contents
Foreword .............................................................................................................................................. 4
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5
2 Applicability of this Report Format ........................................................................................... 5
2.1 Calculation procedures.......................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Additional tests for digital load cells .................................................................................... 9
2.3 General notes ...................................................................................................................... 11
2.4 Formula signs and list of symbols ...................................................................................... 12
2.5 Summary of formulae contained within calculation procedures......................................... 13
3 Guidance for the application of this Test Report Format ...................................................... 13
4 The Evaluation Report .............................................................................................................. 14
4.1 Authority responsible for this Report ................................................................................. 15
4.2 Synopsis of the results of the examination and tests ........................................................... 15
4.3 Summary of the results of the examination and tests.......................................................... 16
4.4 General Information regarding the evaluation process ....................................................... 17
4.5 General information concerning the load cell type ............................................................. 20
4.6 Accessories, supplied with the test pattern by the applicant ............................................... 21
4.7 Selection of sample(s) tested .............................................................................................. 22
4.8 Adjustments and modifications made to the samples during the testing: ........................... 24
4.9 Additional information concerning the type ....................................................................... 25
4.10 Information concerning the test equipment used for the tests............................................. 33
5 Examination ............................................................................................................................... 43
5.1 Marking requirements (R 60-1, 6.2) ................................................................................... 43
5.2 Suitability for testing (R 60-2, 2.3, 2.4) .............................................................................. 45
5.3 Software (if present) (R 60-1, 6.1) ...................................................................................... 45
5.4 Documentation for type approval (R 60-2, 2.5) .................................................................. 46
6 Performance tests....................................................................................................................... 47
6.1 Results of the performance tests ......................................................................................... 47
6.2 Initial tests and general notes concerning performance tests .............................................. 50
6.3 Load test data (Load cell error EL) 3 runs ........................................................................... 52
6.4 Load test data (Load cell error EL) 5 runs ........................................................................... 54
6.5 Load cell errors (EL) calculation ......................................................................................... 56
6.6 Repeatability errors (ER) calculation................................................................................... 57
6.7 Temperature effects on minimum dead load output return (MDLO) ................................. 58
6.8 Creep (CC) and DR (CDR) .................................................................................................... 59
6.9 Barometric pressure effects (CP) ......................................................................................... 62
6.10 Humidity effects ................................................................................................................. 63
6.11 Warm-up time ..................................................................................................................... 76
6.12 Power voltage variation ...................................................................................................... 78
6.13 Short time power reductions ............................................................................................... 80
6.14 Bursts (electrical fast transients) ......................................................................................... 80
6.15 Surges.................................................................................................................................. 83
6.16 Electrostatic discharge ........................................................................................................ 85
6.17 Electromagnetic susceptibility ............................................................................................ 87
6.18 Immunity to conducted electromagnetic fields ................................................................... 89
6.19 Span stability....................................................................................................................... 91
3
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
Foreword
The International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML) is a worldwide, intergovernmental
organization whose primary aim is to harmonize the regulations and metrological controls applied by
the national metrological services, or related organizations, of its Member States. The main categories
of OIML publications are:
International Recommendations (OIML R), which are model regulations that establish the
metrological characteristics required of certain measuring instruments and which specify
methods and equipment for checking their conformity. OIML Member States shall implement
these Recommendations to the greatest possible extent;
International Documents (OIML D), which are informative in nature and which are
intended to harmonize and improve work in the field of legal metrology;
International Guides (OIML G), which are also informative in nature and which are
intended to give guidelines for the application of certain requirements to legal metrology;
International Basic Publications (OIML B), which define the operating rules of the various
OIML structures and systems; and
OIML Draft Recommendations, Documents and Guides are developed by Project Groups linked to
Technical Committees or Subcommittees which comprise representatives from OIML Member States.
Certain international and regional institutions also participate on a consultation basis. Cooperative
agreements have been established between the OIML and certain institutions, such as ISO and the
IEC, with the objective of avoiding contradictory requirements. Consequently, manufacturers and
users of measuring instruments, test laboratories, etc. may simultaneously apply OIML publications
and those of other institutions.
International Recommendations, Documents, Guides and Basic Publications are published in English
(E) and translated into French (F) and are subject to periodic revision.
Additionally, the OIML publishes or participates in the publication of Vocabularies (OIML V) and
periodically commissions legal metrology experts to write Expert Reports (OIML E). Expert
Reports are intended to provide information and advice, and are written solely from the viewpoint of
their author, without the involvement of a Technical Committee or Subcommittee, nor that of the
CIML. Thus, they do not necessarily represent the views of the OIML.
This publication – reference OIML R 60-3:2017 – was developed by Project Group 1 of OIML
Technical Subcommittee TC 9 Instruments for measuring mass and density. It was approved for final
publication by the International Committee of Legal Metrology at its 52nd meeting in October 2017
and will be submitted to the International Conference on Legal Metrology in 2020 for formal
sanction. It supersedes the previous version of R 60 dated 2000.
OIML Publications may be downloaded from the OIML web site in the form of PDF files. Additional
information on OIML Publications may be obtained from the Organization’s headquarters:
4
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
1 Introduction
1.1 This Report Format applies to any kind of load cell (independent of its technology). It presents a
standardized format for the results of the various tests and examinations, described in OIML
R 60-2, to which a type of load cell shall be submitted for the purpose of its approval based on
this OIML Recommendation.
1.2 It is recommended that all metrology services or laboratories evaluating and/or testing types of
load cells according to OIML R 60-1, or to national or regional regulations based on this
Recommendation, use this Report Format, directly or after translation into a language other than
English or French. In the case of a translation, it is highly recommended to leave the structure
and the numbers of the clauses unchanged: in this case, most of the content is also
understandable for those who cannot read the language of the translation.
1.3 Some of the tests may have to be repeated several times and reported using several identical
sheets; therefore, report pages must be numbered in the space provided at the top of each page,
completed by the indication of the total number of pages.
1.4 In the practical application of the Report Format, in addition to a cover page by the Issuing
Authority, as a minimum, clauses A–F (as necessary) shall be included.
5
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
The units of conversion factor f are indicated units (e.g. digits or counts) per load cell
verification interval v.
[Link] Enter the average test indications of the tests at the temperatures following the initial test
at a nominal 20 °C in Table 6.5. In recording this data, indicate a “no test load”
indication (at Dmin) as “0”. This may require subtracting the “no load indication at Dmin”
from the “test load indication” so that the first entry in the column is “0”. These “0’s”
have been preprinted on the form to clarify that a dead load condition is recorded as “0”.
[Link] Calculate the reference indication, Ri, by converting the net test load, in mass units, to
indicated units (e.g. counts or digits), by multiplying by the conversion factor, f, for each
test load and recording in the 2nd column in Table 6.5.
(test load i – Dmin )
Ri = ∙ n∙f
(Dmax − Dmin )
[Link] In Table 6.5 calculate the difference between the average test indication and the reference
indication for each test load at each test temperature and divide the result by the
conversion factor f to obtain the error, EL, for each test load in terms of v.
EL = (average test indication for test load i – reference indication Ri) / f
[Link] Compare EL with the corresponding MPE for each test load.
2.1.3 Repeatability error (ER in terms of verification interval v)
[Link] Enter data in Table 6.6.
[Link] Calculate the maximum difference between the test indications on Form 6.3 and divide it
by f to obtain the repeatability error, ER, in terms of the load cell verification interval v.
ER = (maximum indication of the test load – minimum indication) / f
[Link] Compare ER with the absolute value of the corresponding MPE for each test load.
6
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
2.1.4 Temperature effects on minimum dead load output (MDLO) (CM = Change MDLO)
[Link] Enter in Table 6.7 the average indication for the initial minimum test load, Dmin, for each
test temperature from Table 6.3.
[Link] Calculate the difference between the average test indications for each temperature Ti in
sequence and divide the result by the conversion factor f to obtain the change in terms of
the load cell verification interval v.
CM = (average test indication at T2 – average indication at T1) / f
[Link] Divide CM by (T2 – T1) and multiply the result by 5 for class B, C, and D load cells or 2
for class A load cells. This gives the change in v per 5 °C for class B, C, and D load cells
or in v per 2 °C for class A load cells.
[Link] Multiply the result by [(Dmax – Dmin) / n] / vmin to give the final result CM(vmin) in units of
vmin per 5 °C for class B, C, and D load cells, or in units of vmin per 2 °C for class A load
cells. CM(vmin) must not exceed pLC.
CM ∙ (Dmax − Dmin )
CM (vmin ) =
𝑛𝑛 ∙ vmin
pLC ≤ CM(vmin)
2.1.5 Creep magnitude CC(t) and minimum dead load output return (CDR)
(CC(t) = Creep, expressed in terms of the load cell verification interval, v)
(CDR = DR, expressed in terms of the load cell verification interval, v)
Remark: Contrary to the minimum dead load output return DR in terms of mass the
minimum dead load output CDR is expressed in terms of the verification
interval v).
From the test indications recorded in Table 6.8, calculate the difference between the initial
indication obtained at the minimum creep test load after the stabilization period and any
indication obtained over the 30 minute test period with the maximum creep test load of 90 %
to 100 % of Emax and divide by the conversion factor f.
[Link] CC(t) must not exceed 0.7 times the absolute value of the MPE for the maximum creep
test load at any time t over the 30 minute creep test period.
[Link] Calculate the difference between the test indications obtained at t = 20 minutes and
t = 30 minutes after the initial indication at t = t0 and divide by f to obtain the creep error,
CC (30 – 20), in terms of the load cell verification interval v.
CC (30 – 20) = (indication at time t = 30 minutes – indication at time t = 20 minutes) / f
[Link] CC (30 – 20) shall not exceed 0.15 times the absolute value of the MPE for the applied
load.
7
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
[Link] Calculate the difference between the initial indication obtained at the minimum creep test
load after the stabilization period (t0 = 0 min) and the indication at the minimum creep
test load after the creep test and after a time interval for stabilization (t > 30 min) and
divide the result by conversion factor f to obtain the minimum dead load output return,
CDR, in terms of v.
CDR = (minimum test load indication2 – minimum test load indication1) / f
[Link] If the time intervals specified in R 60-2, Table 1 have been met, CDR must not exceed
0.5 v.
[Link] If the actual time is between 100 % and 150 % of the specified time in R 60-2, Table 1,
then the following applies:
CDR ≤ 0.5 (1 – (x – 1)) v
with
[Link] Divide CP by (P2 – P1) to determine the change due to barometric pressure in terms of v
per kilopascal (kPa).
[Link] Multiply the result by [(Emax– Emin) / nLC] to obtain the result in units of mass (g, kg, or t)
per kPa (as stated by the manufacturer). The result must not exceed vmin.
CP (E −E )
CP(v) = (P −P )
∙ maxn min ≤ vmin
2 1 max
1
This test may not be necessary depending on the design of the load cell.
8
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
2
This test is not necessary if the load cell is marked NH or SH.
3
This test is not necessary if the load cell is marked NH or CH or has no humidity marking.
9
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
10
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
11
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
12
OIML R 60-3:2017 (E)
R 60-1,
Y relative vmin, Y = (Emax – Emin) / vmin
3.5.15,
R 60-1,
Z relative DR, Z = (Emax– Emin) / (2 × DR)
3.5.14
[see Note 2]
Ri Ri = [(test load – Dmin) / (Dmax – Dmin)] × n × f
Note 1: Observe extreme caution by referring to calculation procedure for correct application of
these formulae.
Note 2: Use with initial 20 °C ascending load run only. Refer to R 60-2, 2.8.2.
13
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Cover page
by the
Issuing Authority
14
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Address
Report number
Application number
Period of tests
Stamp(s)
(if applicable)
15
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Minimum dead load output return (DR) R 60-1, 5.5.2 / R 60-2, 2.10.3
16
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Address
Contact information
17
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
4.4.2 Applicant
Company
Representative
(name, telephone)
Address
Contact information
Reference
Date of application
Application number
18
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Name
Address
Application number
Date/period of tests
Date of signature
Remarks:
19
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Unit Range
Accuracy classes
(mV/V or
Rated output
counts)
Input impedance Ω
20
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Cables
Data printer
Other accessories:
21
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
22
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
23
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
4.8 Adjustments and modifications made to the samples during the testing:
Justification of the selection of the test sample(s) (refer to R 60-2, 2.3):
Model Serial Adjustments and modifications Test Report No.
designation number made to the samples (if available)
24
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Serial number
Accuracy classes
(mV/V or
Rated output
counts)
Input impedance 1 Ω
Cable length 2 m
25
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Accuracy class A B C D
Working temperature (if other than –10 °C to +40 °C): Upper_____ °C, Lower_____ °C
Excitation voltage: AC DC
4.9.3 Additional information of the test pattern for digital load cells
Power voltage: AC DC
Interfaces:
Output signal:
Software identification:
26
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
27
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
28
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
29
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
30
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Type /
OIML
Model Specification Remark
R 60-1
designation
Application of load 3.2.1 (E.g. tension / compression)
Load cell construction 3.3 (E.g. bending beam)
Material or
combination of 3.4.2
materials
Shape 3.4.2 See R 60-2, 6.2.1
Design of measuring
3.3.1 (E.g. strain gauge bonded to metal)
technique
Sealing of strain
3.4.2
gauges
Mounting method Annex E
Load transmission Annex E See R 60-3, 4.9.1
Output rating 3.4.2
Supply voltage 3.4.2
Input impedance 3.4.2
Cable connection 3.4.2
Cable length 1 3.4.2
Further remarks concerning the definition of load cell families / construction (see table above)
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
1
mandatory for strain gauge load cells with 4-wire connection
31
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
32
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
4.10 Information concerning the test equipment used for the tests
(including details of simulations and the way uncertainties are taken into account, including the level of
“risk.” For instance, 95 % or k = 2)
The following tables have to be completed for each individual piece of test equipment used for the tests.
General information:
For each of the following pieces of test equipment, indicate for which of the following test procedures
the test equipment is used:
33
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Example:
A test equipment is used for determination the measurement error (R 60-2, 2.10.1), the creep error
(R 60-2, 2.10.2), the minimum dead load (R 60-2, 2.10.3) and humidity effect marked with SH
(R 60-2, 2.10.6):
R 60-2
2.10.1 2.10.2 2.10.3 2.10.4 2.10.5 2.10.5 2.10.6 2.10.7
reference
Used for X X X X
4.10.1 Force generating system (if a force generating system or force generating machine is used)
Description Remark
Designation
Type
Manufacturer
Identification number
Load range
Load steps
Unit
Preload
Rel. uncertainty (k = 2)
Last calibration
Certificate No. / report No.
Recalibration interval
The force generating system is used for the following test procedures:
R 60-2
2.10.1 2.10.2 2.10.3 2.10.4 2.10.5 2.10.5 2.10.6 2.10.7
reference
Used for
34
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
4.10.2 Weights
(if the load cell is tested manually with weights)
1
according to OIML R 111
35
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Description Remark
Designation
Type
Manufacturer
Identification number
Height × width × length
dimension
Temperature range
Temperature stability
Rel. uncertainty (k = 2)
Last calibration
Certificate No. / report No.
Recalibration interval
36
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Description Remark
Designation
Type
Manufacturer
Identification number
height × width × length
dimension
Temperature range
Temperature stability
Humidity range
Humidity stability
Rel. uncertainty (k = 2)
Last calibration
Certificate No. / report No.
Recalibration interval
37
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Description Remark
Designation
Type
Manufacturer
Identification / Serial number
Measurement range
Rel. uncertainty (k = 2)
Last calibration
Certificate No. / report No.
Recalibration interval
Description Remark
Measurement range
Supply voltage (AC/DC)
Filter settings
Cable connections
The indicator / indicating instrument is used for the following test procedures:
R 60-2
2.10.1 2.10.2 2.10.3 2.10.4 2.10.5 2.10.5 2.10.6 2.10.7
reference
Used for
38
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Description Remark
Designation
Type
Manufacturer
Identification / Serial number
Measurement range
Last calibration
Certificate No. / report No.
Recalibration interval
Description Remark
Measurement range
Supply voltage (AC/DC)
Filter settings
Cable connections
The terminal / digital data processing device is used for the following test procedures:
R 60-2
2.10.1 2.10.2 2.10.3 2.10.4 2.10.5 2.10.5 2.10.6 2.10.7
reference
Used for
39
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Description Remark
Type
Manufacturer
Identification / Serial number
Measurement range
Rel. uncertainty (k = 2)
Last calibration
Certificate No. / report No.
Recalibration interval
The barometric pressure meter is used for the following test procedures:
R 60-2
2.10.1 2.10.2 2.10.3 2.10.4 2.10.5 2.10.5 2.10.6 2.10.7
reference
Used for
4.10.8 Thermometer
Description Remark
Type
Manufacturer
Identification / Serial number
Measurement range
Rel. uncertainty (k = 2)
Last calibration
Certificate No. / report No.
Recalibration interval
40
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Description Remark
Test equipment
Type
Manufacturer
Identification / Serial number
Measurement range
Rel. uncertainty (k = 2)
Last calibration
Certificate No. / report No.
Recalibration interval
41
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
42
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
5 Examination
(To be completed by the Evaluating Authority)
Fulfills
R 60-1 requirements
Information
reference
Yes No
43
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
44
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Fulfils requirements
Yes No
Remarks
Passed Yes No
Yes No
Software protected by sealing
Automatic change of identification code
Fixed version number
Remarks:
Passed Yes No
45
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
g) Panel layout
h) General information of the software
For details, see R 60-1, 6.1
(R 60-2, 2.5, g)
i) Operating instructions
(R 60-2, 2.5, e)
j) Information supporting the
manufacturer’s assumption of
compliance (R 60-2, 2.5, f)
Other relevant information pertaining to identification of the instrument, diagrams, results of
previous tests, etc.: (attach photograph(s) and/or outline-drawing(s) here if available):
Remarks:
Passed Yes No
46
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
6 Performance tests
6.1 Results of the performance tests
Maximum error in v
Temperature in °C
remark
Passed
Clause
Failed
Performance tests
R 60-1/2
R 60-1,
5.3 / Load cell errors (EL)
R 60-2, (see R 60-3, 2.1.2)
2.10.1
R 60-1,
5.4 / Repeatability errors (ER)
R 60-2, (see R 60-3, 2.1.3)
2.10.1
R 60-1,
5.5.1 / Creep (CC(t))
R 60-2, (see R 60-3, 2.1.5)
2.10.2
R 60-1,
5.5.1 / Creep (CC(30–20))
R 60-2, (see R 60-3, [Link])
2.10.2
47
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Maximum error in v
Temperature in °C
Remark
Passed
Failed
R 60- Performance tests
1/2
(See note 1)
DR=
R 60-1, (See note 1)
Minimum dead load
5.5.2 / DR=
output return (CDR) /
R 60-2, (See note 1)
(see R 60-3, [Link])
2.10.3 DR=
(See note 1)
DR=
R 60-1,
[Link] Humidity effects (CHmin) /
/ (CH or no mark)
R 60-2, (see R 60-3, [Link])
2.10.5
R 60-1,
[Link] Humidity effects (CHmax) /
/ (CH or no mark)
R 60-2, (see R 60-3, 2.1.7)
2.10.5
R 60-1,
[Link] Humidity effects (SH) /
R 60-2, (see R 60-3, 2.1.8)
2.10.6
R 60-1, Temperature effects on (See
[Link] minimum dead load output note 2)
R 60-2, (CM) /
2.10.1 (see R 60-3, 2.1.4)
R 60-1, (See
Barometric pressure
5.6.2 note 2)
effects (CP (vmin)) /
R 60-2,
(see R 60-3, 2.1.6)
2.10.4
1)
DR is the minimum dead load output return in units of (g, kg, t) and determined according to R 60-3, [Link]
2)
Maximum error in unit vmin
Remarks:
48
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Maximum error in v
Temperature in °C
remark
Passed
Failed
R 60-1, [Link] / Warm-up time /
R 60-2, [Link] (see R 60-3, 2.2.1)
Power voltage
R 60-1, 5.7.2 /
variations /
R 60-2, [Link]
(see R 60-3, 2.2.2)
Short time power
R 60-1, [Link] /
reductions /
R 60-2, [Link]
(see R 60-3, 2.2.3)
Bursts (electrical fast
R 60-1, [Link] /
transients)
R 60-2, [Link]
(see R 60-3, 2.2.4)
R 60-1, [Link] / Surge /
R 60-2, [Link] (see R 60-3, 2.2.5)
Electrostatic
R 60-1, [Link] /
discharge /
R 60-2, [Link]
(see R 60-3, 2.2.6)
Electromagnetic
R 60-1, [Link] /
susceptibility /
R 60-2, [Link]
(see R 60-3, 2.2.7)
Immunity to
R 60-1, [Link] / conducted
R 60-2, electromagnetic
[Link] fields /
(see R 60-3, 2.2.8)
R 60-1, [Link] /
Span stability /
R 60-2,
(see R 60-3, 2.2.9)
[Link]
Remarks:
49
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
6.2.1 Units
Unit (e.g. counts, digits, g, kg, t) in which the measurement result is displayed.
R 60-2
Test procedure Unit
reference
50
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
6.2.3 Conditions
(see R 60-2, 2.8.1)
(To ensure that these requirements are met, the calculations should be carried out using lower n
values than the nLC specified. The calculations made do not include the application of 2.8.1).
Check that
Dmax − Dmin
vmin ≤ n
.
It should be sufficient to carry out the calculations with n = nLC, nmax – 500 and n = nLC – 1 000 if
applicable.
Dmax− Dmin
Test Is the requirement vmin ≤ fulfilled with
n
procedure
Dmin Dmax nLC nLC nLC -500 nLC-1000
(R 60-2
reference) Yes No Yes No Yes No
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.10.3
2.10.4
2.10.5
2.10.6
2.10.7
51
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
52
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
0
0 *
53
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Application no.:
Load cell model: _______________________________ At start At end
54
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
0 *
55
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.5
0 0 0 0 0 0
Notes: 1) Load/reference indications: if a 75 % load point was not obtained, a straight line interpolation between the
adjacent higher and lower load point indications is used (see R 60-1, 5.3.1 and calculation procedures in
R 60-3, [Link]).
2) Error, EL: the difference between the test indication and the reference indication divided by the conversion
factor, f.
3) Test load values are values above minimum test load, Dmin.
56
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.6
. . . . °C (20 °C) . . . . °C (T1 °C) . . . . °C (T2 °C) . . . . °C (20 °C)
Test
load Repeatability Repeatability Repeatability Repeatability Repeatability Repeatability Repeatability Repeatability MPE
error error error error error error error error (v)
(unit)
(counts) (v) (counts) (v) (counts) (v) (counts) (v)
PASS: FAIL:
Note: Error, ER: the maximum difference between the three test indications divided by the conversion
factor, f (classes C and D) or the maximum difference between the five test indications divided
by the conversion factor, f (classes A and B).
57
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.7
pLC
pLC
pLC
PASS: FAIL:
58
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
59
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.8
Creep DR
Original Barom. Change of Original Barom. Change of
Test load mpc Test load mpc
Indication Time Press Indication Time Indication Time Press. Indication Time
Dmin
Dmax
(*) Dmax
Dmin
(***)
Dmax Dmin
(**)
60
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
actual time (s): 20 – 30 minute creep difference (< 0.15*MPE): PASS: FAIL:
Notes: 1) Change (v) for creep: the observed indication minus the initial "load" indication (**) divided by the
conversion factor, f.
2) Determine the difference between the reading obtained at 20 minutes and the reading obtained at 30 minutes
(see 5.5.1).
3) Change (v) for DR: the initial indication (***) minus the initial "no load" indication (*) divided by the
conversion factor, f.
4) Absolute (not relative) time shall be recorded.
61
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.9
0 0 0
1
1
1
PASS: FAIL:
62
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
63
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.10.1.(a)
64
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
65
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
66
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
At start At end
Application no.: _______________________________
Load cell model: ________________________________ Date:
Serial no.: _______________________________ Temperature: °C
Emax: _____________ Emin:_________________ Relative humidity: %
nLC: ______________ pLC: ________________ Barometric pressure: kPa
Y: _______________ Z: _________________ Indicator temperature: °C
vmin: _____________ DR: _________________
Force-generating system: _________________________
Electronics power voltage
Test load, Dmax: __________________ Dmin: __________________________
(when applicable): ________________________
Indicating instrument: ___________________________
Evaluator: ___________________________
67
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
68
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
69
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Test Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average Repeatability
load Indication Time Indication Time Indication Time Indication Time Indication Time indication error
(unit) counts hh:mm:ss counts hh:mm:ss counts hh:mm:ss counts hh:mm:ss counts hh:mm:ss counts counts
70
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
71
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Test Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average Repeatability
load Indication Time Indication Time Indication Time Indication Time Indication Time indication error
(unit) counts hh:mm:ss counts hh:mm:ss counts hh:mm:ss counts hh:mm:ss counts hh:mm:ss counts counts
72
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
73
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
For summary of SH-humidity load test errors: use form 6.3 (3 runs) or 6.4 (5 runs) as appropriate to record individual teat
results.
Table 6.10.2
74
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
PASS: FAIL:
Notes:
1) Load/reference indications: if at 75 % load point was not obtained, a straight line interpolation between the
adjacent higher and lower load point indication is used.
2) Error, EL: the difference between the test reference and the reference indication divided by the conversion factor, f.
3) Test load values are values above minimum test load, Dmin.
4) Conditioning period: the time period for exercising the load cell.
5) For family certification this test is not necessary, if a pattern with a smaller capacity and the same or better
metrological characteristics has passed this test.
75
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
R 60-1, 3.5.17
R 60-2, [Link]
R 60-3, 2.2.1
76
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.11
Preloads
Test load
Indication Time
(units)
(counts) hh:mm:ss
Dmin
Dmax
Dmin
Dmax
Dmin
Dmax
Dmin
Dmax
Span Counts
Span vmin
Change vmin
PASS: FAIL:
Notes:
77
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
78
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Dmin
Dmax
Span Counts
Span vmin
Change vmin
PASS: FAIL:
Dmin
Dmax
Span Counts
Span vmin
Change vmin
PASS: FAIL:
79
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.13
Disturbance Result
Test load
(g, kg, t) Amplitude Duration Number of Repetition interval Indication Difference Significant fault > vmin
(%) (cycles) disturbances (v) ( ) (v) No Yes (remarks)
Without disturbance
0 0.5 10
50 1 10
Remarks:
Note: In the case of a voltage range, use the average value as the reference value.
80
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.14.1
Power supply lines: test voltage = 2 kV; duration of test = 1 minute at each polarity
Connection Result
Test load L N PE Significant fault > vmin
Polarity Indication Difference
(g, kg, or t) to to to
( ) (v) No Yes (remarks)
ground ground ground
without disturbance
× pos
neg
without disturbance
× pos
neg
without disturbance
× pos
neg
81
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Form 6.14.2 Bursts (electrical fast transients) – I/O circuits and communications lines
R 60-1, [Link]
R 60-2, [Link]
R 60-3, 2.2.4
Table 6.14.2
Result
Test load
Cable interface Polarity Indication Difference Significant fault > vmin
(g, kg, or t)
( ) (v) No Yes (remarks)
without disturbance
pos
neg
without disturbance
pos
neg
without disturbance
pos
neg
without disturbance
pos
neg
without disturbance
pos
neg
without disturbance
pos
neg
Remarks:
Note: Explain or make a sketch indicating where the clamp is located on the cable: if necessary use additional page(s).
82
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
6.15 Surges
Form 6.15 Surges
R 60-1, [Link]
R 60-2, [Link]
R 60-3, 2.2.5
83
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.15
Test conditions surges on signal, data and control lines Observer’s name:
OIML using actual loads
R 60-2, Output Test load: Line to line 1 kV
......... gained simulating loading Line to earth 2 kV
using:
Cable: Symmetrical line
[unit] Date: Start Stop Unsymmetrical line
[g]; Time: Specimen:
[kg]; Ambient temperature ºC ºC f
[t] Relative humidity % % Dmin [unit]
Barometric Pressure kPa kPa Dmax [unit]
Cycle phase Initial During exposure After
Load
Time Start
Stop
Quantity reference
[unit] indicated
Error [vmin]
relative error [%] Eii
MPE [%]
Pass
Fail
Observed faults after exposure
Fault limit [%] .............
Line to line (N/A for balanced) Fault/Deviation Significant Acts on fault
↑ ↓ Yes No Yes No
3x
3x
Line to earth
3x
3x
Observations
84
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.16.1
Result
Test load Test No. of Repetition Significant fault > vmin
Indication Difference
(g, kg, t) voltage discharges interval
( ) (v) No Yes (remarks)
(kV) ≥ 10 (s)
without disturbance
8 (air
discharges)
PASS: FAIL:
Remarks:
Notes: 1) If the load cell fails, the test point at which this occurs shall be recorded.
2) IEC Publication 61000-4-2 (2008) Ed 1.1 Consolidated edition specifies that the test be conducted with the
most sensitive polarity.
85
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
without disturbance
2
4
without disturbance
PASS: FAIL:
Remarks:
Notes: 1) If the load cell fails, the test point at which this occurs shall be recorded.
2) IEC Publication 61000-4-2 (1999-05) Ed 1.1 Consolidated edition specifies that the test be conducted with the
most sensitive polarity.
86
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Specify test points utilized on load cell and test equipment used, e.g. by photos or sketches.
a) Direct application
Contact discharges:
Air discharges:
b) Indirect application
R 60-1,[Link]
R 60-2, [Link]
R 60-3, 2.2.7
Rate of sweep:
Test load:
Test load material:
87
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.17
Disturbance Result
without disturbance
Front
Right
Vertical
Left
Rear
Front
Right
Horizontal
Left
Rear
PASS: FAIL:
Remarks:
Note: If the load cell fails, the test point at which this occurs shall be recorded.
Describe the setup of the test and equipment, e.g. by photos or sketches:
88
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Rate of sweep:
Test load:
Test load material:
89
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Table 6.18
Test conditions RF current injection Observer’s name:
OIML
using actual loads
R 60-2,
Output Test load: fl = MHz
........
gained simulating loading fh = MHz
using: RF voltage Vemf
Cable exposed Modulation % AM
Date: Start Stop Dwell time s
[unit] Time: Specimen:
[g];
Ambient temperature ºC ºC f
[kg];
Relative humidity % % Dmin [unit]
[t]
Barometric pressure kPa kPa Dmax [unit]
Frequency Cycle phase Initial During exposure After
cycle Load
Time Start
Stop
Quantity reference
[unit] indicated
Error [vmin]
relative error [%] Eii
MPE [%]
Pass
Fail
Observed faults during exposure
Fault limit [%] ................
Frequency Fault/Deviation Significant Acts on fault
MHz Yes No Yes No
Observations
90
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Form 6.19.1 (3 runs) Span stability – measurement data for classes C and D
R 60-1, [Link]
R 60-2, [Link]
R 60-3, 2.2.9
91
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 2:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Average Date:
Test load
Indication Indication Indication indication Time:
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
span
Evaluator: _______________________
Remarks:
Measurement no. 3:
Date:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Average
Test load Time:
Indication Indication Indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Temperature: °C
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
span
Evaluator: ________________________
Remarks:
92
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 4:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Date:
Average
Test load
Indication Indication Indication indication Time:
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
span
Evaluator: ________________________
Remarks:
93
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 5:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Average Date:
Test load
Indication Indication Indication indication Time:
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
span
Evaluator: ________________________
Remarks:
94
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 6:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Date:
Average
Test load Time:
Indication Indication Indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Temperature: °C
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
span
Evaluator: ________________________
Remarks:
Measurement no. 7:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Average
Test load
Indication Indication Indication indication Date:
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Time:
Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
span
Evaluator: ________________________
Remarks:
95
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 8:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Date:
Average
Test load Time:
Indication Indication Indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Temperature: °C
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
span
Evaluator: ________________________
Remarks:
R 60-1, [Link]
R 60-2, [Link]
R 60-3, 2.2.9
Application no.: _____________________ Force-generating system: Notes: 1) Span is the result of subtracting the
Load cell model:_____________________ Indicating instrument: _____________________ average indication at minimum test
load from the average indication at
Serial no.: __________________________ pLC: _____________DR: __________________
maximum test load.
Emax: ______________________________ Conversion factor, f: ______________________
2) Absolute (not relative) time shall be
nLC: _______________________________ Minimum test load, Dmin: __________________ recorded.
Vmin: ______________________________ Maximum test load, Dmax: __________________
96
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 1:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average
Test load
indication Date:
indication indication indication indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Time:
Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
Span
Evaluator: __________________________
Remarks:
Measurement no. 2:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average
Test load
indication Date:
indication indication indication indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Time:
Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
Span
Evaluator: __________________________
Remarks:
97
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 3:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average
Test load
indication Date:
indication indication indication indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Time:
Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
Span
Evaluator: __________________________
Remarks:
Measurement no. 4:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average
Test load
indication Date:
indication indication indication indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Time:
Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
Span
Evaluator: __________________________
Remarks:
98
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 5:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average Time:
Test load
indication indication indication indication indication indication Temperature: °C
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
Span
Date:
Evaluator: __________________________
Remarks:
Measurement no. 6:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average
Test load
indication indication indication indication indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Time Time Date:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Time:
Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Span
Barometric pressure: kPa
Evaluator: __________________________
Remarks:
99
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
Measurement no. 7:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average
Test load
indication Date:
indication indication indication indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Time:
Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
Span
Evaluator: __________________________
Remarks:
Measurement no. 8:
Run no. 1 Run no. 2 Run no. 3 Run no. 4 Run no. 5 Average
Test load
indication Date:
indication indication indication indication indication
(g, kg, t) Time Time Time Time Time
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Time:
Temperature: °C
Relative humidity: %
Barometric pressure: kPa
Span
Evaluator: __________________________
Remarks:
100
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
101
Report number ________ Report page ___ of ___ Report date:
PASS: FAIL:
Remarks:
102
INTERNATIONAL OIML R 60
RECOMMENDATION Annexes
Edition 2017 (E)
Annexes
Annexes
OIML R 60 Annexes Edition 2017 (E)
ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE
DE MÉTROLOGIE LÉGALE
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
OF LEGAL METROLOGY
OIML R 60:2017 – Annexes
Contents
Foreword ................................................................................................................................ 4
Annex A Definitions from other applicable international publications ................................. 5
Annex B OIML Certificate for load cells – Content of the Certificate .................................. 7
Annex C OIML Certificate for load cells............................................................................... 9
Annex D Selection of load cell(s) for testing - a practical example ..................................... 13
Annex E Load transmission to the load cell ........................................................................ 20
Annex F Bibliography ......................................................................................................... 24
3
OIML R 60:2017 – Annexes
Foreword
4
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex A
Annex A
(Mandatory)
Definitions from other applicable
international publications
6
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex B
Annex B
(Mandatory)
OIML Certificate for load cells -
Content of the Certificate
The OIML Certificate template that can be downloaded from the “Documentation” section of the OIML-CS
part of the OIML website shall be supplemented with the following additional information:
Model designation
Maximum capacity, Emax
Accuracy class
Maximum number of load cell
verification intervals, nLC
Minimum load cell verification
interval, vmin
Apportioning factor, pLC
Additional characteristics and identification, as applicable according to R 60-1, 3.4.2 and 5.1.5, may be
included in the Certificate or on additional pages if necessary, in the format below:
Model designation
(Additional characteristics, per
R 60-1, 3.4.2 and 5.1.5)
Special conditions:
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
7
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex B
*
Note: For load cells with digital output this refers to the number of counts for Emax
**
Note: For load cells with digital output this is not required
8
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex C
Annex C
(Informative)
OIML Certificate for load cells
This Annex is provided as an example of supplemental information that may be included in the OIML
Certificate and is intended to complement the information found in Annex B.
Certificate history
1 Technical data
The metrological characteristics of the load cells type xxx are listed in Table C1. Further technical data
are listed in the data sheet of the manufacturer (see the section “6 Data sheet and dimensions” in this
Annex).
Table C1: Essential data
Accuracy class C3
2 Tests
The determination of the measurement error, the stability of the dead load output, repeatability and
creep in the temperature range of –10 °C to +40 °C as well as the tests of barometric pressure effects
and the determination of the effects of static damp heat have been performed according to OIML R 60
as shown in Table C2 on the load cell denominated in the test report with the reference No. xxx, dated
xxx.
9
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex C
The complete type designation is indicated as follows in the example on the name plate:
10
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex C
4 Documentation
Example
• Test Report No. xxx; C3; Y = xxx; Z = xxx; Emax = xxx kg; SN: xxx
• Datasheet No. Xxx
• Technical Drawing No. Xxx
5 Further information
The manufacturing process, material and sealing (i.e., environmental protection) of the produced load
cells shall be in accordance with the tested patterns; essential changes shall be identified and
communicated to the issuing authority and are only allowed with the permission of the issuing authority
based on the impact of those changes on the certification process.
Sufficient information shall be included to describe the patent design.
The typical errors related to linearity, hysteresis and temperature coefficient as indicated in the data
sheet point out possible single errors of a pattern; however the overall error of each pattern is
determined by the maximum permissible error according OIML R 60-1, 5.3.2.
The technical data, the dimensions of the load cell and the principle of load transmission are given in
section 6 of this Annex, “Data sheet and dimensions”, and shall be complied with.
11
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex C
Wiring
The load cell is provided with a shielded 4 or 6 conductor cable. The cable length is indicated in the
accompanying document. The shield will be connected or not connected to the load cell according to
the customer’s preference.
Connections
12
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex D
Annex D
(Informative)
Selection of load cell(s) for testing - a practical example
D.1 This Annex describes a practical example showing the complete procedure for the selection of
test samples out of a load cell family.
D.2 Assume a family consisting of three groups of load cells, differing in class, maximum number
of load cell verification intervals, nLC, and maximum capacities, Emax. The capacities, Emax, overlap
between the groups according to the following example:
13
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex D
D.2.1 Summarize and sort the load cells with respect to Emax and accuracy as follows:
nLC
Group vmin, kg
Z
10 30 50
C3 12 000 100 300 500 5 000 000 000 000
3 000
6 000
10 000
D.2.2 Identify the smallest capacity load cells in each group to be tested, according to R 60-2, 2.4:
nLC
Group Z vmin, kg
3 000
6 000
10 000
14
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex D
nLC
Group Z vmin, kg
3 000
6 000
10 000
15
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex D
nLC
Group Z vmin, kg
3 000
6 000
10 000
In this example, there is no change to the load cells selected. The capacities of the load cells C6 –
300 kg and C6 - 500 kg exceed the capacity of the load cell C6 - 50 kg by greater than 5 times but not
greater than 10 times. However, a 500 kg load cell of better metrological characteristics (from group
B10) has already been selected. Therefore, in order to minimize the number of load cells to be tested
according to R 60-2, 2.3.1, neither cell is selected.
D.2.5 Again, and repeating this process until all groups have been considered, move to the group
with the next best characteristics (in this example, C3) and in accordance with R 60-2, 2.4.4, select the
next largest capacity between 5 and 10 times that of the nearest smaller capacity load cell which has
been selected. When no capacity meets this criterion, the selected load cell shall be that having the
smallest capacity exceeding 10 times that of the nearest smaller capacity load cell which has been
selected. Continue this process until all load cell capacities in the group and all groups have been
considered.
16
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex D
nLC
Group Z vmin, kg
3 000
6 000
10 000
17
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex D
nLC
Group Z vmin, kg
3 000
6 000
10 000
Inspect the values of vmin, Y, and Z for all cells of the same capacity.
If any load cell of the same capacity has a lower vmin or higher Y than the identified load cell, that load
cell (or load cells) is also liable for partial evaluation testing, specifically the conduct of additional
temperature effect on minimum dead load, Emin and barometric pressure effect tests.
If any load cell of the same capacity has a higher Y than the selected load cell, that load cell (or load
cells) is also liable for partial evaluation testing, specifically the conduct of additional creep and DR
tests.
In this example, the load cells identified above also have the best characteristics of lowest vmin,
highest Y and highest Z. This is normally the case, but not always.
D.2.7 If applicable, select the load cell for humidity testing in accordance with R 60-2, 2.4.5, that
being the load cell with the most severe characteristics, for example the greatest value of nLC or the
lowest value of vmin.
In this example, the load cell with the greatest value of nLC or the lowest value of vmin is the same load
cell, therefore select:
B10 - 500 kg (humidity test required)
Note: The other B10 load cells also possess the same qualifications and are possible choices. The
500 kg load cell was chosen because it is the smallest of the applicable B10 capacities. Although the
C6 - 50 kg load cell has the lowest vmin of 0.0028, the B10 load cells have the highest nLC, highest
accuracy class, and the highest Y and Z.
D.2.8 If applicable, select the load cell for the additional tests to be performed on digital load cells
in accordance with R 60-2, 2.4.6, that being the load cell with the most severe characteristics, for
example the greatest value of nmax or the lowest value of vmin.
18
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex D
C6 - 50 kg
B10 - 500 kg
Load cells requiring full evaluation test
B10 - 4 000 kg
C3 - 30 000 kg
Load cells requiring partial evaluation test None
19
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex E
Annex E
(Informative)
Load transmission to the load cell
This Annex is taken from the WELMEC 2.4 (European cooperation in legal metrology) Guide for
Load Cells (Issue 2, published in August, 2001). With permission from WELMEC, the following
portion of that Guide is reprinted here to provide guidelines for load cell evaluators, during load cell
performance evaluations. Recognizing the critical role that load cell receptors and load transmission
devices play in accurate measurements, this Annex is intended to provide information regarding the
effect of load transmission and recommendations for test design and procedure. The annex is
informational and not to be considered required practice.
For some types of load cells, the kind of load transmission to the load cell has an influence on the
measurements and therefore on the test results.
In this Annex the standard load transmission devices are listed.
The manufacturer should define whether the load cell works with all standard load transmission
devices for the type of load cell or with selected standard load transmission devices or with a load cell
specific load transmission devices.
This information may be considered for the load cell tests and may be marked on the certificate.
Symbol Description
Inclination possible
Note: allows for tilt of load cell or deflection of load
receptor, no movement normal to load axis possible
20
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex E
The single bending beams had been exempted for general acceptance, because very small
displacements of the “force transducing point” may lead to a change of span and linearity.
21
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex E
22
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex E
23
OIML R 60:2017 – Annex F
Annex F
Bibliography
24
Amendment (2019-12-23) to OIML R 60:2017 (E)
BIML note
The corrections in the present Amendment are applicable to the English text only;
the French version was corrected prior to publication. The present Amendment
supersedes the previous Amendment dated 2019-02-07.
2.1.4 Temperature effects on minimum dead load output (MDLO) (CM = Change MDLO)
[Link] of the published version of OIML R 60-3:2017 (page 7) currently reads:
pLC ≤ CM(vmin)
The equation should be corrected to read:
CM(vmin) ≤ pLC
The title of 6.7 of the published version of OIML R 60-3:2017 (page 58) currently reads:
6.7 Temperature effects on minimum dead load output return (MDLO)
The title of 6.7 should be corrected to read:
6.7 Temperature effects on minimum dead load output return (MDLO)
The reference in Note 2 to 6.7 of the published version of OIML R 60-3:2017 (page 58)
currently reads:
2) Indication: the average initial minimum test load indication obtained from Table D.1.
The reference in Note 2 should be corrected to read:
2) Indication: the average initial minimum test load indication obtained from Table 6.3.
1
Amendment (2019-12-23) to OIML R 60:2017 (E)
2
Amendment (2019-12-23) to OIML R 60:2017 (E)
Connections
The published version of the figure currently reads:
Signal +
Sense +
Excitation +
Signal -
Excitation -
Sense -
Shield
Annex F - Bibliography
Reference [5]
The published version currently reads:
[5] OIML D 11 General requirements for electronic measuring instruments, 2004
OIML R 60-1:2017 specifies that both analog-active and digital load cells must maintain performance accuracy under specified reference conditions. This involves conducting controlled tests to ensure their measurement outputs remain consistent and within permissible error limits despite technological differences .
Temperature and humidity can significantly affect load cell performance by inducing measurement errors. Tests specified in OIML R 60-1:2017 involve subjecting load cells to cyclic temperature and humidity conditions, recording measurement changes, and comparing them against permissible limits to ensure reliability under varied environmental conditions .
Maximum permissible measurement errors are critical in standardizing load cells, as outlined in OIML R 60-1:2017. They define the acceptable accuracy limits for load cell performance, ensuring that all cells meet consistent and reliable measurement standards across different environments and applications, thus facilitating trust in their use .
Humidity tests expose load cells to high humidity and temperature cycles to simulate challenging environmental conditions. The results are compared against standard limits to ensure the load cells perform reliably without significant measurement errors under such conditions, thus demonstrating their robustness in real-world applications .
To determine measurement and repeatability error as per OIML R 60-1:2017, load cells are subjected to a series of tests involving temperature stabilization, preload cycles, and recording of indicative instrument readings at minimum and maximum test loads. These measurements are repeated across various temperatures and accuracy classes to assess consistency and compliance with permissible error limits .
OIML R 60-1:2017 specifies that the construction of load cells must support their functional and metrological integrity by considering design elements that influence characteristics like accuracy and stability. This involves evaluating materials and assembly techniques to maintain performance under different operational stresses .
Input impedance testing, as per OIML standards, involves measuring the electrical impedance of the load cell input to ensure it aligns with specified criteria. This is crucial because improper impedance can affect signal integrity and thus the accuracy of weight measurements, making it a key parameter in load cell assessment .
According to OIML R 60-1:2017, the software in load cells must meet stringent criteria to ensure accurate data processing and reporting. This includes provisions for data protection, security measures against unauthorized alterations, and maintaining measurement integrity throughout operations .
Repeatability is crucial for load cells as it reflects the ability of the cell to consistently reproduce the same measurements under identical conditions. The OIML R 60-1:2017 requires rigorous testing to ensure that repeatability error is within specified limits, highlighting its role in achieving accurate and dependable weighing results .
OIML R 60-1:2017 defines categories of load cells to ensure they meet precise metrological requirements for different applications. This classification is crucial as it helps in determining the appropriate load cells for various measurement tasks, ensuring accuracy and reliability in weight measurements under varying conditions .