0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views7 pages

PID Controller Effects on System Response

The document describes an experiment to study the effect of proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control. The experiment uses an experimental kit to analyze the response of a second-order system under open-loop and closed-loop control with proportional, PI, PD, and PID controllers. Key responses such as settling time, overshoot, and steady-state error are observed on an oscilloscope and sketches are made to compare the performance of each controller type.

Uploaded by

bt21eee122
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views7 pages

PID Controller Effects on System Response

The document describes an experiment to study the effect of proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control. The experiment uses an experimental kit to analyze the response of a second-order system under open-loop and closed-loop control with proportional, PI, PD, and PID controllers. Key responses such as settling time, overshoot, and steady-state error are observed on an oscilloscope and sketches are made to compare the performance of each controller type.

Uploaded by

bt21eee122
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

EXPERIMENT NO.

8
Aim To study the effectofPID controller:
Apparatus
1. Experimental kit (PCS-01)
2. CRO
3. Connecting probes
or
Theory A controller is a device which when introduced in a feedback
forward path of a system, reshapes the time response of the system as per requiremeit. Such
device converts input to the controller to some function of error, like proportional to error,
derivative of erroretc, ue to whích steady state &transientresponse changest .
In general good time response demands
i) Less settling time
ii) Less overshoot
ii) Less rise time
iv) Smaller steady state eror
To improve the transient response damping ratio is changed. To improve steady state
performance steady state errors are tried to reduce.
Consider second order system
Gs) =a/s(s + 2fa,)
H(s) -1
C(s)
R{S) s²+ 25w,s +a
Where Eis damping ratio &o is iatural frequency.
The error constant can be determined as below

Kp = limG(S)H(S) = c
K, = lim sG ($)H($) = an /25
Where, K, is position error constant
K is position error constánt

R(s) E(s) c(s)


a/s(s + 2w,)
P controller
In many practical systems, controller input is proportional to the error generated. Such
controllers are known asSproportional cöntroller is2tn
Consider second order systenm where coniroller input is error itself &proportional constant
is K

Controller Plant

R{s) c(s)
K
o/s(s + 2fw,)
/s(s +?

By increase in K i.e., increase in system gain, steady state error can be reduced but due to
highi gain seting time &peak oversköot withinacceptabl limits by providing folBowing
different types of controHer,
ijhfPD proportional +derivative action
i) Plproportional +integral action'
iin) PID proportional + integral +derivative action.

PD controller:
[Link] in the forward path, which changes the plant input to the proportional plus
derivative of error sigDal is called as PD' ontreller pi
ie; input to controBler = Ke(t) + Kpde(t)fdt '
Taking Laplace = KE(s) +sKzE(s)= E(S)K +skp]
The transfer function of suchontroller is [K+ skpl
s4
This is realized as shown in fig

R(s) E(s) C(s)


K
o/s(s + 25 o,)

sk,

2
Gs) = (K +skp)o/s(s + 2{@n)
H(s) = 1
CS) (K+SKp)a
R(S) sl+s(2fWntKp)+oh

Comparing denominator with standard form,


O, is sane as in the previous Ptype controller.
&2 a,=2 ), to~Kp
Therefore =Fto,Kp/2 while,
This controller increases damping ratio by afactor o,Kp2
Ky = 0
K, = Wn/2 Hence
steady state error remains same.
As there is no change in the error coefficients,
controller has following effects on the system.
i) It increases damping ratio,
ii) , for the system remains unchanged,
in)Type of the system remains unchanged,
iv) It reduces peak overshoot,
v) It reduces settling time,
unchanged
vi) Steady state error remains state response
improves transient response without affecting steady
In general it
PIcontroHer: H(s)=1
+ 2w,)
Consider system with G(s) = 1/(s
C(s)/R(s)=1/(s +25w, + 1)

ess = 2fan/(1 + 2fwn)

changes the controller input to the proportional pus


in the forward path, which
Acontroler controller.
is called as PI
integral oferror signal Ke(t) + K, [e(t) dt
controller =
ie., Input to the
(s) + K,E = E(s)[K + K,/s]
TakingLaplace = KE S
+ K,/s]
transfer funetion of suchcontrolleris [K
The shown in fig
Thís ís realizedas
R(s) E(s) C(s)
K
1/(s + 2fw,)

K,
S

G(s) H(s) = (K+ K,/s)/(s + 25on)


-(Ks + K;)/s (s + 25w,)

This indicates type of system has increased from 0 to 1


So K, =0
ess = 0
Hence PIcontroller has following effects
Iy It imcreases type of system
i) Steady state error reduces tremendously for the same input Traysient
In general it improves steady state response & has slight effect on the transfer response

PID controller:
As PD improves transient response &PIimproves steady state response combination of two
can be used to improve overall time response of the system
This is realized as shown in fig
Controller Plant

K,/s

R(S) K
C(s)
o/s(s + 2wn)

skp
Observe Input & Output Waveforms yOn CRO (Ch-1& Ch-1)
Procedure:
(A) SETTINGS
Simultaneousty
Set input signal
1. Set switch SW2 on (wavefom generator)
2. Set
frequency waveformgenerator panel to fast
[Link] knob on division 2.
square wave knob to'6V
4. Set, set
value knob to zero
position.
(B) Set process
[Link] SW4 to faat.
2. Set
switches Plon lag &P2 ön lag
(C) Set controller.t
1. Set switch
SW3 fast
2. Set
proportional band (PB) knob on.100%
(D)
Studyopen
1. Dó comectionloop system
as shown in fig 1
2. Obaerve [Link] CRO for (Black colour only)
PB knob setting 50%,
3.
Drawrough sketch for each on same graph. 100%,200%
(E} Cloaed loóp system with
1. Do additional proportional control only
connections (Blue
2. Observe output on CRO for knobcolour)
3. Draw rough sketche's for
aetting 200%,100% &20%
each on same graph.
(F)Closed loop with PI
1. Do additional connections
(Green colour)
2. Keep PB'knob at 20% setting &integral time
(IT) knob to zero.
3. Vary IT knob & note the changes in steady state &
4.
transient.
Draw rough sketch for each ßn same graph.

(G)Closed loop with PID


5. Do additional connections (Red colour)
6. Keep PB krob at 20%, IT knob such that steady state error is zero &
knob. zero.
derivative time (DT)
7. Vary DT knob &note changes insteady state &trarisient
8. Draw rough sketches for each on same graph.

(H)Closed lóop with PD controller


1. Remove integral connections (green colour)
2. PBknob át 20%, DT át zero.
3. Vary DT & note the changes in steady state &transient
4. Draw rough sketches for each on same graph.
PD-REMOYE
GREEN AITH LoOP. CLOSED
CONNECTION-RED CONTRoLLER PLD WITH LOOPCLOSED
CON CCLOSEDLoOP
PE WITH
CONNECTION-REEN TROLER CLOSEDLoOP
CONNECTION PROPORT|ONAL WITH
BLUE CoNNECTION LOOR(OPEN
BLACK
Y
TA
ORNRATOR WAVERORM
onlBluyk
(PCSO1) SIMULATOR CONTROD PROCESS
TVAT
POVER

OAD

CLOsEDLooP
CLOSED CLOSEDOPEN
CLOSED LOOP

DNVERTSR

[Link] LoOP 3RROR

WTH wITH WTH


AITH CoNNECTION T PROCESS
YALUZ

REMOYE PID PC
PROPORT|ONAL RANTORT
DEYADH
CONTROLER
CoNTROLLER
VALLE

VALBSST
ZAST OONTROLLER LAG

swI CONTROL

BLACK
OUT
VOLTAB DC RI

GREEN CON
SOURCE
LOW SIMULATOR
ONNECTION-
CTIONGREEN. DNTIORL
TIY(o) PROCISs

NECTION-
3
15

-
OUT (PCS-01)
BLUE
V DNIEG
MaoeyROns P
+
RED. CENERATOR
WAVERORM

PROPOKTONL N
23055
Pt. AD
Lud, CUT
3%

Cec6
FRRQUCY
P1

FANT
DI5TURAANCZ
UTPLT

sW2

Common questions

Powered by AI

When varying the proportional band (PB) in a PID-controlled system, adjustments directly influence the system's sensitivity to error, with wider bands providing less aggressive control. Changing the derivative time (DT) affects the system's response to rate-of-change of errors, enhancing damping and reducing overshoot when tuned appropriately . These adjustments are observable as changes in steady-state error and transient response in the system's output, which can be tracked through waveform analysis .

Control loops are central to performance tuning in control systems as they regulate the system's input to achieve the desired output by continuously adjusting based on feedback. Open loops do not have this feedback mechanism, while closed loops incorporate feedback to correct errors dynamically . Different types of controllers, such as P, PI, PD, and PID, offer varying degrees of control and stability depending on the specific requirements of the system, impacting performance across different operational parameters .

A PID controller differs significantly from P or PI controllers in error management. While a P controller focuses on proportional error correction, it leaves steady-state error unresolved . A PI controller addresses steady-state error effectively but may struggle with overshoot and response speed . The addition of the derivative component in a PID controller aids in predicting system error trends, enhancing stability and transient response by dampening oscillations, providing comprehensive error management that neither P nor PI controllers alone can achieve .

In a PID controller, the proportional component addresses present errors, aiming to reduce overall system error by a gain factor . The integral component is responsible for eliminating steady-state error by accumulating the past errors and adjusting the system accordingly . The derivative component predicts future errors by assessing the rate of error change, thereby enhancing the stability of the system by damping oscillations and reducing overshoot . Each component targets a specific aspect of the system response to optimize accuracy and stability .

A PD controller increases the damping ratio of a system, which reduces overshoot and improves stability, enhancing the system's transient response . However, it does not change the type of the system, meaning the number of poles at the origin of the s-plane remains the same . It mainly modifies the transient behavior by adding derivative action to counteract changes rapidly, without affecting steady-state error .

A combination of PI and PD controllers is employed to optimize both steady-state and transient responses of a system. The PI controller primarily enhances the steady-state performance by reducing steady-state error, while the PD controller improves the transient response by reducing overshoot and settling time . This combination allows for a balanced approach where the overall system benefits from reduced steady-state error and improved stability and response speed . This comprehensive tuning provides robust control suitable for systems requiring both stability and accuracy .

The damping ratio (ζ) and natural frequency (ωn) are key parameters that dictate the system's transient response. A higher damping ratio typically reduces overshoot and leads to a faster settling time, contributing to a better transient response . The natural frequency influences how quickly the system responds, with a higher natural frequency generally resulting in a quicker response time .

A PI controller reduces the steady-state error significantly by introducing an integral action which accumulates errors over time and adjusts the process accordingly . This action increases the system's type, thus improving the system's ability to track a reference signal without steady-state error . Consequently, the system's capacity to manage persistent errors and integrate input disturbances improves .

A PID controller improves the system's transient response by decreasing the rise time and reducing overshoot. The proportional action primarily affects the transient response, while the integral and derivative actions help to reduce steady-state error and overshoot, respectively . The PI part is crucial in minimizing steady-state error, while the PD part enhances the system's stability by reducing overshoot and settling time .

To evaluate the performance of a PID controller using a process control simulator, the setup involves several steps: Set the waveform generator to specific frequency and waveform settings, configure the process switches, and adjust the controller settings such as the proportional band, integral time, and derivative time knobs . These adjustments are made to observe changes in steady-state and transient responses, captured through waveform observations on CRO, enabling a detailed performance analysis .

You might also like