Scribd
Upload
14 views2 pages

Return of Historic Artefacts Debate

The document discusses the debate around whether historic artifacts from other countries should be returned to their countries of origin. Three key points are made in favor of returning artifacts: 1) Many artifacts were acquired through theft and colonization, depriving nations of their cultural heritage and identity. Returning artifacts can help strengthen cultural identity. 2) The country of origin can best preserve artifacts due to understanding of the cultural context and climate. This ensures artifacts are cared for by those most connected to their history and significance. 3) Preservation efforts are more effective when artifacts are near people who have a deep connection to the artifacts. Museums in countries of origin can better educate locals to appreciate artifacts within their

Uploaded by

eunwann
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
14 views2 pages

Return of Historic Artefacts Debate

The document discusses the debate around whether historic artifacts from other countries should be returned to their countries of origin. Three key points are made in favor of returning artifacts: 1) Many artifacts were acquired through theft and colonization, depriving nations of their cultural heritage and identity. Returning artifacts can help strengthen cultural identity. 2) The country of origin can best preserve artifacts due to understanding of the cultural context and climate. This ensures artifacts are cared for by those most connected to their history and significance. 3) Preservation efforts are more effective when artifacts are near people who have a deep connection to the artifacts. Museums in countries of origin can better educate locals to appreciate artifacts within their

Uploaded by

eunwann
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topic Breakdown

Historic artefacts from other countries should all


be returned to the respective countries of origin .

Affirmative
- Returning it would be more respectful to the original owners
- Most artefacts were retrieved from british colonisation, thus returning them
would be a sign of apology

Negative
- The british museum receives a lot of visitors and they would be able to learn
more on their cultures
- The british museum has a lot of advanced technology to preserve the artefacts

I stand before you today to affirm the resolution that historic artefacts from other
countries should be returned to the country of origin. This is a matter of justice, respect,
and the preservation of cultural heritage.

However, before I elaborate, I would like to disprove the opposition’s arguments. The
second speaker stated museums are in more developed nations, thus are able to preserve

the artefacts better. This is completely wrong as museums are more prevalent in

more developed nations, however, much of the preservation of artefacts

depends on the conservation methods employed by museums. While

resources and funding may be more accessible in more developed nations,

the same preservation techniques can be applied in any nation.

He also declared that. This is also incorrect since.


They also replied with the rebuttal that. This reply can be deemed as invalid because.

Firstly, many historic artefacts were acquired through means that cannot be described as
anything other than theft against certain regions. These actions resulted in a severe loss
of cultural identity for the affected nations. The rightful owners of these artefacts were
deprived of a crucial part of their heritage, often against their will and under oppressive
circumstances. This occurring problem can be simply solved by returning the stolen
artefacts, hence the country of origin will be able to reunite with the lost, yet significant
part of their culture. The people will then be able to strengthen and secure their cultural
identity through the artefacts that were justly returned.

Secondly, returning artefacts to their country of origin is essential for their proper
preservation and care. Museums in foreign lands may strive to maintain the artefacts, but
the true understanding and connection to these pieces often lie in the soil of their origin.
The climate, the people, and the cultural context play a significant role in the appropriate
conservation of these artefacts. By returning them to their homeland, we ensure that they
are cared for by those who understand their historical and cultural significance the best.

Preservation efforts can be more effectively carried out when the artefacts are in
proximity to the people who have a deep-rooted connection with them. Museums in the
country of origin can integrate these artefacts into their educational systems, fostering a
sense of pride and responsibility among the local population. This approach not only
ensures better preservation but also allows for a more holistic understanding and
appreciation of the artefacts within their cultural context.

In conclusion, the return of historic artefacts to their country of origin is a matter of


solving historical injustices and ensuring the proper preservation of cultural heritage. By
acknowledging the tainted history of acquisition and recognizing the importance of
cultural context in preservation, we can take a step toward fostering global respect and
understanding. Let us stand together in affirming this resolution, promoting justice and
honouring the rich tapestry of the world's diverse cultural heritage. Thank you.

You might also like