Lowland Path Guide
Lowland Path Guide
Construction Guide
Paths for All is a partnership organisation, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) is the
for a full list of our current partners please government's adviser on all aspects of
visit our website [Link] nature and landscape across Scotland.
Paths for All Partnership is a registered Our role is to help people understand,
Scottish charity No: SC025535 and a value and enjoy Scotland's nature now
Company Limited by Guarantee No: and in the future. For more information,
168554 incorporated 19 September 1996 visit our website at [Link]
at Companies House, Edinburgh,
Registered Office:
Office 8, Forrester Lodge, Tullibody Road,
Alloa FK10 2HU.
Design: [Link]
1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4
For most people, you know you have been on a good path when you can look up and enjoy
the view and not what is beneath your feet, when you don’t arrive back home with your wellies
and the dog covered in mud, and when you can find your way easily without getting anxious
or lost. Usually this does not happen by chance. Paths need careful planning, constructing,
and signposting and most important of all, they need looking after to keep them in good
shape.
From doing simple maintenance to building a bridge, choosing a suitable path surface to
finding a suitable contractor there is a lot to learn and sometimes some difficult choices to
make. These pages are designed to help you develop some path ‘know how’, whatever level
you are working at. There is advice and training available, National Path Demonstration Sites
to visit, a lot of tried and tested ideas and designs to make use of and some information about
how legislation underpins how paths are planned and managed.
This good practice guide has been fully revised and updated from the original "Lowland Path
Construction - A Guide to Good Practice" which was published in 2001.
The guide considers all aspects of lowland path development and management and looks at
the different stages of path construction projects – planning, design, construction and
maintenance. The guide provides information to help make lowland path management
decisions across Scotland from urban areas to rural places. It will also help in making
The guide is mainly aimed at professionals, such as Access Officers. There is a degree of
technical information included but our aim was to produce a guide that can be used with the
minimum of technical knowledge. We hope that people from community path groups who
have limited experience of lowland path development and management will also find the
guide useful.
The information has been structured to allow easy navigation to the appropriate level of detail.
For example, experienced path managers may be looking for information on a particular path
design, whereas those new to this topic may benefit from understanding the principles of
lowland path management.
This guide was produced by Paths for All with support from Scottish Natural Heritage.
The guidance in this guide is not standards. The guide has been compiled using the best
information available to Paths for All at the time of publication. It is intended as a general
guide to the topics and should not be viewed as a substitute for professional advice in specific
project cases.
The guide contains clickable text to help navigate through the guidance and to link to other
relevant resource as follows:
Before starting work on designing or constructing a path, you need to think about the existing
paths in your area and ensure you understand how to go about developing a path or network.
Before deciding to build a new path or upgrade an existing one, spend some time getting to
know the paths in your area. Try to find out who already uses them, how many people use
them, and who might want to in the future.
The Core Paths Plan for your area will show the core paths and ‘wider access network’. Your
local authority or national park access officer should also have a record of the consultations
done as part of the core path planning process, so ask for copies of any maps that they may
have which show existing paths as well as the aspirational routes.
Once you have gathered some information, transfer it to a map so that you can visualise the
network on the ground. You will build up a picture of whole paths and ‘links’ or gaps, which
you can then describe in terms of the physical characteristics of the area; who owns the land;
any path construction or maintenance work that has been done in the past; existing
infrastructure, such as car parks, bridges and signs, and any features associated with the
path, such as viewpoints, buildings or wildlife. This is the Green Level survey and compiles all
the available information about each path. It is not necessary to put together a complete
inventory before going further, but the more information that you can find, the easier it will be
to anticipate issues further down the line.
Things to consider:
Landscape
How do the paths fit in to the local landscape and are there any special features that need to
be avoided or protected? What landscape features could enhance the character of the paths,
or provide interest to path users? For example, it may be dangerous to site a path along the
top of an exposed cliff, but the view is one of the main attractions that users want, you may
need to design the route to give safe opportunities to appreciate the view by providing defined
viewpoints.
Terrain
Will the paths need any specific works to negotiate slopes or physical features? Can you
change the route's alignment to avoid steep slopes, or provide alternatives? For example, if an
existing desire line goes directly to the top of a local hill, decide whether building steps is the
best option, or if the path could take a less direct route, with shallower gradients.
User needs
Are there any outdoor activities that are particularly popular in your area that would affect the
design or management of the paths? For example, is the network in an area of high horse
ownership or are there livery stable 'hot spots', you need to take this into account.
Identifying opportunities
It is easy to get stuck on detail, so taking a broader view of your local paths as a network
should help you to identify opportunities to address the constraints you have acknowledged,
and find ways of making the paths interesting and easy to use for everyone.
Involving people
This is where it makes sense to get the views of other people in your local area. Community
engagement is a really important part of any planning exercise, and can make the difference
between success and failure. Take the time to work out what you want to ask, and find out
whether there are other people undertaking consultation processes around the same time –
consultation fatigue is becoming a problem for both local people and those trying to get
people’s opinions.
If you work for an organisation there may already be procedures and processes in place that
will guide how you involve people in the planning. In general, the earlier you can gather
people’s views and the more you understand about people’s needs (and take them into
account), the more likely you are to gain their support.
Some of the more important information you may want to collect includes:
• what activities people currently take part in (e.g. walking, cycling, riding)
• where people currently go to take part (e.g. draw lines on a local map)
• where people want to go (e.g. draw lines on a local map)
• what activities people want to take part in, but cannot due to lack of suitable facilities
• where barriers exist that cause problems for people to access the route (e.g. wet or
muddy spots, narrow or overgrown, steep slopes, steps, stiles, cross drains, etc.).
The long-term task of keeping your paths in a 'fit for purpose' condition should be at the centre
of your thinking. Planning and designing your paths with this in mind and you should be able
to minimise the overall costs of providing a path network. By taking account of the whole life
costs of the path you might decide to use a low-cost specification that requires regular
maintenance or it might be necessary to spend most of your overall budget on a high cost
specification and low maintenance option.
The following sections cover a range of issues that you need to consider at the early stages of
any path project, and the different types of survey used to gather information about paths or
networks, which will help to make important decisions:
2.2.1 Location
2.2.2 Meeting users’ needs
2.2.3 Moving the ground
2.2.4 Keeping water off the path
2.2.5 Path structure
2.2.6 Path building materials
2.2.7 Planning to do maintenance
2.2.8 Deciding which path to take
2.2.9 Planning for climate change
2.2.10 Permission to proceed
2.2.11 Project team considerations
2.2.12 Getting expert help
2.2.13 Health and safety
2.2.14 Paths and green networks
2.2.15 Path surveys
2.2.1 Location
A good location for a path can make a difference in many ways – whether the network can
cope with changing weather patterns and use, or even whether people will want to use the
path at all. When looking at options for where to put new paths, or how to replace or upgrade
existing ones, think about the considerations in the following table.
Surrounding land use check whether there are any land management activities that could
cause a problem for some or all users
look at the local authority's Local Plan for development to see if there
are planned developments – there may be opportunities to include new
or better paths within planning proposals
Landscape make sure the proposals do not adversely affect the character of the
local landscape – ensure that paths follow landscape features rather
than cut through them or go straight over the top, e.g. take the path
around the side of a hill, rather than up and over it so that the path will
not be seen (e.g. as in the following image)
check whether there are any particular features of interest that could
enhance the path – viewpoints and vistas provide opportunities for
interpretation, as well as a good location for a resting place
Path corridor negotiating a narrow strip of land for just the line of the path might not
give you enough scope to account for design problems or space for
different users – fitting a path within a wider corridor gives better
opportunities for management and can help to prevent conflict between
different user groups and improve the people's experience of the path
Try to put yourself in the position of a particular user group and consider what would make the
paths more attractive and easier to use. The fundamental principle that you should adopt is
the 'least restrictive option'. This is often used to design paths for people with disabilities (the
Equality Act (2010) places an obligation to make 'reasonable adjustments' in public spaces),
but the approach should be seen as good practice for all user groups – this means that you
You may also need to think about the likely levels of participation, and how the various
adaptations could have mutual benefits between user groups. For example, in areas where
there are very few horse riders it may be sufficient to leave space for horses to ride alongside
the constructed path, which would allow a higher specification of path surface to be used on
the main path to accommodate people on foot and wheels. However, this may not be
sufficient if there is frequent use by horses and one path surface built to accommodate
everyone might be necessary.
You can find out more about shared use paths here Shared Use Paths in Scotland and there
is detailed good practice guidance on 'Countryside For All' from the Fieldfare Trust.
Path width
There are various conventions of path width and the main considerations are who is likely to
be using the path and how much room is available along the route corridor. It is usual to
specify a minimum width of 1.5m for paths in rural areas, but most shared use paths are at
least 2m wide. In urban areas, 2.5m - 3m wide is commonly specified for shared use paths to
accommodate the likely higher usage. The choice of path surface may dictate the width, to
enable access for construction plant, and you need to consider whether maintenance
operations (such as grass cutting) will affect the minimum width of the path. For natural
surfaces, it is common to cut a swathe of at least 2m, but this may depend on the landscape
setting and expected use.
Cross slopes
In order to produce a path of adequate width across a slope it will be necessary to form a level
‘bench’. This can be done either by cutting a ‘bench’ into the slope or by building up to the
level with a suitable well graded fill material. The angle of the cut slope is important for stability
of the path and is dependent on the strength of the soil and underlying substrate (e.g. glacial
till or rock).
Longitudinal slopes
The amount of work required to deal with short longitudinal slopes depends on the maximum
gradient of the path specification. As part of the early stages of path planning try to select a
route around high and low areas to avoid or minimise earthworks and disturbance. However,
you may still need to deal with steep slopes and undulations, where the path traverses ground
with hollows and hummocks.
Wherever possible, water should be kept away from the path by intercepting it before it
reaches the surface and diverting it away so that it does not cause problems elsewhere. Take
a careful look at the topography (the shape of the ground) and watch or work out where the
water is likely to drain. Bear in mind that water will always look for the easiest, if not shortest,
route across the ground. You may need to intercept water from springs or surface flow.
The shape of the path surface can be used to 'shed' water and is one of the most important
points to consider before installing any drainage features into the surface. You can use a
camber, which provides a sloping surface with raised centre to drain water to either side of the
path or a crossfall, which is a level surface that slopes to one side. On very narrow paths, you
can add a short dip in the surface to reverse the direction of the gradient (called grade
reversal) to force water off the path.
You can intercept and divert surface and ground water away from the path using:
Cut-off drains, water bars, culverts and cross drains may be needed to divert the water off or
across the path, as follows:
In some cases, you may be able to run ditches or pipes to existing burns to discharge the
water from along the path. Take care not to change the overall drainage pattern – your ditches
and drains should allow the water to pass through the path and resume its original flow.
Diverting all collected water into a burn could cause problems downstream, such as flooding.
If there is an existing drainage system, such as agricultural land drains, you may be able to
make improvements or repairs, with the landowner's agreement, rather than starting from
scratch. Take care not to damage existing drains and check that, if you want to divert surface
water into the existing system, there is enough spare capacity to cope with the extra water.
Where a path has to cross a watercourse – a stream, river or drainage channel – you will need
to construct a culvert or bridge. You will need to check with your local Scottish Environment
Protection Agency (SEPA) office regarding the Water Environment (Controlled Activities)
(Scotland) Regulations (2011) as work within a watercourse may be restricted or prohibited.
These regulations are often simply referred to as the CAR regulations.
Bridges can be costly, but will allow a much greater volume of water to pass unrestricted along
the watercourse. They are essential for any sizeable burn or river. Planning, designing and
constructing a bridge is a potentially complex subject, and is beyond the scope of this Guide.
For more information about planning, designing and building small-span bridges see the Path
Bridges Guide.
Culverts are generally a pipe or pipes laid in the bed of a small burn with stone headwalls to
retain the material laid over the pipe and hide the pipe ends. Pipe culverts are cheap, in
comparison with bridges, and easy to install, but will have a greater effect on a watercourse
than a bridge, so size is critical.
In order to design an appropriate drainage system, you will need to work out the potential
surface run-off that your system might need to cope with. There are lots of 'factors' to take into
account, such as the area being drained, slopes, the permeability of the underlying soil,
rainfall intensity and duration. There are complex calculations that you can perform if you want
to have an accurate estimate of the amount of water likely to be flowing during a storm.
When planning a route, remember to look at the overall accessibility of the path and install
drainage features that are appropriate to the situation – if the terrain limits what is technically
feasible, select drainage features that match the accessibility.
Formation
Geotextiles and geogrids
Base
Surface
Edges
Formation layer.
Geotextile in location.
For most light use paths, if the formation layer is well drained and reasonable hard, a
geotextile sheet and geogrid will not be required. You can use a simple field heel test to check
In the longer term, the inclusion of a geotextile sheet and geogrid can be beneficial to the
durability of a path. They are a low-cost addition that will not vastly affect the path construction
price.
Base
The base layer is the main 'load bearing' layer of the path. It is also referred to as the 'sub
base' layer. A base layer is made up of one or more layers of well graded granular stone
comprising a wide size distribution from large stones down to fine particles (dust). The larger
stones interlock to provide most of the strength. The smaller stones and 'fines' fill in the gaps
between the larger stone to help 'bind' the base layer together into a strong solid mass once it
is compacted. The base layer should evenly spread the weight of users from the surface layer
above to the formation layer below. A well constructed base layer will prevent settlement,
rutting or cracking.
The deeper a path's base layer is, the stronger it will be. Specifying the base layer depth
requires four factors to be considered, as set out in the table below.
path users the types, frequency and loads they will impose
formation strength the load bearing capacity of the ground on which the path is being laid
maximum aggregate the depth of base layer needs to be at least twice the size of the largest
size stones used to allow the stone particles to interlock properly
composition of the some rock types or recycled materials will require additional thickness
aggregate or layers to provide the required strength
The path's base layer will also regulate any surface imperfections left in the formation layer. A
smooth, even and well compacted base layer is essential for a high-quality surface.
• durability
• maintenance requirements
• smoothness
• appearance
• sustainability.
Consider what the users will want in terms of smoothness and all-weather usability and then
consider this in relation to durability, maintenance implications and appearance when
choosing a suitable surface. The sustainability issue of where materials are sourced is
increasingly important, to ensure that path networks have minimal ecological and carbon
footprints.
The budget usually has the greatest effect on surface choice. Aim to obtain sufficient funds to
provide a path specification suitable to the location and needs of users, rather than specifying
the path according to how much funding is available. If funds are restricted, consider first
reducing the length of the constructed path rather than using a cheaper, less durable and less
suitable surface type.
Surface types
Path surfaces fall into five main types: natural, unbound, semi-bound, bound and porous. The
main types of surface and the pros and cons of each are outlined in this section.
Not all path surfaces are suitable for everyone and every location. Unbound surfaces tend to
get heavily marked by horses, particularly during or after wet weather. Wheeled users such as
cyclists, wheelchair and mobility scooters normally prefer a smoother surface like bound
surfaces. Horse riders on the other hand feel safer on softer natural surfaces with more grip
and like to avoid loose stones that can damage the horse's hooves. Providing a constructed
Natural surfaces
In some situations, a path may not require a formal surface. The existing vegetation may be
appropriate for the expected users and setting, especially in rural areas. Mowing a strip of
grass regularly will help to define the path and improve the strength and wearing quality of the
grass. Short grass will be easier for wheeled users. The addition of drainage works may
further improve the surface by removing muddy areas and puddles. With high volumes of use,
natural surfaces will be susceptible to rapid wear and tear which requires careful maintenance
and management to prevent deterioration beyond comfortable use.
Unbound surfaces
An unbound surface is generally made of well graded aggregate. It relies purely on the friction
between the different sized stone particles to bind them together for strength and durability.
Generally, the aggregate is very fine and particle sizes range from 4mm, 5mm or 6mm to dust.
Common unbound surface types are whin dust, limestone and granite dust, depending on the
local geology. Coarser aggregates can be used to provide more surface texture. Because
stone particles are not bound together, these surfaces are very susceptible to being washed
out by water, so careful surface drainage is required.
The simplest unbound surface is the path's base layer itself. This can be blinded with whin
dust or granite dust in order to fill up any voids and bind together loose stone. This method is
very economical as it requires the minimum amount of material. However, use and weather
will quickly expose the stone surface below, which will require regular patching and
compacting.
Whin dust and granite dust can be laid on top of the base layer (usually about 25mm thick)
and compacted. This will provide a reasonably smooth, even surface suitable for a variety of
users. However, as whin dust is not free draining, frost heave and heavy rain can turn the
surface to mush, making it unusable in winter or wet weather. Granite dust is free draining and
less susceptible to frost heave.
Semi-bound surfaces
Semi-bound surfaces are based on locally available sources of natural or recycled aggregates
and industrial waste by-products. These surfaces can be composed of many different
combined materials such as limestone, shale waste or granite waste and screened road
planings. They generally contain significant quantities of fine particles, which when wetted,
start to 'set', and then 'harden' when dry, although not to the same extent as a bound surface.
Newly laid surfaces can be loose, but will 'harden' to the point of becoming impermeable after
a period of continuous use.
Toptrec path.
Bound surfaces
A bound surface is a combined layer of well graded aggregate glued together by a binder,
such as bitumen. This top layer is called the 'surface course', a term used in road and
pavement construction. Bound surfaces are much more durable than an unbound or semi-
bound surface as the binder will prevent the aggregate being washed or worn away quickly.
Bound surfaces will therefore be more suitable for steeper slope gradients and all year round
use. It should be noted, however, that choosing a bound surface doesn't mean that drainage
Impermeable bound surfaces used for most path applications fall into three categories:
surface dressing, bituminous macadam (Bitmac) and hot rolled asphalt.
Surface dressing
Surface dressing involves spraying a thin layer of bitumen emulsion over an existing bound
surface or a newly laid base layer, followed by rolling-in a layer of washed stone chippings.
The objective of a surface dressing is to create a stable mosaic of stone chippings that are
securely attached to the surface by the bitumen emulsion. The result is a sealed surface that
protects against water ingress into the base layer below, and, in the case of resurfacing
treatment, slows down the deterioration of the path to prolong its life and restores surface
texture. Because the surface dressing is a very thin layer it is liable to crack if the path's base
layer surface is uneven or poorly prepared.
Surface dressing provides the appearance of loose stone but creates a non-slip surface for
users, even horses. The finished look of these surface treatments will depend on the colour of
the aggregate used. Loose stone chippings must be swept from the finished surface as they
can cause a slip hazard. The time period available for surface dressing is very narrow and the
summer months are only really suitable. There can be a high risk of surface failure when
temperatures are low.
Bitmac is a combined mixture of well graded aggregate and a bitumen binder. It can be laid to
various depths and is commonly used in road and pavement construction. The most common
type of bitmac used in path construction is Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM). Bitmac is very
strong and durable. If laid correctly, the surface can last for 20 years or more without repairs
being required. The smooth finish is very attractive to wheeled users, but frost and ice can
make these surfaces treacherous in winter, so salt application may be required. Leaf litter can
also cause problems, so overhanging trees may need to be cut back and leaf clearance
included in the maintenance schedule.
Hot rolled asphalt is a combination of a bitumen binder and fine, well graded aggregate. When
it cools it sets to a strong flexible 'concrete'. It is very smooth and totally impermeable. Texture
is achieved by rolling in chips after laying. Asphalt is more difficult to lay than bitmac and
requires a skilled surfacing contractor. However, asphalt is more flexible and tends to deform
rather than break apart if the path's base layer settles.
Porous surfaces
The issue of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) cannot be ignored, particularly in urban
situations where a smooth surface is required. If surface water can be dispersed 'at source' it
will reduce the need for systems to store and drain storm water.
In order to produce a porous surface, the path's base layer also needs special preparation – it
must be free draining, uniformly graded aggregate with no fine content, relying on the spaces
between particles to allow water to pass through. However, the base layer needs to be
constructed above the water table to avoid becoming waterlogged, and therefore ineffective.
Two techniques that give a similar durable finish to bound surfaces are porous asphalt and
resin-bound aggregate. Both surface types need to be laid by specialist contractors and use
hot bitumen or UV resin respectively to bind the surface layer together.
Reinforced grass or gravel systems can also be used to construct a porous surface, using
interlocking plastic cellular pavers to provide structural strength.
Edges
It is essential to support path edges to prevent lateral spread of the base layer and to protect
the edges of the surface layer. Ideally the base layer is wider than the finished surface layer,
with landscaped turfs providing a soft edge. This method increases the formation layer width
and disturbance, so may not be suitable for some sensitive areas. However, it does give extra
support to the path edges, and, can be very beneficial where path usage is high and the route
is occasionally accessed by vehicles for maintenance purposes.
In sensitive areas or where corridor space is limited, the base and surface layers are kept at
the same width. The undisturbed sides of the formation tray will provide adequate support to
the path edge. Some vegetation encroachment will occur, but this may be desirable to give a
visually softer path edge for a more natural look.
Construction materials used to build paths are called 'aggregates'. Aggregates are generally
from natural, recycled or industry waste by-product materials used in construction, which are
described by size, angularity, etc. Aggregates are generally sold as mixtures of different
particle sizes, where each one is designed for a specific purpose. Aggregate mixtures, are
generally described either as traditional mixtures, (20mm down to dust) or standardised
mixtures based on the Department of Transports' Specification for Highway Works (SHW)
(Type 1 granular sub base). Aggregates are also defined by compliance to British Standards
(BS) or European Norms (EN) standards.
Type 1 aggregate.
Under European Norms standards, aggregate mixtures are determined by the size of sieve
that the aggregate does not fit through (lower range d) and the size of sieve that all aggregate
must pass through (upper range D). The standard formulae used to write a European Norm
aggregate mixture is d/D. For example, Type 1 granular sub base is specified as 0/32.
Following the SHW specifications, aggregate mixtures consist of several aggregate sizes
mixed together in known proportions, with size distributions described by the meaning of
'grading', as follows:
• 'well graded' - contains a good range of different particle sizes in the aggregate
mixture which allows it to naturally interlock, forming a strong solid mass once
compacted
• 'uniformly graded' - contains mostly particle sizes of the same size in the aggregate
mixture which interlock less when compacted, leaving plenty of voids.
Aggregates used for path construction are generally of high quality. If won 'as dug' aggregates
or recycled aggregates are locally available, these materials should be considered first, before
quarried aggregates. Such aggregates depend on availability and suitability, but if a particular
type of material is required it must be specified clearly. Before using these aggregates, obtain
a sample to check it out, and test it to ensure it will perform to your requirements, before
purchasing.
A simple material test can be used to decide on whether the materials on site are likely to be
suitable, or if recycled or quarried aggregates will need to be transported-in to site.
Each path within the network needs to have a maintenance schedule – which could vary from
annual inspections to frequent grass cutting. As part of the initial planning for your network,
you will need to strike a balance between the level of construction and the ongoing
maintenance. Highly engineered paths still need some routine maintenance, and in some
cases, it may be more appropriate to undertake low-key improvements coupled with ongoing
maintenance to retain that level of reasonable condition.
make the drainage system capable of carrying the largest possible water volume likely to be
encountered in an area, allowing for some blockage by silt, debris or vegetation
use multiple pipes in a ditch system. If an individual pipe becomes blocked others will ensure the
drainage system still functions properly (see image below)
build catch pits in French drains (filter drains) to allow silt removal and easy cleaning of all pipe
sections. Line filter drains with geotextile to reduce the amount of silt getting into the free draining
stone
try to make ditches 'self-cleaning.' Aim for a gradient of 1:40 or greater, but less than 1:15 to avoid
scour and erosion
avoid using timber edging as it will require periodic replacement, will not stop vegetation
encroachment and can prevent shedding of surface water. If 'hard' edging is required because, for
example, weak soil needs the extra support, consider using recycled plastic edging instead of timber,
which does not rot. If you do use edging make sure the path surface level is finished above the top
edge, so surface water can easily run off, unimpeded by the installed edging or landscaped verges
ensure path verges are smooth and level to allow easy grass cutting by mower or flail
ensure efficient removal of surface water to prevent scouring or the formation of rain ruts
select a path surface that is appropriate to the gradient. If a bound surface is undesirable, reduce the
path gradient to suit an unbound or semi-bound surface
ensure path construction is robust enough to take maintenance plant and equipment without damage
be generous when specifying the path's base layer depth. A heavy vehicle may cross or use a path –
legitimately or not –and a strong base layer will allow this without serious damage occurring
be generous when specifying the path's width. Path users or maintenance vehicles travelling along a
narrow path may damage the path edges and verges – a wider surface will allow users or vehicles to
remain on the path
You will need to work out what the network has to provide and who is going to use it, rather
than approaching from what you think the path should look like. There are large variations in
the cost of the different options, which you will also need to take into account. There may
need to be compromises and some difficult decisions might need to be made – going through
the planning steps also helps to give you a rationale for your choices which can be helpful
when you need to justify the project to users, landowners or potential funders.
One way of assessing the opportunities and options available is to look at the 'whole life'
costs. It may be cheaper in the long run to spend more on the construction and have a low
Natural Cheap, fits in well with the May not stand up to heavy Vegetation will need to
landscape use. Not easy for people on be managed on an
wheels to use annual basis. Surface
wear and drainage
need to be monitored
Semi-bound Can harden to provide a Materials may not be locally May need occasional
durable surface. More available. Susceptible to repair on steeper
robust on gradients than wear and tear if material is gradients
unbound surfaces. loose and not hardened off.
Suitable alternative where May be affected by frost
bound (sealed) surfaces heave
are unacceptable in the
setting. Cheaper to install
than a bound surface
Bound Can provide a very Very expensive to construct. Annual removal of leaf
durable smooth surface. Intrusive in some litter required
Good surface for wheeled landscapes. Slippery where
users. Okay for horses on leaf litter covers surface. May
level or shallow gradients. need gritting in winter.
Low annual maintenance Experienced surfacing
costs contractors required for
laying. Good access for plant
required. Only suitable for
laying in the summer
It may not be possible to eliminate the risk posed by acute impacts and it is almost impossible
to predict the probability of extreme weather occurring at a defined location, but this should
not be used as an excuse to avoid forward planning. Approaching lowland path management
in terms of creating and managing path networks provides a useful perspective for dealing
with the challenge of climate change. Looking at a network as a whole gives you an
opportunity to identify 'weak links', or critical points where action would be required in the
event of acute impacts occurring and to look for alternative options to keep a network
'functional'.
There is limited 'generic advice' that will be useful, because of the enormous variation in paths
across Scotland. Therefore, a risk assessment process can be used to identify the climate
change hazards for your network, the probability of occurrence and the scale of impact. This
produces a risk score which can be used to identify high, medium and low risks. These should
be sub-divided into risks associated with Chronic and Acute impacts as they may require
different adaptation approaches. For each high risk impact a 'control' or adaptation needs to
be devised, which will provide a practical response to predicted climate change for the path
network. This could include actions that can be taken in advance, such as changing the
specification of drainage features to cope with increased surface water, or to identify (and
hold) contingency funding to deal with very low probability but catastrophic events.
Some of the climate change hazards will be specific to the location of your paths – for
example riverside paths may become more liable to flooding in wetter winters (chronic
impacts) and bridges could be at greater risk of damage from extreme flood events (acute
impacts). It is therefore important to use local knowledge of the landscape to plan your
network to avoid unnecessary risks (e.g. multiple bridge crossings) or to look for adaptations
to existing infrastructure to cope with predicted changes (e.g. upgrade unbound surface to
semi-bound, bound or porous surface). Planning ahead can allow you to prioritise tasks so
that you can make adaptations over a number of years, rather than needing to use emergency
funds when something catastrophic occurs that could have been prevented.
Coastal paths are an extremely popular concept and have been built to varying standards
across Scotland. They are, in many cases, susceptible to damage during extreme weather
events and there may be limited options for providing alternative routes where damage does
occur, e.g. following storms. Careful consideration about the long-term planning and
management of coastal paths is therefore of high importance to ensure that existing
investments are adequately protected and unsustainable schemes should be avoided, even
where there is demonstrable demand.
You may find it helpful to discuss ideas with land managers at an early stage in your planning.
These discussions may help to identify new opportunities to resolve existing issues as well as
avoid creating additional problems. This will also help to define expectations on all sides as
there is limited value in trying to build a new path through an area that would have a negative
impact on land management operations. Equally, you may be able to persuade a land
manager to provide alternative access that will reduce the potential for conflict with their
operations.
Realistically there are very few land managers who will allow a path to be built where it will
have an adverse impact on their own interests and you may find that some land managers are
wary of encouraging public access on their land. There are, however, some benefits for land
managers where paths provide an inviting alternative to 'roaming' across the countryside. You
may even be able to help unlock funding for the landowner to undertake some of the
proposals. Some opportunities exist to improve access that will also benefit the land manager,
but you will need to be careful to demonstrate the public benefit of the work, and you could
look at asking the land manager for a contribution towards improvements that they may
otherwise need to instigate themselves.
If you are looking for funding towards path development it is likely that the funder will ask for
some form of legally binding agreement that will secure the investment. This could be a lease
or a licence agreement. You will probably need to cover the reasonable costs of developing
any agreement.
Planning consent
Local authorities take different approaches to paths across Scotland so it is probably best to
speak to your local authority or national park authority access officer and the authority’s
development planning department, rather than to assume that you can just get on with
developing your path network.
Natural Heritage
The natural heritage, such as the landscape or wildlife, around path networks is part of the
attraction for many people who use paths, but it is important to ensure that the path does not
have a negative impact on that natural heritage. Some areas are protected by law and you will
need to check with your local Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) office whether your paths pass
through a designated site.
Depending on the legislative status of the site you may need to get permission to undertake
the work and this could affect how you do it, as well as where and when. For example, there
may be restrictions on disturbance of birds at certain times of year, or some habitats may be
sensitive to damage during the construction phase. For some designated sites, such as a
Special Area of Conservation (SAC), you may need to provide information to allow an
'appropriate assessment' of your proposals to be made by a 'competent person', to ensure
that the designated features will not be significantly impacted on by the path construction
work. The scale and scope of that assessment is meant to be proportionate to the proposed
work. The best advice is to contact Scottish Natural Heritage and ask for their assistance with
minimising any impacts, or helping to enhance the natural heritage around your path network.
Some existing paths may be historic sites themselves – for example, paths following old drove
roads, ancient Roman roads or historic towpaths [Heritage Paths]. The fact that a route has
been around for hundreds of years is an attraction in itself for users. It may also offer useful
pointers when thinking about what is appropriate by way of upgrading or replacement. For
example, paths which follow former railway track beds will have a different character to those
which follow old farm tracks, while those following Roman roads may require special
treatment. In this context you may wish to consult the Historic Landuse Assessment (HLA
map) website, which is a source of useful information about earlier land uses.
Some historic sites are protected by law as scheduled monuments and must not be disturbed.
You will need to discuss any proposals that relate to changing access to or across scheduled
monuments with Historic Environment Scotland.
Regardless of your projects size, complexity and risks, who you appoint into the project team
will depend on how many contractors will be involved in construction stage. The CDM
Regulations 2015 separates construction projects into two types based on how many
contractors will be working on site at any one time.
• one contractor project - if your project only needs one contractor to carry out all of
the work, you will need a designer and contractor. An example of where this might
happen - one contractor resurfacing a tarmac path when no other contractors are
required to do any work.
• more than one contactor project - if your project needs more than one contractor to
carry out different parts of the work, you will need a principal designer and principal
contractor. For example, a contractor building the base layer of a new path (including
groundworks and landscaping works) and a surfacing contractor laying the new tarmac
surface. The contractor who builds the base layer would be principal contractor and
the surfacing contractor a sub-contractor, under the control of principal contractor.
Quantity surveyor
You may want to appoint a quantity surveyor to provide cost advice and assistance to the
project manager during the project, on:
There are a small number of external consultants and contractors specialising in path project
management, who have the skills, knowledge and experience of lowland path construction
practices and health and safety.
There are also civil or structural engineering companies with engineers, who will have some
experience of path construction projects. These engineers will be able to design larger
structures such as bridges or earthworks, and will have extensive knowledge and experience
of construction design and management (CDM), and other health and safety regulations.
When looking to hire consultants to do design work produce a 'client brief' outlining what you
want them to do. You need to be confident that the consultant you appoint is suitably skilled,
knowledgeable, and experienced in path design work. You can ask consultants bidding for
the work to provide specific information about their health and safety training, design decision-
making experience, and hazard elimination and review procedures. You could also ask them
to provide evidence of previously completed design work relating to similar path projects like
yours.
When you assess a consultants' suitability to work on your project, you could also ask them to
provide information about their membership of any relevant professional bodies, such as the
Institute of Civil Engineers. However, some designers may not be members of a professional
organisation, as they do not have qualifications in a civil or structural engineering or health
and safety disciplines. In this case, you need to rely on evidence of their previous experience
working on similar path projects.
Everyone involved in a path construction project has 'duty of reasonable care' towards each
other, and must comply with legal duties (responsibilities) set by health and safety law and
regulations. Equally those affected by the work, e.g. members of the public, should also be
protected from the risks created by those who make them. Accidents can have serious
financial implications for organisations, which could lead to adverse publicity, and a lack of
trust. In the worst-case scenario, accidents can also have a significant and long-lasting effect
on the individual involved. So, don't ignore health and safety – integrate it in to your projects
from the beginning.
There are several health and safety regulations that affect the undertaking of path
construction projects, for example, the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations
2015.
Regardless of project scale, complexity, and level of risks and number of contractors involved,
your path project will need to comply with the Construction (Design and Management)
Regulations 2015 - referred to as CDM or CDM 2015.
CDM 2015 is the main set of regulations for manging health, safety and welfare on all small or
large construction projects (this includes path, bridge or boardwalk projects), and applies to all
• make sure that health and safety issues are properly considered during a project's
development so the risk of harm or ill health to those who have to build, maintain, use
the structure is removed or reduced to acceptable level
• make sure that the people involved in a project team are working together to deliver a
successful and safe project - the individuals (or organisations) in the project team
should treat health and safety as a normal part of a project's development - not an
afterthought or bolt on extra.
CDM 2015 requires individuals or organisations to be appointed (in writing) at the right time to
carry out the roles and responsibilities of 'duty holders' in the project team. The organisations
or individuals you appoint can carry out the role of more than one duty holder, provided they
have suitable skills, knowledge, training, and experience, and (if an organisation) the
organisational capability, necessary to carry out the roles in a way that secures health and
safety.
If you are going to be involved in a path construction project for the first time, are not familiar
with CDM, or see them as an obstacle to overcome. Don’t be put-off, CDM can provide your
project with a number of key benefits, even beyond health and safety improvements.
Reduced costs
At first it may seem that CDM increase costs. Yes, there will be additional costs that you need
to budget for and find the funds. However, as CDM requires members in the project team to
work together, and focus on better design, planning and management - unexpected problems,
changes, and accidents during the construction phase should be reduced - last minute
changes, problems and accidents can be costly for a project.
Reduced delays
CDM requires much more consideration to be given to good designing and planning at the
earlier stages in a project. Therefore, the consequences of decisions, and the implications of
the work should be finalised before pathwork commences on site. This allows time for
properly programming the work in ahead of time reducing the risk of delays during the
construction phase.
The important thing to remember is that every path project involving construction,
maintenance work is a CDM project. CDM will apply to all path projects, in spite of size, the
number of working days, how many contractors are involved, or people working on site.
CDM is there to improve health, safety and welfare on all path projects, especially small
projects where improvements are urgently needed. It is all about designing and planning the
project well and doing the pathwork safely so no one is hurt, or suffers ill health.
So back to that question - Will CDM apply to our project? The answer is yes, CDM will apply
to your project when pathwork, including bridge or boardwalk installation work, is carried out.
Some of those projects will be 'notifiable' projects that need notifying to the Health and Safety
Executive (HSE), whilst others will not.
Your project is only 'notifiable' to the HSE if the work will, is expected to:
• last MORE than 30 working days and have MORE than 20 workers working on site at
any one time, or;
• involve MORE than 500 person days.
If your project will or you expect it to exceed either one of those notification thresholds above,
then it is 'notifiable' to the HSE under the CDM Regulations 2015.
If it does not exceed any of those thresholds, you do not need to notify project to the HSE -
the project will then be classed as a 'non-notifiable' project.
• a 'working day' is classed as any day, or part of a day, on which construction work
takes place. Even if the planned work will only be for 2 hour duration, it will need to be
classed as a 'working day' when determining if the project is 'notifiable'. So any day on
which work takes place during construction phase should be counted. What matters is
how many days of construction work the project entails, not when these days occur, or
the start and finish dates.
• a 'person day' relates to one individual who carries out construction work on one
individual day. It includes workers, plant operators, etc. But they do not actually have
to be carrying out any manual work or operating plant to be involved in construction
work - if the person is supervising or managing the project on site they must be
included as a 'person day'.
As a general rule, you should calculate the number of working days and number of workers
working on site at same time, first. If the project passes that threshold, then your project is
'notifiable' and you need not worry about the 'more than 500 person days'.
You must give notice in writing to the HSE, as soon as practical before the construction phase
begins. The written notice must contain the information in Schedule 1 of the CDM Regulations
2015, for example, the address of the site or exact description of its location.
The easiest way to notify your project to the HSE is to use the online electronic interactive
form called 'F10' on HSE's website - click here to find out more and access the F10 form.
Construction site.
If your project is only going to involve one contractor working on site, you will need to appoint
(in writing) a contractor only - no principal contractor required for project.
A green network is made up of the greenspaces that are found within and around villages and
towns, which link out to the wider countryside. It can include areas such as parks, graveyards,
allotments and other open space within an urban area as well as the larger green spaces such
as woods and grass fields in rural areas. Crucially, green networks can also include paths,
and other transport corridors.
Green space.
Green networks can help improve the biodiversity of an area by allowing plants and animals to
survive and move through built up areas. But green networks are also designed to benefit
people. A good green network will incorporate paths and other active travel routes so that
more people can get around without having to use their cars. This is not just good for the
health and social well-being of the people who live there – having good access to green
spaces can have economic benefits as well. For example, developers will be able to get a
better price for houses in areas with good green networks and businesses may be more likely
to have their offices in places where their employees can get out and about. That means
green networks can have social, environmental and economic benefits, so many local
authorities are keen to develop them in their areas. Some Local authorities are now producing
supplementary planning guidance on green networks (for example, this is what Highland
Council has produced - Green Networks - Supplementary Guidance) and may have mapped
out potential green networks in their areas. Within the central belt, there are several green
network projects – including the Central Scotland Green Network and the Glasgow and Clyde
Valley Green Network.
If you are developing a path network in your area, it should link in with any emerging green
networks. You can check with your local access officer to see what planning guidance and
green networks mapping have been produced in their local authority area. If there are
indicative maps published, you should be able to see how to ensure your paths fit within this
bigger network. If maps have not been published, you should still try and think about how your
paths can have maximum benefit. For example, are there places where a new path will link up
two green space areas? Can you create a wildlife corridor that will also serve as a route for
The precise details will vary depending on your local situation, but the over-arching principle is
to look at the surrounding landscape when planning your projects. That way your path can
have multiple benefits and, because green networks are important to the government, you will
have a better chance of getting funding.
Condition (Amber) survey rapid assessment for looking at the condition of a path or
network
The purpose of the survey is to provide you with enough information to make decisions about
what type of action is required and any issues that will need to be considered, or dealt with at
early stage in a project. It is essentially a desk-based exercise, but a site visit can help to get
an idea of path condition and the type of path construction work required.
The information contained in green surveys has been agreed by Upland Path Advisory Group
and follows a standard format. However, this has been adapted to be more appropriate for the
use of lowland path management.
The survey should collect as much of the information in the following table as possible.
Setting and features route description (type of path, where it goes and any links or gaps,
landscape features, etc)
associated features (car parking, directional signs, tea shop, etc)
location (proximity to settlements, transport options)
Designations and status Natural Heritage interests (Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI),
National Scenic Area (NSA), Special Area of Conservation (SAC), etc)
cultural Heritage interests (Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM), etc)
access status (Core Path, Right of Way, Long Distance Route, Local
Network, etc)
Health and safety file is there a Health and Safety File available (yes or no)? If yes, make
note of its name, where it is kept, and in what format (Word or PDF or
hard folder)
Additional information for example, details about potential funding sources or a description of
how the path fits into an access strategy
• local authorities are a key source of information. Look for access strategies and local
development plans. They may have information about planning requirements, existing
survey data, maps and photographic records. Many local authorities also fund access
work and will give advice about their policy
• Paths for All will be able to point you towards a community path group or local access
officer who may have specific information about a path or network
• community councils may have access to information about local historical points of
interest, estimates of levels of use, alternative local routes and shortcuts. Information
gleaned from community councils may be more anecdotal than that provided by local
authorities, but it can be useful
• Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) will provide detailed information about nature
conservation issues and access strategies and legislation. SNH offices hold a wealth
of useful reference material, which may include aerial photographs of the relevant area
• landowners, factors, land agents, farmers or estate managers will know all about the
ground they manage on a day-to-day basis and may be able to provide useful
information about many areas of paths and access management on their land. You will
need to find out about how they manage their land (i.e. farming, shooting, recreational
activities, woodland or forest management, vehicle access), and how that might impact
on paths, and vice versa. Pay particular attention to livestock management.
Sometimes improving a path can help land managers to do their work more easily
• path users who use and know the path may be able to provide detailed information
about path development and drainage during heavy rainfall/thaws, seasonal variations,
etc. You may be able to find information from organised groups affiliated to Ramblers
Scotland, British Horse Society Scotland or International Mountain Bike Association
UK. Your local access panel may be able to help in relation to people with disabilities.
For contact details of your local access panel visit the Disability Equality Scotland
website.
• organisations such as local tourist information centres and businesses that promote
access may be able to provide information about visitor numbers etc
Do not expect to find information on every aspect of your path or path network: most green
surveys contain information in only half or two-thirds of the categories. However, if you are not
able to find some basic information, then it will need to be collected. Additional green data can
be added as it becomes available, and it is not necessary to have all aspects covered
before starting to manage the route.
Amber surveys measure the condition of routes using a series of more than 30 measurements
for each section of the route. The measurements collected cover the physical characteristics
of the route such as slope, width and other real figures, along with assessments of condition,
drainage and dynamism (how quickly change is likely to occur).
The amber survey method is designed to be fairly quick and, if required, more detailed
information can be collected later using the red survey [internal link] method. Try not to get
bogged down in too much detail, there will be variations along a route and it is not necessary
to capture everything at this stage.
Although this next section might appear quite daunting, the amber survey methodology is well
structured and reasonably intuitive. It provides four types of data:
Descriptive data
Path location
This information should provide clear and unambiguous instructions about where the survey
commenced and where it ended. Subsequent to survey completion other people should be
able to locate the path and be confident about the start and end points. Provide grid
references (or GPS coordinates) at the start and end of the path and a note of the feature(s)
at these points.
Path sections
Each path is divided into sections in the field and a new section commences when an obvious
change in path character occurs, for example, a significant change in width, gradient or
adjacent land use or vegetation. Path sections are numbered consecutively from the start
point and path length is measured using a measuring wheel. There is no set length for path
sections (but less than 250m gives rise to reams of data to work with!), but you should be able
to divide a path ‘logically’ on the basis of common characteristics within each section – it will
require you to make a judgement about where to end a section. The reason for a section
change should be noted on the survey sheets.
Vegetation
The average ground cover and main species within surrounding vegetation should be noted.
Surrounding vegetation can have a large impact on path development: certain species may be
extremely tolerant to trampling or may confine the path width. However, surveyors should not
spend a long time running through the National Vegetation Classification (NVC) methodology,
the important point is to illustrate how the surrounding vegetation may affect path
development.
• evolved line - informal path that has evolved to get from place to place or run across
open space or around the coast
• evolved slope - informal path that has evolved more or less directly up or down a
slope
• single use path - a path that has been designed with a particular user group in mind
such as mountain bike 'single track' or equestrian path
• shared use path - a wide path constructed with unbound, semi-bound or bound
surface for unsegregated recreational use or active travel
• pavement - a roadside path with a bound surface
• stalkers' path - a narrow path constructed in remote rural locations as, or in the style
of, a stalkers' path. Typical features are relatively low gradients, unbound surface,
drainage by top side open ditch and pipe or stone culverts or cross drains, and
occasional water bars
• forest or estate road - a wide off-road route with unbound or bound surface for
unsegregated recreational use
• public road - a minor road without any verge or roadside pavement (generally
connecting other sections of a network and do not need to be surveyed in detail)
• other - a route that does not fit into any of the above categories.
Path surface
The existing surface may be ‘natural’, ‘unbound’ or ‘semi-bound’ or 'bound'. If the path section
is a mix of different materials (e.g. some steps but mostly aggregate) select the one that is
most common, but put a note in the comment section so that these features are not forgotten.
Physical measurements
Number of braids
Record the number of paths present and any braids (narrow worn desire lines, sometimes
parallel to main path) that it will have to be managed. It is uncommon to manage more than
one path if two paths arrive at the same destination point, although you may have situations
where different users have specific requirements and more than one path is needed. For
example, you may need to negotiate a slope that is too steep for people on wheels or horses,
so a long shallow ramp is required, but decide that a set of steps is the only way to stop a
short-cut developing.
Braid lines, on the other hand, occur close to the main line and usually develop as people try
to find more comfortable lines. For example, the braids might have less rough surfaces, easier
gradients or are drier under foot. Braids are path lines separated from the main path by a strip
of vegetation or un-trampled ground; they are not simply the trampled path margins. Again,
some judgement is required to record information which illustrates the nature of the path.
Braids are often only 10 or 20 m long, and it is clearly impractical to have a section change
every time a braid occurs or disappears. The record should however provide a flavour of the
site – for example, if braiding occurs over a large proportion of the site and the section is likely
to remain braided.
If the path is braided the total amount of bare ground across the braided section should be
given, so if the path comprises three lines each 1 m wide, then the bare width would be 3 m.
It is a little more difficult to measure trampled width accurately. The edges of the trampled path
margins are not usually clearly defined, but damage to vegetation and changes in species
composition are good indicators of trampling.
Eroded depth
The eroded depth is defined as the depth at which the path surface is below the surrounding
ground levels. If the path surface is gullied, measure the maximum depth in the section.
Long gradient
Long gradient is measured along the path and is the gradient of the path expressed as a
percentage. It is not necessarily the angle of the slope that the path is climbing or descending
as the path may meander or zigzag up steep slopes in order to reduce the long gradient.
Managing paths with low cross gradient can be quite problematic. If low cross fall is
accompanied by low long gradient, it is difficult for water to run away from the path and
drainage may be difficult.
Condition
This is an assessment of overall current condition including bare width and trample width,
drainage and surface condition. When recording this information relate the assessments to
reference photographs or the descriptive table (see below) and do not score sections on a
relative basis.
Drainage
This index measures a combination of water flow (including seepage) and standing water. It is
obviously easier to get a better idea of drainage conditions during or immediately after heavy
rainfall, although this is not always practicable and sometimes assumptions will have to be
made about drainage. However, there are a number of indicators that provide clues to
drainage conditions when a route is surveyed in dry conditions, some of which are fairly
obvious.
Examine the surrounding ground. The presence of peat or clay soil usually indicates that it is
poorly drained, whereas sandy soils and stoney ground are better drained. Shallow soil depth
and bedrock close to the surface encourage very rapid runoff of water after rain. Vegetation
types usually coincide with different drainage conditions to a large extent and can be used as
indicators of drainage.
Observe the condition of the route, if it is gullied it was probably subject to high water flows.
Look for material that has been washed from the routes surface on to surrounding vegetation
or elsewhere. Check the composition of the surface material, an absence of fine materials
may indicate that they have been washed out by surface water runoff. An accumulation of silt
on the surface, on the other hand, can indicate the presence of standing water during wet
conditions. A wide route and braid lines could also have resulted from poor drainage. Make a
note of blocked or damaged drainage features on constructed paths, since damage to these
structures will cause drainage problems.
Roughness
This is an assessment of the condition of the routes surface. Research has demonstrated that
roughness has a strong influence on width. If the surface is rougher than the surrounding
ground, people are likely to stray off and cause trample-related damage either on the margins
or on other more comfortable lines.
Erosion
Erosion is strongly influenced by drainage and gradient. However, levels of use, surface
material, topography, altitude and vegetation also affect rates of erosion. Erosion is an
ongoing process, and a one-off visit to a site will only provide an estimate of the rate at which
erosion is occurring. Combinations of steep gradient, loose surface material, high levels of
use, sparse vegetation, bedrock close to the surface, high rainfall and/or rapid thawing with
poor drainage have the potential to lead to erosion. Evidence of high rates of erosion includes
gully formation or route surface well below surrounding ground and surface material washed
onto surrounding ground or vegetation.
The most difficult part of using the indices is to make sure that the values you use are
comparable with other routes, and surveys done by different people. The following table may
help to set ‘standards’, but there is no substitute for photographic records to check between
routes.
1 - Extreme constructed path will show deep standing boulders or deep gullies
features major water or sub base or complete
mostly deterioration waterlogged exposed on removal of
broken, sub within a year surface, long sections surface,
base drains choked actively
exposed, or broken or changing
overgrown not present
3 - Moderate signs of wear path will small puddles, pot holes scouring of
to path deteriorate in boggy across part of surface, no
surface and 1 to 3 years sections, path – not sub base
other drains continuous showing,
features, functioning loose material
some but close to present
vegetation capacity
encroachment
4 - Minor very little sign path will drains occasional slight scouring
of problems deteriorate in functioning potholes or of surface,
4 to 6 years but needing uneven little sign of
attention surface active change
Work urgency
This is the urgency with which work is required to prevent damage or further damage
occurring to the path in its present condition. The urgency should be consistent with the
assessment of path condition, and essentially summarises that information. A high score
should be allocated if a path is currently in reasonable condition but likely to degenerate
rapidly if no pre-emptive work is undertaken. An index score can be used:
1 = high priority: work should be undertaken within the next 1–3 years
5 = low priority: work may be required in the next 5–10 years, often depending on the
results of monitoring information.
Work urgency is not necessarily a priority rating. Other factors will influence priority, such as
availability of funding or importance of a path in terms of network connections and popularity.
Prescription
As the amber survey is a quick survey method it is not designed to provide specification
details. To simplify matters, prescriptions can be categorised into a list of treatments required,
such as upgrade existing path, construct new path, etc. The list of treatments can be adapted
to specific management styles and the needs of different geographical areas. The amount of
each prescription is also required and you can calculate outline costs for budgeting purposes
from this information.
Site access
The ease of access, or not, for plant and equipment, and distance from the nearest road or
vehicle track for hauling materials to the construction site where the path being built will have
impact on the cost of works. It may also dictate whether certain path construction methods are
viable if there is no way to bring in the relevant plant, equipment and materials.
Comments
Include any information not collected elsewhere which is important in terms of path
development or management. Also note any useful reference points. Include notes about the
availability of suitable on-site materials, alternative alignments, etc. Comments about the site
conditions should include any localised conditions that have not been clarified elsewhere. For
example, an erosion problem caused by a burn overflowing or a path section with a peat
surface and short aggregate section might not have been previously noted.
Distances are measured using a measuring wheel which provides relatively accurate
measurements over most terrain. Shorter lengths and path widths are measured using a tape
measure. A hand-held global positioning system (GPS) is used to generate accurate eight
figure GPS grid reference information. Gradients are measured with a lightweight clinometer.
A digital camera, which should be waterproof, is essential for recording path condition, etc.
If you are surveying a large number of paths, storing the data on a spreadsheet or in a
database may be the best way to manipulate the data. However, do not lose sight of the
purpose of this survey – a quick assessment of path condition and its management needs.
Be objective do not emphasise the most damaged parts of a section. Data should reflect the
characteristics of whole path lengths
Be some data collection relies on the judgement of the surveyor. Apply decisions
consistent consistently throughout the survey, and if more than one surveyor is involved spend
some time together in the field to standardise the approach to surveying
Be aware of do not describe paths in minute detail. This is a broad-brush look at path condition
the function and management requirements and will not provide costs with a dependable
of the survey accuracy of more than ± 20%
Use suitably Amber surveys rely to some extent on the judgement and experience of the
experienced surveyor. Useful and relevant data are likely to be collected if the surveyor has
people extensive experience of path development processes and construction techniques
Work safely produce a risk assessment for the field survey stage and monitor the effectiveness,
especially reporting-in procedures
Specification (Red) surveys are the most detailed of the three levels of path survey, and are
made up of detailed field sketches of the route as it is now and how it will look after completion
of any physical work. They provide a:
Specification survey
sheet example.
All the information on the site assessment survey sheet should be entered and read
from the bottom of the survey sheet towards the top.
A standard set of picture (hieroglyph) written symbols are used to represent various physical
characteristics and recommended path construction works (including any other structures to
be installed e.g. bridge) on the ground.
Bill of quantities
The bill of quantities is derived from the Red survey and is a useful summary of the work
required. It should provide a detailed written description of individual items that have been
specified and the number or quantity of each item. Materials that are to be used should be
specified and dimensions included. The bill of quantities also forms part of the tender
documentation and will be used by tendering Contractors for pricing the proposed path
construction works, and any other site preparation or structural installation works.
The costs can be estimated to provide a budget figure for the work, but bear in mind that
Contractor prices can vary greatly according to the location in the country, distance from
roads, price of materials and the availability of other work, and timing of the contract.
Remember the make sure that the specifications take account of the needs of the proposed
users users of the path, and avoid introducing unnecessary physical barriers/ or
hazards in the design such as water bars and cross drains
Realign if evolved path lines that climb directly uphill present various path management
necessary problems e.g. fast flowing water causes erosion down the path surface. It
may be possible to realign a path to reduce the gradient and make it more
attractive to users and less intrusive, allowing the original line to recover
Be aware of if budgets are limited, identify priority sections and ensure that specifications
budgets are prepared for those sections first. There is little point wasting resources
preparing specifications that are unlikely to happen in the near future.
Remember, a Red survey will have a shelf-life of no more than 3 years
Use suitably Red surveys rely to a large extent on the judgement and experience of the
experienced and surveyor. Surveyors should have extensive experience of path design and
qualified people construction techniques
Surveyors are specifications are based on one or two visits to a site. Modifications may be
not infallible required to design and specifications as work progresses and a contingency
plan should allow for this
Test the do not assume that ‘as dug’ materials will provide the required durable
suitability of surface or that you will have to import all aggregate for surfacing. A simple
available test can simulate the effects of compaction, displacement, and erosion in wet
materials on site and dry conditions on any potential surfacing materials
Use a clinometer it can be tempting to look at a route on a slope and try to guess its gradient
to measure the by sight alone. However, this is a surprisingly difficult skill, so use a
gradient clinometer to measure all gradients along the route when surveying
Assuming that you understand the principles of path planning, you will need to look in more
detail at the design considerations and construction techniques that are available. Although
there is a wide variety path types, they share some underlying construction details. The path
will be constructed from three or more layers, and may have additional features according to
the terrain or surface of the path.
The following sections explore different design options and technical specifications that can be
used to design paths including information about the other features related to paths:
This part of the guide provides detailed specifications for the drainage techniques used to
intercept, divert or move surface water and ground water off, under, or away from a path. In
addition, there is useful information on how to deal with existing drainage, designing drainage,
and practical solutions for dealing with drainage problems on paths.
When designing how to get water off the path, you need to consider who will use the path so
that you don't create physical barriers that form trip hazards and make access for people
difficult. Designing drainage features, such as water bars, in to the path surface should be
considered as last resort - they create a step which can cause a trip hazard or puncture a
bicycle tyre, but most importantly they will make taking access for most users difficult - a
wheelchair, bicycle or pram will have to pass around the raised feature in order to continue
along the path. In the first instance, you should consider the least restrictive option which is
the camber, crossfall or cut-off drain.
Camber
A camber is where the centre of the surface is higher than both path edges, which allows
surface water to run off to either side of the path and onto the verges.
Camber
Cambers
are preferred to a crossfall by wheeled users, such as cyclists or wheelchair users, as they can
travel along the centre of the path without needing to correct steering
are most suitable for paths that cross level ground where surface water will be able to run off to
side ditches or onto the adjacent ground
are not suitable on tight curves as they tend to create adverse conditions for path users
Camber specification
the slope from the centre to each path edge should be a maximum of 2.5% (1:40), which
translates to 40mm height difference for a 2m wide path, and 25mm for a 1.2m wide path
Crossfall
A crossfall is a gradient across the path surface which allows water to flow towards the lower
path edge. It is generally recommended to produce a crossfall inwards towards the slope,
when a path contours around a slope, to prevent users on wheels inadvertently steering off
the edge of the path. Likewise, on a curve, the crossfall should be towards the centre of the
radius of the curve (often referred to as a favourable crossfall).
Crossfalls
are generally used on paths where the natural drainage is not suitable for a camber, like crossing
a side slope, or on bends where the radius of curvature is small
are easier to form than cambers as the level surface slopes in one direction only
with 2% (1:50) gradient are preferred by wheeled users, such as wheelchair users, as steeper
crossfalls can make steering difficult over any distance
Crossfall specification
a crossfall should typically be no more than 2.5% (1:40). This means that a 2m wide path may
have a height difference of up to 50mm across its width, or up to 30mm for a 1.2m path
Grade reversal
Grade reversals can be the most unobtrusive of all drainage features and are most effective
on narrow paths (1.2m or less). A grade reversal is actually a change in slope to a short
incline on a downhill section and this technique diverts water off the path before it has a
chance to cause damage. It is most commonly used on mountain bike trails, but could be used
on lowland paths with either unbound or semi-bound surface. A grade reversal cannot easily
be ‘retro-fitted’ into an existing path surface without excavation works, and even then, may not
be effective. Grade reversals are best installed when the path is first built.
Grade Reversal
on a sustained incline or across the side slope, mark the location of natural changes in gradient
at each decrease of gradient, reverse the downhill gradient for about 3 to 5m to form a minor
incline in the surface
the crossfall will need to be altered to accommodate the dip and incline
take care not to exceed the maximum long gradient that has been specified for the path (based on
the needs of users)
the outlet area should be at least 500mm wide and sloped to prevent debris from building up at
the entrance or water ponding on the path surface
annual inspections will be necessary to ensure that the grade reversal is deflecting water off the
path without causing surface erosion
remove all debris from the outlet area that is stopping water from draining away from the path
Cut-off drain
A cut-off drain can be used to intercept fast flowing water on sloping paths without introducing
a wide open gap, like a cross drain or a raised step, like a water bar, in the path surface. This
means that they are suitable for creating ‘barrier-free’ access without a trip hazard or a hazard
where a horse’s foot may become trapped, then damaged or broken. Most cut-off drains have
a u-shaped cross-section and grating over the top. The grating provides a continuous surface
across the drain, and should be strong enough to withstand the load of any traffic that is
expected to use the path.
A cut off drain can either be constructed on site using wood or, preferably, made from sections
of ‘linear drain’. These prefabricated units are more robust and have a longer life span. They
are available in a range of sizes (from 50-250mm deep) and come with tightly fitting gratings.
The channel unit can be made from HDPE plastic, pre-cast concrete, polymer concrete or
stainless steel, with galvanised steel or HDPE plastic gratings. Linear drains used for this
purpose can either have a channel with constant depth or ‘built-in’ fall (where one end is
deeper than the other). For use as a cut-off drain, the constant depth type is suited to paths
with a crossfall.
Linear drains are available in six 'load classes’ that comply with the European Standard DIN
19580, for intended specific purposes - class A 15kN and class B 125kN are suitable for
paths. They need to be laid in a concrete bed so are difficult to retrofit without major
construction works.
install Class B polymer concrete linear drain (constant depth type) on 100mm concrete bed at an
angle to the path line between 45°- 60°. Ensure the drain has a crossfall towards the outlet side
install Class B galvanised grating, 3mm - 5mm below the finished level of the path surface
if required, include a large flat stone to act as a splash plate at the outlet end to prevent erosion of
the path edge or a silt trap to collect washed off surface material
inspect drain channel frequently to ensure it has not become blocked with debris - leaf litter and
silt are a particular problem. It may be necessary to remove the grating in order to inspect the
channel properly
if installed, inspect the outlet silt trap and remove any material annually (or after extreme weather
events) – washed out surfacing could be reapplied to the path if it is relatively free from debris
Water bar
Water bars are used on unbound surfaces to prevent scouring. They are built across the path
on slopes with a ‘shedding bar’ to catch running water and to divert it off the surface. However,
by creating a raised bar across the path to intercept water you will be introducing a physical
barrier for most people including cyclists, wheelchair users and people with visual
impairments. For that reason, water bars should only be used as a 'last resort' but preferably
cut-off drains should be considered first. Water bars should be installed when the path is
constructed or upgraded, but can be installed on existing paths as an erosion control
measure.
For water bars to catch and disperse water effectively they must be carefully positioned on the
path. This depends on where water is coming onto the path, expected water volume and good
dispersal areas – where water will not flow back onto the path further down. A ‘liner’ - a row of
level stones - should be installed on the uphill side to prevent undercutting of the shedding
bar.
Water bars
should be used as a last resort as they introduce a raised step in the path surface, which can
cause a trip hazard but also puncture bicycle tyres
should not be used in locations where they are not the best option for accessibility where more
suitable alternatives like cut-off drains should be used
in rural locations are normally built from locally won stone obtained on site. When local stone of a
suitable size is not available, water bars can be built from alternative materials – standard
concrete kerbing, dressed stone, slate, sawn timber, sawn logs, recycled plastic lumber, and even
conveyor belt rubber
should have a channel installed on the uphill side of the shedding bar to prevent water from
scouring the path surface or undermining the bar. An outlet is also required to allow water to
disperse easily
spacing and frequency depends on the path gradient. For example, on an 8% (1:12) path gradient
the distance between water bars should be around 12 metres
using local won stone of suitable sized dimensions construct a water bar between 45° and 60° to
the path line
shedding bar depth should be a minimum 50mm at upper path edge rising to approximately
100mm at lower path edge
the liner stone(s) should be flush with the path surface and match the crossfall of the path
if required, include a large flat stone splash plate at the outlet end if the ground drops steeply or
install a silt trap to collect washed off surface material
construct path above the water bar level with the top edge of the shedding bar and, below, the
front edge of front liner
annual inspection is required to ensure that the bar is functioning and in safe and good condition
a well-constructed water bar should be solid, immoveable and ‘self-cleaning’ but it may need
clearing if there is a build-up of surfacing or debris (e.g. leaf litter)
if a silt trap is installed this should be emptied annually (or after heavy rainfall) – washed out
surfacing could be reapplied to the path if it is relatively free from other debris
The following drainage techniques can be used to keep water off paths: open ditches, turf
lined ditches, French drains, culverts and soakaways.
Open ditches
Open ditches are the simplest option – they can have a V-shaped or U-shaped channel
section, depending on the amount of space available within the path corridor. Verges between
the ditch and the path should be a minimum of 300mm or maximum of 500mm. At shallow
gradients, ditches should have smooth beds for unrestricted water flow. Ditches must have a
sufficient fall to allow free flowing water, but not so steep that scouring or undercutting to the
bottom and sides of the channel occurs. Gradients between 1:15 and 1:40 will work
effectively. If steeper ditches are unavoidable, try to include bends and level areas to reduce
water flow speed. Short steep sections may be piped to avoid erosion of the ditch.
Open ditch
U-shaped ditches should be 200-300mm deep and 300-450mm wide at top – the sides should be
angled slightly for stability
remove silt and debris and ensure it will not re-enter the ditch
clear and remove vegetation growth so that it will not enter the ditch as debris
Once installed and vegetation re-established this type of ditch is resistant to erosion and will
carry relatively large volumes of water. Turf lined ditches are generally used in upland paths to
reduce the visual impact of any ditches in sensitive landscape. However, where there is
vigorous plant growth these ditches can become ineffective where the vegetation is not cut
back or if shrubs or trees become established in the channel.
the ditch should be 0.5-1m wide (but may be up to 2m wide in some situations) and at least
200mm deep
existing vegetation should be stripped back as cut turfs and carefully stored for re-use
line the bottom and side of ditch by replacing turfs, butted tightly together without exposed gaps
if possible, turfs should not be placed directly on unconsolidated gravel/ alluvial material as they
are easily washed out and may need to be pinned into place (wooden pegs will biodegrade and
are preferable to metal ones)
vegetation clearance may be required if the ditch’s water-holding capacity is reduced by a third or
more (minimum of one cut per year)
remove any tree seedlings/ saplings that become established within the ditch
French drains
French drains are essentially trenches that have been filled with clean free draining stone and
can be used to drain surface water or intercept groundwater. They may have a perforated pipe
installed to increase the volume of water that can be drained. The name comes from the
‘inventor’, Henry French, rather than the country.
French drain
can be used where open ditches are considered to be an unacceptable hazard or where available
space is limited with no room for an open ditch alongside the path
should have the clean free draining stone fill reach the surface where the drain is required to
intercept surface water runoff from a path or a slope. However, mud and silt can easily block the
gaps between the stones and encroaching vegetation can allow surface water to bypass the drain
can use a permeable geotextile sheet to line the excavated trench, which acts as a filter to reduce
clogging by silt and mud
starting at the lowest point in the drain line, excavate a 300mm wide trench to 300mm - 500mm
depth below ground level with a continuous gradient
if required, line the trench with lightweight permeable geotextile sheet, allowing 300mm either side
fill the bottom of the drain trench with graded aggregate - single size clean gravel or quarry stone
(20 - 40mm) with no fines
lay 150mm PVC perforated land drain pipe (sometimes referred to as Flexicoil or Wavincoil) in the
base of the trench, on top of the laid graded aggregate. Use 100mm for small drains. Ensure that
there is a continuous gradient down slope
fill drain trench with graded aggregate to 250mm – 450mm below top edge of trench sides using
single size clean gravel or quarry stone (20-40mm) with no fines. Alternatively, use screened ‘as
dug’ gravel without fines, recycled crushed brick or railway ballast without fines
if a geotextile liner has been used, wrap the sheet over the top of the aggregate before filling the
trench as follows:
• for intercepting water on the surface and ground water, fill the remaining trench with
graded stone or gravel
• for intercepting ground water only, fill the remaining trench with excavated materials. A
geotextile sheet at the base of this layer will help prevent clogging of the drain
• provide an inspection/ sediment pit at regular intervals (or where there is a junction/ bend)
encroaching vegetation should be removed and any tree seedlings/saplings near the line of the
drain should be removed
pipes can be cleaned using drainage rods and silt dug out of the bottom of inspection pits
For culverts across watercourses, inspect any existing culverts and choose a size at least as
big as those that are obviously working well. If there are none, you need to calculate the
'discharge area' of the watercourse in spate conditions (width of channel x maximum depth of
water). You then need to specify a pipe, or pipes, with twice this area (the area of the pipe =
radius2 x 3.14).
The most commonly used pipes are the 'twin wall' polypropylene type. They are lightweight,
easy to handle, strong and relatively cheap. Concrete pipes can be used if deep cover is not
possible and heavy vehicles require use of the path. Stone 'box' culverts may be suitable in
some locations, e.g. if material is available on site and access is difficult. These are traditional
culverts comprising a rectangular section stone channel, capped by flat stones under the path.
The culvert may either be completely buried or else the capping stone can be incorporated
into the path surface.
On small burns, place culverts on a straight section, preferably where water speed is likely to
be low. If this is not possible, provide suitable rock armouring to prevent scouring and erosion.
Culvert
Gradients longitudinal run on pipes should be a minimum of 1:40 to prevent silting. Where
possible, avoid pipe gradients greater than 1:15 to prevent potential erosion
problems at the outlet
Sizing pipes should never run full. Ideally, they should be no more than two thirds full at the
worst-case water flow. For deep, slow moving streams, use a pipe diameter which is
twice that of the stream depth. For ditch system culverts use several 300mm
diameter water pipes set at regular intervals – every 10 to 20m depending on
amount of water flowing into ditches
Construction pipe bedding material should be smooth and free of large stones which could
puncture pipe walls. Lay the pipe on a bed of graded aggregate (the top level of
which must not be above the streambed level). Backfill the pipe with well compacted
graded aggregate as used for path base. Cover depth should be 50-100% of pipe
diameter, depending on expected loadings, with a minimum cover of 150mm
Headwall build a stone headwall around both ends of the pipe to retain pipe bedding and
backfill materials and to hide the pipe ends. Headwalls may be dry or mortared.
Walls should be 150-450mm thick depending on depth of backfill. All stones must fit
together well and be firmly set into the stream or ditch sides. Install a large single
mantle stone across top of pipe ends - take care not crush the outlet and inlet ends.
Alternatively, arrange stones to provide an arch around pipe
Inlet for multiple pipes provide flow 'splitters'– long thin stones wedged between pipes to
direct water flow into pipes without washing out pipe backfill materials. Place a bed
of flat stones around inlet to prevent scouring under or around the pipe
Outlet install a 'splash plate', which is a single flat stone immediately below the pipe outlet
to prevent undercutting. Also provide a wider bed of flat stones, around the outfall, to
prevent scour and erosion
Handrails if culverts present a falling hazard to path users (more than 600mm drop), consider
installing a suitable handrail of an approved design, depending on user types and
the depth of the culvert
Culvert Maintenance
annual inspections are necessary to ensure that culverts do not become blocked
more frequent inspections will be required in some situations - particularly after heavy rainfall
which may have washed debris into the pipe
inspect the culvert inlet and outlet to identify any scouring or erosion
routine maintenance may involve removing any debris in the pipe or from the inlet or outlet ends
Soakaways can be placed at the end of French drains or culvert outfalls to allow water to
percolate into the sub-soil downslope from the path.
Soakaway
Soakaway specification
a large cube-shaped excavated trench, if necessary lined with permeable geotextile sheet filled
with clean free draining stone or rubble
there is no available standard size or position because these depend on the amount of water, type
of soil and topography
a soakaway should be placed far enough away, and low enough down the slope to avoid water
backing up and possibly flooding the path
soakaways must also be built above the level of the natural water table
Soakaway maintenance
there is very little scope for maintaining soakaways, but they should be inspected annually to
ensure that there are no signs of heavy silting up (e.g. culverts are full at the entrance or French
drains are overflowing)
the stone fill could be dug out and replaced or cleaned in extreme cases
ask the current (and past) landowners on the whereabouts of drainage systems on their land
look for signs of sub-surface clay pipe drains (or modern plastic perforated pipe – see image
below) on the field surface e.g. standing water on low lying areas
look for any obvious linear strips of crops, grass or other vegetation taller than the surrounding
ground which could indicate a drain
look and listen for fast flowing water running along drains and coming out of pipe outfalls (see
image below)
carefully dig inspection trenches where the line of a drain may be (see image below)
you could use divining rods to try and identify the line of a drain
look for old clay pipe drains running through railway cuttings which may have inspection pits at
regular intervals that allow access to cleanout blocked drains
• plan the most efficient way of intercepting the water, which could be lateral drains
along the length of the path, with frequent culverts to disperse the water on the
downslope side
• pay attention to the outflow from drains and ditches to make sure that you do not
create a problem further down on the path or for a neighbouring landowner.
You need to give careful consideration to the outfall from ditches into a stream. High water
levels in the stream could flow back up the ditch and possibly flood the path. Place the ditch
outfall above the highest expected water level of the stream.
Consider including ponds in a ditch system to increase the overall capacity of the drainage
system. They can be used to give extra water capacity for high intensity, short duration rain
storms. Ponds with shallow and deep water will also provide habitats for flora and fauna,
although fluctuating water levels and silt build-up may limit their ecological value. Care needs
to be taken to avoid introducing additional hazards, particularly for small children – do not
construct steep sided ponds.
Water sources
Muddy path scrape off mud, if required remove overhanging vegetation to allow sunlight and
the wind to dry out the surface
improve, or create, cambers, or cross falls, to drain water into ditches or drains
Soft, deep find the source of water and divert it away from the path with an open ditch or
mud on the closed drain e.g. French drain
path
improve, or create, cambers or cross falls to drain water into ditches or drains
Soft mud scrape off mud and re-dig ditches to prevent water running onto the path, so that
deposited over the problem is eliminated
the path
if the ecological value of the wet ground is medium – build a raised aggregate path
on geotextile or geocomposite to separate the path from the wet ground
if the ecological value of the wet ground is high – build a boardwalk using either a
timber boardwalk with recycled plastic support posts, or an entire recycled plastic
boardwalk
Water flowing if an obtrusive drainage system is suitable for the site, install a ditch to catch water
onto the path with piped culverts to carry water under the path
from a side
if an obtrusive drainage system is not suitable for the site, install a French drain, or
slope
filter drain to collect and carry water away from path
Water running install a cut-off drain where water runs onto the path to catch and carry water off
down the path the path. Don't install a water bar, as the raised bar will create a step in the surface
which will cause a physical barrier, and potential hazard
Water ponding install a lett at the path verge or a grip through the verge to drain water off the path
on the path
Wet, soft if the problem is caused by a seepage or spring under the path, find the source of
patch on the the water, catch it and then carry it away from the path with an appropriate
path drainage feature. Repair the section of path affected by the problem
3.2 Earthworks
Modification of slopes is only really practical by using machinery, and you will need to give
careful consideration to the scale of earthworks that are appropriate within the context of your
path and the landscape. In some landscapes relatively large scale works could be acceptable,
but in areas of open or sensitive landscapes it may not be possible to undertake major
earthworks. Where you are dealing with cross slopes or gradients along the length of the path
(longitudinal slopes), some earthworks will be necessary:
The angle of the cut slope is important for stability of the path and is dependent on the
strength of the soil and underlying material (e.g. glacial till or rock). In order to keep water off
the path, you need to cut a sufficient width to include drainage between the bottom of back
slope and edge of the path. If space is restricted and steeper slopes are required, you may
need to use slope stabilisation methods, such as a geotextile or a retaining wall.
If you are building up a bench with bulk fill material, remove and store the vegetation and
topsoil first and be sure that the imported bulk fill material has the strength to remain on the
slope. Ensure that the fill part of the bench is formed in well compacted layers.
In some circumstances the material cut from the slope can be used as fill on the lower side of
the slope. This will reduce, or eliminate, the amount of bulk fill material to be imported onto
site.
You can use ‘cut and fill’ technique on slopes where the cross gradient is less than 33% (1:3).
Only use cut and fill if the soil is strong (i.e. does not contain a lot of clay) otherwise it will not
remain stable when the path is used. Test the soil for strength and look for granular, ‘gritty’
feeling soil. If the soil is weak, form the bench by only cutting material - this will produce a
large amount of material for disposal on or off site.
Undulations
For small scale undulations, the easiest technique is to transfer material from the high points
into the low points, forming a series of rises and falls within the required gradient.
the length of the path that will be needed as zigzags is based on the height gained and the
average gradient of the path. First measure the total height of the slope to be climbed using a
level or clinometer (height = Sin(angle°) x distance). The length of path is then calculated using:
for a 20 metre height gain with a path surface slope of 5% or 1:20 you will need 400m of path
(400m = 20 ÷ 0.05 (5%) or 20 x 20)
you then need to divide the length of path by the width of the path corridor, to determine how
many ‘legs’ you need (e.g. on a 100m wide corridor, you will need 4 legs, each of 100m plus 3
platform turns, in order to gain 20m height with an average gradient of 5%).
The following table gives some typical figures that may help with estimating your needs:
Average path Length of path 100m path corridor 50m path corridor
gradient needed to gain 20m
The path should be pegged out accurately on site to ensure correct gradients and remember
to add on the ‘platform’ for turns in your calculations of materials required and length of path.
Avoid using ‘symmetrical’ zigzags of the same length and consider blocking potential short-
cuts (with vegetation, boulders or even barriers) as these will lead to rapid erosion of the
slope. Make sure that drainage from higher levels does not interfere with lower sections, by
extending the outfall / soakaway points beyond any lower section of path.
earthworks to adapt the gradient should be considered as a last resort – try finding an alternative
line that does not require cutting or filling
earthworks may disturb sub-surface water flows and so drainage issues not found during the site
assessment survey may become apparent. In particular, cuttings will attract water and suitable
drainage provision will be required
allow a minimum of a 500mm verge between a path edge and a side slope. If space does not
allow such a verge, consider whether a hand rail will be required
ensure that newly formed side slopes have a maximum gradient of 50% or 1:2 (66% or 1:1.5 for
stronger soils). All slopes should be dressed with topsoil and preferably turfs or appropriate grass
seed mix. Using turfs will rapidly establish and regenerate vegetation and avoid leaving large
scars of bare earth. A vegetated slope is also less susceptible to slipping. If turfs are scarce, lay
those that are available along the foot (toe) of a slope since growth here is particularly important
for slope stability. If side slopes must be made steeper due to width restrictions, use some form of
slope stabilisation or retaining wall
edges of new slopes should be curved into existing slopes to avoid harsh, straight cut lines
if you need to dig borrow pits to generate fill material ensure they are left tidy and present no
hazard to users who stray off the path. Ideally, fill borrow pits with unsuitable soil taken from the
path route and cover with excess turfs
to reduce the landscape impact of earthworks, consider using additional planting to hide
unavoidably large cuttings
Soil reinforcement involves the use of a variety of geotextiles, both man-made and natural.
Slopes as steep as 60 degrees can be formed, but require complex civil engineering
techniques beyond the scope of this guidance. Further information should be sought from a
civil engineer or specialist manufacturers of available slope stabilisation materials.
Retaining walls can also be complex structures requiring specialist design. A well-built wall
looks very attractive and can be an additional feature on a path. However, a retaining wall
beside and below a path edge may present a falling hazard to path users and some kind of
handrail may be required, depending on the height involved and local setting.
Timber walls
These comprise support boards or logs with timber or steel stakes driven into the ground.
They are low cost, easy to install and can be reasonably unobtrusive. Timber walls can
deteriorate after a relatively short period (5 to 10 years), although they can often be repaired
or partially replaced to extend their life.
Gabion walls
Gabion wall.
These are wire mesh rectangular baskets filled with stone, which are available in various
sizes. Stone should be 200mm down to 100mm graded, crushed rock built into the basket
very much like a dry stone wall. Gabions should be perfectly rectangular and should not sag or
move about. Gabions can be stacked up and even pinned together (or pinned into a large
slope) to form large walls. The stonework can be infilled with soil and seeded to help stabilise
the gabions, as well as giving them a more natural look. They are fairly cheap and will last a
Stone walls
Retain a slope with a solid stone wall laid either dry or mortared. A good source of local stone
is essential (purchasing stone should be avoided if possible, for budget reasons). Careful
choice of suitable sizes and shapes of stones is essential for stability, bearing in mind that a
retaining wall has to withstand considerable pressure from soil pushing behind it. Skilled
stonemasons/ wallers should be used to undertake construction. Stone walls can last a
lifetime if well-built and they are very resistant to vandalism.
Rock walls
These are essentially walls constructed with large rocks. If a supply of large rock is available
on site, they can be used in a variety of situations to stabilise large slopes, support extensive
causeways and protect bridge abutments from water scour. A large excavator will be required
to place them into position and care should be taken loading them on to large dumpers.
specifications for small retaining walls are given in the TCV ‘Footpaths’ handbook
if larger or more complex walls are required, seek specialist advice from a consultant structural
engineer. There are a number of techniques available, some of which are simple and low cost
annual inspection should be undertaken for all retaining structures to record visual condition and
structural stability
a longer-term technical inspection cycle (e.g. every 5 years) by a suitably competent person is
recommended
The following aggregate mixtures, based on the Specification of Highway Works (SHW) are:
3.3.1 Full tray excavation - well drained and firm top soil close to the surface
3.3.2 Semi-tray excavation - firm top soil and poorly drained ground
3.3.3 Floated construction - soft ground or woodlands with exposed tree roots.
excavate ground vegetation and topsoil to form X metre wide formation tray to maximum depth of
X mm below ground levels. The tray should be rectangular in section with vertical sides and level
base
stripped vegetation and excavated topsoil to be cast and spread locally on site, either side of
formation tray and landscaped into existing ground levels. If space is limited cart excess materials
to suitable location on site for spreading and landscaping
if soft spots are present, excavate the area below formation level until the sub grade is stable.
Back fill with lower quality granular sub base material to formation level and compact to refusal
strip off ground vegetation and excavate topsoil to form X m wide formation tray to maximum
depth of 50mm below ground levels
use stripped vegetation and excavated topsoil to form raised path verges on either side of
formation tray. Source extra topsoil on site. The tray should be rectangular in section with vertical
sides and level base
if the formation level contains high clay content, lay and secure geotextile sheet in the formation
tray. Geotextile sheet should line the base and both sides. Overlap joining sheets by 1.0m
if the formation level is very wet and soft, lay and secure geogrid on top of geotextile sheet.
Geogrid should not protrude up the sides of the formation tray. Overlap joining sheets by 1.0m.
Use a combined geocomposite instead of separate geotextile and geogrid.
don’t excavate more than 150- 200 mm looking for a firm sub-soil. If the topsoil is so deep that
more excavation is required then use the floated construction technique. This will reduce the
amount of material produced during formation works and reduce the amount of imported stone fill
required. Small localised soft spots may be excavated and back filled with stone to the formation
level, or supported with geotextile and geogrid, if required
soft spots can be difficult to identify before the formation layer has been excavated. As a
contingency, it is useful to provide a provisional sum in the bill of quantities for excavating and
back filling soft spots. Where a formation layer needs to be increased in depth because of soft
spots, it is more cost effective to deal with the problem at this stage, rather than having to re-
construct a section of path that has failed, because a soft spot was not dealt with when the path
was first built
Only use a geotextile if there is significant clay content in the soil (i.e. the soil is soft and
‘sticky’ when wet) or if the soil is very weak (i.e. it contains a lot of organic material such as
peat). If the formation is hard or well drained and the sub-soil is granular with little or no clay
content, a geotextile will not be required.
A geotextile can help to prevent vegetation growth through a path. ‘Terram’ and similar woven
felt-type geotextiles are particularly resistant to vegetation. Some geotextiles are susceptible
to damage by chemical weed killers so it is important to refer to the manufacturer’s information
for details.
Non-woven felt.
Woven polypropylene.
©Tensar TriAx TX
geogrid.
Geocomposite
This is simply a combination of a geogrid laid over a geotextile to provide additional strength
to a formation layer.
©Tensar Geocomposite
(TriAx geogrid on top of
non-woven geotextile).
Fascines
Fascines are tightly bound bundles of freshly cut brushwood which are laid across the path
width and were the traditional predecessor to geotextiles. They have been used over many
centuries and can still be used in areas where importing an artificial material may be
inappropriate, being a constructive use of cleared vegetation. It is good practice to use
Separation to prevent base stone from disappearing into weak soil formation (geotextile)
to prevent soil pumping into base stone (geotextile)
to prevent the wash out of base stone from underground springs (geotextile)
to prevent vegetation growth through a formation (non-woven felt geotextile)
Reinforcement to strengthen a base layer laid on a weak soil with high clay content (geotextile)
to float a base layer over a very weak soil (peat) (geocomposite)
to prevent migration of aggregate down the slope on gradients steeper than 1:12
(geogrid)
Filtration to line filter drain or French drain trenches to prevent silting up of drain stone and
perforated pipe with fine particles washed out of soil (geotextile)
Fascines specification
use a medium grade of geotextile sheet for most path applications (Autoway 120, Terram 1000,
Terram 1500, Terram 2000, Lo Trak 16/15). Heavier grades are used for high loadings, such as
paths with vehicle use or high volume of different user groups)
overlap successive sheets of geotextile and geogrid by 1 metre along the formation tray length.
Geotextile sheet edges should extend about 150mm beyond the formation tray edges and should
be covered by verge soil or turfs to a minimum depth of 150mm. If a geocomposite is used, the
geogrid should be facing upwards with the geotextile beneath, cut to the required path width within
the formation tray. Geogrid edges should not curve up the tray sides
cover the geotextile and geogrid with path base stone. Minimum cover should be 150mm to
prevent possible localised exposure on unbound path surfaces which are prone to frost-heave.
Geotextiles and geogrids should not be visible after path verges have been landscaped.
Fascines maintenance
a path should not require maintenance to the geotextile or geogrid once the path is constructed
exposure of the geotextile or geogrid is an indication of other problems with the design or
construction of the path
For detailed information about the well graded granular sub base materials used to create a
base layer including how deep a base layer can be and how they are constructed, read the
following sections:
Well graded granular sub base materials can be: natural aggregates, or recycled aggregates
and secondary aggregates.
Natural aggregates
The Department of Transport 'Specification of Highway Works' (SHW) defines a number of
well graded aggregates based on the composition of particle sizes contained in the
commercially produced mixture. Clause 803 defines ‘Department of Transport (DTp) Type 1
granular sub base’ and Clause 804 describes ‘DTp Type 2 granular sub base’. These
aggregates are more commonly referred to as 'Type 1' and 'Type 2'.
Type 1
This is the most common well graded granular sub base material used to construct a path's
base layer. It is a well tried and tested component of lowland paths that has been used for
many years as the default base layer material. Commercial quarries supply DTp Type 1
granular sub base consisting of crushed rock graded to a specification that has a defined
proportion of stone particle sizes. Well graded Type 1 contains a good mix of angular
aggregate sized between 63mm and 'fines' (sand sized particles), however, most of the
aggregate content is less than 32mm in size - the European Norm standard for Type 1 is 0/32.
The solid stone particles should not exceed 63mm in size and less than 9% of fines. This
Type 1 aggregate.
Type 2
Like Type 1, this is crushed rock less than 32mm in size with less than 9% 'fines' but with no
specified grading. It usually contains finer material than Type 1, being composed of fewer
angular aggregate sizes. Type 2 is not as strong as Type 1, so for that reason, it is not
generally used on its own to build a base layer. It would usually be used to form the lower part
of a base layer with Type 1 laid on top.
Type 2 aggregate.
Type 3
Another crushed aggregate with a lower 'fines' component than Type 1 or Type 2 - there
should be less than 5% 'fines' and over half of the aggregate particles are greater than 4mm in
size. This uniformly graded aggregate material is suitable for a free draining base layer for
porous surfaced paths.
Crusher run
This granular sub base is a waste material from quarry stone processing. It is crushed material
that comes straight off the rock crusher after the first crushing stage, which is not carried
forward to sieving stage. It is similar to scalpings, its strength is variable, and is available in
different maximum particle sizes, based on the screen sizes used on the rock crusher, which
means there is no guarantee that the waste material is well graded. Providing that the rock
crushed is not too soft, crusher run can be used as an alternative to Type 1 or Type 2.
Scalpings
This is a waste material from quarry explosions which is removed (sieved out) before the
larger rock is crushed. It is often referred to as quarry waste, its strength can be variable and
there is no guarantee that its well graded. It is often much cheaper to purchase than the other
granular sub base materials because of quality issues. Particles range in size from 100mm -
40mm to dust. Scalpings can be used as fill material to make up the formation level where it
has been excavated deeper than originally specified to deal with soft spots. It can also be laid
as the lower part of a base layer with Type 1 on top. If carefully selected, scalpings may make
a reasonably good base layer when used on their own, but avoid wet material with high clay
content. It can cause problems.
‘As dug’
This granular sub base material should consist of free draining, naturally occurring sands and
gravels with sufficient clay content to bind the material together when compacted. It is
sometimes referred to as ‘hoggin’. Such materials are usually glacial tills found mainly in
glaciated areas and river valleys. ‘As dug’ material is taken straight out of the ground from
small scale borrow pits alongside the route being built, and has not been crushed or graded to
any specification. It can also be imported to site from one large borrow pit where onsite
materials are not suitable for path construction.
'As dug' materials can be used to provide the bulk of a base layer, which can then be overlaid
by a regulating layer of higher quality Type 1 on which the path surface can be laid. To
improve the quality of the ‘as dug’ material it can be graded on site using a portable non-
vibrating screener attached to the dumper or a larger mobile vibrating screener. The latter is
suitable where good access is available.
‘As dug’ materials may be the only source of stone in some areas where it is impractical or
prohibitively expensive to import commercially quarried aggregates. These situations could
include small scale upgrades, or particularly remote locations. However, if the range and
composition of particle sizes would result in a poor-quality path, such as too much clay or soft
rock, it is worth investigating other options before settling for ‘as dug’ material.
Hoggin.
Typical recycled aggregates are road planings (from road re-construction or maintenance) and
crushed concrete (from demolition waste). All recycled and secondary aggregate products
should be chosen carefully. Industrial by-products that do not form a specified standard
aggregate mixture design must be individually assessed, because some materials are prone
to leaching or just not suitable for construction.
Demolition waste
Recycled Type 1, Type 2 can be produced from a variety of materials arising from demolition
waste (crushed concrete, brick, hardcore) from buildings or other structures. However, quality
can be variable so check the specification with the supplier before purchasing the material -
check for a well graded size distribution. Recycled demolition wastes can make good
bottoming or lower half of the base layer with Type 1 laid on top. Some path base layers have
been successfully built using just recycled Type 1 where the material has been well graded to
the specified quality standard.
Type1 recycled
demolition waste.
Road planings
These are crushed or milled bitmac or asphalt arisings produced in road or pavement
reconstruction or maintenance work. This material has similar properties to well graded
aggregate. If rolled hard in hot weather, the bitumen binder can soften and then re-bind the
bitumen coated stone to form a hard surface. For this reason, planings have been mainly used
for path surfacing, but they can be used to create a base layer. The planings can be either
part of the base layer with higher quality granular sub base laid on top, or as a whole base
layer.
The price of planings can vary considerably. Unscreened planings purchased straight from a
site may be cheaper, but the quality will be variable. Well graded screened material bought
If you plan to use road planings for path construction, check where the material has come
from before accepting it. It is possible that materials from deep planing of old roads may
contain tar products, which generally should be treated as hazardous / special waste and not
recycled. However, in some situations tar bound planings may be reprocessed in agreement
with Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA). It is important therefore to seek their
advice before purchasing and using road planings.
Road planings.
Blaes
This industrial waste by-product of colliery spoils and spent oil shale bings is reprocessed as a
secondary aggregate and is available in some areas of Central Scotland, particularly West
Lothian. Blaes from colliery spoil is either black or red. Black material contains coal dust that is
combustible. Red material has been burnt, and can be re-used for other construction
purposes. Blaes from spent oil shale is pinkish, and similar in nature to red burnt colliery spoil.
Blaes.
Blaes consists of particles of variable sizes making quality very variable. It can provide a well
bound base layer material that is suitable as bottoming or the lower part of the base layer, with
Care must be taken when using near to watercourses as some materials can be highly toxic. If
you plan to use blaes for path construction, seek the advice of SEPA before using it,
especially if the path is to be built near a watercourse.
Formation description Test for soil strength Geotextile Base layer depth
Granular soil with high clay Medium to large heel Yes 150-200mm depending
content, hard when dry, marks dependant on on users
soft when wet wetness
Clay with minimal granular Large marks unless very Yes 200-250mm
content dry – test in wet to avoid
false reading
Peat with minimal granular Visual, no support of any Yes 300-500mm rock
content, wetland load causeway with 100mm
base on top
An extra 50mm or more of base layer depth is recommended on paths where equestrian use
is expected to be heavy.
Construction methods
The approach to constructing the base layer, generally depends on hardness of the exposed
formation level in the tray. If the formation level is reasonable hard and well drained, and the
depth of granular sub base is to be less than 150mm, the base layer can be laid and
compacted as one single layer. However, if the formation level will not be able to support the
The best approach to undertaking the double layer construction method is to lay the first layer
of granular sub base from the start of the formation tray (the end nearest to the material heap)
and continue to lay materials along the tray to opposite end (the end furthest from the material
heap). That first layer is then compacted with a heavy vibrating roller. The second (final) layer
of granular sub base material is then laid on top of the compacted first layer. A dumper, which
can now easily travel along the formation tray without damaging it, will lay the second layer of
granular sub base material on top of the compacted first layer working from the opposite end
and back to the start of the path. The final layer of laid granular sub base is compacted to
refusal with the roller again.
A ‘drag box’ is a useful method of making sure each layer of granular sub base material is laid
relatively evenly, either as a single layer or double layer. A 'drag box' is a sledge which is filled
with aggregate and dragged (by excavator or dumper) along and inside the excavated
formation tray. Aggregate is spread rapidly and evenly, and some Contractors have drag
boxes that can form a camber, making it easier to roll the camber to specification.
using hand rake or drag box, lay dry granular sub base material to the specified width and depth
in the formation tray forming a camber or cross fall as required
the base layer should be laid and compacted in layers not exceeding 150mm. For example, a
200mm thick base should be built as two separate layers - 150mm layer and then 50mm layer
compact the granular sub base material to refusal by multiple passes with a heavy smooth
wheeled vibrating roller (either ‘double drum’ or ‘single drum’ type, depending on the width of
path)
there should be no high spots or dips along the base layer surface. Check the level of the surface
at regular intervals along the base layer for a consistent even surface, which should have a
maximum gap of 10mm under a 3m straight edge laid along the compacted surface. Any area of
the base layer surface deviating from the required level should be raked off or topped up with
extra material and re-compacted to the correct levels
the final compacted base layer surface should be ‘closed tight’ with no exposed surface voids. If
necessary, fill any openness with fines. The compacted surface should also be free of ruts, dips,
potholes and roller marks, before the surface layer is laid
Where the lower half of the base layer is built with lower quality granular sub base material
such as demolition waste, asphalt road planings or as dug material, a specified higher quality
granular sub base material, such as Type 1 can be laid on top to bind together the lower layer
to make it stronger. This practice also removes all irregularities (low points, high points or
hollows) providing an even surface ready for laying the path's surface layer.
using a drag box lay lower quality granular sub base material (screened ‘as dug’ stone / RSA) to
150mm depth in the formation tray forming a camber or cross fall
re-run the drag box over the compacted base layer laying maximum 50mm depth of higher quality
granular sub base (recycled or quarry Type 1)
Drag box.
This section looks at different path surface types to consider when designing a new path, or
replacing or upgrading an existing surface. In addition, information about the issues to
consider when selecting a surface type to be used by equestrian users are provided.
Ideally lay unbound surfaces using a drag box to maximum depth of 25mm to seal the base
layer from the ingress of water, protecting it from frost heave, and for even surface.
Always specify the tolerance of surface evenness for unbound surfaces - less than 5mm gap
under a 3m straight edge placed along the path surface provides a smooth and even surface
which will prevent puddles forming, and pleasant surface for all path users to enjoy safely.
New unbound surfaces tend to be soft until fully consolidated. If horse and bicycle use is
expected allow a new path to consolidate before use (usually after the first fall of rain and
some further pedestrian use).
Materials
As dug
A won surfacing material consisting of free draining, naturally occurring sands and rounded
gravels with relatively high fines and clay content to bind the sand and gravel particles
together when compacted with a roller. It is commonly sourced from on-site burrow pits
alongside the path under construction, or imported to site. As dug will bind well after plenty of
rolling and forms a reasonable firm surface, but it can be very variable and its quality and
consistency should be monitored when used.
For best results, as dug materials should be sieved and graded to produce suitable sized
material for surfacing which binds naturally together once rolled e.g. 6mm down.
Beware of as dug materials with a very high fines and clay content. If the fines content is too
high, the material will go soft, rut and become slippery when wet. When considering any as
dug material for path surfacing, check its suitability first.
Hoggin.
Whindust surfacing.
Where hand laying is necessary, take care not to over rake the material as the coarser and
finer materials will separate, with the larger material coming to the top.
For best results, lay materials whilst damp and then compact using a heavy vibrating roller
(120 type roller is recommended) to ensure adequate compaction. This material does not
harden quickly after delivery, allowing time to get the material into difficult work sites (it can be
stockpiled for a few days on site before laying).
The recommended laying depth for semi-bound surfaces range from 50mm to 100mm.
Always specify the tolerance of surface evenness for semi-bound surfaces - less than 5mm
gap under a 3m straight edge placed along the path surface provides a smooth and even
surface which will prevent puddles forming, and pleasant surface for all path users to enjoy
safely.
Materials
Semi-bound surface materials available in Scotland tend to be composites from one or more
recycled or secondary aggregates such as screened road planings, blaes, crushed concrete.
In central Scotland, Toptrec is available to purchase as a 100% recycled material made of well
graded aggregate products including shale waste and screened road planings. This material is
generally graded as 20mm to dust and has reasonably good binding properties from the road
planing content. It is proprietary product produced by Tarmac, and is best laid by surfacing
Toptrec surface.
Where the surface layer is to be machine laid, the base layer must be wide enough and
capable of supporting the weight of plant and tar lorries. Path widths less than 2m can be
difficult to lay using paving machines. Path construction sites where the ground adjacent to
the path may be soft can be problematic - a machine or lorry can get stuck if it moves onto a
soft verge.
Always specify the tolerance of surface evenness for bound surfaces - less than 5mm gap
under a 3m straight edge placed along the path surface provides a smooth and even surface
which will prevent puddles forming, and pleasant surface for all path users to enjoy safely.
Materials
There are two methods for laying surface dressing:
Single layer
The simplest and cheapest method is a single layer of bitumen emulsion spray and one layer
of washed stone chippings rolled in. This is a particularly useful way of upgrading an existing
unbound or semi-bound surfaced path or even worn bound surface at a relatively low cost.
Alternatively, a new path which has both level and sloping sections can be an unbound
surface throughout its length, and then the sloping sections which are susceptible to surface
water scouring can be sealed with a single surface dressing layer.
Surface dressing.
Fibredec
‘Fibredec’ is a proprietary variation on the two-layer method. It has a layer of chopped glass
fibres between the two layers of proprietary bitumen emulsion binder, and a top layer of
washed stone chippings to provide a high tensile strength, crack resistant thin surface layer on
top of new base layer or existing surface layer.
The new formation layer or worn surface layer must be treated with weed killer prior to laying
surface dressing or Fibredec. Weeds may break through causing the thin surface to crack.
Use a residual weed killer subject to environmental considerations.
Surface dressing and Fibredec quality is dependent on how well a new base layer is laid or
how smooth and even the existing worn surface is. Specify a tolerance of surface evenness -
maximum gap of 10mm under a 3m straight edge placed along the surface with no high or low
points or hollows. Ideally lay the new base layer or regulate the worn surface with a drag box
to achieve a smooth and even surface. Likewise, if as dug or recycled secondary aggregate
materials are used to build the base layer, regulate with 100mm depth of Type 1 granular sub
base to provide a strong even surface layer suitable for surface dressing or Fibredec. If the
regulation layer lacks sufficient fines to provide a smooth surface, blind with quarry dust before
laying the thin surface layer.
The bitumen content in making bitmac can vary slightly in hardness. This is measured in terms
of the bitumen “penetration grade” (measurement of how deep a standard needle penetrates
the hardened bitumen at a standard temperature under a standard pressure). Higher
penetration grades (where the needle penetrates deeper) are softer and generate a smoother
and more forgiving surface. Typical penetration grades for shared use paths are 160/220 pen
(softer) or 100/150 pen (harder). The other main variation in bitmac surfaces is the graded
aggregate size that is used. Larger aggregate sizes make a porous surface, which allows
surface water to drain through rather than flowing across the surface. Smaller aggregate size
gives a smoother surface, which is usually preferred by wheeled users, particularly cyclists.
Standard maximum aggregate sizes are 20mm, 14mm, 10mm and 6mm.
Brushing whin dust into the surface, immediately after laying, will reduce the initial visual
impact of a bitmac surface. The dust will eventually wash off, by which time the bitmac will
have faded to a grey colour. Alternatively, dress bitmac with 3mm grit, rolled in before the
bitumen binder hardens or lay coloured stone chippings rolled into a bitumen emulsion layer
(as described in ‘Surface Dressing (tar spray and chippings)’ above). Coloured bitmacs are
available but they are extremely expensive and the colour will fade quite quickly leaving the
exposed grey aggregate.
Bitmac.
Hot rolled asphalt surface course layer is usually paver laid on top of a binder course, with
bitumen coated stone chippings scattered over the newly laid surface at a specified rate, and
compacted into the asphalt with roller when still hot.
Porous surfaces are a relatively recent introduction to path management, but their use is likely
to rise in the coming years. The base layer needs to be free draining to allow water to drain
through the stone to reach the underlying ground. Open graded aggregate, such as Type 3
could be used, which is composed of a limited range of stone sizes with open voids between
the individual stones to provide free draining properties. The base layer must be designed so
that the water level never rises into the porous surface. The surface of porous paths do not
need a camber or cross fall for shedding water as water drains directly down through the
constructed layers.
Materials
Porous asphalt
Asphalt can be laid as a porous surface by removing the sand from the aggregate mixture to
create voids so water can drain freely through. It is generally even more expensive than
standard hot rolled asphalt, and is laid in the same way, to a high specification by paving
machine and has a coarser texture. It has a long service life and can be recycled.
For porous grass paving, the cells are filled with free draining soil (or sand / soil mixture) and
seeded with grass mix.
For porous gravel paving, the cells are filled with clean angular gravel over a free draining
sand bedding layer. The individual cells contain and prevent the gravel substrate moving
laterally.
For both systems, the cells are supported on an open graded stone base layer, covered with a
permeable geotextile. This prevents the bedding layer from being washed into the voids
between the large stone particles, maintaining the free draining base layer. A second
geotextile may be required below the base layer to separate the free draining stone from the
formation layer, preventing soil clogging and moving upwards through the open voids between
Bound surfaces, such as bitmac and asphalt can withstand horse use, but horse riders do not
favour them as the hard and smooth surface can cause discomfort to horses’ hooves or a slip
hazard. Alternatively, surface dressing or 3mm grit can be applied to the bitmac or asphalt
surface at the time of construction to provide the extra grip which will reduce the risk of
slipping. The hard grit is spread at a rate of 1.0kg per square metre and rolled in immediately
after laying the bound surface. Excess grit is swept and removed from the surface. Surplus
loose grit can be a slip hazard for path users.
If space allows, a separate 'softer' surface for horses should be considered, for short
distances at least, alongside the main path. This approach allows horses to move off the hard
surface for a short period of time, and then to return to the hard surface when the rider wishes
too. In the past, where separate horse-riding surfaces have been provided, they have been
surfaced using bark/ woodchips. If extra space is limited and only available in certain locations
along a route, consider providing short ‘rides’ away from the main path to give horse riders a
chance for a gallop or canter. If the ground is relatively free draining, simply clear taller
vegetation and overhanging branches, and any other unobvious hazards on the ground to
form a natural surface which horses' can easily use. If horse riding is going to be regular daily
activity on such 'rides', then consider upgrading the natural surface to more durable surface
with a constructed free draining base layer.
Paths on disused railways lend themselves to separate surfaces for different user groups as
there is often plenty of space available to share. Remove of all loose ballast and clear a strip
of the underlying ash will provide an excellent free draining surface for most users to use
throughout the year.
There needs to be good and suitable source of natural or recycled bark/ woodchips available
locally. Woodchips from forestry operations may include greenery such as leaves, which rots
quickly and will reduce the life expectancy of the surface. There are equestrian surface
suppliers who produce equestrian surface products for equestrian facilities and bridle paths.
The surface will probably need to be topped up annually, and unless a plentiful supply of
material is available locally, this type of surface will incur high maintenance costs.
excavate ground vegetation and topsoil to form X metre wide formation tray to maximum depth of
300mm below ground levels. The tray should be rectangular in section with vertical sides and
level base
stripped vegetation and excavated topsoil to be cast and spread locally on site, either side of
formation tray and landscaped into existing ground levels. If space is limited cart excess materials
to suitable location on site for spreading and landscaping
lay and compact 80mm depth of 80mm no fines free draining coarse drainage stone in the bottom
of formation tray to form a firm base layer
lay and secure non-woven or woven permeable geotextile separation layer on top of the
compacted base layer in the formation tray. Line bottom and sides of tray and overlap joining
sheets by 1.0m
lay 300mm depth of bark/ woodchips (nominal particle size range 5mm - 40mm) on top of
geotextile separation layer in the formation tray and compact until bark/ woodchips are below
existing ground levels
Turf
A better solution than a wood-based surface is to construct free draining base layer and cover
with existing topsoil and turfs to form a natural surface, which blends well into its natural
surroundings, and provides a firm surface for equestrian use.
Like a wood-based surface, this type of surface is only suitable for free draining ground – not
clay or poorly drained wet ground. It is low maintenance surface requiring one or two cuts per
year to keep the ground vegetation short.
excavate ground vegetation and topsoil to form X metre wide formation tray to maximum depth of
350mm below ground levels. The tray should be rectangular in section with vertical sides and
level base
stripped vegetation and excavated topsoil to be placed to either side of formation tray for later
use. Excess materials to be landscaped into existing ground levels or carted to suitable location
on site for spreading and landscaping
lay and compact 200mm depth of 80mm no fines free draining coarse drainage stone in the
bottom of formation tray to form a firm base layer
lay and secure non-woven or woven permeable geotextile separation layer on top of the
compacted base layer in the formation tray. Line bottom and sides of tray and overlap joining
sheets by 1.0m
lay 100mm depth of excavated topsoil on top of geotextile separation layer in the formation tray
and lightly consolidate
lay available turfs to cover topsoil layer to levels of existing ground. Ensure all turfs are butted
tightly together with no exposed gaps, roots and topsoil
The soft edging method consisting of topsoil and turfs can form verges (shoulders) that makes
a path surface on top of wider base layer look much narrower. The same method can also
consist of keeping the base and surface layers at the same width, with the undisturbed sides
of the excavated formation tray providing adequate support to the path. Some vegetation
encroachment will occur with the second method, but this may be desirable to give a more
natural look.
These exposed edges also pose a trip hazard to users. Timber edging made from boards will
rapidly deteriorate, the path will collapse and complete re-construction of the path will be
required. Using timber edging or concrete kerbing can also increase construction costs.
Concrete kerbing is generally only used for footway pavements constructed to Local Authority
roads and pavement standards.
For woodland paths, where tree roots are exposed and there is limited availability of turf and
soil to create suitable path verges to support the path, sawn logs can be useful alternative.
Also, cellular confinement system, such as 'geocells' infilled with free draining aggregate could
be used.
make sure the planted turf or topsoil is not higher than the finished path surface layer (they should
be finished off level with the path surface or just below) - high verges can prevent surface water
from running of the path surface causing standing water and scouring
make sure the verges slope down away from the edges of the path surface to allow surface water
to runoff and not back on to the path
3.8.1 Boardwalks
3.8.2 Bridges
3.8.3 Fences
3.8.4 Gaps, gates and barriers
3.8.5 Handrails
3.8.6 Horse mounting blocks
3.8.7 Joining highways
3.8.8 Passing places
3.8.9 Ramps (including landings)
3.8.10 Resting places
3.8.11 Seats and perches
3.8.12 Signs (advisory and directional)
3.8.13 Steps
3.8.14 Stiles
3.8.15 Turning space
3.8.16 Tactile cues
3.8.1 Boardwalks
Boardwalks can provide an alternative surface type for balancing the needs of public access
with the protection of sensitive habitats. They are usually made from wood or plastic.
Boardwalks are expensive and require regular inspection and maintenance. Recycled plastic
will provide a longer lifespan than wooden boardwalks, and with less risk of becoming
slippery. A plastic boardwalk can also be installed at ground level to reduce its visual impact in
the landscape as, unlike timber, plastic does not rot. However, in sensitive habitats the
introduction of plastic may not be desirable in the long term. Boardwalks can avoid impacts to
the hydrology of a wetland site which may be adversely affected by an aggregate path built
directly on the ground.
For general guidance about boardwalks and specification details for various boardwalk types,
refer to the boardwalks section of our ‘Outdoor Access Design Guide’.
3.8.2 Bridges
Bridges are an integral part of paths and are used to cross a range of ‘barriers’. The need to
accommodate different users will dictate variations in the design. Whether crossing a road,
railway, river or burn, each bridge poses a different set of planning, design, construction and
maintenance issues. So, although there are some common features in bridges, each is
adapted to its own circumstances.
Bridge.
For comprehensive guidance to help you negotiate the complex factors involved getting a
bridge in place refer to Path Bridges - Planning, Design, Construction and Maintenance (Paths
for All, Scottish Natural Heritage, Forestry Civil Engineering).
3.8.3 Fences
Fences for paths, recreational sites or sensitive site areas such as nature reserves or historic
sites can provide one or more functions by acting as a physical barrier or visual boundary.
Fences can be used for guiding people as well as separating them from potential hazards.
For general guidance about fences, key design principles and specification details for various
fence types, refer to the fences section of our ‘Outdoor Access Design Guide’.
Our ‘Outdoor Access Design Guide’ has detailed guidance about gaps and barriers and also
for gates.
3.8.5 Handrails
Handrails can be attached to structures such as steps, ramps, boardwalks or bridges to
provide safety and comfort. In some situations, handrails can give a means of propulsion for
wheelchair users.
For handrail specification details on steps and ramps, refer to our ‘Outdoor Access Design
Guide’ ‘Countryside Access Design Guide’ (Scottish Natural Heritage). You will also find
handrail specification details for boardwalks.
For choosing handrail height for bridges and specification details, refer to ‘Path Bridges –
Planning, Design, Construction and Maintenance’ (Paths for All, Scottish Natural Heritage,
Forestry Civil Engineering).
For mounting block specification details, refer to ‘Mounting Blocks’, available from the British
Horse Society.
Flush kerb.
The following publications provide general guidance about what to consider when planning
and designing paths that meet roads, as well as giving specification details:
Maximum distance
Path setting
between passing places
urban 50m
rural 150m
Passing places need to be incorporated into the planning and design stage so that they can
be constructed and maintained as an integral part of the path surface. Each passing place
Passing place.
The maximum recommended gradient of the ramp itself depends on the location, but in all
cases a flat ‘landing’ area should be provided for each 750mm of height gained. Each landing
should be at least 1.5m long.
For people to use ramps easily, the Fieldfare Trust Countryside for All Good Practice Guide
(2005) recommends that a ramp should be no longer than 15m before a rest area or landing is
provided. The maximum steepness of ramps for urban or urban fringe paths is recommended
to be 8.3% (1:12) and 10% (1:10) for rural paths.
Ramps with landings are built in much the same way as a path and should be even and non-
slip with no loose stone in excess of 5mm in size. The crossfall of a ramp should be no
steeper than 2% (1:50).
For more information about ramps, refer to our 'Outdoor Access Design Guide' key design
principles and specifications for ramps.
The Fieldfare Trust Countryside for All Good Practice Guide (2005) recommends the following
spacing:
Maximum distance
Path setting
between resting places
urban 100m
rural 300m
When looking for suitable locations for a resting place, try to find somewhere with a view or
something of interest, to provide a ‘natural break point’. Path users will appreciate resting
places at the top, bottom and at some point along flights of steps or ramps, which they can
see and aim for.
Resting places are best incorporated into the planning and design of the path so that they can
be constructed and maintained along with the path surface. Each resting place should be a
minimum of 1.5m wide and 3m long. The crossfall of a resting place should not be steeper
than 2% (1:50). If you are constructing a path less than 1.5m wide, you should consider
resting and passing places together. If you need to retro-fit resting places, they should be built
to the same specification as the main path and the path surface should be continuous.
Resting place.
Large logs or rocks and low walls can be used as seats although the ‘heel space’ can be
difficult to incorporate. The provision of seating could give you opportunities to incorporate art
or interpretation along the path.
Seats with a backrest and arms are preferable to plain benches as they provide additional
support or comfort to those sitting. The arm rests can also provide leverage when standing up
or support when sitting down.
The Fieldfare Trust Countryside for All Good Practice Guide (2005) recommends the following
dimensions for seats and perches set out in the table below.
Furniture Dimensions
seat 450 – 520mm above the path surface, although for children, height of 350mm is better
seat with length of seat (and backrest) should be 2m with the height of the backrest at 700mm
backrest
perch 500 – 750mm high – if more than one is to be provided install each one at different
height above the surface, as this will allow children to use at least one of them
For general guidance about seats and perches and specification details for various seats,
perches and picnic tables, refer to the seats and picnic tables section of our 'Outdoor Access
Design Guide'.
Advisory sign.
Directional signs such as finger posts, way markers or orientation panels are used to help
people find their way to a given destination or route.
Directional sign.
For general guidance about signage and specification details for various directional finger
posts, way markers and orientation panel frames, refer to ‘Signage Guidance for Outdoor
Access’ (Paths for All, Scottish Natural Heritage).
3.8.13 Steps
Well designed and constructed steps can provide convenient, easy and safe access for most
people. However, if they are combined with ramps, your path will be more accessible to a
wider range of people.
For further information about steps, refer to our 'Outdoor Access Design Guide' key design
principles and specification details for steps.
3.8.14 Stiles
Stiles are traditionally a common way of crossing boundaries but many people find them
difficult or impossible to use. If you can, avoid using a stile by installing a gap or gate. Reliable
self-closing gate mechanisms are available so investigate that option with the land manager.
Although the actual size of turning area depends on the length and width of any gate, access
control, you should provide at least 1m of path surface (and clear space) beyond the arc of the
gate. For one-way opening gates you need to provide enough space for a person to open the
gate towards them without needing to come off the path.
The Fieldfare Trust Countryside for All Good Practice Guide (2005) suggests that path turns or
structures like gates, kissing gates or chicanes require the minimum dimensions in the
following table.
180° or 360° 2m x 2m
If space is limited, by manoeuvring backwards and forwards around a central point, a 180° turn can
be done in a 1.5m diameter circle. However, mobility scooters need more room to turn. Some need
a turning space of 2.1m. The larger ones need even more space
If you are intending to provide tactile cues to assist with the enjoyment of the path, you will
need to find a way of informing people what each cue means and what to expect. This could
be through the use of trailhead information, for example, with sample cues.
The Fieldfare Trust Countryside for All Good Practice Guide (2005) states that tactile cues
must cover the full width of the surface and be 800mm long. Materials used to form tactile
cues must be securely attached to the existing surface with a maximum lip of 5mm so that the
cue does not cause a trip hazard or make access difficult for other people.
Tactile pedestrian /
cycleway paving (©
Paving Expert).
The next stage is the preparation of a 'design' for each route, based on information in the pre-
construction information and the Specification (Red) survey. Whether it is replacing or
upgrading an existing path or constructing a new path from scratch, the same design process
will apply. The aim should be to design a path, including any related features e.g. passing
places, which is safe to construct, maintain, and use.
What is a design?
A design is a specification, drawing and bill of quantities that relate to a structure e.g. path,
bridge, boardwalk or earthwork. A design can also include calculations prepared for the
purpose of a design, or a product intended for a particular structure e.g. type of surfacing
material, like tarmac or Toptrec, for a path. When designing the path, including the drainage
system or any related features, you will need to consider the matters in the following table.
fitting the path into the landscape over which it will cross
width of base and surface layers (to accommodate the different user groups and levels of use)
depth of base and surface layers (based on ground conditions, different user groups and levels of
use)
type of separation and reinforcement layer if need (material type and strength grade based on
ground conditions and different user groups and levels of use)
site drainage conditions, e.g. work out where water is coming from and likely to go when it drains
away)
availability and suitability of materials to build the path (both on-site and off-site in the local area)
site ground conditions, e.g. type of soil, wetness, vegetation, how hard the ground is along the
route
preparation of designs with adequate consideration to safety and ill health of everyone
constructing, maintaining, and using the path or any other related structures, e.g. bridge
foreseeable hazards on site or with the design harmful to health, likely to cause personal injury or
lead to catastrophic events
site access, e.g. how easy or difficult will it be to get materials on site, where materials can be
stored on site, can a one-way system be designed so vehicles do not need to reverse or turn
any statutory requirements that will affect how and when the work is carried out, e.g. Water
Environment (Controlled Activities) (Scotland) Regulations 2011
A designer has a duty to advise the client of their responsibility to appoint a principal designer,
before detailed design work commences - only ‘initial design work' should be permitted by the
client without a principal designer appointed. If the client does not appoint a principal designer,
they will then be principal designer for their project.
Avoid risks ask yourself, can you get rid of the problem (hazard) altogether? e.g.:
• design a bridge so it can be assembled on the ground and then lifted into
position across a watercourse with a crane or large excavator to remove
the risk of workers falling off when working at height
• design a bridge with a high handrail to remove the risk of a horse rider
falling off the bridge
• position the end of a path away from a material storage area, so workers
and moving plant are separated when the path is being built
Replace risk replacing the dangerous with the non-dangerous or the less dangerous, e.g.:
• use stone to pitch a path or install steps that is lighter in weight
• substitute solvent-based products with water-based ones
• use untreated instead of treated timber
• use recycled tyre kerbing instead of heavy concrete ones
• use recycled plastic instead of treated timber
Collective give collective protective measures priority over individual measures, and make
measures provisions so that the work can be organised to reduce exposure to hazards, e.g.:
Information give appropriate information and instructions to everyone carrying out the work,
e.g.:
The following table identifies four health and safety considerations for designers that will crop
up on many path projects.
Access consider access during path construction work and for future maintenance, after
the work is completed
your design should allow for safe access during construction for site vehicles,
plant, delivery vehicles, and pedestrians - consider space for turning, segregated
routes, one-way traffic routes, and site access/ egress points
Material some construction materials may need to be handled on site. Their size and
weight can affect the manual handing risks to workers when carrying out the work
this should be a consideration on all projects, but particularly where materials need
moving around the site, and over long distances, where access is poor and
mechanical aids may not be practical to use. For example, if a bridge design can
accommodate smaller decking components, movement of materials around site
and on the bridge becomes easier for workers. This will also be of benefit to those
who will maintain the constructed structure, as replacement of damaged
components will be easier and safer
Trip hazards you may have seen drainage features like water bars and cross drains across a
path to catch running water flowing down the surface or to get water to cross the
path from a ditch
consider building the path with a sufficient camber or cross fall to remove trip
hazards
where gradients on a path are moderately steep or steeper, install closed cut-off
drains rather than water bars
where water in a ditch needs to cross the path, install piped culverts under the
path instead of cross drains
avoid shallow steps, surface breaks (gaps wider than 12mm) and other uneven
surfaces that could cause trips and falls, resulting in minor accidents and broken
bones
The level of detail will depend on the extent and complexity of the path construction project.
For small projects, written detail can be given in a simplified format.
excavate ground to reduced depth of 150mm below finished path surface level to form 1.5metre
wide formation tray. All excavated material to be casted and landscaped into surrounding areas
excavate any soft spots in sub-grade as required and backfill to formation level with well
compacted 50mm crusher run
supply and install Terram 1000 geotextile sheet in formation tray bottom and sides. Overlap
adjoining sheets by 1.0 metre
supply, lay and compact to refusal 150mm depth of DTp Type 1 granular sub base to falls and
levels
supply, lay and compact to refusal 25mm depth of 6mm whinstone dust to falls and levels
where required, landscape verges level with finished surface layer to support path edge using
suitable excavated topsoil won from formation layer works
all granular sub base materials to comply with SHW Clause 803
For medium or large-scale projects, where there is greater risk to the Client if something goes
wrong, more detailed written descriptions should be considered and included with construction
drawings.
3.11 Drawings
Like specifications, the level of detail to provide on drawings will be determined by the extent
and complexity of the path construction and any related feature work required but should
include:
Location plan
A 1:2500 Ordnance Survey map showing the general location of the route where the path and
any related features will be installed.
Construction drawings
Construction drawings are cross section drawings, showing the widths, depths and materials
for formation, base and surface layers etc, should also be detailed as part of the design for the
benefit of the Contractor or Principal Contractor. Any other related feature or structure such as
drainage works should also have a cross section drawing to show all construction details
required. These drawings should be cross referenced with the relevant specifications and
work items in the bill of quantities.
Construction drawing is also effective communication tool for informing others about remaining
safety or health risks with the design. One communication method is to provide 'SHE' boxes
on construction drawings.
• obtaining prices from several Contractors or Principal Contractors for completing the
works
• valuing the extent of work and variations completed for the purpose of issuing payment
to a Contractor or Principal Contractor.
The detailed measurements for the purpose of bill of quantities production is beneficial for a
number of reasons:
• it saves the cost and time of several Contractors or Principal Contractors measuring
the same design in order to calculate their bids for competition
• it provides a consistent basis for obtaining competitive bids
• it allows the Client to compare different returned bids using a standard measurement,
before taking into account quality considerations
• it provides an extensive and clear statement of the work to be completed
• it provides a very strong basis for budgetary control and accurate cost reporting of the
contract (i.e. post contract cost control), including:
o preparation of cash flow forecasts
o a basis for valuation of variations or changes to the works
o a basis for the preparation of interim payments
• when priced, it provides a useful source of cost data, which can be used to support
claims for grants and for estimating the cost of similar future path construction projects
in cost estimating works e.g. approximate estimating and setting costs for budgeting
purposes.
Preliminaries
Work items referring to everything the Client wants the Contractor to do before they actually
start path construction work or other items that will affect the implementation of the works.
Allowances are given for such things as: temporary site welfare facilities; site clearance;
dismantling and removal of existing structures; and disposal of waste.
Preliminaries are not required to be measured work items but need to be described in detail
and the tendering Contractors will have to price the items that will affect the cost of the works
in a 'lump sum' price.
Aggregated construction work items are a way of simplifying the BQ and are well suited to
smaller, straightforward path construction projects. Each measured work item quantity should
An example of separate individual construction work items (descriptions and quantities) for
path construction work is shown in the following table.
One aggregated construction work item for the same path construction work would be:
New Class
Item Description Quantity Unit £ rate £ cost
1 Construct 1.5metre wide granite dust path on 500 lin.m
Autoway 150 geotextile sheet using 150mm
depth recycled Type 1 granular sub base and
25mm depth 6mm granite dust surfacing in
accordance with drawing 1
Provisional Items
For work or costs that cannot be entirely defined or detailed as provisional quantities items at
the time the BQ was prepared.
For example, soft spots can be a common provisional item. If the contractor encounters soft
spots at the formation level in the formation tray which need to be excavated out and
backfilled with granular sub base material before the path is built, they can invoke the
provisional items without needing to negotiate a contract variation. If no soft spots are
encountered then you get charged nothing at all.
There are several methods used by Quantity Surveyors to prepare a BQ. One traditional
method involves breaking down the process into two stages, as follows:
Taking off as the name suggests, this involves taking off dimensions from the
construction drawing and entering them on a ruled paper called a
'dimension paper'. Clear and concise description detail in the form of
explanatory notes is also included to allow the accurate understanding
and pricing of the work items.
Billing direct
The above method is long and tedious in practice. There is another method that can simplify
the process called 'billing direct' that is suitable when the work is relatively straightforward and
the number of work items limited.
This method involves taking off and transferring the measured work items directly from the
dimension paper to the BQ, eliminating the need to abstract. Each work item is taken off as a
separate article in the order in which it will be presented on the BQ, thereby, reducing time
and cost of preparing a BQ.
For example, in the sample bill of quantities the aggregated construction work item
(description, quantity and unit of measurement) is listed under the elemental heading of 'New
Class'.
In previous chapters of this guidance the construction techniques and options for designing
paths have been laid out. In order to put this into practice and produce a path on the ground a
series of stages need to be negotiated, all within the context of procurement and management
of path construction work. These stages are:
• you invite designers to tender and appoint one designer to prepare the design for the
pathwork and any other related features/ structures in detail, including planning,
managing, monitoring, and coordinating the pre-construction phase, on a competitive
tendering basis
• you invite contractors to tender and appoint one contractor to build the path design
(and any other related features/ structures), including planning, managing, monitoring,
and coordinating the construction phase, on a competitive tendering basis.
Your designer completes the design fully before the tender to find a contractor commences,
which gives you more control over the design and certainty about design quality and cost.
However, the design process is longer and slower than other forms of contract, and as the
contractor is only appointed once the design is complete, you do not benefit from the
contractors' input on the designs buildability as the designer has already developed the
design.
A fixed price contract is considered a low risk method of contracting for a client, as the
contractor takes on financial risk of completing the work. However, the contractor has no
responsibility for the design, so you retain that risk. If the design is incomplete, there are
mistakes or omissions in the design, or variations are required after the work has started on
site, the cost to you could be significant. Although, some sharing of the risk could happen with
the contractor, you take on board the majority of risk as the client.
Types of tender
Invitation to tender
This provides guidance on how the tender documents are to be completed.
Form of tender
A covering document prepared by the client and signed by the tendering contractor to indicate
that they understand the tender, accept the various terms and conditions of the contract, and
other requirements of participating in the tender exercise.
Bill of quantities
This document is used as the basis of submitting the tender where all prices for carrying out
the work are given. The bill of quantities assists tendering contractors in producing an
estimate of costs for their tender. It also provides a fair and accurate system for tendering.
Each invited contractor bids against the bill of quantities, stating their price for each item of
work. Their priced bill of quantities constitutes their offer. As the bill is made up of prescribed
items of work, it is possible to compare both the prices directly between each tender - this lets
you make a detailed assessment of which aspects of a tender offer good or poor best value.
The prices on the bill of quantities can also assist with negotiations with the preferred tender
at later stages in the tender exercise.
Specifications
This document sets out what needs completing to set standards, including policies,
procedures or guidelines. It sets out the performance standards and the outcomes expected.
It describes the materials and workmanship standards. They do not include cost, quantity, or
drawn information, and so need to be read alongside the terms and conditions of the contract,
bill of quantities, and construction drawings.
Quality requirements
A questionnaire about how the tenderer intends to provide the contracting service, including
supporting evidence demonstrating relevant experience. This information will help evaluate
the quality of the tender.
Pre-construction information
A document giving relevant information about the project that might influence the health and
safety of the paths design and work.
Tendering contractors must follow the instructions and information given in each tender
document provided, as failure to do so may prevent you as the client from considering the
tender properly.
Producing a tender document could appear bureaucratic for what could be seen as a small
path project. However, time spent preparing a tender document can save time and money
when the work is carried out at construction phase. There is also extra financial security in
having a legally binding agreement with a contractor (or principal contractor). The contractor
gets the security of knowing that there will be no surprises on a site at their cost, which will
make them more likely to price a tender competitively. In addition, you as the client get the
security of knowing that the project will be completed on time and budget.
Some of the different types of contractor are set out below along with a few things to consider
when deciding which to select. The technical requirements and extent and complexity of path
construction project will influence choice.
Path contractors
There are very few contractors specialising in lowland path construction as their main
business. However, some upland path contractors have branched out into the wider field of
lowland path construction.
Benefits - They will be familiar with path specifications, and should require minimal
supervision for a high-quality output. They know what needs to be done to build a path
that blends well with the landscape. Some may also have experience of installing small
span bridges.
Points to consider - Upland path contractors may be less experienced with the more
tightly specified path construction work required for urban environments. Some
contractors only have experience of building unbound surfaces and may have no
knowledge and experience of laying semi-bound or bound surfaces.
Benefits - These contractors are well accustomed to path or track building in forest or
woodland sites. They are familiar with working on routes with difficult access.
Points to consider - They are less experienced with urban paths where a higher
quality of finish is required. They may require close supervision to follow specifications
and do work of good quality.
Benefits - There are plenty of small civil / plant hire contractors available. They can
usually do small scale asphalt surfacing works.
Points to consider - Large contractors are their main clients and may have demands
on their time which may affect programming in your path construction project. Tidiness
and quality of finishing off can be variable as they generally deliver to tight cost
margins and may be used to working on specific aspects of jobs rather than whole
projects. They are accustomed to sites with good access and may charge extra if
access is poor (seen as a risk).
Benefits - These contractors are common and readily available. They are able to do
everything from path construction works to bridge installation. They are highly
professional and will work to approved quality standards. A suitable choice for large
scale path construction projects.
• tenders returned by the date and time stated on the tender document should be
assessed
• any tenders arriving after the deadline, you do not have to accept them, but you should
have the discretion to assess them if there are valid reasons for the delay
• all returned tenders should be opened together, assess each one fairly, and treat the
information with care and attention - remember that the contractors have spent time
and effort responding to the tender. Local authorities or national park authorities will
have specific procedures for opening tenders. For other organisations who do not
have procedures in place, the lead person should ask someone else to be present
when tenders are opened. You should consider recording the following information:
o time when tenders are opened
o names of those opening tenders
o details of tenders received after the deadline
o contractor names of tenders not returned at all.
Tender assessment:
• assess all opened tenders together with two or three people present and involved in
the assessment process
• creating a tender assessment sheet will help you to assess each tender individually in
a consistent way. This will then demonstrate that you have been objective in the
selection process. The sheet should include the key selection criteria that you are
looking for in a contractor - use the criteria that you gave in the tender document. You
should note whether the tender includes that information and how well the contractor
matches the criteria. If some of the information required is missing, you or the project
manager should contact the relevant contractor to request it and provide a reasonable
time for response
• assess each tender for completeness and meeting the minimum selection criteria
requirements, you will need to compare the tenders to decide who will provide best
value for money. By looking at the returned bill of quantities, you should be able to see
whether the contractor has understood the work. Look for items of work priced
particularly high or low compared with other bill of quantities, and ‘hidden’ costs of
provisional sums, which might make a seemingly cheap tender more expensive, if
those sums are required
• check previous work experience for similar pathwork in order to judge the contractor’s
skills, knowledge, experience, and organisational capability. The most useful thing to
do is speak to previous clients of a contractor who appear to score well in the tender -
find out whether the previous client was happy with the quality of contractor’s work. It
• before a decision is made to enter in to contract with your preferred contractor, make
sure you have adequate funding in place first.
Awarding the contract to the preferred contractor:
• once you have made the final decision, contact the preferred contractor to ask them to
take on the work. If the contractor is happy and agrees to take on board the contract,
you should then schedule the start-up process for the construction stage
• if the construction phase is going to involve more than one contractor to undertake the
work, you should advice the contractor of their appointment as principal contractor -
advise them that they must fulfil the principal contractors CDM Regulation 2015
responsibilities, before starting any work on site, e.g. preparing construction phase
plan, and during the construction stage
• award the contract to the contractor (or principal contractor) in writing with the award of
contract letters signed by you and them
• if your project is notifiable to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), you must inform
HSE of who the contractor (or principal contractor) is by updating and resending the
original F10 form
• you, or the project manager contacts all unsuccessful contractors in writing to inform
them of your decision. These contractors will find it helpful to know how well they did
compared with the other contractors, particularly on price - one useful way of providing
'anonymous' feedback is to list the contractor’s names in alphabetical order, then the
prices in ascending order, so the contractor’s names and prices are not linked
together. The successful contractor should also be highlighted with their tender price
shown - this is important if you have not gone for the lowest price.
Once the contractor (or principal contractor) has been appointed, they will commence the
mobilisation stage of construction phase, if required appointing sub-contractors to complete
elements of work, and commencing site set up (welfare facilities, etc). At this point, you or the
project manager will arrange the pre-start meeting.
The contractor (or principal contactor) will prepare the construction phase plan and make sure
welfare facilities are in place before any work begins.
One of the most important jobs for the client, although they have no legal obligation to, is to
make sure that the pathworks are properly supervised. Even the best contractor (or principal
contractor) will find that they need some guidance whilst on site, and a good works supervisor/
manager, or clerk of works, can make the difference between mediocre and top-quality work.
Works supervisor needs to be able to get on with the contractor (or principal contractor) but
also to make sure they are working in the best interests of the client (you) - it can be a tricky
job, particularly for a technical path project, so this aspect should not be left to chance. If you
are the client and have limited experience of managing path construction projects, make sure
that you appoint someone who is suitably skilled and experienced at site management and
working with contractors on the ground. Instead of appointing a works supervisor, you could
ask the designer to supervise the construction phase - they will be familiar with the
specification and will have a good understanding of the construction methods being
undertaken.
Pre-construction preparations
Pre-start meeting
Before the contractor (or principal contractor) starts on site, hold a pre-start meeting, around
two weeks before pathwork starts, to which all relevant parties will attend. The purpose of the
meeting is to introduce all parties to each other, review the requirements of the project’s
construction phase, and to make sure that everyone knows their responsibilities, and all
queries are answered - so everyone is happy!
After the meeting, the designer (or principal designer if still involved) will mark out the
pathwork on the ground, and indicate where the different types of work are required along the
route, e.g. where piped culverts need installing.
The contractor (or principal contractor) needs to be aware of site access points, one-way
routes, material storage areas, welfare facility locations, restricted site areas, site boundaries,
nature conservation or historic site issues, and environmental site issues. Most of this
information will have been available to the contractor in the pre-construction information
provided at the tender stage, but it is good practice to go over it all again with them before
they actually start any work on the ground. It is important that everyone is clear and
understands what it is that they have to do.
• reviewing method statements making sure they provide a safe method of working
• resolving technical queries and liaising with the contractor (or principal contractor) and
designer (or principal designer)
• inspecting the quality of work to ensure the required levels of workmanship are
achieved and the specification is being complied with
• monitoring the contractors (or principal contractors) progress and level of resources
being deployed.
Construction phase plan also identifies construction site hazards and remaining design risks
and how they need controlling to prevent harm to those carrying out the pathwork, but also to
others who will be visiting the site, or should not be accessing the site, e.g. members of the
public. The information in the plan should be proportionate to scale and complexity of the
work and level of risks involved in the path project.
Site supervision
Once the pathwork has started, the designer (or principal designer, clerk of works, or works
supervisor if any of these appointments are involved) should be on site at least once a week,
or more. They should track progress of the work against the design (specifications), and
guide the contractor (or principal contractor) with regard to the standards required on an
ongoing basis.
For complex projects, it is useful to hold a progress meeting at regular intervals throughout the
construction phase with everyone involved. Discuss work progress, problems, health and
safety, design changes/ modifications, etc. Someone present should take minutes, which
should be logged and circulated to everyone in attendance.
To assist with site management, the following table sets out some things to lookout for.
Quality and check that all path and related feature/ structure works are of a sufficiently high
tidiness quality – e.g. piped culvert headwalls are neat and stable with no plastic pipe ends
protruding out past the stonework
make sure the contractor (or principal contractor) responsibly disposes of all
packaging, geotextile sheet or geogrid off-cuts, rubbish and litter in line with good
waste recycling practices
Materials and make sure supplied materials are in accordance with the specification – e.g. if DTp
alterations Type 1 granular sub base is required, make sure that the quarry has dispatched
the right aggregate
inspect all materials before installation. Any supplied materials should be rejected
if, in the opinion of the clients' site representative, they do not meet specification or
are defective in any way. The contractor (or principal contractor) needs to be
informed and is then responsible for making sure the materials are replaced
any alterations or variations to the specification must be agreed verbally on site –
however, this must be confirmed in writing in advance of the work being completed
significant design alterations that result in concealed or unusual risks being
present must be noted, preferably on as-built drawings. In the case of a project
with more than one contractor, they must be placed in the health and safety file for
future reference
Quantities make sure the correct amount of material is used as stated in specifications or on
drawings
measure the path base and surface layer depths and widths, and ask for them to
be topped up or widened if less than specified
the contractor (or principal contractor) should inform the clients' site representative
of any situations where additional depth or widths are required so that the bill of
quantities can be amended
as with changes to the design, any variations to materials or quantities that affect
the bill of quantity work item must be agreed verbally on site, and then in writing in
advance of the work being undertaken
• is the path surface even (is the surface regularity in line with the specification) and free
of high and low points and hollows?
• is the crossfall or camber to the specification?
• is the path surface free of roller marks? Noticeable roller marks on the surface are an
indication that materials have not been compacted enough and require more rolling
with a heavy roller
• are landscaped edges / verges finished level with path surface and not higher than the
finished surface level?
• are ditches free of obstructions that could cause water to overflow onto the path?
• are ditches running in right directions?
• are piped culverts and other drainage features built to the specification?
Invoicing (payments)
For small path projects, payment to the contractor is issued after the works are completed and
signed off.
For medium or large-scale projects, the terms of payment should be agreed in the terms and
conditions of contract - by law, any construction contract lasting more than 45 days must have
an interim payment scheme. Generally, the contractor (or principal contractor) is paid on
issue of interim invoices throughout the construction phase. The contractor (or principal
contractor) should submit an invoice with a measurement of completed works. This
measurement should relate to the bill of quantities and note the total amounts for the various
work completed.
You or the project manager should check the measurements and totals to make sure the
works have been done, and to specification. The measurements and totals should be signed
off prior to payment. Good record keeping is essential to keep control of what payments have
been made for works completed to your satisfaction.
The purpose of the snagging meeting is to identify all outstanding works, or even extra works
to be completed before the construction phase is finished. This is also the time to note any
visible problems with the pathworks and wider site. For additional works, negotiate a price
using existing bill of quantities rates if possible, rather than simply using the daywork rates.
Look for:
On site, with the contractor (or principal contractor), agree a time scale for outstanding and
snagging work, as well as any extras to be completed. Make sure full list of snagging items
are agreed before issuing, making sure the contractor (or principal contractor) is aware that
invoices will not be processed until the list of snaggings is signed off.
The work should be signed off by issuing a practical completion certificate. This certificate is
usually a simple checklist of various elements of work completed with final total quantities
shown. The contractor (or principal contractor) and clients' site representative should sign it,
as well as the client or the project manager. This forms a record of agreement if there are
later problems. It should be noted that in contract law there is some ambiguity over the
meaning of 'practical completion' and potential liabilities to rectify defects, so some care needs
to be taken that all parties are in agreement.
The contractor (or principal contractor) can issue the invoice once all parties sign the practical
completion certificate. Providing that it has been included in the terms and conditions of
contract a retention sum, usually 3 - 5% of total contract price, is then held back by the client
for a given period. This is known as the 'defects period'.
Final certificate
The final certificate is certification by the client that the fixed price contract has now been fully
completed. It is issued at the end of the defects period and has the effect of releasing all
remaining money due to the contractor (or principal contractor), including any retention sum.
Claims
Unforeseen circumstances often mean that extra works will be required to complete a path
project. Ideally, the provisional items in the bill of quantities will cover all possible extra works.
This means that prices are already agreed, and it is just a matter of verifying quantities.
If the contractor (or principal contractor) claims for extras not included in the bill of quantities,
then it is essential to find out exactly what they are requesting, and why. If extra works are a
result of the contractor (or principal contractor) not having allowed enough time to complete
the work, or due to their own actions, then it is important that the contractor (or principal
contractor) covers their own costs.
In the event of a claim, good recordkeeping of all works, such as site visit records are
invaluable. It is difficult for a contractor (or principal contractor) to claim for works when no
one has a record of its completion.
The health and safety file provides health and safety information about the constructed path
and any other structures installed at same time on site, e.g. bridge. The file is a live document
that informs those tasked to maintain the structures about remaining or unobvious health and
safety risks. It is also of value to those who will dismantle, replace or upgrade the path and
other structures in the future - as they will need to know about the risks.
The principal designer starts to develop and prepare the health and safety file during the pre-
construction stage of project. If the principal designer is still involved through to end of project,
they are responsible for finishing the file off, or updating original file if one already exists. If
the principal designer is not involved, they must hand the part prepared file over to the
principal contractor, who will finish it and pass it to the client for keeping.
The client, designer, principal contractor, and other designers or contractors if involved, will
need to provide any relevant information such as 'as-built drawings' to the principal designer
or principal contractor for the health and safety file. The client, who retains the health and
safety file, keeps it up to date and makes it available to those who need to know about
remaining or unobvious health and safety risks, e.g. volunteers maintaining the path or a
contractor replacing or upgrading the path surface, or other structures on it.
Maintenance needs to be seen as an integral part of the management of a path network – the
time spent planning, designing and constructing paths will be severely compromised without
maintenance being done. Maintenance can be easy to plan and cheap to implement and
should be incorporated at the planning and design stages of path projects, rather than
‘tagged-on’ as an afterthought after a path has been constructed.
Regular maintenance will help to avoid large repair costs, compared to paths that have been
neglected. This chapter gives guidance on what is maintenance and how to plan, implement
and resource maintenance to get the best long-term value from a path network:
Repair making a path suitable again after minor or major damage or failure
e.g. re-building a pipe culvert or short section of path after being damaged by flood
waters from the nearby burn
Replacement a complete path needs replacement when it has reached the end of its design life,
or worn beyond the point of repair
e.g. a path needs complete re-surfacing as the surface has worn through exposing
the base layer along most of its length
Upgrade improving a path surface or changing its purpose to allow access by a wider range
or greater number of path users, or to correct a defect in a path that is causing
repeated failure
e.g. a whin dust path surface changed to bitmac surface as the path has become a
popular route by children walking and cycling to school - upgrading the surface
with bitmac will make the path more suitable for walking and cycling to school
every day
For each feature including the path surface, there should be define an acceptable condition or
wear limit, which is used to assess whether items need to be repaired, replaced or upgraded.
Most complex structures, such as bridges, should have these conditions as part of their
design. There may need to be a judgement call for other items, such as drains, to decide how
much change to the original condition is acceptable. For example, some ditches may still
function adequately in normal conditions at half capacity if they were designed to cope with
‘extreme flooding’ events, and an acceptable wear limit for a whin dust path could be 25%
exposure of base layer showing through the surface.
It can be helpful to assess the maintenance needs of individual paths and then combine the
data to make a maintenance schedule for the network as a whole – this will probably make
The worst-case scenario is to neglect a path completely until it is no longer usable, and then
have to carry out a major repair. The cost of one major repair could fund planned maintenance
and will cause inconvenience to the people who want to use the path. It is also a risky
‘strategy’ as funders may not be particularly sympathetic to picking up the cost of previous
neglect, so you are left with a damaged path and no way of securing the funds to repair it, or
replace or upgrade it in the future when the time comes.
Maintenance scheduling can be assisted by geographic information systems (GIS). They can
be used to locate paths and also features on paths which require maintenance. This enables a
comprehensive database to be set up to identify what is on the ground and what maintenance
is required. Computer based management systems, such as CAMS (Countryside Access
Management System), can then be linked to GIS to plan maintenance tasks and monitor
works and expenditure. However, before investing time, training and resources in a monitoring
system, make sure it will be suited to your needs – a simple spreadsheet and a paper map
could be enough for your situation.
• reporting procedures (what is the problem, what to correct and what further action is
required if any)
• provision and action plan for emergencies and repairs.
The table below is an example schedule covering all the maintenance tasks as well as
inspections. A schedule like this can be adapted for one path or network of paths. This must
be done with care, as each path is different.
When to inspect
Inspections should be carried out to a fixed routine. This is important for record keeping and
will assist in minimising inspection costs and planning maintenance expenditure. Emergency
inspections should also take place in response to adverse weather or serious complaints.
Some items can be visually inspected by staff or volunteers, but may require more detailed
inspection by an engineer on a longer cycle.
If possible, divide the path into sections that relate to the original specification of the path, or
divide into easily identifiable lengths of similar character. You can then record an overall
impression of each section as well as the condition of specific items.
A standard form can be useful to make sure that the condition of each item on the path is
recorded. This can generate a lot of paperwork, so think carefully about the level of detail you
need – you may, for example, wish to report on the overall state of drainage features, but be
able to pinpoint problems with individual drains. Complex structures, such as bridges, will
need a dedicated form detailing each component to be inspected. Taking the previous year’s
report out on the path can be useful to check whether problems were resolved, or if they are
recurring (and therefore require more substantial action).
You may find it useful to define categories of problems to help with prioritising action as a
result of the inspection. However, anyone inspecting or dealing with reports must have a
consistent understanding of each category. A serious problem may warrant urgent repair
whereas less serious problems can be built into the planned maintenance programme.
Inspections may also highlight features requiring upgrading and will assist resource
management. More detailed descriptions and photographs of condition will be helpful in
Path users may be the first to encounter a problem. They must be able to report problems
easily. A telephone answering machine, dedicated email address or online website form can
be used for this purpose, providing that they are monitored. It is also a good idea to produce a
pro-forma for recording phone calls so that all relevant information is obtained. Publicise the
contact details on path promotion tools - orientation board or leaflet. Try to respond to reports
quickly to maintain public goodwill - and get in touch with those who have reported problems
to let them know the problem is fixed.
Inspecting structures
Structures, such as bridges and retaining walls, need more detailed inspections. It is good
practice to carry out a full and detailed inspection of structures annually. The table below
details some points to look for.
Large bridges and other complex structures should be inspected by a qualified engineer on a
defined inspection cycle – this could be every three years, with routine inspections by a
trained person on an annual basis.
It is good practice to set out response times and action plans for carrying out repairs. Ensure
repairs are carried out to a satisfactory standard and comply with health and safety
requirements.
If an immediate repair is not required, inspections can be used to monitor the problem and
decide when a repair is needed. Washed out surfaces (unbound or semi-bound) can often be
levelled out and re-compacted using the material washed out. The temporary surface may not
enable all users to access the path, but at least the path will be open and safe. It can be
repaired when other works are being done in the vicinity, to avoid bringing plant in for one
small job.
Some maintenance problems or faults may present a hazard to the public, such as a failure on
a structure such as a bridge. You may need to erect warning signs, seek expert help to assess
the fault or even close the path. The responsibility rests with the path manager to assess the
risk, and take appropriate action.
Tall vegetation close to the path can make some users feel unsafe or at risk, particularly in
urban situations. Users report feeling safer on paths with wide open verges and clear sight
lines. Large trees close to the path will drop leaf litter onto the surface, causing mud formation,
and will prevent sunlight and breezes from drying out puddles and muddy areas. Leaves
falling on path surfaces, even bridges and boardwalks, can present a slip hazard.
Routine tasks
Mow or strim the path verges to keep vegetation below 150mm - 200mm height, for a width of
0.5m to 1m from the edge of the path. Depending on the location you can plan for between 2
and 4 cuts a year. Wayside shrubs and bushes will need to be cut back to retain the full width
of the path.
Cut back overhanging branches to keep the specified clear path corridor, and remove trees
that are in danger of falling. Follow good practice in tree care to ensure that limbs are safely
removed and that cutting does not cause damage to the tree itself.
Remove leaf litter from path surfaces and structures (use a rake or leaf blower). This may
need to be done twice in the autumn and winter. This is most easily achieved when leaves are
dry and they should be moved so that there is minimal chance of them being blown back onto
the path or in to open ditches.
Applying herbicide
It is good practice to spray weeds on path surfaces to reduce encroachment. However, care is
needed to make sure that there are no undesirable effects or impacts on the vegetation and
wildlife. Ensure that anyone applying herbicide is qualified to use the equipment, chemical and
understands the management objectives of the path. Excessive application of herbicide can
sterilise verges, making them visually unattractive and exposing them to potential for soil
erosion. Regular verge mowing will reduce encroachment of vegetation, reducing the need to
apply herbicide. If weeds appear through unbound, semi-bound or bound surfaces use spot
applications of herbicide rather than treating the whole area.
Take extreme care in choice of amenity herbicide. This is particularly important if you are
planning to treat drainage features where vegetation growth is dense. The herbicide may
affect local burns and could cause damage to important flora and fauna. Check the safety
information sheets for the amenity herbicide that you plan to use to see if it can be used near
or in watercourses.
Make sure that path users are aware that herbicide spraying has been carried out. People will
be reassured to know which herbicide has been applied and where on site. This is particularly
important for people out walking their dogs.
Natural surfaces
Strim or mow surface to define the line – this may need to be fortnightly from May to July and
less frequently for the rest of the growing season. At the beginning of the cutting season, cut a
wide enough area to include path edges, which can then be cut less frequently than the line of
the path itself.
A ‘quick fix’ for a rough or worn out unbound surface is to re-compact it. This will allow use for
at least another season before re-dusting is required. Re-dusting should be done when a
significant amount of base layer stone becomes exposed and loose. Surfaces on slopes less
than 1:20 (5%) should last around 7 to 10 years. Slopes between 1:20 (5%) to 1:10 (10%)
should last for 3 to 5 years.
Bound surfaces
In recent years bound surfaces have been suggested as a ‘maintenance free’ option.
However, there are a number of routine tasks that are required to retain the original
specification and accessibility levels. These include weed treatment to prevent the surface
from breaking up, and removal of leaf litter which, on bitmac and asphalt surfaces, can be a
serious slip hazard for users, especially pedestrians and cyclists.
In the longer-term frost, vehicles and water will eventually break up a bound surface. Expect
10-15 years from surface dressing (tar spray and chip surface), 15-20 years from a bitmac
surface and 20 plus years from a hot rolled asphalt surface.
Allow for the cost of management and supervision, as well as inspection in the maintenance
budget. If volunteers are to be used, it is reasonable to assume that labour costs will be
reduced, but allow for increased management and supervision. Encourage volunteer groups
to take charge of maintenance planning and support them in estimating any costs for
materials, equipment or specialist contractors.
Delivery options
Many different people and organisations may be involved in maintenance. Whoever does the
work, standards must be clearly defined and measurable in order to achieve best value.
Maintenance is often viewed as a menial task to be carried out once the path construction,
replacement or upgrading work is finished. This view of maintenance is unlikely to engender
enthusiasm or help to secure long term resources, and does not fully reflect what affects a
user’s experience of a path. Complaints from the public are most likely to arise from lack of
maintenance, so the people undertaking that work play an important role in achieving
‘customer satisfaction’ for your organisation.
In-house teams
In-house teams provide a flexible way to get all sorts of maintenance tasks done. They can
respond very quickly to emergencies and are able to work to a fixed routine. Keeping a
dedicated team in constant work can be difficult, although this is essential for cost
effectiveness. One team could be used for maintenance on several path networks and for new
path construction works. There are varying opinions on the long-term productivity of in-house
maintenance teams, so effective management is vitally important.
Beyond access officers, in-house staff who have been trained in what to look for on a path,
can make effective inspectors. They can work to a fixed schedule and will become familiar
with paths, being able to anticipate where and when the problems are likely to occur. Rangers
or wardens, for example, can carry out inspections and could have a wider role in managing
routine maintenance and supporting contractors or volunteer groups.
Most contractors will have a full work programme so you may need to allow plenty of lead-in
time for a one-off job. They may not be able to ‘drop everything’ in order to clear a landslide
that has closed the path or even to come out as a one-off to mow the verges. Rushing
contractors can mean higher prices and poorer standards of work.
An ongoing framework contract or service level agreement can be beneficial all round,
reducing the cost of commissioning work, and providing some security to allow the contractor
to offer better value rates. Building long term relationships with contractors is desirable as they
will become familiar with the area and supervision requirements may reduce. Provide enough
security for a contractor to be able to resource a maintenance contract, but do not be afraid to
re-tender the work on a 3 or 5 year basis to maintain best value.
Not-for-profit organisations
Not-for-profit organisations, such as the Outdoor Access Trust for Scotland, National Trust for
Scotland work together to manage upland path maintenance on a partnership working
agreement in the Cairngorms area. The path maintenance work is resourced by the
organisations involved and carried out by combination of contractor, seasonal path
maintenance worker, seasonal rangers and trained volunteers.
Fife Coast & Countryside Trust carry out path maintenance works in the Fife area with their
own 'in-house' maintenance team. The Fife Coast Path and paths across the Lomond Hills are
inspected by the Trust's Operations Supervisor and the works are completed by skilled
maintenance workers.
Land managers
Land managers can help to carry out path maintenance in their local areas. They may have
staff and suitable plant and equipment available to do the work. Working with land managers
in your area can strengthen relationships and assist future access planning and development.
Like contractors, land managers can be paid by retainer sums or for each task. Land
managers can also help with path inspections, but will probably require some training. Such
arrangements are most likely to work by fitting inspections around their normal tasks, and so
the schedule should be flexible. A simple reporting system will help to plan repairs and
account for any contractual requirements.
Training organisations
Training organisations have been used for maintenance although the costs and quality of work
can vary. Privately run training companies often require a higher price and Council run teams
may be better value. Training organisations look for discrete programmes of work linked to
opportunities for skills enhancement. An effective way of using them is to bring them on site
after an inspection to deal with a number of identified problems. This option may not be as
useful for routine maintenance tasks.
Inspections are a common task for volunteers. Set out a simple reporting procedure, train
them on how to record the information and try to get them to work to a routine to avoid a
constant stream of minor comments. In some cases, volunteers have carried out many small
tasks such as lopping overhanging vegetation, picking up litter or clearing small blockages in
drains.
Community groups
They will have a strong local identity and can be highly motivated. The main issues relate to
maintaining a pool of labour, skills and training. They can do inspections once given training,
and may also will be willing to carry out physical works. In some cases, they will be capable of
taking on the management of a path network and will look to the public sector to help fund
their activities. This is usually far more cost effective than any other management
arrangement. Often, there is one key member of a community group who motivates the
others, so understanding the dynamics of a group is important to long term success.
Volunteer organisations
Various volunteer organisations provide practical volunteering days. Midweek practical
volunteering days can be cost effective approach to getting maintenance tasks done on path
networks. A team of volunteers lead by a trained supervisor can be an effective way to do
planned maintenance tasks as well as minor repairs. The organisation usually provides all
training and supervision, but you will need to be able to provide clear instructions about the
nature of the maintenance tasks or repairs, and the expected standards to be met. One such
organisation is 'The Conservation Volunteers' (formerly the British Trust for Conservation
Volunteers (BTCV).
Email: info@[Link]
Produced by Paths for All 157 Lowland Path
with support from Scottish Natural Heritage [Link] Construction Guide
[Link]