0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Quantum Measurement of Qubit Operators

This tutorial discusses measuring a single qubit operator U that has eigenvalues of ±1, making it both Hermitian and unitary. It shows that this measurement can be implemented by the quantum circuit that applies Hadamard gates before and after applying U. The circuit works by performing a projective measurement with projectors P+ and P−, which are equal to (I ± U)/2. These projectors project onto the ±1 eigenspaces of U. Measuring the first qubit of the output state corresponds to measuring the observable U.

Uploaded by

golge123321
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Quantum Measurement of Qubit Operators

This tutorial discusses measuring a single qubit operator U that has eigenvalues of ±1, making it both Hermitian and unitary. It shows that this measurement can be implemented by the quantum circuit that applies Hadamard gates before and after applying U. The circuit works by performing a projective measurement with projectors P+ and P−, which are equal to (I ± U)/2. These projectors project onto the ±1 eigenspaces of U. Measuring the first qubit of the output state corresponds to measuring the observable U.

Uploaded by

golge123321
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Introduction to uantum Computing (IN2381) – W2023/2024 Tutorial 5 solution

Christian B. Mendl, Isabel Le, Wang Yu, Keefe Huang

Tutorial 5 (Measuring an operator1 )


Suppose U is a single qubit operator with eigenvalues ±1, so that U is both Hermitian and unitary, i.e., it can be
regarded both as an observable and a quantum gate. Suppose we wish to measure the observable U . That is, we
desire to obtain a measurement result indicating one of the two eigenvalues, and leaving a post-measurement state
which is the corresponding eigenvector. Show that this is implemented by the following quantum circuit:

|0i H H

|ψin i U |ψout i

This tutorial requires the concept of an orthogonal projection (see also the linear algebra cheatsheet): a square matrix P ∈ Cn×n is called
an orthogonal projection matrix if P is Hermitian (P † = P ) and P 2 = P , i.e., applying P a second time does not change the result any
more. Note that a geometric projection is a special case of this abstract definition.

Solution We compute the intermediate two-qubit states |ψ1 i, |ψ2 i, |ψ3 i shown below, which result from applying
the circuit gates from left to right:

|0i H H

|ψin i U |ψout i
|ψ1 i |ψ2 i |ψ3 i

1
|ψ1 i = (H |0i) ⊗ |ψin i = √ (|0i + |1i) ⊗ |ψin i , (1)
2
1 1
|ψ2 i = (controlled-U ) |ψ1 i = √ |0i ⊗ |ψin i + √ |1i ⊗ (U |ψin i), (2)
2 2
1 1
|ψ3 i = √ (H |0i) ⊗ |ψin i + √ (H |1i) ⊗ (U |ψin i)
2 2
1 1
= (|0i + |1i) ⊗ |ψin i + (|0i − |1i) ⊗ (U |ψin i)
2 2 (3)
I +U I −U
= |0i ⊗ |ψin i + |1i ⊗ |ψin i
2 2
= |0i ⊗ (P+ |ψin i) + |1i ⊗ (P− |ψin i)
where we have defined P± = 12 (I ± U ). The P± are orthogonal projectors: they are Hermitian since U is Hermitian
by assumption, and
1 1  1
P±2 = (I ± U )2 = I ± 2U + U 2 = (I ± U ) = P± .
4 4 2
In the last step we have used that U 2 = U † U = I. Moreover, the P± project onto orthogonal subspaces since
1 1
I − U 2 = 0.

P+ P− = (I + U )(I − U ) =
4 4
Since U = 1·P+ +(−1)·P− , we have found the spectral decomposition of U , i.e., the P± project onto the eigenspaces
of U corresponding to the eigenvalues ±1.
Now we show that the circuit can indeed be interpreted as measurement of |ψin i with measurement operators
P± : first, they satisfy the completeness relation since P+ + P− = I. Moreover, according to the last line of Eq. (3),
|ψ3 i is a sum of two orthogonal states, and the probability that the measurement (in the circuit diagram) of the first
qubit gives 0 or 1 is equal to the squared norm of the first and second state, respectively:

p(0) = k|0i ⊗ (P+ |ψin i)k2 = kP+ |ψin ik2 = hψin |P+† P+ |ψin i = hψin |P+ |ψin i
1 M. A. Nielsen, I. L. Chuang: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press (2010), Exercise 4.34

1
and correspondingly p(1) = hψin |P− |ψin i. Directly after the measurement, the second qubit will be in the state

P+ |ψin i
|ψout i = if measured 0,
kP+ |ψin ik
P− |ψin i
|ψout i = if measured 1
kP− |ψin ik

which agrees with the definition of a quantum measurement with operators P± .

Common questions

Powered by AI

The operator U must be Hermitian, ensuring real eigenvalues, and unitary, preserving state norm, for the orthogonal subspaces onto which the projectors P± act to be valid in quantum measurement. This setup guarantees that P± form a complete set of mutually orthogonal projectors, which decompose the Hilbert space in such a way that the measurement outcomes reflect linear projections corresponding accurately to eigenvalues ±1. Thus, it ensures that the post-measurement state transitions respect the physical constraints of quantum systems .

The matrix U must satisfy being both Hermitian and unitary. Hermitian means U† = U, ensuring that U can function as an observable with real eigenvalues. Being unitary means UU† = I, ensuring that U preserves the norm of the state, essential for it to be representable as a quantum gate. These properties allow U to properly represent a measurable observable in quantum mechanics and permit the decomposition into projection operators P± which project onto the eigenspaces corresponding to eigenvalues ±1, enabling accurate measurement outcomes .

In quantum measurement, the completeness relation P+ + P− = I ensures that the projection operators collectively account for all possible measurement outcomes and subspaces the state can be projected into. This guarantees that all probabilities sum to one, making the measurement process consistent with the axioms of probability. It also ensures the preservation of the overall norm of the quantum state, essential for coherent quantum operations and measurement consistency .

Unitary operators in quantum computing preserve state normalization and enable reversible logic gate implementations crucial for fault-tolerant computing. Their Hermitian attribute ensures they represent observables with real measurement outputs, aligning with physical observables needing real eigenvalues. This dual nature is pivotal for quantum computing’s unique ability to operate coherently and measure efficiently: unitary ensures operations are information-preserving, and Hermitian allows generating meaningful measurements from computation. Such operators underpin innovations in both modular and stable quantum gate designs, impacting computational efficiency and reliability .

The spectral decomposition of the operator U is essential as it provides a clear framework for utilizing projection operators P± that correspond to U's eigenspaces related to eigenvalues ±1. This decomposition shows that U can be expressed as U = 1·P+ + (−1)·P−, directly linking U’s observable properties to its measurement process. It allows the circuit to prepare and measure the input state |ψin⟩ in terms of these projections, transforming the problem of measurement into one of finding these orthogonal components, which the circuit processes directly through its configuration .

U being both an observable and a quantum gate allows it to encapsulate the dual aspects of measurement and unitary evolution, making it ideal for use in measurement circuits. As an observable, it can be measured to yield eigenvalues ±1, while as a quantum gate, it facilitates coherent evolution and controlled transformations on quantum states. This dual role is integral, as it enables the application of U to both prepare and measure quantum states within the same circuit framework, providing a complete approach to extracting eigenstate information in a quantum computational setting .

The quantum circuit measures the observable U by transforming the input state |ψin⟩ through controlled operations that depend on the Hadamard gates and the unitary operator U, which has eigenvalues ±1. The circuit uses intermediate two-qubit states that map the eigenstates of U into the measurement results. The projection operators P± = 1/2(I ± U) are crucial as they represent the measurement operators which project onto the orthogonal eigenspaces of U corresponding to its eigenvalues. The probability of measuring a certain outcome is determined by the squared norm of the projections P± applied to the input state, aligning with the post-measurement state given by |ψout⟩ = P+/−|ψin⟩/∥P+/−|ψin⟩∥ depending on the measurement result .

The Hadamard gate transforms the input state |0⟩ into a superposition 1/√2(|0⟩ + |1⟩), creating an equal probability legacies for subsequent controlled operations. This superposition is essential for enabling the quantum circuit to probe both eigenstates of the operator U effectively. The Hadamard gate creates interference patterns that are necessary for the state |ψ1⟩ to undergo transformations that facilitate measurement by extracting information about U’s eigenstates through the later controlled-U operation in the circuit .

The state transformations within the quantum circuit commence with |ψ1⟩ = (H|0⟩) ⊗ |ψin⟩ resulting in a superposition 1/√2(|0⟩+|1⟩) ⊗ |ψin⟩ following the Hadamard. Upon applying the controlled-U, the state becomes |ψ2⟩ = 1/√2 |0⟩⊗|ψin⟩ + 1/√2 |1⟩⊗(U|ψin⟩). The interaction here entangles the computational and input qubits based on the unitary operation. Further action by the second Hadamard gate transitions the state to |ψ3⟩ = |0⟩⊗(P+|ψin⟩) + |1⟩⊗(P−|ψin⟩). This final transformation encapsulates the projection of the input state into matrix-defined subspaces corresponding to eigenvalues ±1, facilitating direct measurement routing based on the eigenstate components .

Orthogonal projection matrices such as P± = 1/2(I ± U) allow the measurement of quantum states by explicitly projecting the input state |ψin⟩ into orthogonal subspaces associated with the eigenvalues of the unitary operator U. These matrices are Hermitian and satisfy P² = P, ensuring the idempotence essential for consistent projection operations. By partitioning the state space into distinct outcomes based on U's eigenvalues ±1, these matrices facilitate deterministic post-measurement states aligned with quantum measurement principles, ensuring reliable measurement outcomes .

You might also like