EUROCODES

Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 1

Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-

2: General actions – Actions on structures
exposed to fire

Tom Lennon
Principal Consultant, BRE, UK

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Scope of presentation
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 2

Introduction to structural fire engineering design

Section 3 Thermal actions for temperature analysis
3.2 Nominal temperature-time curves
3.3 Natural fire models
Section 4 Mechanical actions for structural analysis
4.2 Simultaneity of actions
4.3 Combination rules for actions
Annex A Parametric time-temperature curves
Annex B Thermal actions for external members
Annex C Localised fires
Annex D Advanced fire models
Annex E Fire load densities
Annex F Equivalent time of fire exposure
Annex G Configuration factor
Worked example – Equivalent time of fire exposure
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Introduction to structural fire engineering design
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 3

Why structural fire engineering?

What is structural fire engineering design?

How do we do it?

EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Structural fire engineering design – Do we need it?
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 4

Existing body of data

Tried and tested solutions

Accepted levels of safety and reliability

Tabulated data generally conservative

 Structural fire engineering design – Do we need it? –
EUROCODES
Background and Applications YES!
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 5

Levels of safety unknown

Degree of conservatism unknown
No account of interaction between structural
elements
No account of alternative load carrying
mechanisms
No account of alternative modes of failure

EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Structural fire engineering design – Do we need it? – YES!
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 6

Complex structures not covered by existing

regulatory requirement – “fire engineering
may be the only suitable approach”
Provides for a more rational approach to the
design of buildings for fire if undertaken as
part of an overall fire safety strategy
Change of use or renovation of existing
structure – possible increased fire
resistance requirement, removal of existing
means of ensuring fire resistance
Uncertainties in existing prescriptive approach
 EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Structural fire engineering design – what is it?
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 7

Standard
Temperature

fire curve

FLASHOVER Natural
fire curve

Ignition - Smouldering Heating Cooling Time

Life safety Structural damage – risk of collapse – structural fire
engineering only concerned with this phase of the fire

EUROCODES
Background and Applications
General - Design Procedures
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 8

Project Design

Prescriptive Rules Performance-Based Code

(Thermal Actions by Nominal Fire (Physically based Thermal Actions)

Member Analysis of Analysis of Selection of Simple or Advanced

Analysis Part of the Entire Fire Development Models
Structure Structure

Calculation of Calculation of Selection of Member Analysis of Analysis of

Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical Analysis Part of the Entire
Actions at Actions at Actions Structure Structure
Boundaries Boundaries

Calculation of Calculation of Selection of

Tabulated Simple Advanced Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical
Data Calculation Calculation Actions at Actions at Actions
Models Models Boundaries Boundaries
If available

Simple Advanced
Calculation Calculation
Models If available Models
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Structural fire design procedure
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 9

Structural fire design procedure takes into

account:
Selection of relevant design fire scenarios
Determination of corresponding design fires
Calculation of temperature within the
structural members
Calculation of mechanical behaviour of the
structure exposed to fire
EN1991-1-2 is principally concerned with the
first two above. Fire parts of the material
codes cover the remaining two.

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Consider relevant design fire scenario
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 10

Building fire / tunnel fire / petrochemical fire

Localised fire / fully developed fire
Identification of suitable compartment
size/occupancy/ventilation condition for
subsequent analysis – representative of
“reasonable worst case scenario”
The choice of the design fire scenario will dictate the
choice of the design fire to be used in subsequent
analysis.
The choice of a particular fire design scenario should
be based on a risk assessment taking into account
the likely ignition sources and any fire
detection/suppression systems available.
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Choose appropriate design fire
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 11

For fully developed post-flashover building

(compartment) fires the usual choice is
between nominal and natural fire exposures
Nominal fires are representative fires for the
purposes of classification and comparison
but bear no relationship to the specific
characteristics (fire load, thermal properties
of compartment linings, ventilation
condition) of the building considered
Natural fires are calculation techniques based
on a consideration of the physical
parameters specific to a particular building.

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Modelling compartment fires
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 12

In compartment fires it is often assumed that the whole

compartment is fully involved in the fire at the same
time and the same temperature applies throughout.
Such a scenario is the basis of a one zone model.
Two zone models exist in which the height of the
compartment is separated into two gaseous layers
each with their own thermal environment
Three zone models exist in which there is a mixed gas
layer separating the upper and lower gas levels
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) may be used to
analyse fires in which there are no definite boundaries
to the gaseous state. This type of analysis would be
suitable for very large compartments such as airport
terminals, atria and sports stadia. It is often used to
model smoke movement.
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Post-Flashover Fire Models
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 13

In a compartment flashover occurs when

sustained flaming from combustibles reach
the ceiling and the temperature of the hot gas
layer is between 550°C and 600°C.
After flashover the rate of heat release will
increase rapidly until it reaches a maximum
value for the enclosure. To simplify design,
the growth period between the onset of
flashover and the maximum heat release rate
is usually ignored and it may be assumed that
when flashover occurs the rate of heat release
instantaneously increases to the maximum
value set by the available air.

EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Section 3 Thermal actions for temperature analysis
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 14

Thermal actions are

given by the net heat
flux:

hnet hnet,c hnet,r

Convective Radiative heat

heat flux flux
EUROCODES
Background and Applications 2.2 Nominal temperature-time curves
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 15

Standard temperature-
time curve
1200

945ºC
1000

800
g = 20+log10345(8t+1)
600

400

200

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Nominal fire curves
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 16

Other nominal curves include:

Smouldering fire curve

“Semi-Natural” fire curve

External fire exposure curve*

Hydrocarbon curve*

Modified hydrocarbon curve

Tunnel lining curves – RWS/RABT

* Included in the Eurocode

EUROCODES
Background and Applications External fire temperature-time curve
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 17

800

700

600

500

g = 660(1 – 0.687e-0.32t – 0.313e-3.8t) + 20

400

300

200 Temperature constant after 22 mins at 660ºC

100

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Hydrocarbon temperature-time curve
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 18

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
EUROCODES
Background and Applications 2.3 Natural fire models
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 19

Natural fire models are based on specific

physical parameters with a limited field of
application

For compartment fires a uniform temperature

distribution as a function of time is generally
assumed

For localised fires a non-uniform temperature

distribution as a function of time is assumed

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Natural fire models
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 20

Simplified fire models – compartment fires

Any appropriate fire model may be used

considering at least the fire load density and
the ventilation conditions

The parametric approach in Annex A of the

code is one example of a simplified natural
fire model
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Natural fire models
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 21

Simplified fire models – external members

For external members the radiative heat flux

should be calculated from the sum of the
radiation from the compartment and from
the flames emerging from the opening

An example of a simplified calculation method

for external members is given in Annex B of
the Code

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Natural fire models
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 22

Simplified fire models – localised fires

In many cases flashover is unlikely to occur.

In such cases a localised fire should be
considered.

Annex C presents an example of a procedure

for calculating temperatures in the event of
a localised fire
EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Section 4 Mechanical actions for structural analysis
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 23

If they are likely to occur during a fire the

same actions assumed for normal design
should be considered.

Indirect actions can occur due to constrained

expansion and deformation caused by
temperature changes within the structure
caused by the fire.

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Section 4 Mechanical actions for structural analysis
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 24

INDIRECT thermal actions should be

considered. EXCEPT where the resulting
actions are:
recognized a priori to be negligible or
favourable.
accounted for by conservatively chosen
models and boundary conditions or
implicitly considered by conservatively
specified fire safety requirements.
EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Section 4 Mechanical actions for structural analysis
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 25

The indirect actions should be determined

using the thermal and mechanical properties
given in the fire parts of EN1992 to EN1996
and EN1999.
For member design subjected to the standard
fire only indirect actions arising from the
thermal distribution through the cross-
section needs to be considered.

EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Section 4 Mechanical actions for structural analysis
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 26

Actions considered for ‘normal’ design should

also be considered for fire design if they are
likely to act at the time of a possible fire.

Variable actions should be defined for the

accidental design situation, with associated
partial load factors, as given in EN1990.
EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Section 4 Mechanical actions for structural analysis
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 27

Simultaneous action with other independent

accidental actions does not need to be
considered

Additional actions (i.e partial collapse) may

need to be considered during the fire
exposure

Fire walls may be required to resist horizontal

impact loading according to EN1363-2

EUROCODES
Background and Applications
Section 4 Mechanical actions for structural analysis
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 28

When indirect actions do

not need to be
considered, and there is
no prestressing force,
k, j G "" or
1,1 2,1 Qk,1
the total design action
j1
(load) considering
permanent and the
leading variable action is
given by;

The use of 1,1 or 2,1 is defined in the National Annex

EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 29

The values of 1,1 and 2,1 are given in Annex A of

EN1990:2002

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Mechanical actions for structural analysis
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 30

As a simplification, the effect of actions in the fire condition

can be determined from those used in normal temperature
design

E fi ,d ,t E fi ,d fi Ed
E fi ,d ,t
Where
fi
Rd
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Annex A Parametric Temperature-Time Curves
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 31

EN 1991-1-2 Annex A- Parametric Equation

= 1325(1-0.324e-0.2t*-0.204e-1.7t*-0.472e-19t*)
g
where t* = t.
and = (O/b)²/(0.04/1160)²
O is the opening factor
and b relates to the thermal inertia ( c )
Where = density (kg/m³)
c = specific heat (J/kgK)
= thermal conductivity (W/mK)

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Parametric equation (contd)
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 32

O = opening factor Av h/At (m½)

Av = area of vertical openings (m²)

h = height of vertical openings (m)

At = total area of enclosure – walls, ceiling and

floor including openings (m²)
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Parametric Equation
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 33

Scope of Equation

- 0.02 O 0.2 (m½) (lower limit of 0.01 in UK

NA)
- 100 b 2000 (J/m² s½ °K)
- Af 500m² (No restriction in UK NA)

- mainly cellulosic fire loads

- maximum compartment height = 4m (No
restriction in UK NA)
- concept of limiting duration (20 minutes for
offices)

EUROCODES
Background and Applications EC1 Parametric exposure
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 34

Cooling phase
g = max – 625(t*-t*max.x) for t*max 0.5
g = max – 250(3-t*max)(t*-t*max.x) for t*max < 2
g = max – 250(t*-t*max.x) for t*max 2

Where t*max = (0.2x10-3. qt,d/O).

And tmax = maximum of (0.2x10-3. qt,d/O) and tlim
With tlim = 25 minutes for slow fire growth rate,
20 minutes for medium fire growth rate and
15 minutes for fast fire growth rate
EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 35

comparison between EC1 parametric calculation and measured values

1200

1000

800
temperature (deg C)

600

400

200

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
time (mins)

test 1 prediction test 2

EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 36

Time temperature curves

1200

1000

Average temperature TEST 1

Temperature [deg C]

800
Average temperature TEST 2
Parametric time temperature
600 ISO curve

400

200

0
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180
Time [mins]
 Annex B Thermal actions for external members – Simplified
EUROCODES
Background and Applications calculation method
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 37

Allows for the determination of:

Maximum temperatures of a compartment fire

The size and temperatures of the flames

emerging from the openings

Radiation and convection parameters

Takes into account effect of wind through

inclusion of forced draught and no forced
draught calculations

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Annex C Localised fires
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 38

Where a fully developed fire is not possible

the thermal input from a localised fire
source to the structural member should be
considered.

Annex C provides one possible method – The

UK NA specifies an alternative methodology
based on existing National information
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Annex D Advanced Fire Models
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 39

Annex D sets out general principles

associated with advanced fire models (One
zone, two zone or CFD)

There is no detailed guidance and such

methods should only be used by experts

EUROCODES
Background and Applications Annex E Fire load densities
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 40

Annex E presents a method for calculating

design fire load densities based on
characteristic values from survey data for
different occupancies
The characteristic values are modified
according to the risk of fire initiation and the
consequence of failure related to occupancy
and compartment floor area
Active fire safety measures are taken into
account through a reduction in the design
fire load density
This approach is not accepted in the UK NA
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Annex F Equivalent time of fire exposure
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 41

Provides a quick and easy method of relating

a real fire exposure to an equivalent period
in a standard fire resistance furnace

Mainly based on work on protected steel

specimens

Recent analysis extended the use of the

concept to unprotected steel for low fire
resistance periods

EUROCODES
Background and Applications

1200
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 42
Atm osphere
(fire)

1000
Atm osphere
(furnace)
Max. Steel
800 Tem p
Temperature [ o C]

600
Steel
(fire)
400

Steel
200 (Furnace)

0
0 15 30 45 60 Te 75 90
Time [mins]
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Time equivalent – calculation methods
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 43

CIB W14: te = qf c w
Law: te = kL/ (AvAt)
Pettersson: te = 0.067qf(Av h/At)-½
EC1: te,d = qf,d kb wf

Where qf,d = design fire load density

kb = factor to take into account the
thermal properties of the enclosure
wf = ventilation factor to take into
account vertical and horizontal openings

EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 44

Time equivalent – what is it? How does it work? How do

you do it?

Worked example – fire Floor area (m²) 36 (6m x 6m)

compartment within Ventilation 7.2 (3.6m wide

an office building area Av (m²) by 2m high)

Geometric data Height of 2

ventilation
opening h (m)
Height of 3.6
compartment
H (m)
Area of 0
horizontal
opening (roof
light) Ah
EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 45

Time equivalent – thermal properties

Element Material Thermal Area (m²)

inertia (b
value –
J/m²s½K)
Roof Concrete 2280 36

Floor Plasterboard 520 36

Walls Plasterboard 520 76.8

EUROCODESTime equivalent worked example

Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 46

te,d = (qf,[Link])kc

Where qf,d = design fire load density (MJ/m²)

kb is a factor dependent on thermal properties of the lining materials

And wf is a ventilation factor given by:

wf = (6/H)0.3 [0.62 + 90(0.4- v)4] in the absence of vertical openings

Where H is the height of the compartment (m) and
v = Av/Af

kc = factor dependent on material = 1.0 for protected steel

EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 47

Time equivalent worked example

b = ( c )½ kb (min.m²/MJ)
(J/m²s½K)

b > 2500 0.04 (0.055)

720 b 2500 0.055 (0.07)

b<720 0.07 (0.09)

EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 48

Time equivalent worked example

Occupancy Characteristic fire load

density (MJ/m²) 80%
fractile
Dwelling 948 (400)

Hospital 280 (350)

Hotel 377 (400)

Office 511 (570)

School classroom 347 (360)

EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 49

Time equivalent worked example

qf,d = 570 MJ/m²
wf = 0.863 ( v = 0.2)
kb = 0.07 (b = 945 ( (bjAj/Aj))
kc = 1.0 (protected steel beam)
te,d = 570 x 0.863 x 0.07 = 34 minutes therefore 60
minutes fire protection would be appropriate

EUROCODES Time equivalent – important questions to ask

Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 50

Have sensitivity studies been carried out

on % glazing removed during the fire.
Breaking of glass during a fire is very
difficult to predict. In reality the
ventilation area will vary with time
during the fire process.
What value has been used for the fire load
density
What confidence is there in the final
configuration of the compartment
linings? In the absence of definite data
then a figure of kb = 0.09 should be used
(UK National Annex)
EUROCODES
Background and Applications Annex G Configuration Factor
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 51

Text book information on general principles

for radiative heat transfer

Specific guidance for external members

EUROCODES
Background and Applications

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop 52

Thank you for your attention!